DA
783
.3
C3
c. 1
LIFE
OF
SIR WILLIAM WALLACE,
OF
ELDERSLIE.
BY
JOHN D. CARRICK.
The bugle ne'er sung to a braver knight
Than William of Elderslie.
THOMAS CAMPBELL.
FOURTH EDITION.
V
GLASGOW:
THOMAS D. MORISON, INGRAM STREET.
M1CROFORMED BY
PRESERVATION
— c
ID
.3
C3
•y-
INTRODUCTION
THERE is no portion of the history of Scotland more embarrassing to modern writers, than the period
which relates to the life and achievements of Wallace.
Having been long since anticipated in all the leading details respecting him by Henry the Minstrel,
our historians in general seem nervous in approaching the subject ; and have either contented them-
selves with such materials as the old English writers and certain monastic chronicles have furnished, or
have deliberately borrowed, without the grace of acknowledgment, the facts recorded by an author they
affected to despise, as one whom the learned were not agreed to admit within the pale of respectable
authority. This treatment, however, we conceive to be not only unfair, but rather discourteous in those
who may have extended their suffrages to writers guilty of much greater aberrations from historical
veracity than any which are chargeable against him. It is true, that the works of those writers are in
Latin ; but still, we do not see that a great falsehood, told in the classical language of ancient Rome,
should be entitled to a larger portion of public faith than a lesser one set forth hi the more modern
patois of Scotland.
When Walsingham, in describing the battle of Falkirk, tells us that the sharpness and strength of
the English arrows were such, that " they thoroughly penetrated the men-at-arms, obscured the helmets,
perforated the swords, and overwhelmed the lances (ut ipsos armatos omnino penetrarent, cassides tene-
brarent, gladios perforarent, lanceas /undercut) — and another learned author *, in narrating the same
battle, makes the loss of the Scots in killed, wounded, and prisoners, amount to more in number than
were disposed of in any one of the most sanguinary conflicts between the Roman and Barbaric worlds, —
we would naturally expect, that the indulgence which can readily attribute such outrages on our cre-
dulity, to the style of the age in which the writers lived, might also be extended to our Minstrel, even
when he describes his hero " like a true knight-errant, cleaving his foes through brawn and bayne down
to the shoulders."
It is said by Lord Hailes, in speaking of Henry, that " he is an author whom every historian copies,
yet no historian but Sir Robert Sibbald will venture to quote." This, though intended as a sneer by
the learned annalist, may be viewed as complimentary to the candour of Sir Robert, who, while he
avails himself of the facts related by another, is not above acknowledging the obligation. Considering
the situation of this unfortunate but ingenious man, no author had ever a stronger claim on the indul-
gence of his readers. Blind from his birth, he was deprived of the advantage of correcting the
manuscript of his work, while his poverty prevented him from procuring an amanuensis capable of
doing justice to his talents. Hence we find a number of errors and omissions, that from the ease with
which they can be rectified, appear evidently the faults of transcribers. Succeeding historians, far from
making the allowance which his case demanded, have acted towards him with a degree of peevish hos-
tility exceedingly unbecoming. Because his dates do not always correspond with the transactions he
records, he has been termed a " liar," a "fabulist" " a man blind in more respects than one ;" with other
appellations no less unworthy of themselves than unmerited by him. When it is considered that there
is no circumstance connected with Wallace mentioned by subsequent writers, but what had already
found a place in the work of the Minstrel ; — that they had no other story to give than what he had pre-
viously given ; — and that they must either repeat what he had already stated, or remain silent : we are
ed to conclude, that he could not have so effectually pre-occupied the ground, without having very
complete information regarding the subject of his biography. This information, he tells us himself, was
derived from a memoir written in Latin by John Blair, assisted by Thomas Gray, the former chaplain
to Wallace, and the latter parson of Liberton, both eye-witnesses of the transactions they relate. It
follows, therefore, that Scottish authors, having obtained, in a great measure, their information respecting
Wallace from the pages of Blind Harry, their characters, as historians, become seriously involved with
the fate of him whom they have so unceremoniously vituperated. Under these circumstances, it appears
a very proper subject of inquiry, to ascertain whether he has, or has not executed his task with be-
coming fidelity. Were the memoir of Blair extant, this matter could very soon be determined ; but
having long since disappeared, doubts are now entertained of its ever having been in existence. Sir
Robert Sibbald has published a few fragments, entitled Relationes qucedam Arnaldi Blair, Monachi de
Dumfermelini, et Capellani D. Willielmi Wallas, Militis, 1327. Though these are merely transcripts
* Hemingford says, that there were fifty thousand slain, many drowned, and three hundred thousand foot taken prisoners, j
besides a thousand horsemen.
INTRODUCTION.
from the Scotichronicon of Fordun, yet some have supposed them to have been the groundwork on
which Blind Harry founded his poem. This opinion, however, can scarcely be maintained save by those
who have only seen the title ; the most superficial inspection will be sufficient to induce a very different
conclusion. Arnold Blair may have, on some occasion, officiated as chaplain to Wallace, and, proud of
the distinction, in imitation of his namesake, may have made the ill-arranged excerpts from Fordun, for
the purpose of handing down his own name in connection with that of the illustrious defender of his
country : but the confident manner in which Henry refers to his author, as evidence of facts which are
not alluded to, even in the most distant manner, in the work of Arnold, shows the impossibility of its
being the foundation of his narrative ; for we cannot suppose that an author, wishing to pass off a tissue
of fables for a series of truths, would act with so much inconsistency, as to court detection by referring
for authority to a quarter where he was sure of finding none. When Henry introduced his translation to
the public, the approbation with which it was received may very justly be viewed as the test of its cor-
rectness, there being no scarcity of men in the country capable of collating it with the original, and
detecting the imposition, if any existed ; and it may therefore reasonably be inferred, that the excel-
lency of the translation was such as to supersede the original ; being, from its language, more accessible
to all classes than the other, which, on that account, was more likely to go into desuetude, and ulti-
mately to disappear.
The character of Minstrel which has been attached to Henry, — joined to the vulgar and disgusting
translation of his work into modern Scotch, by Hamilton of Gilbertfield, — has, it is presumed, injured
his reputation as a historian, more than any deviation he has made from the authentic records of the
country. No other work of his exists, or is known to have existed, which might entitle him to rank as
a minstrel ; but being called upon — and possibly compelled by circumstances — to recite his translation
in the presence of the great, he received a minstrel's reward, and became, perhaps improperly, con-
founded with the profession.
Had Barbour, Wyntown, Langtoft, and other authors, who wrote their chronicles in rhyme, been
quoted by subsequent writers as minstrels, it would no doubt have weakened their authority as histo-
rians. These men, however, professed to give, though in verse, a faithful register of the transactions of
their country. Henry seems to have had only the same object in view ; and thus endeavours to impress
the reader with the fidelity of the translation, and the disinterestedness of his motives.
Off Wallace lyff quha has a forthar feill,
May schaw furth mair with wit and eloquence ;
For I to this haiff don my diligence,
Eftyr the pruff geyffyn fra the Latyn buk,
Quhilk Maister Blayr in his tym wndyrtuk,
In fayr Latyn compild il till ane end ;
"With thir witnes the mar is to commend.
Byschop Synclar than lord was off Dunkell^
He gat this buk, and confermd it him sell
For werray true ; thar off he had no dreid,
Himselff had seyn gret part off Wallace deid.
His purpos was till haue send it to Rom,
Our fadyr off kyrk tharon to gyff his dom.
Bot Maister Blayr, and als Schir Thomas Gray,
Eftir Wallace thai lestit mony day,
Thir twa knew best of gud Schir Wilyhamys deid,
Fra sexteyn yer quhill nyne and twenty yeid.
Fourty and fyve off age, Wallace was cauld,
That tym that he was to [the] Southeroun sauld.
Thocht this mater be nocht till all plesance,
His suthfast deid was worthi till awance.
All worthi men at redys this rurall dyt,
Blaym nocht the buk, set I be wnperfyt.
I suld hawe thank, sen I nocht trawaill spard ;
For my laubour na man hecht me reward ;
Na charge I had off king nor othir lord ;
Gret harm I thocht his gud deid suld be smord.
I haiff said her ner as the process gais ;
And fenyeid nocht for frendschip nor for fais.
Costis herfor was no man bond to me ;
In this sentence I had na will to be,
Bot in als mekill as I rahersit nocht
Sa worthely as nobill Wallace wrocht.
Bot in a poynt, I grant, I said amyss,
Thir twa knychtis suld blamyt be for this,
The knycht Wallas, off Cragge rychtwyss lord,
And Liddaill als, gert me mak [wrang] record.
On Allyrtoun mur the croun he tuk a day,
To get battaill, as myn autour will say.
Thir twa gert me say that ane othir wyss ;
Till Maister Blayr we did sumpart off dispyss."
Suke Eleuenth, v. 1410—1450.
What more can an author say to satisfy his reader of the purity of his intentions, as well as of the
genuineness of the source from whence he has drawn his materials ? Without reward, or promise of
reward, he appears to have undertaken his task from the purest feelings of patriotism, and finished it
before he experienced any of the fostering influence of patronage. That the transactions he relates
are substantially correct, or at least such as were generally believed to be so at the time he wrote, we
have the evidence of one nearly cotemporary. Major thus expresses himself*: "Henry, who was
blind from his birth, in the time of my infancy composed the whole Book of William Wallace ; and
committed to writing in vulgar poetry, in which he was well skilled, the thinys that were commonly related
of him. For my own part, I give only partial credit to writings of this description. By the recitation
of these however, in the presence of men of the highest rank, he procured, as he indeed deserved, food
and raiment." Though Major says nothing of Blair's Memoirs, yet he frees Henry from the charge of
relating any thing that was not previously believed by his countrymen.
Thomas Chambers, in his History of the House of Douglas, says, " These things fell out in the
year 1298 ; which passages, as the most part of actions done in the time of Sir William Wallace, are
either passed over, or slenderly touched by the writers of our chronicles, although the truth thereof be
unquestionable, being related by those eye-witnesses who wrote the diary or history of Sir William
• Hist. Lib. iv. c. 15.
INTRODUCTION.
Wallace in Latin, which is paraphrastically turned into English rhyme, the interpreter expressing the
main body of the story very truly ; howsomever, missing or mistaking some circumstances, he dift'ereth
therein from the Latin *." From the manner in which this is expressed, it may be supposed that
Chambers had seen the original. If this could be established, his testimony would be of considerable
importance. Nicholson, Archdeacon of Carlisle, in his Scottish Historical Library, says, that the names
of the great northern Englishmen, whom Henry represents Wallace as having been engaged with, such
as Sir Gerard Heron, Captain Thirlwall, Morland, Martindale, &c. are still well known on the borders
of Cumberland and Northumberland. The reader may also find, by the Statistical Account of Scotland,
that the localities mentioned in the poem, are given with a precision beyond the reach of one labouring
under the infirmity of blindness.
The invasion of Lorn by MacFadyan and a horde of Irish, at the instigation of Edward, is a circum-
stance unnoticed by any historian, save the translator of Blair ; and were it not for the undoubted
evidence, arising from traditions still preserved among a people who never heard of the work of the
Minstrel, it might be considered as the mere creation of his own fancy. But such decided testimony in
favour of the correctness of his statement, when taken in connexion with the accurate manner in which
he has described the advance of Wallace through a country, respecting the intricacies of which he, of
himself, could form no idea — the near approach he has made to the Celtic names of the places, which
can still be distinctly traced — and the correct description he has given of the grand scene of action on
the Awe, — are sufficient to stamp the impress of truth on his narrative, and satisfy any one of the
impossibility of a man, situated as he was, ever being able to accomplish it without the diary of an eye-
witness.
After the defeat of MacFadyan, Wallace is represented as holding a council or meeting with the
chieftains of the West Highlands, in the Priory of Ardchattan. The ruins of the Priory are still to
be found on the banks of Loch Etive, a few miles from the scene of strife ; and among the rubbish,
as well as in the neighbouring grounds, coins of Edward I. have at different times been dug up, in
considerable quantities. So late as March, 1829, the following paragraph appeared in the Glasgow
Herald : — " In digging a grave, a few days ago at Balvodan (or St. Modan's), a burial-place in the
neighbourhood of the Priory of Ardchattan, Argyllshire, a number of ancient silver coins were found,
in a remarkably fine state of preservation. The place where they had been deposited was about four
feet below the surface ; and they seem to have been contained in an earthern vessel, which mouldered
into dust, on exposure to the atmosphere ; they were turned up by the shovel, as those who were
attending the interment were surrounding the grave, and each of the party present having picked up a
few, the rest were, by the Highlanders, returned with the earth to the grave. The coins were struck
in the reign of the First Edward, whose name can be distinctly traced on them ; and they were pro-
bably placed there at the time, when that monarch had succeeded in getting temporary possession of
the greater part of Scotland. In that case they must have lain where they were found for upwards of
five hundred years." The writer had an opportunity of examining a number of these coins on the
spot ; he found a great many of them to be struck in Dublin, and they seemed below the regular
standard. Though numerous discoveries have been made of the coins of this ambitious monarch in
other parts of Scotland, yet in the West Highlands they are extremely rare. Neither Edward, nor
any of his English generals, ever penetrated so far in that direction. It is, therefore, highly pro-
bable, that the above money may have formed part of the contents of the military chest of MacFadyan,
which, in that superstitious age, had found its way into the hands of the priesthood.
Although Henry cannot be collated with his original, the truth or falsehood of his narrative may, in
part, be ascertained by comparing him with those who preceded him on the same subject. The most
reputable of these writers, and those whose characters for veracity stand highest in the estimation of
the learned, are John de Fordun, and Andro de Wyntown, both original historians ; for, though
Wyntown outlived Fordun, he had not an opportunity of seeing his history. With respect to Fordun's
agreement with the Minstrel, the reader has the evidence of Nicholson, Archdeacon of Carlisle, who
says, that " Hart's edition of Wallace contains a preface which confirms the whole of it out of the
Scoti-Chronicon f." Wyntown, who finished his history in 1424, being about forty-six years before
Henry, in alluding to those deeds of Wallace which he had left unrecorded, says,
Of his gud Dedis and Manhad
Gret Gestis ; I hard say, ar made ;
Bot sa mony, I trow noucht,
As he in -till hys dayis wroucht.
Quha all hys Dedis of prys wald dyte,
Hym worthyd a gret Buk to wryte ;
And all thai to wryte in here
I want bathe Wyt and gud Laysere."
B. viii. c. xv. v. 79-86.
The first couplet may allude to Blair's Diary, or perhaps to Fordun's History, which he had no doubt
heard of ; and, in the succeeding lines, he doubts that however much may have been recorded, it must
still fall very short of what was actually performed. This is so far satisfactory, from one who lived almost
within a century of the time, and who no doubt often conversed with those whose fathers had fought
under the banners of Wallace ; it is a pity that his modesty, and his want of " gud laysere," prevented
him from devoting more of his time to so meritorious a subject. The first transaction which he has
narrated, is the affair at Lanark ; but it is evident from what he says, that Wallace must have often
* Appendix to Blair's Relationea in the Library of the College of Glasgow,
t- Scottish Historical Library, p. 68. quarto ed.
I
VI
INTRODUCTION.
W. " Hald stylle thi hand, and spek thi worde."
/. " Wyth thi Swerd thow mais gret bost."
W. " Tharefor thi Dame made lytil cost."
/. " Quhat caus has thow to were the Grene ?"
W. " Na caus, bot for to make the Tene."
J. " Thow suld noucht bere sa fare a Knyf."
Swa sayd the Preyst, that, swywyd thi Wyf :
Swa lang he cald that Woman fayr,
Quhill that his Barne wes made thi Ayre."
Me-thynk thow drywys me to scorne."
Thi Dame wes swywyd or thow wes borne."
B. viii. c. xiii. 28-38.
The similarity of Henry's version is too apparent to be the effect of chance. After a little badinage,
which does not appear in Wyntown, he says,
4 Quhat suld a Scot do with sa fair a knyff ? — '
' Sa said the prest that last janglyt thi wyff;
' That woman lang has tillit him so fair,
' Quhill that his child, worthit to be thine ayr.'
' Me think,' quod he, ' thow drywys me to scorn.'
' Thi deme has beyne japyt or thow was born.' "
" Buke Sext," 141-154.
: Ma Sotheroune men to thaime assemblit ner.
Wallace as than was laith to mak a ster.
Ane maid a scrip, and tyt at his lang suorde :
' Hald still thi hand,' quod he, ' and spek thi word.'
' With thi lang suerd thow makis mekill bost.'
' Tharoff,' quod he, 'thi deme maid litill cost.'
' Quhat causs has thow to wer that gudlye greyne ?— '
' My maist causs is bot for to mak the teyne.'
The parties soon come to blows ; and, in the conflict, Wallace cut off the hand of one of his oppo-
nents. Wyntown thus takes notice of the circumstance.
" As he wes in that Stowre fechtand,
Fra ane he strak swne the rycht hand ;
And fra that Carle mycht do na mare,
The left hand held fast the Buklare,
And he swa mankyd, as brayne-wode,
Kest fast wyth the Stwmpe the Blode
Henry narrates the anecdote with little variation.
" Wallace in stour wes cruelly fechtand ;
Fra a Sotheroune he smat off the rycht hand :
And quhen that carle off fechtyng mycht no mar,
With the left hand in ire held a buklar.
In-til Willame Walays face :
Mare cumryd of that Blode he was,
Than he was a welle lang qwhile
Feychtand stad in that peryle."
B. viii. c. xiii. 47-56.
Than fra the stowmpe the blud out spurgyt fast,
In Wallace face aboundandlye can out cast;
In to great part it marry t him off his sicht."
" Buke Sext" 163-169.
The escape of Wallace by means of his mistress — her murder by order of the sheriff — his return the
ensuing night — with the slaughter of the sheriff— are particularly taken notice of by Wyntown.
Henry's translation includes all these occurrences, and only differs by being more circumstantial.
The account of the battle of Falkirk agrees in numerous instances. The covenant between Cumming
and Bruce, which Henry states to have taken place near Stirling, is corroborated in place and circum-
stance by Fordun, Wyntown, and Barbour. The hanging of Sir Bryce Blair, and Sir Ronald Crawford
in a barn at Ayr, is confirmed by the last mentioned writer, although he does not descend to particulars.
These, and many other instances may be adduced,. to show, that, though Henry or his authority may
have occasionally indulged in the marvellous, yet the general outline of his history, and even many of
before mingled in deadly feud with the English soldiers, and done them serious injury ; otherwise, it
would be difficult to account for their entertaining towards him the degree of animosity expressed in
the following lines : — I
" Gret Dyspyte thir Inglis men
Had at this Willame Walays then.
Swa thai made thame on a day
Hym for to set in hard assay :"
B. viii. c. xiii. v. 19-22.
Every particular that Wyntown gives of the conflict which ensues, in consequence of this precon-
certed quarrel on the part of the English, is detailed in the account of the Minstrel with a degree of
correctness, leaving no room to doubt that either the two authors must have drawn their materials
from the same source, or that Henry, having heard Wyntown's version of the story, considered it so
near the original as to leave little to be corrected. The language, as will be seen from the following
examples, is nearly the same :
" Twelf hundyre nynty yhere and sewyn
Fra Cryst wes borne the Kyng of Hewyn."
B. viii. c. xiii.
Henry thus enters upon the same subject —
" Tuelff hundreth yer, tharto nynte and sewyn,
Fra Cryst wes born the rychtwiss king off hewyn."
" Buke Sext," 107, 108.
Wyntown gives the following dialogue, as having taken place between Wallace and an athletic wag
belonging to the English garrison of Lanark, who, when surrounded by his companions, made " a Tyt
at hys sword :"
CONTENTS.
the particulars, are in strict accordance with truth ; and the work itself necessarily becomes not only
valuable as a depository of ancient manners, but as containing matter which, if properly investigated,
may be useful to the historian. Whether the apocryphal part — and which, it must be allowed, is con-
siderable— ought to be attributed to the fancy of the translator, or if it formed a portion of the original
text, we have no means of ascertaining. From the frequent and apparent sincerity, however, with
which Henry appeals to his " actor," and the value he seems to attach to a faithful discharge of his
task, we might be led to infer, that if it were practicable to collate his performance with the memoir of
Blair, the rendering of it would be found unexceptionable. Under these circumstances, the writer of
the following narrative has not scrupled to avail himself of such statements as appeared entitled to
credit ; and, though he cannot consider the Minstrel as deserving the same degree of confidence as
Wyntown or Barbour, yet, when he finds him consistent and characteristic, he conceives it would be
unjust to suspect falsehood in every instance, where he does not happen to be supported by the respect-
able testimonies already enumerated. That he is more circumstantial than any of the Scottish his-
torians, is easily accounted for, by his attention, or rather that of his authoi*, being engrossed by the
actions of one individual. A degree of minuteness is in this case adopted, which would be altogether
incompatible with the plan of a general historian.
These remarks it has been deemed necessary to make in defence of one to whom we are indebted for
the only original memoir of the greatest hero, and purest patriot, Scotland or any other country ever
produced ; an author, however, who, instead of having the merits of his work fairly appreciated, has
been vilified and abused by those who, in their zeal for establishing new historical creeds, have found it
a matter of less labour to sneer than to investigate.
The sources from whence the present writer has drawn his materials, will, it is hoped, be found such
as are generally entitled to credit. Being of opinion that the authors who lived nearest the period
under review ought to be best informed respecting the transactions connected with it, he has therefore
endeavoured to collate as many ancient Scottish and English authorities as possible. The biographical
notices of such Englishmen as figured in the Scottish wars, are chiefly drawn from the historians of
England ; conceiving that it belongs to the writers of a country to be best acquainted with the details
of its internal and domestic history ; but to enumerate the authorities he has consulted, would here be
superfluous, as th( y are duly noted at the proper stages of the narrative.
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
State of Scotland in the Thirteenth Century
CHAPTER II.
On the Claim of England to the Feudal Homage of
Scotland
CHAPTER III.
Birth, Parentage, and Early Years of Wallace
13
CHAPTER IV.
Accession of Baliol— Siege of Berwick— Battle of Dunbar 1 8
CHAPTER V.
Wallace again takes refuge in the Woods — Organizes a
System of Warfare— Harasses the English in their
Cantonments — Conflict of Beg — Biographical Notices
of his early Companions — His Dress and Armour —
Anecdote of the relative personal Prowess of Wallace
and Bruce 22
CHAPTER VI.
Peel of Gargunnock taken by the Scots — The Bradfutes
of Lamington oppressed by the English — The Orphan
of Lamington — Sir Raynald Crawford summoned to
•AM
Glasgow — Wallace captures the Baggage of Percy —
Retires to Lennox — Various Rencounters with the
English 29
CHAPTER VII.
Singular Adventure of Wallace in Gask Castle— Kills
the English Leader— Escapes to Torwood— Interview
with his Uncle 35
CHAPTER VIII.
Wallace joined by Sir John Graham— Proceedings in
Clydesdale— Wallace visits Lanark— Adventure with
a Party of the English 33
CHAPTER IX.
Attack on Crawford Castle— Return to Lanark— Con-
flict with the English— Murder of the Heiress of
Lamington— Her death revenged— The English driven
out of Lanark— Battle of Biggar— Atrocious Proceed-
ings of the English at Ayr— Severe retaliation by
Wallace 49
CHAPTER X.
Affair of Glasgow— Defeat and Flight of Bishop Bek—
Wallace joined by a number of the Barons— Expe-
dition to the West Highlands— Battle of Bradher, and
Death of M'Fadyan , „ 4?
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XL
PAGE
Robert Bruce joins the Standard of Wallace — Percy and
Clifford sent to suppress the Insurrection— Night
Skirmish in Annandale— Disaffection of the Scottish
Nobles— Wallace retires to the North— Battle of Stir-
ling Bridge 46
CHAPTER XII.
Wallace appointed Guardian of the Kingdom — Invades
England— Inroad of De Clifford on the South of Scot-
land 51
CHAPTER XIII.
Wallace returns to Scotland — Envied by the Nobility —
Edward lands in England — Wallace meets his Army
at Stanmore — Battle of Blackironside — Legality of
Wallace's Regency — Edward invades Scotland —
Treachery of two Scottish Noblemen 54
CHAPTER XIV.
The English Army advance to Linlithgow — Battle of
Falkirk, from the Accounts given by English and
Scottish Writers— Miscellaneous Transactions 58
CHAPTER XV.
Notices respecting Sir John Graham and Sir John
Stewart — Conduct of Cumyn — Wallace resigns the
Guardianship — Edward returns home — Triumphant
Procession of the Londoners in honour of his Victory
at Falkirk— Review of the Campaign 64
CHAPTER XVI.
State of Scotland after the Return of Edward — Opinion of
an English Spy on the Strength of Dumbarton Castle-
Various Exploits of Wallace— Edward sends Supplies
to the Garrison of Stirling — List of Articles sent —
Baliol delivered over to the Pope— The Scots besiege
Stirling Castle — Edward raises an Army for its
Relief-The English Barons refuse to accompany
him — Surrender of Stirling Castle — Conduct of
Cumyn
67
CHAPTER XVII.
Edward again invades Scotland— Siege of Carlaverock; ~
Miscellaneous Occurrences during the Siege 69
CHAPTER XVIII.
Winchelsea, Archbishop of Canterbury, reads a Bull
from the Pope, in the English Camp before Carla-
verock— Edward's Answer — Earl Warren advances
to Irvine — Cruelty of the English at Lesmahago —
Edward agrees to a Truce— Wallace visits France —
Captures a French Pirate— Notices of Longueville 72
CHAPTER XIX.
j Edward again invades Scotland— Sir Simon Frazer de-
Iserts the English, and joins his Countrymen — Wallace
returns to Scotland— Battle of Roslin 76
CHAPTER XX.
j Second Visit of Wallace to the French Court— Encoun-
ters an English Pirate — The English again enter
PAGE
Scotland — Submission of the Nobles — Wallace re-
turns— Conflicts with the English — Edward destroys
and carries off the Records of the Monasteries —
Marches through the Country— Wallace follows the
Invaders 77
CHAPTER XXI.
Edward's Policy respecting the Settlement of Scot-
land— Endeavours to gain Wallace to his interest —
Siege of Stirling — Its surrender— Conduct of Edward
towards the Prisoners — Haliburton undertakes to be-
tray Wallace 81
CHAPTER XXII.
State of the Country — Bruce invited to take the Crown —
Conduct of Cumyn towards Bruce — Notice of Cumyn —
Tradition respecting the Clan Cumyn — Notice of
Kerle — Wallace betrayed by Menteith 84
CHAPTER XXIII.
Trial, Execution, and Character of Wallace 87
CHAPTER XXIV.
Conclusion .
APPENDIX.
A. Wallace's Tree— Torwood „ 96
B. The Crawfurds 97
C. The Burning of the Barns of Ayr 98
D. Memoir of Bishop Anthony Bek 99
E. Expedition to the West Highlands 102
F. Memoir of John, Earl of Warren— Lord Henry de
Percy— And Lord Robert de Clifford 108
G. Hugh de Cressingham : 112
H. Original Letter from Sir William Wallace and Sir
Andrew Murray ib.
I. Memoir of Patrick, Earl of Dun bar 114
K. Charter of Protection granted to the Prior and Con-
vent of Hexceldsham 115
L. On the intention of Edward to curtail the Power of
his Barons 116
M. The Setons ib.
N. Memoir of Fitz-Marmaduke 117
O. Memoir of Brian Fitz-Allan ib.
P. Memoir of Aymer de Vallence, Earl of Pembroke.. 118
Q. Memoir of Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln 121
R. Memoirs of Richard Siward and Walter de Hunter-
combe 122
S. Memoir of Sir Simon Frazer 124
T. Extracts from the Wardrobe Accounts.... 127
U. Trial of Wallace 128
X. On the Martyrdom of Wallace ib.
Y. On the Personal Appearance of Wallace 130
Z. Reminiscence of Wallace 131
AA. Wallace's Descendants 132
BB. On the Treachery of Menteith „ 133
CC. Singular Legend 136
DD. Verses on the Death of Wallace.... .. ib.
LIFE
OF
SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
CHAPTER I. '
STATE OF SCOTLAND IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY.
THE scanty and imperfect records which exist
respecting the early state of Scotland, have been a
fruitful source of complaint to all writers who have
applied themselves to the investigation of her his-
tory. Those, however, who would form an estimate
of her relative situation and internal resources, by
reference to her condition at the time she became
allied to England on the accession of James VI.,
would arrive at very erroneous conclusions on the
subject.
That Scotland retrograded under the dynasty of
the Stuarts, few, who are conversant with her early
history, will be inclined to deny. But, without in-
quiring how far the incapacity or imprudence of
that unfortunate race may have contributed to her
decline, the writer will endeavour to arrange a few
remarks respecting the above-mentioned period,
for the benefit of those readers whose attention may
not have been directed to that interesting portion
of our annals.
The jurisprudence of Scotland, like that of the
other states of Europe, embraced the feudal system
in all its degrees of servitude, from the knightly
devoirs of the baron, down to the humble and more
laborious task of the bondsman, who could be either
put to death at the will of his over-lord, or bartered
away to the church, for a certain number of masses.
Yet though this state of society existed to a con-
siderable extent, there were some privileged classes
exempt from its more degrading operation. The
most influential of these, as might be expected,
were the priesthood, who, as soon as admitted to
orders, became emancipated from their temporal
bondage *.
Merchants and burgesses were of course free.
Had this not been the case, those useful classes
could not have existed, as the control of the feudal
superior over the adscriptos glebce, extended not
only to an absolute property in themselves and
* In England, Thomas a Becket conceded to Henry II.,
that, in the event of a bondsman becoming a clerk, he
should not receive orders without the consent of his lord ;
and further, if a man of holy church held any lay-fee, he
must do the King's service thereto attached, except in cases
connected with the execution of criminals. — See Hearne's
Glossary to Langtoft's Chronicle, vol. ii. p. 530.
their offspring, but also over any means they might
accumulate. When a bondsman, therefore, bought
a burgage, and remained a year and a day in a
burgh, without being molested or claimed by his
lord, he became a free man for ever*.
Another useful portion of society is to be found
in our records under the name of liberi firmcvrii, or
free yeomanry, the formation of which, it is pre-
sumed, may be attributed in a great measure to the
ecclesiastical establishments. The clergy, from
their superior education, were wiser, in their gene-
ration, than their neighbours ; and instead of
allowing the produce of their lands to be eaten up
by hordes of idle serfs, they preferred letting them
at a valuation to industrious free men, whom they
encouraged by the immunities which they had it in
their power to grant. These free men were gene-
rally the descendants of the clergy, the younger
sons of gentlemen, or burgesses possessed of small
capitals. From this judicious management, the
church lands were always the best cultivated, and
consequently the most productive in the country.
At an early period the maritime towns were fre-
quented by foreigners, and the productions of
almost every clime were to be found in Scotland.
By an Act of Alexander Ill.f, it appears that the
trade of the country had rather declined during
his minority ; the causes of which are stated to
have been, captures by pirates, shipwrecks on the
coast, storms at sea, and detentions on slight
grounds in various ports and places. In order,
therefore, to revive the foreign commerce of the
kingdom, and give the necessary security and fa-
cility to transactions with strangers, all the lieges
were strictly prohibited from interfering with the
said traffic, except the burgesses at the different
ports. This regulation gave confidence to foreign-
ers, by bringing them into immediate contact with
a description of men, with whom reciprocal advan-
tages would naturally beget and maintain a friendly
understanding J.
* Macpherson's Annals of Commerce, vol. i. p. 324.
t Fordun, vol. ii. lib. x. cap. 42.
J Fordun, vol. ii. lib. x. cap. 42.— If we compare the fol-
lowing provisions of an act put forth by Edward I., with
the above-mentioned enactment, some idea may be formed
respecting the views entertained by the two British mon-
archs, on the subject of foreign commercial intercourse.
" It is ordained, that no fishmonger shall have any partner-
ship with a stranger who brings fish from sea to the city ;
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. i.
The consequence of this liberal policy was soon
felt ; and before the year expired, vessels from all
quarters made their appearance in the Scottish
harbours, willing to exchange their cargoes for the
productions of the country ; and in the course of a
few years Scotland exhibited a very flourishing
appearance, abounding in money and wealth of
every description. The Flemings, whom the Eng-
lish had expelled, found protection and encourage-
ment in Scotland, and were allowed to fortify their
factory at Berwick, called " The Red Hall," under
condition of their defending it to the last extremity
against the enemies of that kingdom. This en-
gagement, as will be seen, they afterwards nobly
performed.
A number of wealthy Lombards, jealous perhaps
of their rivals the Flemings, now made application
to the government of Scotland for permission to
erect similar establishments in various parts of the
country, particularly at Queensferry and other
stations on the Forth, — craving, at the same time,
certain spiritual privileges. The States of the king-
dom acceded at once to their request, in so far as
they regarded trade ; but as the Lombards were
the vassals of the Pope, they prudently declined
mixing up any ecclesiastical matters with affairs of
commerce. In the mean time, the unfortunate
death of the king put an end to the negociation.
Fordun, who narrates the circumstance, does not
condescend on the nature of the spiritual privileges
required. It is highly probable, however, that they
consisted in their being admitted into Scotland on
the same terms which they enjoyed in England and
other European states, where they were recognised
in a special manner as " the Pope's merchants," and
were intrusted by him with the receiving and re-
mitting the immense revenues which were drawn
from every country where their Holy Father's
supremacy was acknowledged. Trade, with them,
was often a secondary consideration. Lending of
money, for which they exacted enormous usury,
constituted the most lucrative part of their opera-
tions ; and in these nefarious transactions, it has
been conjectured, that they were often commis-
sioned to employ the funds belonging to the Holy
See, whose bulls were frequently issued in their
favour, when their crimes or rapacity had aroused
the vengeance of the governments under which
they resided*. Their severity to their debtors,
made them known by the name of Caursini ; and
they at last became generally obnoxious for their
extortion. If the account given of them by Mat-
thew Paris may be relied on, the caution of the
Scots respecting the admission of such harpies into
the country was highly commendable.
The great mart for foreign commerce in the
kingdom, previous to 1296, appears to have been
Berwick. The importance of this place was con-
but let them seek for fish in their own ships, and permit
foreigners to bring it and sell, when they come in their own
ships. Because, by such partnerships, they who are of the
city, and have known the state of the city, and the defect of
victuals, will hold the fish at a dearer rate than foreigners,
who shall not have known it; and also, that they who are
of the city, when they cannot sell, as they will lay it up in
cellars, and sell it dearer than the strangers would do, if they
came without partnership, and knew not where they might be
harboured." — Lambert's Historical Survey of London, vol. i.
p. 156, 157.
* Fcedera, vol. i. p. 467.
siderable. Even in the reign of Malcolm IV., it
possessed more ships than any other town in Scot-
land, and was exposed, from its wealth, to visits
from the piratical fleets of the Norwegians. In
1156, a ship belonging to a citizen, called Knut the
Opulent, and having his wife on board, was taken
by Erlend, Earl of Orkney ; but it is recorded
Knut hired fourteen ships, with a competent num-
ber of men, for which he paid one hundred merks
of silver, and went in pursuit of the pirate, who had
anchored for the night at one of the adjacent
islands*.
The wealth and importance of this ancient em-
porium of commerce, became so great in the reign
of Alexander II., as to excite the admiration of
contemporary authors, one of whom calls it a
" second Alexandria ;" and eulogizes the inhabit-
ants for the extent of their donations to religious
houses. " But we have," says Macpherson, in his
Annals of Comnierce, " better authority than the
voice of panegyric, for the prosperity of Berwick ;
as we find the customs of it assigned by King Alex-
ander to a merchant of Gascoigne for 2,1 97^. 8s.
sterling — a sum equal to 32,961 bolls of wheat, at
the usual price of sixteen pennies •)*."
In the years 1283 and 1284, Robert Durham the
Mayor, together with Simon Martel, and other
good men of Berwick, enacted the Statute of the
Gilt.
"By c. 20, none but gild-brothers were per-
mitted to buy hides, wool, or wood-fells, in order
to sell them again, or cut cloth, except foreign
merchants.
" C. 22. 37. and 44. Herrings and other fish,
corn, beans, peas, salt, and coals J, were ordered
to be sold f at the brayj along side the vessel bring-
ing them, and no where else ; and they were not
to be carried on shore when the sun was down.
Any burgess who was present at a purchase of
herrings, might claim a portion of them for his own
consumption, at the original cost.
" C. 27- Brokers were elected by the commu-
nity of the town, and their names registered. They
paid annually a tun (dolium) of wine for their li-
cense ;" — a proof that their business must have
been lucrative.
" C. 28. No regrator was allowed to buy fish,
hay, oats, cheese, butter, or other articles brought
into the town for sale, till the bell rung.
" The government of the town was declared
to be by a mayor, four provosts (prcepositis), and
twenty-four councillors," &c.
In 1283, when Edward. was preparing for his
* Torfasi Orcades, lib. i. cap. 4.
t Chron. of Lanercoste. See Macpherson's Annals of
Commerce, vol. i. p. 446. In 1282, the customs of England
were farmed by Bonricini, Guidicon, and Co., of Lucca, and
the sum realized, from Easter 1281 till Easter 1282, netted
841U. 19*. ll|d. The money, it may be observed, at this
time, was the same in both countries. — Madox, History of
the Exchequer, c. 23. fo. 1.
t The use of coal as fuel was very early known in Scot-
land. By a charter, dated in April, 1291, William de Ober-
vill granted liberty to the monks of Dunfermline to dig
coal for their own use in his lands of Pittencrieff, but upon
no account to sell any, (Chart, in Statist. Account of Scot-
land, vol. xiii. p. 469.) By this restriction, it would seem
that the proprietor not only set a value on the sale of coal,
but also that the monks of those days were in the habit ot
improving their resources, by trafficking in temporal as well
as in spiritual matters.
CHAP. I.]
SCOTLAND IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY.
invasion of Wales, he commissioned one John
Bishop, a burgess of Lynne, to purchase merchan-
dise (meroimonia) for him in Scotland. This is
rather a singular instance of the superiority of the
Scots market in those days *.
The other cities in Scotland, though inferior to
Berwick, were not without their proportion of
trade. About the same time, the sheriff's of Cum-
berland and Lancaster were ordered to send people
to purchase fish on the west coast of Scotland, and
convey them to the depot at Chester; and one Adam
de Fulcham was commissioned to furnish 100 bar-
rels of sturgeons, of five hundredweight each, 5000
salt fish, also dried fish. The fish of Aberdeen
were so well cured, that they were exported to the
principal fishing port of Yarmouth.
Four hundred fish of Aberdeen (perhaps sal-
mon), one barrel sturgeons, five dozen lampreys,
fifty pounds whale oil, balen (for burning, perhaps,
during the voyage), and a half last of herrings,
constituted the fish part of the provisions put on
board of a ship fitted out at Yarmouth for bringing
the infant Queen of Scotland from the court of her
father, the King of Norway. The fish of Aberdeen
cost somewhat under three pennies ; stock -fish
under one penny each, and the half last of herrings
thirty shillings f.
In the reign of Alexander III., the merchants of
St. Omer's, and partners of the Florentine houses
of Pullici and Lambini, had established correspond-
ents in Scotland ; and one Richard de Furbur, a
trader of the inland town of Roxburgh, had sent
factors and supercargoes to manage his business in
foreign countries, and various parts of Britain.
The exports of Scotland, at this time, consisted
of wool and woolfells, hides, black cattle J, fish,
salted and cured, horses, greyhounds, falcons,
pearls, and herrings, particularly those caught in
Lochfyne, which had a preference, and found a
ready market among the French, who came and
exchanged their wines at a place still known by the
name of French Foreland ; and so much was wine
a regular understood barter, that Lochfyne (Locli-
* Ayloff's Calendar, p. 88. Some idea may be formed of
the injury which the trade of Scotland sustained by the long
protracted and impoverishing warfare she had to maintain
in support of her independence, from the circumstance of
James I. being obliged, in 1430, to commission two citizens
of London to send him the following articles for his own
use : viz. twenty tuns of wine, twelve bows, four dozen
yards of cloth of different colours, and twelve yards of scar-
let, twenty yards of red worsted, eight dozen pewter vessels,
1200 wooden bowls (or cups), packed in four barrels, three
dozen coverels, a basin and font, two summer saddles, one
hackney saddle, one woman's saddle, with furniture, two
portmanteaus, four yards of motley, five yards of morray,
five yards of black cloth of Lyn, twelve yards kersey, twelve
skins of red leather, and some trifling articles. These
goods, shipped on board a vessel belonging to London, were
secured by a royal order from being molested by English
cruizers.but they were to pay the customary duties. — Fccdera,
vol. x. p. 470.
t Rymer's Coll. MS. vol. ii. p. 287.
j This traffic was frequently interrupted by war; in time
of peace, it was carried on to a considerable extent. The
first notice that we have of its revival after the wars of
Wallace and Bruce, occurs in a letter of safe-conduct granted
12th January, 1359, to Andrew Murray and Alan Erskine,
two Scottish drovers, with three horsemen and their serv-
ants for travelling through England, or the king's foreign
dominions, for a year, with horses, oxen, cows, and other
goods and merchandise. — Fccdera, vol. vi. p. 114.
i, or the Wine Loch, became the only name for
one of the most extensive arms of the Western
Ocean on the Scottish coast. The pearl was a
more ancient branch of traffic, and said to have
been in request among the Romans. The Scot-
tish pearl, however, appears to have been partially
superseded in the French market, by the introduc-
tion of an article of superior lustre from the East.
The goldsmiths of Paris, therefore, made a trade
regulation, forbidding any worker in gold or silver
to set any Scotch pearls along with Oriental ones,
except in large jewels for churches. The grey-
hounds *, however, kept up their price ; and the
Scottish falcons were only rivalled by those of
Norway.
The reader may have some idea of the quantity
of wine consumed at the table of Alexander III.,
from the circumstance of one hundred and seventy-
eight hogsheads being supplied in the year 1263,
and sixty-seven hogsheads and one pipe furnished
the following year. The difference in the quantity
of these two years may have been occasioned by
the battle of Largs having taken place on the 2d
October, 1263 ; after which there would, no doubt,
be a considerable influx of barons and their fol-
lowers to the royal presence, to partake of the fes-
tivities incident to the occasion f.
Horses were, it is said, an article of importation
as well as exportation with the Scots in the thii
teenth century. Alexander I. rode a fine Arabian ;
and, in the Norwegian account of Haco's invasion,
we are told that a large body of Scottish knights
appeared on Spanish steeds, which were completely
armed. It is probable, however, that the warriors
so mounted might have been the forces of the
Temple, as this wealthy order had been some time
before established in the country ; and its services
would no doubt be required on so stirring an occasion.
Asia, in the thirteenth century, was the grand
military school for the nations of Europe ; and
every country having representatives in the armies
of the crusaders, the improvements that took place
in the art of war were quickly transfused through
the various kingdoms of Christendom ; and the
offensive and defensive armour of each was, there-
fore, nearly the same. The warriors of Scotland
and England assimilated very closely to each other ;
and, with the exception, perhaps, of the glaive-men
and the bill-men of the English, and the Highland-
ers and Isles-men of the Scots, no material differ-
ence could be discovered. The Scots, as well as
the English, had "men-at-arms," who fought on
foot ; and while the latter used the lance, the
former were armed with a spear of no common
length. These men among the Scots were selected
on account of their stature and strength, and were
* The greyhounds, "leporarii" of Scotland were con-
sidered so superior, that the Duke of Berry, in France,
thought it worth while to send his valet, and three other
men, to procure some of them, and to obtain letters of safe-
conduct from the King of England, to enable them to travel
through his dominions on that business.-* Fccdera, vol. vii.
page 831.
t By the chamberlain's accounts, it appears that the 178
hogsheads cost 439J. 16*. Sd. sterling, while the sixty- seven
hogsheads and one pipe cost 3731. IGs. Sd. Could this differ-
ence arise from the latter being of superior quality, or from
the market being overstocked, in consequence of the ex-
pected demand ? No doubt there were speculators in those
days, as well as at present.
B2
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. i.
generally placed in the front rank of the squares,
being completely enclosed in defensive armour,
which consisted of steel helmets, a tunic, stuffed
with wool, tow, or old cloth, with a habergeon, or
shirt of iron rings, the joints defended by plates of
the same metal. The stubbornness with which
they maintained their ranks may very reasonably
be supposed to have acquired for the Scottish pha-
lanx or schiltron, that high character for firmness
and obstinate valour for which it was so long dis-
tinguished.
Hauberks of different kinds, with padded or
quilted pourpoints, having iron rings set edgeways,
were generally worn. In the early part of the
reign of Alexander III. chain-mail was first intro-
duced into Scotland by the crusaders ; it was formed
of four rings, joined to a fifth, and all firmly secured
by rivets. Eastern armour, however, had appeared
in the country before this period, as we find that
Alexander I. had a splendid suit of Arabian manu-
facture, richly ornamented with jewels, with a spear
and shield of silver, which, along with his Arabian
steed, covered with a fair mantle of fine velvet, and
other rich housings, he dedicated to the patron
Saint of Scotland, within the church of St. An-
drew's, in the early part of the thirteenth century.
This was considered so valuable a donation, as to
require the sanction of David, the heir-apparent of
the throne *.
Habergeons, of various forms and dimensions,
according to the fancy or circumstances of the
wearer, prevailed in this age. These were gene-
rally covered by a gown or tabard, on the back and
front of which the arms of the wearer were em-
blazoned. Jacked or boiled leather, with quilted
iron-work, was also in use for defending the arms
and legs. Helmets, bacinets, and skullcaps, sur-
mounted, according to the dignity of the person,
formed defences for the head ; and the shields were
either round, triangular, or kite-shape, with the
device or arms of the warrior painted upon them
in glaring colours. The common soldiers wrapped
pieces of cloth about the neck, their numerous folds
of which formed an excellent defence from the cut
of a sword. The " Ridir" or Knight among the
Highlanders, differed little in his equipment from
those of the same rank in the Low Country. In
battle, he was usually attended by a number of
Gall-oglaich. These were soldiers selected as the
stoutest and bravest of the clan, and might be con-
sidered as the "men-at-arms" among the Gael.
They were supplied either with the corslet, or the
liiireach mhailleach (the habergeon, literally the coat
of rings), and were armed with the Lochaber-axe,
the damdhmhor (great two-handed sword), and
sometimes a heavy shelving stone-axe, beautifully
polished, and fixed into a strong shaft of oak f. In
the rear of the Gall-oglaich, stood the Ceatharnalch,
an inferior sort of soldiers, armed with knives and
daggers. Their duty was to take, kill, or disable
those whom the prowess of the front rank had
brought to the ground. The boldest and most dex-
terous among the Gall-oglaich was made squire or
armour-bearer to the chief. This man, as well as
the rest of his companions, received a larger portion
of victuals when they sat at their leader's table ;
* Wyntown, vol. i. p. 286.
t Some fine specimens of these battle-axes may be seen
in the museum at Inverness.
but the part allotted for the armour-bearer was
greater than any, and called, on that account, beath
fir, or, "the Champion's Meal."
Among the Knights of the Isles, the conical-
shaped helmet was more in use than any other.
From piratical habits, and long intercourse with
the Norwegians, their followers in general were
better equipped than those of the mainland. The
habergeon was very common among them ; and
from the gown they put over it, being universally
dyed of a yellow or saffron-colour, they presented a
more uniform appearance than their neighbours.
Besides the lance and spear, the mace, the pike,
the tnartel de fer (a sort of iron hammer), the two-
handed sword, various forms of daggers, knives,
clubs, flails, scythes fixed on poles, bows, cross-
bows *, and slings made by a thong fixed to the end
of a staff, were in use among the Scots. These
slingers used their weapons with both hands. They
had no defensive armour, and were generally placed
among the archers, who were divided into com-
panies of twenty -five men each.
The military engines in use in attacking or de-
fending castles, or other fortified places, were the
Loup de Guerre, or war-wolf, a frame formed of
heavy beams, with spikes, and made to fall on the
assailants in the manner of a portcullis — the Scor-
pion, a large stationary cross-bow of steel, which
discharged darts of an uncommon size, and the
Balista, Catapulta, and Trebuchet, which were en-
gines of great power in throwing large stones, which
were often heated to a high temperature. The
Bricolle threw large square-headed darts, called
Carreaux, or Quarrels. This engine was used by
the Flemings in fortifying their factory at Berwick,
called the "Red Hall." The Espringal threw darts
with brass plates, instead of feathers, to make their
flight steady. The Berfrarium, an engine also called
Belfredus, was made of wood, covered with skins to
defend it from fire, and was formed like a tower,
and of a height to overlook the walls. It consisted
of several stories, and was rolled on wheels towards
the object of attack, and filled with archers and
spearmen ; the latter, under cover of the former,
either rushed upon the walls, or fought hand to
hand with the besieged. The name was afterwards
given to high towers erected in cities, for the pur-
pose of alarming by bells. Hence the origin of the
term "Belfrey." The most expert in the manu-
facture of these engines of destruction was a monk
of Durham. This man supplied the greatest por-
tion of the artillery required for the defence of
Berwick.
Respecting the state of the Arts, it would be dif-
ficult to give any thing like a circumstantial detail.
That various useful mechanical professions were
known and prosecuted, there is abundance of evi-
dence to prove ; but to what degree of perfection
they were brought, is not so clear. That the com-
pass was familiar to the mariners of Scotland at an
early age, appears from the manner in which Bar-
bour expresses himself, in the description of Bru«e
and his companions, who, in crossing from Arran
to Carrick in the night-time, steered by the light of
a fire upon the shore.
* By the chamberlain's accounts it appears, that in the
reign of Alexander III., the king's Balistarius, or keeper of
the crow -bows for the Castle of Ayr, was allowed yearly two
merks and a half.
CHAP. I.]
SCOTLAND IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY.
" For thai na nedill had, na stane,
Bot rowyt always in till ane,
Steerand all tyme apon the fyr."
Suke Feyrd, 1. 23—25.
According to Wyntown, great attention was paid
to agriculture by Alexander III., who fixed that
well-known measurement of land called " Oxgang."
The passage is worth extracting.
" Yhwmen, pewere Karl, or Knawe,
Dat wes of mycht an Ox til hawe,
He gert that man hawe part in Pluche ;
Swa wes corne in his Land enwche ;
Swa than begowth, and eftyr lang
Of Land was mesure, ane Ox-gang.
Mychty men, that had ma
Oxyn, he gert in Pluchys ga.
A Pluch of Land eftyr that
To nowmyr of Oxyn mesur gat.
Be that Vertu all hys Land
Of corn he gart be abowndand.
A Bolle of atis pennys foure
Of Scottis Mone past noucht oure ;
A boll of here for awcht or ten
In comowne prys sawld wes then;
For sextene a boll of qwhete ;
Or fore twenty the derth wes grete.
This falyhyd fra he deyd suddanly."
B. vii. c. x. 507—525.
If the beautiful specimens of architecture which
were produced in this age may be regarded as fur-
nishing certain criteria for judging of the general
state of the arts, we would be warranted in assign-
ing to them a much higher degree of perfection
than many of our readers would be inclined to ad-
mit. It is, however, difficult to believe, that a
nation could have ai'rived at a high degree of ex-
cellence in an art which required a superior know-
ledge of the principles of science, as well as the
greatest refinement in taste, without having made
a corresponding proficiency in those of a subordi-
nate character. The exquisite workmanship which
adorned the crosses and monuments within the
sacred precincts of the Island of lona, commands
at once the admiration and respect of strangers ;
and the fragments which have escaped the ravages
of modern Vandalism, display a neatness of execu-
tion in the figures, lettering and embellishments,
which may justly claim competition with the pro-
ductions of the present day. Some, who will not
look further than the subsequent poverty and de-
gradation of Scotland, insist that these crosses and
monuments are French manufacture, and were
imported from France. This conjecture will not
admit of a moment's reflection. They might as
well inform us that the Abbey of Melrose, the
Cathedral of Glasgow, and all the rest of our sacred
edifices, were importations from the same quarter.
With more propriety, however, it may be alleged,
that the most elegant of our ecclesiastical struc-
tures were erected by a band of ingenious archi-
tects and workmen belonging to various countries,
who associated together about this time, under the
name of Freemasons, and wandered about Europe,
offering their services where they expected the
most liberal encouragement. Of these men, it is
presumed Scotland has a right to claim a fair
proportion.
Naval architecture also appears to have met with
due encouragement ; for we find, in the year 1249,
Hugh de Chantillon, Earl of St. Paul and de Blois
a powerful vassal of Louis IX., joined the cru-
saders under that monarch at Cyprus, with fifty
knights carrying banners, besides a numerous body
of Flemings, on board of a vessel of great strength
and dimensions, which, according to Matthew
Paris*, (who calls it a marvellous vessel,) was
built at Inverness, in the Murray Firth. On this
occasion Macpherson remarks f, " That a French
nobleman should apply to the carpenters of Inver-
ness for a ship, is a curious circumstance ; which
seems to infer, that they had acquired such a
degree of reputation in their profession, as to be
celebrated in foreign countries." A large vessel
was afterwards built for the Venetians at the same
place J.
As the state of literature at this period was
nearly on a level all over Britain, the following
specimens of the earliest lyrical effusions of the
Scottish and English Muse known to exist, may
serve the purpose of exciting a more elaborate
inquiry.
ANCIENT ENGLISH SONG.
Summer is come in,
Loud sings the cuckoo ;
Groweth seed, and bloweth meed,
And springth woods new,
Singth the cuckoo.
Ewe bleateth after lamb,
Loweth after calf, cow ;
Bullock starteth, buck verteth,
Merry sings the cuckoo,
Cuckoo, cuckoo,
Well singth the cuckoo,
May'st thou never cease.
ANCIENT SCOTTISH SONG.
" Quhen Alysandyr oure Kyng wes dede,
That Scotland led in Luwe and Le,
Away wes Sons of Ale and Brede,
Of Wyne and Wax, of Gamyn and Gle :
Oure Gold wes changyd in-to Lede.
Cryst, borne in-to Virgynyte,
Succour Scotland and remede,
That Stad is in perplexyte."
The law of Scotland is known to all to have been
that of the Romans. The municipal and com-
mercial departments were under the control of the
Court of the " Four Burghs," which consisted of
representatives from Berwick, Edinburgh, Rox-
burgh, and Stirling ; to whom all matters connected
with commerce, and the rights and privileges of
the burgesses, were referred. The Chamberlain?s
Court had also a jurisdiction over the burghs in
matters respecting the trade and general policy of
the kingdom. The chamberlain, in the discharge
of his duty, was constrained to make periodical
progress through the kingdom, to adjust the stand-
ards, weights and measures, kept in the different
burghs. It was also his duty to detect any imposi-
tion that might be practised by the king's servants,
in exacting more goods at the king's price (which
was lower than the market) than what were re-
quired for his service, and thereby making a profit
to themselves. From the regulations of the Cham-
berlain's Court, it appears that inspectors were
appointed to examine and certify, by their seal of
* P. 668.
t Annals of Commerce, vol. i. p. 397 & 398.
I Philosophical Transactions, vol. xxi. p. 230.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. i.
office, the quantity and quality of cloth, bread, and
casks containing liquors ; and that other officers,
called " Troners," had the inspection of wool.
Salmon fishings also were carefully regulated ; and
fishing during the night, or while the salmon were
not in season, was prohibited *.
The great councils of the nation, from whence all
the laws emanated, had their meetings at Scone ;
and the promulgation of any new act was preceded
by the ringing of the great bell of the monastery
where the meetings were held. By this practice
"the bell of Scoon" became, in time, a cant ex-
pression for the law of the land f. These councils
were almost solely attended by the barons and
ecclesiastics of the highest rank. Neither mer-
chants nor burgesses were admitted. Representa-
tions, therefore, from the Chamberlain's Court, and
the Court of the Four Burghs, afforded the only
chance for correcting the mistakes which might
arise from the ignorance of these aristocratic legis-
lators.
From the intercourse which existed between
Scotland and England during the long interval of
peace, previous to the aggression of Edward, the
manners, particularly of the higher classes, were
in many respects nearly the same. The frequent
intermarriages tended, more than any other cause,
to render the inhabitants of the two countries fami-
liar with the habits and customs of each other, while
both imitated the French in dress and language ;
and their domestic economy, in numerous instances,
also bore a close resemblance. .
Though the barons and churchmen among the
Scots had no taste for the high-spiced wines so
much relished by the English, yet in the viands
which graced their festivities, particularly those
who held lands in England, there appeared to have
been little or no alteration. On great occasions,
the seal, the porpoise, and the wild boar, though
now banished from the table, never failed to make
their appearance. Venison pasties, game, poultry,
and baked meats of all descriptions, with fish in
endless variety, were common at the tables of the
great. Shell-fish, particularly oysters, were much
in demand among the ecclesiastics. This is evi-
dent from the quantity of shells which are still to
be found in digging about the ruins of religious
establishments. The frequent recurrence of those
periods when food of an opposite description was
forbidden, sufficiently accounts for this profusion.
Among the culinary preparations that were pecu-
liar to Scotland, one known by the name of Mlr-
Mor, was held in the highest estimation. This
savoury dish always had a place at the royal table ;
and so much was it a favourite, that in the tradi-
tionary songs of the Gaelic bards, it is mentioned
as a viand fit only for a hero, and represented by
them to be given as such by Fingal to his friend
Goll Mac-mhairn, in addition to his beaih-jvr, or
"champion's meal," which he received sitting at
the right hand of the royal donor. Of this highly-
prized morceau frland, minced meat, marrow, and
herbs, were the principal ingredients ; and in this
composition it is not difficult to trace the origin
* Macpherson's Annals of Commerce, vol. i. p. 440.
t The following proverb is still floating on the breath of
tradition among the Highlanders — "Mar thubhairt clay
Scdin, an rud nach buin duit na buin da;" "As the bell of
Hcoon rang, what belongs not to you meddle not with."
of the " Haggles," a dish still considered national
among the Scots.
Were it a fair criterion to estimate the strength
and importance of a country by the princely reve-
nues of its church establishment, Scotland, in the
thirteenth century, might be considered as holding
a very respectable rank among the nations of Eu-
rope. The deference which the Roman pontiffs,
on various occasions, paid to the kings of Scotland,
while it displayed their anxiety to preserve, by
conciliatory conduct, the spiritual supremacy in
the kingdom, also shows that the national or pa-
triotic feelings of the Scottish ecclesiastics were
stronger than those ties which connected them with
the See of Rome ; for, by their well-timed support
of the royal authority, the thunders of the Vatican,
so terrible in other countries, rolled harmlessly
over without distracting the state ; and the king
was often enabled to contest, and bring to a favour-
able termination, those differences which arose be-
tween him and the Pope, with whose legates he
frequently assumed very high ground, not only
forbidding them his presence, but even refusing
them a safe conduct through his dominions.
To give any thing like a satisfactory account of
the revenues of the several ecclesiastical endow-
ments, would occupy a space not consistent with
the design of the present work. It may, however,
be briefly stated, that the wealth of the church did
not altogether arise from her spiritual emoluments.
Agriculture, and various branches of traffic, en-
gaged the attention, and increased the riches as
well as the luxuries of the priesthood. In 1254
the Cistercian monks were the greatest breeders of
sheep in England. Being exempted from duties,
their wealth rapidly increased. That they possessed
similar privileges in Scotland, is pretty evident ; for
in 1275 *, when Bagamont, an emissary from Rome,
* The name and labours of this priest have created a little
perplexity among the learned. He appears to have made a
sort of census of the kingdom, in which the names of the
bishops, abbots, priors, parsons, vicars, abbesses, earls,
barons, knights, freeholders, and communities of cities
and burghs, were registered. This roll, in which their
rentals were stated, is known in Scottish history by the
name of "Bagimont's Roll," and was always referred to in
disputes respecting church property. For the purpose of a
like assessment, Bagamont appears to have made a similar
census in England. A copy of the Scotch roll, carried off
most likely by Edward, along with the other documents,
from Scone, was found in the Tower of London, and given
to the world, by the more modern historians of England, as
the " Homage Roll of Scotland," under the cognomen of
" Ragman's Roll." The disgrace which this document
seems to infer, is pathetically bewailed by Abercromby. If
he had turned to the learned Bishop of Carlisle's Scottish
Historical Library, p. 53, his grief might have been a little
assuaged by the following passage: — "One of the most
ancient repertories of the primitive state and rights of the
Scottish church, is the old Book of the Taxation of Eccle-
siastical Benefices, whereof Sir John Skene has given us the
following account. (1) ' The Pape, in the time of King (2)
James the Third, sent in this realm ane cardinal and legate,
called Bagimont : quha did make ane taxation of all the
rentals of the benefices, that the samin might be knawin
to the Pape : to the effect, that, when any person came to
Rome seikin Bulles, or right to ony benefice fra him, he
might conform to the said rental as he pleased, sell the
samin for sa meikle silver or gold as he thocht maist profit-
(1) De Verb. Sign, in voce Bagimont.
(2) It should be Alex.
CHAP. II.]
ON THE CLAIM OF ENGLAND TO FEUDAL HOMAGE.
was sent to levy a tenth on the property of the Scot-
tish church for the relief of the Holy Land, this
wealthy order of temporal as well as spiritual shep-
herds, compounded for the enormous sum of 50,000
merks. By this compromise, the amount of their
revenues remained unknown.
The following is part of the live-stock, which
(according to an inventory preserved in the char-
tulary of Newbottle) at one time belonged to the
Abbey of Melrose, viz. 325 forest mares, fifty-four
domestic mares, 104 domestic horses, 207 stags or
young horses, thirty-nine three-year old colts, and
172 year old colts. Amidst all this profusion of
wealth, the serious reader may desire to know how
the ceremonials of religion were attended to. From
the many jokes which Fordun relates as having
taken place among the clergy of his day, we cannot
suppose that either the teachers or the people were
more devout than their neighbours. An old writer
describes the interior of a cathedral as a place
where the men came with their hawks and dogs,
walking to and fro, to converse with their friends,
to make bargains and appointments, and to show
their guarded coats ; and among the Scots, it is
well known, weapons were too often displayed on
such occasions.
From what has been stated in the foregoing
pages, it is pretty evident that Scotland occupied
a more prominent station among the nations of
Europe, before the aggression of Edward I. than
she has ever done since. The single fact, that
Alexander II. mustered and led to the borders of
England, in 1244, an army of 100,000 foot, with a
well-appointed body of cavalry, proves that, at the
period under review, when the numerical strength
of the two British kingdoms were marshalled, the
inferiority of Scotland was by no means very ap-
parent. An army so numerous as that we have
able.' This is by no means exact, nor answerable to what
we commonly have from that learned writer ; for that very
law of (3) James the Third, to which' he refers, cites this
taxation by the name of the ' Provinciallis Buik, or the auld
taxation of Bagimont ;' and shows, that in this King's time,
endeavours were used to raise the values of the livings above
what they were rated at, to the advantage of the Court of
Rome, and against ' the common gude of the realme.' This
act was confirmed by his son and successor James the
Fourth, who made (4) the crime capital in laymen, ordaining
that all such should ' tine their life and gudes.' We are,
therefore, still in the dark as to the true author of this
ancient valuation ; being certainly misinformed of the time
wherein he lived, and (perhaps) knowing as little of his
proper name. If I' may be allowed to offer my conjecture, I
should guess that this ecclesiastical survey is about the same
age with that which was made (of the lands in England) by
our Edward the First; and possibly the names of (5) Rage-
man and Bagimont were heretofore one and the same. What
this or the other means, or how both have been corrupted,
let the nicer etymologists inquire."
(3) Vide Spotswood, lib. 2. p. 46. (3) Parl. 6. Ja. 3. Act 43.
(4) Parl. 4. St. 39.
(5) Vide D. Hen. Spelman. Gloss, in voce Rageman, and
Repository of Records, p. 26. Had this candid and generally
correct writer referred to Fordun, Book X. chap, xvii., he
might have satisfied himself as to the date, origin, and nature
of this roll, as well as the name and character of its author.
The alteration of Bagimont to Rageman, is evidently an
English corruption, which the writers of that country ought
to be best able to explain. Ragman's Roll, as a roll of vas-
salage to Edward, is unknown to ancient English and Scot-
tish historians.
mentioned, no subsequent monarch of that king-
:lom ever had it in his power to bring into the field.
On the death of Alexander III. the prosperity of
Scotland became eclipsed — anarchy overspread the
land — the machiavelism of her arch-enemy pre-
vailed— her ancient glory was trampled in the dust
— and commerce deserted a country overrun with
the horrors of war. Thus, in the emphatic language
of the Bard, " Oure gold wes changyd into lede ; "
" and," says MacPherson, a our fishermen and
merchants into cut-throats and plunderers, whose
only trade was war, and whose precarious and only
profit was the ruin of her neighbours."
CHAPTER II.
ON THE CLAIM OF ENGLAND TO THE FEUDAL HOMAGE
OF SCOTLAND.
SCOTLAND, at various periods of her history, has
been placed in situations of imminent peril, from
the encroachments and invasions of her ambitious
neighbour in the South. Misled by an insatiable
thirst for conquest, the English monarchs were
either prosecuting their views of aggrandizement
on the continent of Europe, or disturbing the tran-
quillity of Britain by endeavouring to subvert the
liberty and independence of her states. The Welsh,
after being driven from the most fruitful of their
domains, continued an arduous but ineffectual
struggle for their freedom, amid the few barren
rocks and valleys that remained to them 'of their
ancient and once flourishing kingdom. The Scots,
though always numerically inferior to the English,
and, from the comparative poverty of their country,
deficient in those internal resources which their
richer neighbours possessed ; yet, from their war-
like propensities, their parsimonious habits, and
that love of independence which formed so striking
a feature in the character of all the tribes of which
the nation was composed, were either prepared to
guard the frontier of their kingdom, or retaliate an
aggression by invading the territories of the enemy.
This last measure was the mode of defence they
chiefly resorted to ; aware that, with the exception
of Berwick, the English, without advancing farther
into the country than was consistent with their
safety, would find no booty equivalent to what
could be driven by the Scots from the fertile plains
of their more wealthy opponents. These hostilities
were frequently embittered by a claim of supe-
riority which the English urged against the crown
and kingdom of Scotland ; and as the attempts
which were made, from time to time, to enforce it,
have produced more misery and bloodshed than
any other national quarrel that ever existed be-
tween the two countries, an inquiry into the nature
and foundation of the alleged plea of vassalage, may
be of importance in elucidating the conduct of the
conflicting parties in the following narrative. In
this inquiry, we shall dispense with any reference,
either to " Brute the Trojan" on the one side, or
to that no less questionable personage, " Scota,
daughter to the King of Egypt," on the other ; and i
proceed, at once, to the only well-authenticated evi-
dence that exists on the subject.
In the year 1174, William, King of Scotland, dis-
satisfied with the conduct of Henry II. of England,
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. ii.
invaded Northumberland, instigated thereto by a
sense of his own wrongs, real or imaginary, and
those discontented barons who wished to place the
young king on the throne, — an ambitious youth,
whom his father had imprudently allowed to be
crowned during his own lifetime. While the nu-
merous army of William was spread over the ad-
jacent country, wasting, burning, and slaying with
that indiscriminate recklessness peculiar to the
age ; he, with a chosen band of his followers, be-
sieged the Castle of Alnwick. The devastations
committed by the marauding army of the Scots
inflamed the minds of the barons of Yorkshire with
a generous indignation ; and they determined to
exert themselves for the relief of their distressed
countrymen. Having congregated at Newcastle to
the number of four hundred horsemen, encased in
heavy armour ; they, though already fatigued with
a long journey, pressed forward under the command
of Sir Bernard de Baliol ; and, by travelling all
night, came in sight of the battlements of Alnwick
Castle by daybreak. William, it would seem, had
been abroad in the fields, with a slender escort of
sixty horse ; and, mistaking the English for a de-
tachment of his own troops, he was too far advanced
to retire, before he became sensible of his danger.
" Now it will be seen who are true knights," said
the intrepid monarch, and instantly charged the
enemy. His efforts, however, were unavailing ; he
was soon overpowered, and, along with his com-
panions, made prisoner.
The chivalry of Yorkshire thus secured for their
monarch a valuable prize. The magnanimity of
Henry, however, was not equal to the gallantry of
his subjects ; for, on getting possession of the un-
fortunate prince, he inflicted on him every possible
mortification. Not satisfied with exhibiting his
rival, like a felon, with his feet tied under his
horse's belly, to the rude gaze of the vulgar ; he
summoned all his barons to Northampton, to wit-
ness "the humiliating spectacle of a sovereign
prince exposed in public to a new-invented indig-
nity *."
It may appear difficult to account for this treat-
ment of a royal captive, taken under such circum-
stances, in an age when the honours of chivalry
were eagerly sought after by all the crowned heads
of Europe. When we reflect, however, that on
the Thursday preceding the capture of William,
Henry himself had been ignominiously scourged
at the tomb of his formidable enemy, Thomas a
Becket, his lacerated feelings might, perhaps, have
found some relief in this public exhibition of his
power to inflict, on a brother monarch, something
of a similar degradation.
William was at first committed prisoner to Rich-
mond castle, in Yorkshire ; but Henry, either from
apprehension of his being insecure among the
scarcely-extinguished embers of the late insurrec-
tion, or wishing to enhance his value in the eyes of
the Scots, by removing him to a greater distance,
had him conveyed beyond seas, to Falaise in Nor-
mandy. Meanwhile, the Scottish army, thunder-
struck at so unusual a calamity, after some ineffec-
tual and misdirected attempts at revenge, abandoned
their spoil, and hastily retreated to their own coun-
try. Alarmed, however, at the irregularities which
the absence of the head of their government was
* Hailes, 137, 138.
likely to produce among the discordant and inflam-
mable materials of which the kingdom was com-
posed, they too hastily agreed to the ignominious
terms proposed by the enemy ; and submitted to
their king becoming the liegeman of Henry for Scot-
land., and all his other territories ; and further,
" The King of Scotland, David, his brother, his
barons, and other liegemen, agreed that the Scot-
tish church should yield to the English church
such subjection, in time to come, as it ought of right,
and was wont to pay in the days of the kings of Eng-
land, predecessors of Henry. Moreover, Richard,
bishop of St. Andrew's, Richard, bishop of Dun-
keld, Geoffrey, abbot of Dunfermline, and Herbert,
prior of Coldingham, agreed that the English
church should have that right over the Scottish
which injustice it ought to hate. They also became
bound, that they themselves would not gainsay the
right of the English Church."
" A memorable clause ! " says Lord Hailes,
" drawn up with so much skill as to leave entire
the question of the independence of the Scottish
church. Henry and his ministers could never
have overlooked such studied ambiguity of expres-
sion. The clause, therefore, does honour to the
Scottish clergy, who, in that evil day, stood firm to
their privileges, and left the question of the inde-
pendence of the national church to be agitated, on
a more fit occasion, and in better times."
" In pledge for the performance of this miserable
treaty, William agreed to deliver up to the English
the castles of Rokesburgh, Berwick, Jedburgh,
Edinburgh, and Stirling, and gave his brother David
and many of his chief barons as hostages."
Thus stood the right of England to feudal homage
over Scotland in 1175. A superiority, acquired in
such an ungenerous manner, was not likely to be
long submitted to with patience. The Scots had
always plumed themselves on being an unconquered
people, and able to preserve their independence
against all who had attempted to invade them.
Vassalage implies protection ; — it was therefore pre-
sumption in England to pretend to defend Scotland
against those enemies before whom she herself had
been obliged to truckle.
It was not long before the conduct of William
displayed that covered scorn of his liege-lord, which
his late injuries were calculated to inspire. Coun-
tenanced by him, the Scottish bishops, at a council
held at Northampton, boldly declared, in the pre-
sence of the Pope's legate, ((that they had never
yielded subjection to the English church, nor ought
they."
Wiiliam also entered the lists with the Roman
Pontiff, — before whose threats and anathemas
Henry had so ignominiously crouched : — yet,
though all the thunder of the Vatican was levelled
against him, — and the Archbishop of York, armed
with Papal authority, had not only excommuni-
cated him, but placed the kingdom under an inter-
dict ; still he maintained his point with inflexible
resolution, till the judgment of the apostolic father
was annulled, and an honourable compromise ob-
tained. The contrast thus exhibited by his vassal
could not be very consoling to the feelings of the
English monarch.
In the year 1178, William, in the same spirit,
Founded and amply endowed an abbey at Aber-
brothick, in honour of the holy martyr, Thomas a
Becket, — a saint who had been thrust down the
CHAP. II.]
ON THE CLAIM OF ENGLAND TO FEUDAL HOMAGE.
71
throat of his liege-lord with the salutary application
of the whip. It would be doing William injustice
to doubt the sincerity of the gratitude which insti-
gated him to this act of munificence.
In 1189, Henry II. died, and was succeeded by
his son Richard Coeur de Lion. Unlike his father,
Richard, though haughty and imperious, was alive
to all the noble and virtuous qualities which ought to
constitute the character of a king. As soon after
the obsequies of his father as decency would per-
mit, he invited William to his court at Canterbury,
and magnanimously restored Scotland to her inde-
pendence. The important document runs thus —
" That Richard had rendered up to William, by the
grace of God, King of Scots, his castles of Rokesburgh
and Berwick, to be possessed by him and his heirs
for ever as their own proper inheritance."
" Moreover, we have granted to him an acquit-
tance of all obligations which our father extorted
from him by new instruments, in consequence of his
captivity ; under this condition always, that he shall
completely and fully perform 'to us whatever his
brother Malcolm, King of Scotland, of right per-
formed, or ought of right to have performed, to our
predecessors *." u Richard," says Lord Hailes,
" also ordained the boundaries of the two kingdoms
to be re-established as they had been at the cap-
tivity of William." He calls them, " the marches of
the kingdom of Scotland (marchice regni Scotia").
" He became bound to put William in full pos-
session of all his fees in the earldom of Huntingdon
or elsewhere (et in omnibus aliis), under the same
conditions as heretofore."
" He delivered up all such of the evidences of
the homage done to Henry II. by the barons and
clergy of Scotland, as were in his possession, and
he declared, that all evidences of that homage,
whether delivered up or not, should be held as
cancelled."
" The price which William agreed to pay for
this ample restitution, was ten thousand merks
sterling."
It is with difficulty a smile can be suppressed
when we find, even in the nineteenth century, an
author of such learning and talents as Dr. Lingard,
endeavouring to fritter away the meaning and import
of the above deed of restitution, by such fallacious
reasoning as the following : " The King's " (Rich-
ard I.) " CHARTER to the King of Scots may be
seen in Rymer, i. 64. It is NOT, as sometimes has
been supposed, a FORMAL RECOGNITION OF THE IN-
DEPENDENCE OF SCOTLAND, but a recognition, on
the part of Richard, of all those RIGHTS which
Henry had extorted from William for his RANSOM.
In lieu of them he received ten thousand pounds,
probably the sum which William would have given
to Henry. The respective rights of the two crowns,
are now replaced on the same footing as formerly.
William was to do to Richard whatever Malcolm
ought to have done to Richard's predecessors, and
Richard was to do to William whatever they ought
to have done to Malcolm, according to an award to
be given by eight barons, to be equally chosen by
the two kings. Moreover, William was to possess
in England the lands which Malcolm had possessed ;
and to become the liegeman of Richard for all
lands for which his predecessors had been the liege-
men of the English kings. The award was after-
* Hailes, 155, 156.
wards given, by which it appears that the words
^ibertates, dignitates, honor es, debiti, &c. mean the
allowances to be made, and the honours to be
shown, to the King of Scots, as often as he came to
;he English court by the command of his lord the
English king, from the moment that he crossed the
3orders till his return into his own territories,
Rym. i. 87- This will explain the clause of Salvis
iujnitatibus suis, in the oath taken by the Scottish
kings, which some writers have ERRONEOUSLY CON-
CEIVED TO MEAN, SAVING THE INDEPENDENCE OF
THEIR CROWN *." If William was already the vas-
sal of Henry, where was either the policy or the
necessity of the latter bringing his right of homage
into question, by making it again a subject of nego-
ciation ? and if it was not for " A FORMAL RECOGNITION
OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF SCOTLAND5' that William
paid the ten thousand pounds (merks) to Richard,
for what purpose was that sum paid ? Henry ex-
torted no money from William for his " RANSOM ;"
his vanity being amply gratified by the deed of
"lomage. Richard had no claim to 10,000£. from
William, without granting him what he considered
an equivalent. This equivalent could not have been
the independence of the Scottish church; for even
during the reign of Henry, we find, by a note ap-
pended by the learned author to his work (vol. ii.
p. 397, 3d edit.), that when the obedience of the
Scottish church was demanded by the Archbishop
of York, " it was answered that none was due ;
and the answer, after a long controversy, was con-
firmed by Pope Clement III. in 1188."
How " Salvis dignitatibus suis " can be explained
so as not to include the independence of the monarch's
crown, we are much at a loss to perceive. One
thing, however, is sufficiently apparent, that the
sophistry we have quoted ought not to have found
a place in a publication of such acknowledged merit
as that of Dr. Lingard.
As he has evidently allowed the prejudices of
the old English chroniclers to warp his judgment
in this affair, we may be permitted, in order to
place the question on its proper basis, to quote the
following short passage from his own work, by
which it will be seen that the LION of England
showed as little pluck as HE of Scotland, when
placed in a similar situation. — " In an assembly of
the German princes and English envoys, by the
delivery of the cap from his head, he [Richard I.}
resigned his crown into the hands of Henry ; who
restored it to him again to be held as a fief of the
empire, with the obligation of a yearly payment of
five thousand pounds +." Had this claim been
prosecuted against England with the same pertina-
city as England advanced her absurd pretensions
against Scotland, it is presumed they would have
been repelled with similar scorn and derision.
Though the generosity of Richard towards Wil-
liam in the above transaction appears sufficiently
conspicuous, yet there was that in the situation of
his affairs which rendered it a matter of political
expediency. From the arrangements necessarily
connected with the crusade, in which he and his
barons were about to embark, it became a matter
of necessity, before he left Britain, to do something
towards smoothing down the mane of the chafed
Lion of Scotland. The gracious manner in which
the boon was conferred, fixed its proper value in
* Vol. ii. p. 443 and 444. f Vol. ii. p. 487, 3d edition.
10
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. ii.
the estimation of the Scots, and " converted an
impatient vassal and implacable enemy into a faith-
ful and affectionate ally."
English historians have, on this occasion, charged
Richard with impolicy. Happy would it have been
for both countries, if his successors had possessed
half the sagacity he displayed on this occasion.
The consequence of this prudent measure was a
cessation of hostilities between the two nations for
nearly a century. This tranquillity — uninterrupted
except by the assistance which Alexander II. ren-
dered the English barons, when engaged in pro-
tecting their liberties against the encroachments of
King John — was highly beneficial to both king-
dom. Intermarriages took place among the no-
bility, and to such an extent, that there were few
families of note but had their cpnnexions ; and
many became possessed of lands under both govern-
ments. Trade rose to be an object of attention,
and received encouragement from the legislature.
The Scottish burghs emerged from obscurity ; and
money became so plenty, that, though William had
given ten thousand merks for the resignation of
the homage of Scotland, and a farther sum of two
thousand *, to enable Richard to make up the ran-
som exacted from him by the emperor, still he was
able to offer fifteen thousand merks for Northum-
berland f, besides giving dowries upon the marriage
of his two daughters J, amounting to fifteen thou-
sand more. The burgesses of the towns had, in
this short interval, so much increased their means,
as to offer six thousand merks on this occasion.
The nobles offered ten thousand ; and on the
supposition that both ranks tendered according
to their ability, it may afford some criterion
for judging of their relative situations in pecu-
niary matters. Though all these drains had
been made on the treasury, yet Alexander II. was
able to give ten thousand merks, besides lands, as a
dowry to his second sister. He also sent § two
bishops as envoys to Haco, King of Norway, to
negociate the purchase of all the Western Isles,
which they entreated him to value in fine silver.
The overture, though declined by Haco, shows the
state of the precious metals among the Scots of
those days.
In the year 1234, though the resignation by
Richard must have been still fresh in the memory
of the English, Pope Gregory IX., at the request
of Henry, exhorted Alexander to perform the con-
ditions of the old treaty between Henry II. and
William of Scotland. Alexander had too great a
regard for the head of the Papal Church, to let him
remain long in ignorance of the impropriety of
such exhortations ; and with the same spirit which
characterized the conduct of his father towards the
see of Rome, refused, according to Lord Hailes ||,
"to receive a legate, whose original commission
respected England alone," as it " might be inter-
preted in a sense prejudicial to the independency
of the Scottish church. It is reported that Alex-
ander consented to his admission, at the joint re-
quest of the nobility of both kingdoms ; and that
he insisted for, and obtained a written declaration
from the legate, that this should not be drawn into
a precedent. Certain it is, that the legate pro-
ceeded not beyond Edinburgh, and that Alexander
* Chron. Melrose, p. 179. t Hoveden, fol. 420.
J Foedera, vol. i. p. 155. § Icelandic Chronicle.
|| Hailes, 188, 189.
avoided his presence." It is added, " The Legate
sojourned in the principal towns on this side the
sea, and having collected a large sum of money,
secretly, and without leave asked, he departed from
Scotland."
Lord Hailes continues, " Such was the magna-
nimity of Alexander II. that the high-spirited pon-
tiff, Gregory IX., submitted to soothe him by a
detail of specious and affected reasons, tending to
evince the propriety of a legation in Scotland."
The " church of Scotland," says that pope, " ac-
knowledges the Romish see as her immediate
mother in things spiritual. To leave her destitute
of the consolation of a legate from us, would be
an indignity which we cannot in conscience allow.
Were we, by our legate, to visit the church of
England, and yet neglect the neighbouring church
of Scotland, she might think us destitute of maternal
affection."
In 1239, Alexander married Mary de Couci,
daughter of a powerful baron in Picardy. The
politics of this lady's family were adverse to Eng-
land, and Henry became jealous of her influence
over her husband. Various circumstances occurred
to foster the seeds of animosity in the mind of the
English monarch ; among other things, it was told
him that Alexander had said, that " he owed no
homage to England for any part of his territories,
and would perform none." Henry secretly pre-
pared for war, by soliciting succour from the Earl
of Flanders, and instigating the Irish to invade
Scotland ; while he collected a numerous army at
Newcastle, ready to co-operate with them.
Though the claim of homage was not put forth
among the reasons for this display of hostility, yet
the real ground of quarrel was well enough under-
stood by the Scots ; and on that account the war
became so popular, that though Henry had inter-
cepted troops sent to aid Alexander by John de
Couci, his brother-in-law, he was enabled to con-
front his enemy with a formidable body of well-
appointed cavalry, and nearly one hundred thousand
foot, all hearty in the cause, and animated, by the
exhortations of their clergy, to the highest pitch
of enthusiasm. Under these circumstances, Henry
found it expedient to negociate ; and his lofty pre-
tensions were softened down to a very moderate
and reasonable agreement, viz. " Alexander became
engaged to live in amity with England, and never to
aid her enemies, unless the English should do him
ith such a character, Henry found it was in
vain to tamper. We, therefore, hear nothing more
of Scottish homage till after the death of Alex-
ander, who being succeeded by his son, a child of
eight years old, Henry solicited a mandate from
Pope Innocent IV. to the effect, " That Alexander,
being his liegeman, should not be anointed or
crowned without his permission. He also re-
quested a grant of the tenth of the ecclesiastical
revenues of Scotland." To expect that the last
request would have been granted, was preposter-
ous ; but Henry perhaps imagined, that by angling
with two hooks, he might chance to catch one fish.
"The Pope honestly and peremptorily rejected
both requests ; the first, as derogating from the
honour of a sovereign prince ; the second, as un-
exampled." In the mean time, the Scots, without
deigning to wait the decision of the pontiff, pro-
ceeded with the coronation of their infant sovereign.
CHAP. II.]
ON THE CLAIM OF ENGLAND TO FEUDAL HOMAGE.
11
On the 26th December, 1252, Alexander III.,
being about ten years of age, appeared at York, to
celebrate his nuptials with Margaret, daughter of
Henry III., to whom he had been betrothed in
1242. After doing homage for his estates in Eng-
land, Henry also demanded that he should do
homage for the kingdom of Scotland, as a fief
holding of England, " according to the usage re-
corded in many chronicles." The answer of Alex-
ander showed that his instructors had not left him
unprepared on the subject. He stated, " That he
had been invited to York to marry the Princess of
England, not to treat of affairs of state, and that he
could not take a step so important, without the
knowledge and approbation of his Parliament *."
Passing over the meanness of Henry, in endeavour-
ing to circumvent a child of ten years old, the futility
of thus practising upon a minor, ought to have pre-
vented such a proposal ; since he must have known,
that although Alexander had even then reached
the years of maturity, yet, without the sanction of
his Parliament, his compliance was unavailing.
Indeed Henry's attempt to entrap the innocence of
his son-in-law, would almost indicate that he was
I very far advanced in dotage.
Henry appears either to have seen his mistake
afterwards, or to have become ashamed of his
attempts on Alexander. In 1259, the Pope, having
appointed his own chaplain, John de Cheyam, an
Englishman, to the vacant see of Glasgow, Henry
thus writes to Alexander, who intended the vacancy
for Nicolas Moffat, Archdeacon of Teviotdale.
"Although he is my subject," said Henry, " I
would not solicit you in his behalf, could any benefit
arise to you from your opposition to a man on
whom the Pope has already bestowed ecclesiastical
jurisdiction."
In 1260, the Queen of Scotland became enceinte;
and being desirous to lie-in at her father's court,
Alexander accompanied her, after the following
clause was inserted in their safe-conduct, " That
neither the king nor his attendants should be re-
quired to treat of state affairs during this visit."
Henry also made oath, that he would return the
queen and her child in safety to the Scots.
In 1263, Henry affected to use his influence with
Haco, King of Norway, to desist from his hostile
intentions against Scotland. Haco denied such
intentions ; and Alexander, who perhaps questioned
the sincerity of Henry's interference, sent the
steward of Scotland to demand payment of the
arrears of his daughter's dowry. Henry made a
partial payment of five hundred merks, and pro-
mised the remainder in two instalments, one at
Michaelmas in 1263, and the other at Easter, 1264.
" I appoint such distant terms," said he, " because
I mean to be punctual, and not to disappoint you
any more." " To an English reader," says Lord
Hailes, " this might seem incredible ; but the
original instrument exists."
In 1268, Prince Edward, son of Henry, being
* This reply of Alexander has been noticed, by various
historians, as an uncommon instance of the precocity of the
royal intellect. Lord Hailes speaks of it as displaying " pru-
dence and resolution superior to his years." Without de-
tracting from the merits of Alexander, it might with more
propriety be considered as merely the well-conned lesson
given him by the watchful guardians of the independence of
bis nrown, whom experience had taught to be prepared for
the attempt.
about to engage in a crusade, Pope Clement IV.,
at the instigation of the English court, ordered the
Scottish clergy to pay a tenth of their revenues to
the King of England, to aid the undertaking. This
indirect attempt on their liberties was resisted by
Alexander and his ecclesiastics, who spurned at the
obnoxious assessment, though they declared their
willingness to furnish their proper quota of crusa-
ders. Adam, Earl of Carrick, and David, Earl of
Athol, with other barons, engaged in the expe-
dition.
On Michaelmas- day, 1278, Alexander, being
present in the English Parliament, swore fealty to
Edward, in general terms, for the lands held by
him of the crown of England. Edward accepted
it, " saving the claim of homage for the kingdom
of Scotland, whenever he or his heirs should think
proper to make it ;" an early development of the
views of this ambitious monarch, which did not
escape the notice of Alexander.
No further measures inimical to the independence
of Scotland, appear to have been taken till 1 284,
when Edward applied to Pope Martin IV. for " a
grant of the tenths collected in Scotland for the
relief of the Holy Land." The conduct of the pon-
tiff, however, showed the opinion he entertained of
the request. He made the grant under these con-
ditions all equally unpalatable or inconvenient to
the royal applicant : They were,' " That Edward
himself should assume the cross before Christmas,
— obtain the consent of the King of Scots, — and,
out of the money levied, supply the Scottish cru-
saders."
The following year, Scotland was deprived of
the prudent and watchful guardianship of her mon-
arch, who was killed by an accident, 16th March,
1285-6. At a grand council held at Scone, llth of
April, 1286, a regency was appointed for the gov-
ernment of the kingdom. The lineage of Alex-
ander had become extinct in his person, with the
exception of an infant grandchild, daughter of Eric,
King of Norway. This female, whose right to the
crown had been solemnly acknowledged by the
Scottish barons in 1284, was deemed by Edward a
desirable match for his son ; and he lost no time
in despatching ambassadors to Scotland to negociate
a marriage. From the comparatively good under-
standing that had prevailed between the two coun-
tries during the late reign, he found the Scots no
way opposed to his views. The proposal was there-
fore entertained ; and on the 18th of July, 1290,
the regents, clergy, and baronage of Scotland,
having met the ambassadors of England at Brig-
ham, situated on the north bank of the Tweed,
between Coldstream and Kelso, a treaty was con-
cluded, consisting of fourteen articles ; in all of
which not the slightest allusion is made to any
superiority over Scotland, with the exception of the
following clause : — " Saving always the right of the
King of England, and of all others which, before the
date of this treaty, belonged to him, or any of them, in
the marcJies, or elsewhere, or which ought to belong to
him, or any of them, in all time coming."
In the salvo thus artfully introduced, we have a
continuation of that quibbling, sinister, and narrow-
minded policy, which marked the conduct of the
English government in this disgraceful affair. After
the question had been so completely set at rest, it was
extremely irritating for the Scots, whenever any
national calamity befel them, to be annoyed by the
12
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. ii.
perpetual recurrence of such barefaced attempts
upon their liberties. Though the Kings of Scotland
repeatedly did homage to the Kings of England,
for the lands they held in that country, it was no
more than what the latter submitted to do to those
of France. When the English, therefore, strove,
by such insidious measures, to entrap the inexpe-
rience of the Scottish kings, and to encroach on the
independence of their crown, it engendered among
those who had the honour of their country at heart,
a bitterness of spirit, which, as the attempts were
persevered in, settled down to a deep-rooted and
inextinguishable animosity. There was no scarcity
of men in both countries, who had sufficient pene-
tration to see, and judgment to appreciate, the
advantages that might have been secured to all,
were the whole island united under one head. But,
from the ungenerous policy of the English, this
desirable object could not be attained, except by a
sacrifice on the part of the Scots, of all that ho-
nourable minds hold dear, — THE GLORIES OF A LONG
AND UNCONQUERED LINE OF ANCESTRY, THEIR OWN
INDEPENDENCE, AND THE CONSEQUENT DEGRADATION
OF THEIR OFFSPRING. These were the terms which
the English unjustly demanded ; and such terms
the Scottish nation as sternly rejected *. Events
have shown the soundness of their judgment ; and
their posterity may learn, from the history of Ire-
land, the extent of gratitude to which their patriot-
ism is entitled.
The question of homage has now been traced
from its origin to the negociation of Edward with
the Scots at Brigham. Had all other evidence
respecting the independence of Scotland been de-
stroyed, the existence of this treaty would alone
have annihilated the pretensions of Edward : for,
if the King of Scots had been the liegeman of the
English monarch, his daughter, or any unmarried
female succeeding to the throne of Scotland, would
of necessity have been a ward of the English
crown. Can it, therefore, for a moment be sup-
posed, that Edward I., a prince so feelingly alive
* The following quotation is from the work of a learned
Englishman.
" There is " (inter Poemata, M.S. D. R. Maithland, p.
S.Pepys, Armig.) "a manuscript account of Robert the
Third's contest with our Henry the Fourth, upon the subject
of Homage ; in the conclusion whereof (after the word Finjs)
is this inscription — The Ring (for Reign) of the Roy Robert,
made be Dean David Steill. In this the King of England
summons Robert to do fealty at London.
Eftir the richt of Brutus King,
Quhilck had all Ingland in governing, &c.
In return to which, 'tis affirmed that
Scotland evir yit hes bene free,
Sin Scota of JEgypt tuick the see.
It's likewise observ'd, that England itself (having been four
times conquer'd by the Romans, Saxons, Danes, and Nor-
mans) has little ground for such a challenge ; and ought to
remember how frequently she has miscarry'd in her adven-
tures of that kind. In conclusion, Robert proposes the de-
ciding this controversie by sixty against sixty (of the Royal
blood of both kingdoms), forty against forty, or twenty
against twenty : Or, if Henry approves it, that the two kings
themselves may end it in a single combat. In which last
offer, are these remarkable lines :
I proffer me to prief on the
At we and Scotland yit are free,
And of the Paip nothing we hauld,
But of the Kirk our Faith of auld."
See Nicholson's Scottish Historical Library, p. 154, 155, 8vo
ed. and 43 of4to.
to what he considered his prerogative, and whose
political sagacity and intimate acquaintance with
the whole system of jurisprudence had procured
for him the title of the " ENGLISH JUSTINIAN," would
have so far forgotten what was due to himself, as
to submit to negotiate, where he had a right to
command ?
The views, however, of both parties in the above
treaty, were not destined to be realized. The
young queen, the object of such solicitude, and on
whom the hopes of the Scottish nation were sus-
pended, sickened on her voyage, and died at Orkney
about the end of September, 1290. No provision
had been made for the succession to the Scottish
crown, beyond the offspring of Alexander ; and, as
Lord Hailes judiciously remarks, " the nation
looked no farther, and perhaps it durst not look
farther." Under these circumstances, the sceptre
of Scotland became a bone of contention between
the leaders of two powerful factions : and there
being no third party in the country able to control
and enforce the submission of the unsuccessful
claimant, it was deemed expedient to submit their
pretensions to the arbitration of the King of Eng-
land. Edward, who watched every opportunity of
aggrandizing himself at the expense of his neigh-
bours, had determined, whether solicited or not, to
interfere in the disposal of the Scottish crown.
Having summoned the barons of Yorkshire, Lan-
cashire, Westmoreland, Cumberland, and North-
umberland (among whom were Bruce and Baliol, the
two competitors for the Scottish throne), to meet him,
with horse and foot, at Norham, on the 5th of June,
he desired the nobility and clergy of Scotland to
assemble at the same place on the 10th May.
A conference accordingly was held, when Ed-
ward commanded Roger le Brabazon, Justiciary of
England, to inform the assembly, in his name,
" That he had considered the difficulties in which
'the kingdom of Scotland was involved by the death
of Alexander and his offspring, and the dangers
arising from disputed succession : that his good
will and affection to the whole nation, and to each
individual in it, were sincere, for in their defence he
himself was interested : that he had called the Scots
to meet him at this place, with the view that justice
might be done to all the competitors, and the in-
ternal tranquillity of the kingdom established : that
he had undertaken a long journey to do justice,
in person, to all, as Superior and Lord Paramount
of the kingdom of Scotland: that he meant not to
encroach on the rights of any man ; but, on the
contrary, as Lord Paramount, to administer ample
and speedy justice to all."
That his purposes might be the more effectually
accomplished, he required their hearty recognition
of his title as Lord Paramount ; and he declared
his willingness to use their advice in the settlement
of the nation.
The whole assembly stood motionless and silent.
At length some one had the courage to utter these
words : — " No answer can be made while the
throne is vacant." " By holy Edward ! " cried
the king ; " by holy Edward, whose crown it is
that I wear, I will vindicate my just rights, or
perish hi the attempt * ! " The Scots requested a
delay in order to inform those of their countrymen
who were absent ; and, hi consequence, the pro-
• Hailes, p. 243, 244.
CHAP. III.]
HIS BIRTH, PARENTAGE, AND EARLY YEARS.
13
ceedings were put off till the next day. A further
delay was then requested ; and they were allowed
a term of three weeks. By that time, Edward
knew that the barons he had summoned would be
assembled in arms.
This power was, no doubt, intended to insure the
submission of the Scots. Enemies, however, more
dangerous than the English barons, were at work
in their councils. Amongst the secret emissaries
of Edward, William Frazer, Bishop of St. An-
drew's, and one of the regents, acted with treacher-
ous duplicity towards his colleagues. A partisan
of Baliol, he scrupled at no means, however dis-
graceful, provided they advanced the interest of
his employer *. Conduct of this kind could not
well be concealed ; it quickly engendered animosity
and distrust among those who adhered to the in-
terest of Bruce. Weakened, therefore, by their
jealousies, and disunited by their conflicting inter-
ests, the aristocracy of Scotland soon became as
subservient as the crafty usurper could desire.
Edward, finding them in this manner moulded to
his purpose, and wishing to take away the appear-
ance of compulsion, appointed the Scots to meet
him at Upsettlington, within the boundary of their
own country. The Bishop of Bath, who was the
Chancellor of England, resumed the proceedings
of the adjourned meetings. He stated, that " by
various evidences, it sufficiently appeared that the
English Kings were Lords Paramount of Scotland,
and, from the most distant ages f, had either pos-
sessed, or claimed that right ; that Edward had
required the Scots to produce their evidences or
arguments to the contrary, and had declared him-
self ready to admit them, if more cogent than his
» Baliol, who, on the death of the Scottish queen, assumed
the title of " H ceres regni Scotice" had engaged the powerful
interest of the Bishop of Durham, by a grant of all the
manors possessed by Alexander III. in Cumberland ) — or, in
the event of Edward refusing to sanction the grant, fifty
manors in Scotland, in lieu of them. Had any of the other
competitors been preferred, this grant must have fallen to
the ground. — Original Charter in possession of Mr. Astle,
and published in his Account of the Seals of the Kings of
Scotland, p. 22. It is more than probable that the influence
and services of the Bishop of St. Andrew's had been secured
by prospects perhaps equally advantageous.
t In support of this claim, Dr. Lingard has, with great
industry, collected the evidence afforded by the ancient
chronicles of England from Brutus downward. These fabri-
cations of the cloistess, however, are contradicted by events,
respecting the truth of which the historians of both countries
are agreed. It is rather singular, that when John became
the liegeman of the See of Rome, and, with the consent of
his barons, surrendered THE " KINGDOMS OF ENGLAND
AND IRELAND TO BE HELD OF THE POPE IN FEE, FOR
A THOUSAND MERKS," that he should have tricked his
holiness out of THE KINGDOM OF SCOTLAND. Surely the
example of Ananias was lost on the English monarch, when
he thus trifled with the church, and kept back a third of his
kingdoms. Dr. Lingard does not inform his readers how
the watchful guardian of "the Patrimony of St. Peter"
came to wink at so gross an imposition.
After all that the learned doctor has advanced on the sub-
ject, it is pretty plain, that the homage of England over
Scotland is something like that which was extorted by St.
Dunstan from a certain potentate who shall be nameless.
Though the saint compelled him to cry peccavi, in a manner
that made a great noise in the world at the time, yet, when
he became relieved from the scrape, and had got his nose in
order, his saintship found his vassal as troublesome and evil-
disposed as ever.
own, and upon the whole matter to pronounce
righteous judgment ; that as the Scots had pro-
duced nothing, the King was resolved, as Lord
Paramount, to determine the question of the suc-
cession *."
The Scots were right in refraining from the dis-
cussion of a question which they knew had long
since been set at rest. Had they entered the
arena, they would have found themselves but ill-
prepared to meet the lawyers of Edward f, who
had possessed themselves of the chronicles and
other writings that were kept in those Scottish
monasteries, which had been under the charge of
English ecclesiastics. These records were after-
wards found to differ essentially from those kept
in monasteries where Scottish churchmen had the
superiority. In the muniments of the former, every
thing favourable to Scotland, respecting the ques-
tion, had either been suppressed, or rendered nuga-
tory by interpolation ; while in the archives of the
latter, her ancient independence and unsullied re-
putation were as clearly manifested. A reference,
however, to these falsified documents, surprised
and bewildered the inexperienced among the Scots.
It was part of the policy of Edward to increase
the difficulties of coming to a decision, by encou-
raging new candidates to come forward ; as their
claims, though futile, alarmed the original compe-
titors, and rendered them more obsequious to his
will. At this meeting eight claimants appeared for
the crown, and they were afterwards increased to
ten ; all of whom, including Bruce and Baliol,
acknowledged Edward as Lord Paramount of Scot-
land, and agreed that seizine of the kingdom and
its fortresses should be delivered to Edward ; " be-
cause," said they, "judgment cannot be without
execution, nor execution without possession of the
subject of the award." Edward was to find se-
curity for the faithful restitution of his charge in
two months from the date of his award.
In consequence of this agreement, Scotland and
her fortifications were surrendered into the hands
of her artful adversary on the llth June, 1291.
An universal homage was now required ; and
during the summer, many churchmen, barons, and
even burgesses, swore fealty to the usurper.
CHAPTER III.
BIRTH, PARENTAGE, AND EARLY YEARS OF WALLACE.
SIR WILLIAM WALLACE was descended from a
respectable family in the west of Scotland. His
father, who enjoyed the honour of knighthood, was
Laird of Elderslie and Auchinbothie, and married
the daughter of Sir Raynald, or, according to some,
Sir Hugh Crawford, sheriff of Ayr. The exact
period when the ancestors of Wallace first settled
in this country, is a matter of uncertainty J. It is,
* Hailes, p. 245, 246. t Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 248.
J A family of the name of Waleis also existed in England,
some of whom appear to have attained the highest civic
honours in the city of London. We are informed by Stowe,
that, in 1299, when part of the palace of Westminster, and
the public buildings of the adjoining monastery, were de-
stroyed by fire, a parliament was held by Edward in the
house of Henry Waleis, mayor of London, at Stebenheth,
14
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. in.
however, very probable that they were originally
from Normandy ; and those who support this opi-
nion mention one Eimerus Galleius, as the imme-
diate progenitor of the Scottish family of this name.
This person appears as a witness to the charter of
the Abbey of Kelso, founded by David I. about the
year 1128, and is supposed to have been the father
of Richard Wallace, one of the witnesses to the
charter of the Abbey of Paisley, founded in 1160,
by Walter, High Steward of Scotland. From the
Steward he received a grant of a considerable por-
tion of the district of Kyle, which he named
Richardton, or Richardtown, after himself. This
Ricard, or Richard, who was the most powerful
vassal of the Stewards in Kyle, granted to the
monks of Melrose the lands of Barmon and Gode-
neth, with their pertinents ; and this grant, as
appears from the Chart of Melrose, No. 127, Cale-
donia, III. p. 488, was confirmed by the second
Walter the Steward. Richard was succeeded by
his eldest son, also named Richard, who appears to
have altered, or softened down the name into
Walays. Respecting this last person, no particu-
lars have been related, except that he was cotem-
porary with Alan the High Steward, who died
about 1204. He was succeeded by his younger
brother, Henry Walays, who acquired some lands
under the Steward in Renfrewshire, early in the
thirteenth century ; which lands descended by in-
heritance to Adam Walays, who is stated to have
been living in the year 1259, and to have had two
sons, Adam and Malcolm. Adam, being the e'dest,
succeeded to the family estate of Ricardtown.
Malcolm, the father of our hero, received the lands
of Elderslie, and married, as we have already
stated, the daughter of the Sheriff of Ayr. Some
writers assert this to have been his second mar-
riage ; and farther, that by his first he had two
daughters, one of whom was married to Thomas
Haliday or Halliday, who held lands under Bruce
in Annandale ; while others maintain that he had
only two sons, Malcolm * and William, the former
by the first marriage, and the latter by the daughter
of Sir Hugh Crawford. It is, however, more than
probable that these two sons were the issue of one
marriage ; as Wyntown, who mentions the circum-
stance of his having an elder brother, takes no
notice of their being born of different mothers.
His elder brother is, by some, supposed, to have
been killed along with his father, Sir Malcolm, in
a skirmish with the English ; but this statement
seems at variance with Wyntown's couplet —
" Hys eldare Brodyre the herytage
Had, and joysyd in his dayis."
Vol. ii. p. 91.
From which it would appear, that the " eldare bro-
"when crokards, pollards, and rosaries, coyned in foreign
parts beyond seas, and uttered for sterlings, were cried
down." Henry Waleis was also mayor in 1300 ; and a person
of the same name is mentioned as having contributed largely
to the building of " St. Martyn's Church, in the vintry of
London ;" he is also said to have filled the office of mayor,
during which time he built a prison, called the Tun,
in Cornhill, for night-walkers. In 1296, when Edward
granted the citizens of London the right of electing their
chief magistrate, one William Waleis was called by the public
voice to the civic chair.
* Fordun says the name ef the elder son was Andrew, and
thus speaks of him — " Cujus frater senior miles Andreas
nomine, et militise cingulo succinctus."
dyre " outlived the father, since he succeeded to
" the herytage ;" and though he may have fallen
by the hands of the English, it must have been
subsequent to the death of his father.
Sir William, the subject of our narrative, was
born in the reign of Alexander III. The precise
year of his birth is not mentioned in any record at
present known to exist. It is usual, however, for
our historians to commence their accounts of him
in 1297, as if he had then, for the first time, \iurst
forth upon the notice of his countrymen, though
they are represented as being already prepared to
place implicit confidence in his talents as a leader,
without any explanation of his previous deeds to
merit the honourable distinction. In the preface
to one edition of Blind Harry, he is stated to have
been about twenty-seven years of age at the time
of his execution. This, however, would imply a
precocity of nature and strength, and a maturity of
judgment too miraculous not to be dwelt on at
greater length by those early writers who have
handed down his story. If he was twenty-seven in
1305, he would consequently be only nineteen in
1297. Can it be supposed that a youth of that age,
without influence, and without fame, would have
been able to persuade men, his superiors in birth,
years, and experience, to array themselves under
his banner, and submit to his control \ In the
work of the Minstrel, we are told
" Fourty and fyve off age, Wallace was cauld,
That tym that he was to [the] Southeron sauld."
As this, however, is at variance with what is
elsewhere stated in the same work, it is probably
an error of the transcriber, who may have mistaken
"thirtie" for "fourty," as we find it is said, in
" Buke Fyrst," in alluding to our hero, " Scotland
was lost quhen he was bot a child." The term
" child " here made use of, is not to be considered
as inferring that degree of infancy usually under-
stood in our day, but a youth acting, or able to act,
as page or squire to some feudal superior. That
this is the Minstrel's meaning, is evident from the
following lines :
" Yhit he was than semly, stark and bald ;
And he of age was bot auchtene yer auld,"
an age inconsistent with his being forty-five at the
time of his death. If we are to suppose that Henry
dated the loss of Scotland from the solemn surren-
der of the kingdom, and all its fortifications, to
Edward on the 1 1th of June, 1291, it will nearly
correspond with the correction now offered ; and
if his words are to be taken in the strict literal
sense, that he was thirty -five years of age on the
day he was betrayed to the English, it will follow,
that he was born on the 5th of August, 1270.
Wyntown, who first introduces him to notice in the
spring of 1297, says that he had already distin-
guished himself in such a manner, as to have ex-
cited the envy and animosity of the English soldiers.
In accordance with the above date, Wallace would
then be in his twenty-seventh year ; which, con-
sidering that there was no open rupture to call
forth the fiery spirits of the age till 1296, was al-
lowing him no more than a reasonable time for
spreading his fame among the English garrisons
stationed in Scotland.
1291. His early years are said to have been
CHAP. III.]
HIS BIRTH, PARENTAGE, AND EARLY YEARS.
15
passed under the superintendence of his uncle, a
wealthy ecclesiastic at Dunipace in Stirlingshire,
from whom he received the first rudiments of his
education. This worthy man had been at great
pains in storing his mind with the choicest apo-
phthegms to be found in the Latin classics, parti-
cularly those where the love of liberty is most power-
fully recommended ; and the efforts of the tutor
were amply rewarded by the amor patrice excited
in the breast of the pupil. How long he remained
at Dunipace is uncertain ; but he appears to have
been at Elderslie in 1291, when the order for an
universal homage of the people of Scotland was
promulgated by Edward, in his assumed character
of Lord Paramount. " All who came were ad-
mitted to swear fealty. They who came and re-
fused, were to be arrested, until performance ;
they who came not, but sent excuses, to have the
validity of their excuses tried in the next parlia-
ment ; they who neither came nor sent excuses, to
be committed to close custody *." The family of
Elderslie appear to have been among the last class
of recusants. Sir Malcolm, setting all the penal-
ties of non-conformity at defiance, resolutely re-
fused to take an oath so subversive of the inde-
pendence of his country. Aware, however, that
the strength of his fortalice at Elderslie was insuffi-
cient to protect him against the consequences of
his refusal, he retired with his eldest son to the
fastnesses of the Lennox, while William, along with
his mother, sought the protection of a powerful
relation at Kilspindie in the Carse of Gowrie ; and
from this latter place he was sent to the seminary
attached to the cathedral of Dundee, to receive
what farther education the learning of the age
afforded. Here he contracted a sincere and lasting
friendship with his biographer, John Blair, a young
man at that time of great promise, who, on finish-
ing his studies, became a Benedictine monk, and
afterwards officiated as chaplain to his heroic
friend.
With this faithful companion, and other youths
of similar dispositions, Wallace used to lament
over the degradation to which the country was
daily subjected ; and fired with indignation at the
growing insolence of the English soldiers, he formed
an association among his fellow-students for the
purpose of defending themselves, and restraining
the wanton outrages of the intruders, by chastising
their aggressions whenever the parties were to be
found in convenient situations. This, from the
licentious habits' of the soldiery, frequently oc-
curred ; and seldom were they allowed to escape,
without experiencing the effects of their vengeance.
In these juvenile bickerings, too unimportant to
attract the attention of those in authority, Wallace
had frequent opportunities of displaying that dex-
terity and strength, with which Nature had so am-
ply endowed him. In him, his companions found
united all the qualifications they could desire in
a leader — a head to devise, and a hand to execute,
the most daring enterprises — a fertile imagination
ever teeming with stratagems — and a prudence and
foresight which provided against all contingencies ;
so that, when once he determined on any project,
however difficult, they were always confident of its
being crowned with success.
It is not to be imagined that an association of
* Hailes, p. 253.
young men, among whom talents and bravery were
distinguishing characteristics, would not feel deeply
interested in the momentous crisis to which their
country was approaching. The ambition of Ed-
ward, and his designs against the independence of
their native land, were too apparent to escape the
notice of any who had not an interest in appearing
wilfully blind. The subserviency of those who
represented the aristocracy was, therefore, regarded
by their countrymen with feelings of humiliation
and shame. It happened unfortunately for their
characters, as well as for the safety of the country,
that most of the nobility held possessions on both
sides of the Tweed ; and their selfishness dictated
a line of policy extremely dangerous to the inde-
pendence of Scotland. A wish to preserve their
estates in both countries inclined them to a ready
obedience to whatever side was most 'likely to gain
the preponderance. Edward, who, in addition to
his conquests on the Continent, had annexed the
principality of Wales to the English crown, ap-
peared to them, in the distracted state of their
country's affairs, as very likely to consolidate
Britain under his powerful and energetic sway.
Under these feelings, they vied with each other in
their endeavours to propitiate the usurper by dis-
graceful compliances. The poorer gentry, how-
ever, entertained sentiments of a different descrip-
tion, and watched the progress of the submission
respecting the 'succession with feverish impatience.
1291. Since the surrender of the Regents on the
llth of June, the different towns and castles of
Scotland had been garrisoned by English soldiers.
Between the military and the inhabitants, as might
have been expected, brawls were of no unfrequent
occurrence — and in those which came under the
notice of our hero, he seldom remained an inactive
spectator. Gilbert de Umfraville * being removed
from the command of the castles of Dundee and
* This Gilbert de Umfraville, according to Dugdale, v.-as
descended from Robert de Umfraville, Knight of Tours,
otherwise called Robert with the Beard, who was a kinsman
of William the Conqueror. Having obtained a grant of the
Scottish as well as the English inheritance of Ingram de
Baliol, Umfraville became Earl of Angus, and was consti-
tuted governor of the castles of Dundee and Forfar. Justly
considering that he held these fortresses in charge from the
Scottish Regency, he could not surrender them to England,
unless Edward and the Scottish 'Regency joined in an obli-
gation to indemnify him. His demand was complied with ;
on which Lord Hailes remarks, that " he was the only Scots,
man who acted with integrity and spirit on this trial of
national integrity and spirit." But, unfortunately for even
this solitary instance of integrity, Gilbert de Umfraville was
an Englishman, and, as his conduct showed, a prudent, cau-
tious, circumspect man of the world, who wished to pre-
serve his possessions in both countries, by standing fair with
both governments. His request could not be objected to by
either of the parties. The expenses he laid out in main-
taining the castle were afterwards allowed him, in conse-
quence of a precept sent by Edward to the Bishops of St.
Andrew's and Glasgow, and the other guardians of the king-
dom. In 22 Edward I. (according to Dugdale) he was sum-
moned to Portsmouth, with horse and arms, to attend Ed-
ward on his expedition to France ; and in 23 Edward I. he
was summoned to Parliament, but not by the title of Earl of
Angus, till 25 Edward I., at which time, says the above
authority, " our lawyers of England were somewhat startled,
and refused, in their briefs and instruments, to acknow-
ledge him Earl, by reason that Angus was not within the
kingdom of England, until he "had openly produced the
king's warrant."
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. in.
Forfar, one Selby, the head of a freebooting family
in Cumberland, was appointed to succeed him.
His son, a fiery and impetuous youth, having too
rashly insulted Wallace, the latter struck him dead
on the spot with his dagger ; and, though sur-
rounded by the train of his insulter, effected his
escape to the house of a female dependent, who
concealed him from his pursuers. Besides young
Selby, two or three others, who attempted to inter-
cept him in his flight, were either killed or severely
wounded. The case, therefore, became one of too
serious a nature to be overlooked. The prudent
management of his preserver enabled him to quit
the town without being observed. An act of out-
lawry followed this slaughter ; and Wallace was
hunted from covert to covert by the emissaries of
the constable, who, eager to revenge the death of
his son, offered great rewards for his apprehension.
His success in eluding his pursuers was equal to
the boldness of his offence*.
After lurking among the woods and impenetrable
recesses of the country, till the heat of the pursuit
had subsided, Wallace ventured to communicate
with his relations at Kilspindie. The anxiety of
his mother respecting his fate required to be
relieved ; and, in obedience to her solicitation, to
remove himself further from the scene of danger,
he agreed to accompany her on a pilgrimage to the
shrine of St. Margaret at Dumfries. The dress
required for this purpose afforded a suitable dis-
guise ; and the respect paid by the English to a
saint of the royal blood of their country, insured,
* Lord Hailes, in remarking on this anecdote, as told by
Buchanan, says, " I suspect, however, that this is nothing
more than an abridgement of Blind Harry in classical Latin.
It may be remarked, by the way, that this is one of the most
specious tales in the book, for it is characteristical." The
value of his Lordship's " Historical Doubts " are now be-
ginning to be appreciated. There are many tales equally
specious, and equally characteristical, to be found in the
book, which his natural acuteness would have found no
difficulty in discovering, had he laid down the quill of the
lawyer, when he took up the pen of the historian. Mr.
Tyler gives the story, and quotes Wyntown as one of his
authorities. This is a mistake ; Wyntown is silent on the
subject ; and I suspect the truth of it must rest on the evi-
dence of the Minstrel, and traditions still current in the
country, among which are the following: — "Edward I.
thought Dundee of sufficient consequence to be occupied by
an English garrison ; and the illustrious Wallace (with his
companions, John Blair, probably of the Balthayock family,
and Sir Niel Campbell of Lochaw) is said by tradition to
have received his education at Dundee school, and, in this
situation, to have begun his exploits with the death of
the son of the English Governor." — Stat. Account, vol. viii.
p. 212, 213.
" There is a very respectable man in Longforgan (in
Perthshire), of the name of Smith, a weaver, and the farmer
of a few acres of land, who has in his possession a stone
which is called Wallace's Stone. It is what was formerly
called in this country a bear-stone, hollow like a large mor-
tar, and was made use of to unhusk the bear or barley, as a
preparative for the pot, with a large wooden mell, long
before barley-mills were known. Its station was on one side
of the door, and covered with a flat stone for a seat when
not otherwise employed. Upon this stone Wallace sat on
his way from Dundee, when he fled after killing the gover-
nor's son, and was fed with bread and milk by the good-
wife of the house, from whom the man who now lives there,
and is the proprietor of the stone, is lineally descended ;
and here, his forbears (ancestors) have lived ever since, in
nearly the same station and circumstances, for about rive
hundred years."— Stat. Account, xix. 561, 562.
in those days of superstition, all the facilities which
their situation required.
While our hero was thus employed, his father, it
would appear, had become obnoxious to the Eng-
lish ; but in what manner, we are left entirely to
conjecture. Whether they had endeavoured to
apprehend him, for disobedience to the order al-
ready alluded to, or if, driven from his house and
his resources, he found himself constrained to
retaliate upon his oppressors the injuries they had
inflicted, are circumstances respecting which all
authorities are silent.
An unfortunate rencounter, however, appears to
have taken place in the district of Kyle in Ayrshire,
between Sir Malcolm, at the head of a few of his
retainers, and a party of the English, under an
officer of the name of Fenwick ; in which, after a
gallant resistance, the Scots were defeated and
their chieftain slain. Blind Harry asserts, that the
brother of Wallace also fell on this occasion ; but
he is evidently mistaken, as it has already been
shown from Wyntown, that Sir Malcolm was suc-
ceeded in his estate by his eldest son.
The death of his father was not calculated to
lessen the animosity which Wallace had hitherto
entertained towards the English. Thirsting for
revenge, he spurned the offers of some of his rela-
tions, who proposed to use their influence to get
the act of outlawry recalled ; and having placed
his mother under the charge of his uncle Sir Ray-
nald Crawford, he again betook himself to the
woods.
The talents, strength, and dexterity of the young
outlaw, soon attracted to his fortunes a number of
reckless and intrepid spirits, inclined alike from
habit and from circumstances, to prefer a life of
savage and unrestrained liberty, to the uncertain and
degrading protection of those, who, though wearing
the mask of friendship, were daily wounding their
feelings, by their encroachments on the independ-
ence of their country.
1292. As Scotland, at that time, abounded with
game of every description, Wallace and his com-
panions found no difficulty in maintaining them-
selves in their woodland retreats ; from whence
also they could issue forth to surprise the English,
and supply themselves with those necessaries which
their situation otherwise prevented them from ob-
taining. However well disposed the regency and
barons of Scotland might have been to submit to
the claims of England, it was quite different with
the nation ; and the proceedings of Wallace,
though not sanctioned by the shadow of govern-
ment which still lingered in the country, were
viewed by the poorer classes of the Scots, not only
with indulgence, but with approbation. From the
prevalence of this feeling, he derived many im-
portant advantages, and much useful information
respecting the movements of his enemies.
At this early period of his history, his conduct
is said to have drawn upon him the notice of Tho-
mas of Ercildoune, otherwise named Thomas the
Rymer. This shrewd observer of the " signs of the
times," so highly appreciated his talents and hardi-
hood, as to risk his prophetic fame, then in its
zenith, by pointing him out to his countrymen as
the man destined to restore the ancient glory of
Scotland. His matchless strength and acute wit,
joined to the sagacity with which he gave effect to
his stratagems, tended, no doubt, to impress the
CHAP. III.]
HIS BIRTH, PARENTAGE, AND EARLY YEARS.
17
seer with this favourable opinion. Among the
stories told of his early years, the following are
perhaps entitled to a preference, on account of
their being, as Lord Hailes observes, " eharac-
teristical."
One day, having visited Ayr in disguise, his at-
tention was attracted by a crowd collected near the
quarters of the military. In the midst of a circle
of his own countrymen, there stood an English-
man of huge dimensions, playing off his raillery
against the Scots, and offering, for a groat, an op-
portunity of avenging any injury they might have
received from the English, by permitting the best
among them to exert their utmost strength in
striking a blow upon his back with a pole which he
held in his hand ; accompanying this absurd decla-
ration with certain ridiculous gestures and scurrilous
language, while his mailed companions, with arms
akimbo, stood loitering around, laughing, and en-
joying the humour of their bulky buffoon. Wallace
approached, and tendered treble the sum for the
permission offered. This was readily agreed to by
the jester, who winked to his companions as he
prepared to fulfil the conditions. The wary Scot
had observed the trick ; and, grasping the pole
above the place where it was intended to give way,
he let fall a blow with such good will, that the
spine yielded to its force, and the foolish witling
sunk with a groan at the feet of his companions.
Instantly the swords of the English were out to
revenge the slaughter of their favourite. One of
them, advancing towards the offender, received a
blow on the head, which laid him lifeless across
the body of the jester. Surrounded on all sides by
the increasing numbers of his adversaries, he plied
his weapon with a rapidity and a force which kept
the most forward of them at bay. Over the steel
bacinet of a powerful trooper, the fatal pole was
shivered to pieces. Others, seeing him, as they
imagined, disarmed by this accident, rushed for-
ward, expecting to overwhelm him with their
numbers ; but on drawing his sword, which he
had concealed under his dress, they as quickly
receded from the well-known power of his arm.
Having, by his trusty blade, cleared the way to one
of the outlets of the town, he was there attacked
by two of the boldest of the garrison, who had not
before mingled in the fray. The object of one of
them appeared to be, to engage him in a little
sword-play, and thus give his party an opportunity
of hemming him in, but Wallace, aware of the
value of his time, broke through the guard of his
artful opponent, with a blow which clove him to
the teeth ; while the other, in the act of retreating,
received a thrust through an opening in his armour,
which, reaching his vitals, laid him senseless by the
side of his companion. Five of the English sol-
diers had now fallen beneath the arm of the youth-
ful warrior ; and the rest seemed so averse to
come within his reach, that he had time to gain a
little copse in the neighbourhood, where he had
left his horse before he entered the town, and,
bounding into the saddle, the hardy trooper was
soon beyond the reach of any fresh assistance
they might procure. Horse and foot were, how-
ever, soon on the alert ; but after a long and fruit-
less pursuit, they were obliged to return, — some of
those who had already witnessed his prowess no
way displeased at their want of success.
The entire absence of any thing like fear, seems
to have formed the most prominent feature in the
character of Wallace. Although he had so nar-
rowly escaped on the above occasion, and also
aware of the ease with which he could be recog-
nised, yet it was not long before he ventured back
to the same place. The occasion was as follows : —
A report had circulated about the country, that
on a day named, a celebrated English prize-fighter
would exhibit on the esplanade at Ayr, as a gene-
ral challenger. An occurrence of this kind had
powerful attractions, in an age when every man
required to know something of the use of a sword.
Scots, as well as English, became deeply interested
as the day of exhibition drew on ; and Wallace,
instigated partly by curiosity, and partly by a wish
to acquire information respecting the numbers and
the motions of his enemies, determined to be pre-
sent. Having equipped himself and fifteen of his
companions with dresses which concealed their
habergeons, he proceeded to the scene of action.
Their horses they left in a place of safety outside
the town, and then made their entry from different
directions, in such numbers as would not attract the
notice of their enemies.
In the midst of the crowd collected to witness
the feats of the English champion, Wallace stood,
with his face partially concealed in his cloak, to all
appearance an unconcerned spectator, till he saw
several of his countrymen, who had been baffled
by the superior dexterity of their more practised
antagonist, afterwards scoffed at, and otherwise in-
sulted by the English soldiery. The feelings which
this conduct excited were displayed on the fine ex-
pressive countenance of our hero, in such a manner
as did not escape the notice of the victor ; and the
latter, flushed with his success, invited him to a
trial of his skill. Wallace readily accepted the
challenge ; and drawing his sword, prepared for
the onset. The ease and grace with which he
handled his weapon soon convinced the English
that their " buckler-player" had at last engaged in
a perilous enterprise. His art and agility appeared
unavailing against the cool self-possession of the
Scot, who, after a few passes, became the assailant ;
and a blow, which descended with the rapidity of
lightning, laid the arrogant gladiator dead at his
feet. This unexpected interruption of their amuse-
ment irritated the English ; but when they dis-
covered, in the successful combatant, the bold and
audacious outlaw with whom they had been so
lately engaged, they eagerly crowded round, and
endeavoured to prevent his escape. Unappalled
by the numbers with whom he was environed, he
dealt his blows in all directions with unerring and
deadly effect, while his followers, drawing their
swords, attacked those who were nearest them with
a fury that spread consternation and uproar
through the whole assemblage.
The English, finding themselves assailed from
so many quarters, conceived that they were sur-
rounded by a multitude of enemies. Wallace, al-
ways first in the place of danger, according to the
homely, but expressive phraseology of Blind Harry,
" Gret roume" about him "maid;" and the enemy
had already begun to give way, when an additional
force from the castle made its appearance. The
battle was now renewed with redoubled fury on
both sides ; and the capture of our hero being the
principal object in view, he became the subject of
their most inveterate hostility. The few, however,
18
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. iv.
who ventured within his reacli, soon paid the for-
feit of their temerity. Having collected his com-
panions in a body, he fearlessly advanced into the
centre of the English, diminishing their numbers
with every stroke of his broadsword, while his fol-
lowers pressed with determined ferocity upon those
who attempted to intercept him. From the in-
creasing number of his opponents, he at last be-
came apprehensive of having his retreat cut off, if
the unequal contest were much longer protracted.
Placing himself, therefore, in front of the battle he
ordered them to make the best of their way, while
he endeavoured to prevent the enemy from harass-
ing their rear. By incredible exertions, they at last
regained their post at the outside of the town ; and,
mounting their horses, they were soon lost to their
pursuers amid the shades of Laglane woods, leaving
about thirty of the English, among whom were
three knights belonging to Northumberland, dead
upon the streets of Ayr.
These, and similar exploits, appear to have fur-
nished employment to Wallace, during the time
that the English held possession of the country
under the nominal authority of the Scottish re-
gency. It will now, however, be necessary to re-
vert to the proceedings on the Border.
CHAPTER IV
ACCESSION OF BALIOL — SIEGE OF BERWICK — BATTLE
OF DUNBAR.
1292. THE submission respecting the succession
to the crown of Scotland was now drawing near a
close. There is reason to believe, that the know-
ledge of many of the humiliating circumstances,
which had occurred during its progress, had been
confined, in a great measure, to the parties engaged
in it. Enough, however, had transpired to excite
the jealousy of the poorer gentry, who having no
possessions out of Scotland, considered their honour
as inseparably connected with its independence.
When the edict, therefore, was proclaimed for a
general homage to the King of England, the na-
tional degradation became apparent, and the ser-
vility of their more powerful representatives was
regarded with undissembled mortification. The
dangerous practice of allowing the influential ba-
rons to hold lands in England, might now be regret-
ted ; but the fatal effects were, for the present,
beyond the power of remedy. Eager for the re-
moval of the English garrisons, and desirous for the
establishment of something like a regular govern-
ment, the body of the Scottish nation, concealing
their chagrin at the conduct of Edward, became
anxious for the decision. The machinations of
Frazer, and the influence of the Bishop of Durham,
at last determined the English king to declare in
favour of John Baliol, who received the crown with
all humility, and swore fealty to the royal arbiter,
as his liege-lord, at Norham, on the 20th Novem-
ber, 1292. On the 30th of the same month he was
crowned at Scone ; and, on the 26th December
following, he again repeated his oath of allegiance
at Newcastle.
1293. John, though he had not made a greater
sacrifice of the national dignity than the other can-
didates were prepared to agree to, soon found, on
his return to Scotland, that the station he had been
so desirous to attain, was surrounded by cares and
difficulties of no ordinary description. The con-
duct of Edward, too, in continually harassing Baliol
with summonses to attend complaints instituted
against him in the English courts, on very trifling
occasions, was a source of unceasing annoyance ;
and while the latter reflected on the indignities he
had already submitted to, he was conscious of having
forfeited every claim to the sympathy or respect of
his people, by the sacrifice he had made of their
independence. It seemed evident, indeed, that the
only chance which remained of recovering their
favour, was to renounce the fealty he had sworn,
and to afford them an opportunity of effacing, by
force of arms, the stigma that had been affixed to
their national character.
That this was the feeling of the Scots, is manifest
from the alacrity with which they came forward,
when Baliol, stung almost to madness by the
repeated insults received from his liege-lord, had
determined to throw off his allegiance. Levies of
Scottish troops had been ordered by Edward to be
made and sent to him, in order to be employed in
an expedition which he meditated against France.
This the newly-crowned vassal had neither the
inclination nor the ability to perform ; on the con-
trary, he secretly negociated an alliance with the
French king.
1294. The Scots assembled in parliament at
Scone ; and, " under the specious pretence of dimi-
nishing the public charge, they prevailed on Baliol
to dismiss all the Englishmen whom he maintained
at his court." " They then appointed a committee
of twelve — four bishops, four earls, and four barons
— by whose advice all national affairs were to be
regulated. If we may credit the English histo-
rians, they had a watchful eye over Baliol himself,
and detained him in an honourable captivity *."
This latter circumstance, more than any other,
evinces the feelings of the people on the occasion.
It would be difficult to say how Wallace was
employed at this particular period. It seems pro-
bable, that, relieved by the removal of the English
from the apprehensions he might have entertained
of the consequences of the act of outlawry, he
became permanently resident among his relations.
In a charter of James, Lord High Steward of Scot-
land, dated in 1294, confirming the donation of the
predecessors of Sir Arthur de Denoonf to the
monastery of Paisley, the witnesses are, Robert,
Bishop of Glasgow, John, the brother of the Lord High
Steward, Sir Arthur de Denoon, Sir Nicolas Camp-
bell, and Sir Reginald Crawford, Knights ; William
de Shaw, Alexander de Normanville, Esquires.
Though Wallace is not mentioned here, yet we
have the names of five of his future companions in
arms ; and it may be doubted if Sir Nicolas Camp-
bell, whose patrimony lay at such a distance, would
have made a journey to Paisley for the mere pur-
pose of witnessing a charter in which he had no
personal interest, had objects of greater moment
not attracted him to the spot ; — and possibly, a
wish to visit Wallace at Elderslie, of whom, as has
been already stated, he was a school-companion
and intimate associate, may in a more satisfactory
manner account for his appearance on that occa-
* Hailes, p. 284.
t Douglas' Baronage, p. 456,
1
CHAP. IV.]
ACCESSION OF BALIOL— SIEGE OF BERWICK.
19
sion, while the presence of Sir Reginald Crawford,
the uncle of Wallace, rather increases the proba-
bility of this conjecture. The association of the
names of so many parties with whom he was after-
wards so closely connected, is at all events a very
singular circumstance. The fame he had acquired
by the exploits already narrated, and the dangers
he had escaped, would no doubt have excited the
curiosity and the sympathy of his friends.
1295. The treaty which Baliol negociated with
France was peculiarly offensive to Edward. After
stating that the King of Scotland, " grievously af-
fected at the undutiful behaviour of Edward to the
King of France his liege-lord," he bound himself
to assist King Philip with all his power, and at his
own charge, in the event of Edward invading
France. Philip also agreed to aid the Scots, if
attacked by England, either by making a diversion
in their favour, or by sending succours. In this
treaty were included the prelates, earls, barons,
and other nobles of Scotland, as well as the Uni-
versities and distinguished public bodies of that
kingdom, who were thereto required to affix their
seals *. Indeed it may be considered as truly a
national treaty, showing the degree of surveillance
which the Scots exercised over the conduct of
Baliol.
1296. The treaty was soon followed by a solemn
renunciation of the homage exacted by Edward ;
and a numerous army was collected for the invasion
of his northern counties. The Scots, though thus
eager to come to blows, were by no means in a
state of discipline that would enable them success-
fully to contend with the experienced veterans of
England, who had been inured to martial habits in
their wars with France, and possessed many advan-
tages over troops that had never seen the face of a
foreign enemy. Thirty-three years had elapsed
since the battle of Largs ; and the residue of those
warriors who had distinguished themselves on that
occasion, could not now be either very numerous
or effective. The country, it is true, teemed with
men in the vigour of life, panting to restore the
tarnished glory of their country ; but although in-
dividually brave, and not unacquainted with their
weapons, yet, unaccustomed to act in concert, they
could neither fully understand their own deficiency,
nor sufficiently appreciate the advantages of that
discipline which gave the enemy so great a supe-
riority. Under these circumstances, and guided
more by the hasty dictates of their own passion
than the commands of their leaders, the army of
the Scots burst into Cumberland, on 26th March,
1296. The injury done, however, was not very
extensive. They assaulted Newcastle, and set fire
to the town, but were eventually compelled to a
dishonourable retreat.
On the 8th April they also entered Northumber-
land, plundered Lanercoste and Hexham, and re-
tired in disorder from before Harbottle.
At this time a circumstance of rather a curious
nature took place. An English nobleman, Sir
Robert de Ros, lord of the Castle of Werk, had
become deeply enamoured of a Scottish lady, and,
* Quod tarn Praelati quam Comites, Barones et alii nobiles,
necnon universitates communitatesque notabiles dicti regni
Scotiae, suas nobis super hoc patentes literas suis munitas
sifrillis quam citius fieri poterit destinabunt. — Fosdera, t. ii.
n.696.
influenced by the violence of his passion, he de-
serted the standard of his country, and went over
to the Scots. With the intention of gaining the
affections of the object of his desire, he endea-
voured to seduce his kinsman, William de Ros,
from his allegiance. In this, however, he was un-
successful ; for William, after upbraiding him with
his baseness, proceeded to the camp at Berwick to
inform Edward of the treason, who furnished him
with 1000 men, to garrison the Castle of Werk.
Robert, in the mean time, had joined the Scots ;
and learning that the troops sent by Edward were
to quarter the following night at Prestfen, on their
way, he procured a body of Scots from Roxburgh,
and secretly surrounded the village. To enable his
followers to recognize each other, he gave them, as
a password, " Tabard and Surcoat * ,-" command-
ing, that whoever named the first of these words,
if the person to whom he expressed it did not reply
by giving the other, he should instantly kill him.
With this understanding they entered Prestfen at
midnight, and, setting fire to the houses, surprised
and cut off the enemy.
Edward, who had now reached Berwick with an
army equal in numbers to that of the Scots, and
more formidable from its superior discipline, deter-
mined to attack the town both by sea and land.
His navy was, however, found unequal to the task,
and eighteen of his ships were either burnt or dis-
abled. The exasperation f which this discomfiture
occasioned in the mind of Edward, increased, if
possible, the natural ferocity of his temper, and
determined him to lead in person his army to the
assault J.
* Dugdale.
t Wyntown thus quaintly describes the feelings of Edward,
on being told of the loss of his fleet : —
" Quhen the Kyng Edward of Ingland
Had herd of this deidfull Tythand,
All breme he belyd in-to berth,
And wrythyd all in wedand werth,
Alsd kbbbyd in his crope
As he had ettin ane Attyrcope."
Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 81.
I Before the attack, Antony Bek, Bishop of Durham,
joined the English army, with 140 knights, 500 horse, and
1000 foot, accompanied by the consecrated banners of St.
Cuthbert and St. John of Beverley ; the former carried by
Henry de Horncester, a stout monk of Durham, and the
latter by Gilbert de Grymmesby (so called by the English), a
Scottish Vicar of Beverley College, born in the district of
Kyle, in Ayrshire, — who had spent a great part of his life in
the service of Edward in France, where he had acted as a
pursuivant. The banner of St. Cuthbert accompanied the
king only on extraordinary occasions. The following de-
scription of it may not be unacceptable.
" This banner was fastened to a staff, five yards in length.
All the pipes were of silver, to be sliven (slipt) on along the
banner-staff; and on the uppermost pipe, on the height of it,
was a little silver cross, and a goodly banner-cloth pertaining
to it, and in the midst of the banner-cloth was a white
velvet, half a yard square every way, and a cross of crimson
velvet over it, and within the said white velvet was the holy
relique, wherewith St. Cuthbert covered the chalice when he
said mass, and the residue of the banner-cloth was of crim-
son velvet, embroidered all over with gold and green silk
most sumptuously. It was not carried out but on his anni-
versary, and some other principal festivals in procession. It
was the clerk's office to wait on it in his surplice, with a fair
red-painted staff, having a fork or cleft at the upper end
C2
20
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. IT.
The first attack of the English was repulsed. On
the second, a well-concerted stratagem put them in
possession of the town, which was given over to
pillage, and a frightful and unsparing massacre
ensued. Some English writers state, that no less
than 40,000 of the inhabitants * were immolated,
to assuage the wrath of the victor. Wyntown,
however, may be considered nearer the truth,
when he fixes the amount of the carnage at 7,500.
Barons and burgesses, nuns and friars, women and
children, — all were involved in one indiscriminate
and appalling butchery, which continued through
the day, and only subsided when the following
occurrence rekindled the spark of humanity, which
had become extinct in the breast of the unprin-
cipled usurper.
" Thus thai slayand ware sa fast
All the day, qwhill at the last
This Kyng Edward saw in that tyde
A woman slayne, and of hyr syde
A barne he saw fall out, sprewland
Be-syd that woman slayne lyand.
' Lasses, Lasses,' than cryid he ;
' Leve off, leve off/ that word suld be."
Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 83.
This catastrophe, from which Berwick never
entirely recovered, took place on Good Friday,
while the people were preparing for the celebra-
tion of that high festival — a circumstance which
sufficiently proves that the Scots were taken by
surprise. Edward remained at Berwick from the
30th of March till the 27th April, during which
time he received the formal renunciation of the
allegiance of Baliol, who also published an edict,
which cleft was lined with soft silk, having a down under
the silk to prevent it hurting or bruising the pipes of the
banner, which were of silver, to take it down and raise it up
again, by reason of the weightiness thereof. There were
always four men to wait on it, besides the clerk, and divers
who carried it. This last wore a strong girdle of white
leather, to which the banner was fastened by two pieces of
the same, having at each end of them a socket of horn to
put the end of the banner-staff into." — Hist, and Antiq. of
Durham Abbey, p. 118, 120.
By the Wardrobe Accounts, it appears that the monk who
carried the banner of St. Cuthbert into Scotland, was paid
Is. per day,— while he who carried that of St. John was
allowed 8£d., and one penny per day to bring it back.
* Knighton says there were 17,000 killed, and that rivulets
of blood flowed through the city for two days. Langtoft
informs us, that Edward was the first to enter the breach,
which he did on his favourite horse, named " Bayard." He
has omitted to say, if " Bayard " was a pale horse. This dis-
tinguishing trait seems only a-wanting, to render the descrip-
tion given of this "most pious and clement prince," no unapt
representation of the Grand Destroyer and last enemy of
mankind.
The only man of consequence who fell on the side of the
English, was Sir Richard de Cornwall. He was killed by a
quarrell, shot by a Flemish merchant from the " Red Hall."
This place was a fortified factory or store, occupied by a
company of Flemings trading in Berwick, and held by them
of the crown of Scotland, on condition of defending it against
the English to the last extremity. Their knightly devoirs
they bravely performed. The fortress held out the whole
day against all the force the English could bring against it.
j At night it was set on fire, and the faithful little band of
j trading warriors perished in the flames.
I -
inefices I
ordering all English ecclesiastics holding be:
in Scotland to quit the country.
On the 27th April, regardless of the atrocities j
resulting from his guilty ambition, Edward left the
shambles at Berwick, and proceeded northward on
his desolating career, having previously despatched
the Earl of Warren, with 10,000 chosen troops, to
reduce the Castle of Dunbar. This fortress, from
its strong position, was considered as one of the
keys to the kingdom, and had belonged to the Earl
of March, a disappointed candidate for the crown,
who had now attached himself to the banner of
England. His wife, however, possessing more
patriotism than her husband, delivered it over, in
his absence, to be garrisoned by the King of Scot-
land. Aware of its importance, Baliol led the
army he had collected, amounting to upwards of
40,000 men, to its defence. In the mean time,
Sir Richard Siward, the governor, had agreed to
deliver it up to Warren in three days, if not
relieved. On the third day, the army of Scotland
appeared on the heights, and took up a strong
position on Downhill, above Dunbar. Warren
advanced to attack them ; and from having a diffi-
cult line of road to traverse, his ranks became
irregular. The Scots, from their elevated station,
saw the momentary confusion, and foolishly ima-
gined that the English were on the retreat. Under
this impression, they abandoned their strong and
well-chosen position, and rushed down on the
enemy. The English received their disorderly
charge with firmness, and repulsed them with
slaughter. Broken, and dismayed at their unex-
pected reception, a great part of the Scots betook
themselves to flight. Sir Patrick Graham, how-
ever, and a few chivalrous spirits, maintained the
unequal contest ; and, though mostly cut to pieces,
yet the heroism and self-devotion they displayed,
extorted the applause, and excited the regret, of
their adversaries.
Though there be no direct evidence of the fact,
yet there is reason to conjecture, that both Wal-
lace and his brother were present at the battle of
Dunbar. It has already been shown, from re-
spectable authority, that Sir Malcolm outlived his
father ; and, in the work of the Minstrel, we have
an account, though rather obscure, of the manner
in which he met his death. He is represented as
surrounded by a multitude of enemies, and bravely
defending himself on his knees, with all the energy
of despair, after he had been hamstrung, in order
to prevent his escape. Being at last borne down
by a mass of spearmen, he was unmercifully put to
death*. Though Henry does not mention when
this took place, yet, from the previous comparative
tranquillity which reigned in the country, the con-
flict of Dunbar appears most likely to have been
the scene of so deadly a struggle ; and the close
intimacy which Wallace afterwards maintained
with the family of Graham, may have originated
in the circumstance of his brother and himself
having been among the few who stood by their
chief, Sir Patrick +, on this disastrous occasion.
The banner of Sir Richard Siward (black, with
a white cross flowered at the ends) J still floated on
* Henry, Buke Fyrst, p. 10, 11.
t Some accounts say that Sir Patrick Graham waj the
elder brother of the gallant Sir John.
I Walter of Exeter.
CHAP. IV.]
SIEGE OF BERWICK.
21
the battlements of the Castle of Dunbar. To this
place many of the Scottish barons fled for refuge.
The protection they received, however, was of
short duration. The fortress, according to agree-
ment, was surrendered to Warren. On this Lord
Hailes remarks, " Our historians impute this also
to ^treachery ; and they accuse the Governor,
Richard Siward. But this charge is manifestly
unjust. Siward had agreed to surrender the castle,
if it was not relieved within three days ; and it was
not relieved." His Lordship is sometimes rash
in bringing charges against the historians of his
country. The treason of Siward did not consist
in delivering the castle, according to agreement,
but in making that agreement. There is enough in
the fact of his consenting to surrender one of the
strongest and most commanding fortresses in the
country, in so short a time, to warrant the charge
they have made against him. That the Scots
nobles were ignorant of the terms, is evident from
their flying to it, after the battle, as to a place of
safety, which they would not have done, had they
known that they were instantly to be delivered
over in chains to the mercy of the enemy. Siward
could have no certainty of his being succoured in
three days, as the Scottish army, according to his
Lordship's account, only came in sight " on the
third day ;" and if any accident had detained it,
Dunbar must have been surrendered on the day
following. Besides, if Lord Hailes had referred to
Vol. II. p. 274, 275, of the Chronicle of Peter
Langtoft, an Englishman, and a favourite authority
of his own, he would have found not only the state-
ment of Scottish authors confirmed, but a regular
detailed account of the treason. That his Lord-
ship, in the face of such evidence, should have
charged the Scottish historians with doing what
was " manifestly unjust," can only be imputed to
that singular predilection towards whitewashing
the negro, which his Lordship has displayed on so
many occasions.
1296. Ten thousand Scots were slain at this
memorable battle, and a vast number were made
prisoners, among whom were many of the principal
nobility of the kingdom, who were sent to the
South in chains, and distributed among the prisons
of England and Wales. Baliol, after performing a
most degrading feudal penance, and imploring the
clemency of his conqueror, was sent prisoner, along
with his son Edward, to the Tower of London,
having previously resigned the kingdom and the
people of Scotland into the hands of Edward.
Thus terminated the brief and unfortunate reign of
John Baliol, who had aspired to a sceptre he had
neither the judgment nor the energy to wield.
With a spirit subdued before the commanding
genius of Edward, any efforts he made to regain
the independence he had relinquished, were rather
forced upon him, by the impatience of his people
to the English yoke, than the result of any mag-
nanimous resolution of his own. Though possess-
ing qualities that might have graced the seclusion
of private life, he was destitute of those talents
which were required in the discharge of the duties
of a sovereign.
Selected by Edward from the other competitors,
more on account of the natural timidity of his cha-
racter than the superior justice of his claim, it
is impossible to look on the degradation that was
inflicted on him, without feeling disgusted at the
total want of generosity which marked the charac-
ter of the English monarch. Listening to the inte-
rested advice of the Bishop of Durham *, who coun-
selled him to set aside the claim of Bruce, because
the talents and spirit of the latter might be trouble-
some, he arrayed Baliol in the trappings of royalty ;
and, while he insulted the tame unresisting puppet
he had created, he fancied himself trampling with
impunity on the hitherto unsullied majesty of a free
people.
The destruction of Berwick, and the discomfiture
at Dunbar, laid Scotland prostrate at the feet of
her invader, who marched triumphantly through
the kingdom, receiving the homage of the terrified
chieftains, and placing garrisons in the deserted
fortresses ; while churchmen of all grades, earls,
barons, knights, and esquires, hastened to avert
his displeasure, by taking the oath of allegiance,
and renouncing the French alliance.
On the 6th June f, Edward besieged and took
the Castle of Edinburgh, in which he found the
regalia, consisting of the crown, sceptre, and cloth
of gold. On the 1 4th, he was at Stirling and Lin-
lithgow. On the 24th July, he encamped on the
banks of the Spey. He was at Elgin on the 26th,
where he remained two days. He was at Aberbro-
thick on the 5th August, and again at Stirling on
the 14th, at Edinburgh on the 17th, and at Berwick
on the 22d, having spent twenty-one weeks in his
progress of subjugation J. For the final settlement
of his conquest, he appointed John, Earl of Warren,
lieutenant or guardian of the kingdom ; Hugh de
Cressingham, an avaricious ecclesiastic, treasurer ;
William Ormsby, justiciary ; Henry de Percy,
keeper of the county of Galloway and sheriffdom
of Ayr ; while Robert de Clifford had charge of the
eastern districts. The* ancient Great Seal of Scot-
land, surrendered by Baliol at Brechin, was broken
in pieces, and a new seal in place of it was pre-
sented to Walter de Agmondesham, as chancellor.
The conduct of these ministers was ill-calculated
to secure the conquest which the policy and talents
of their master had achieved. Haughty and rapa-
cious themselves, they imposed little restraint on
the licentious soldiery, who lorded it over the
wretched inhabitants with the most intolerable
brutality. While property of every description
was held by the frail tenure of the will of the
usurpers, outrages were committed on the domestic
feelings of the oppressed, which the delicacy of
modern writers has withdrawn from the page of
history. Neither was this galh'ng oppression con-
fined to the common people ; the cup of misery
went round ; and the noblest of the land partook
of its unmingled bitterness. The unlimited exac-
tions of Cressingham, and the little control he
exercised over his underlings, soon banished com-
merce from the Scottish shores. Deprived, by his
impolitic proceedings, of this lucrative branch of
the national resources, with whetted appetite for
plunder, he turned upon the wretched and already
impoverished inhabitants, who looked in vain to
their nobles for that protection afforded them in
times past. Those chieftains who would have
stepped forward in their defence, had either fallen
beneath the axe of the executioner, or were lan-
guishing out the pritne of their existence in the
distant dungeons of the invader.
* Wyntown. f Stowe.
t Vide Appendix to Tytler's History of Scotland, vol. i.
22
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. v.
The fiendish policy that instigated the massacre
of the Minstrels of Wales, lest their strains should
animate their countrymen to revolt, had also sug-
gested the idea of depriving the Scots of the monu-
ments * of their ancient glory. The nobility still
* The object of the greatest national importance, and of
the most venerable antiquity, which he carried off on this
occasion, was the Lia-faile, called also Clack na cineamhuinn
(fatal stone), on which the Kings of Scotland, from the
earliest ages of their monarchy, had been crowned. At the
ceremony of their inauguration, a seanachaidh, or heraldic
bard, clothed in a robe of sky-blue, stood before the Lia-
faile, and recited to the king, as he sat on it, the genealogy
of the Kings of Scotland, from the foundation of their
dynasty. The last performance of this ancient Celtic custom
was at the coronation of Alexander III. The person who
officiated on that occasion is said to have had on a scarlet
robe. This, however, was not the colour used by the Celts
for that office. The person of the heraldic bard was sacred
above all others, and he wore sky-blue as emblematic of
peace. The early history of the Lia-faile is involved in the
obscurity of fable, and no small degree of sacredness has
been attached to it from the connexion it is supposed to
have with the destinies of the Scots. The following Druidical
Oracle is considered as first giving currency to this belief.
Cioniodh scuit saor an fine,
Man ba breag an Faisdine.
Mar a bh' f huighid an lia-fail,
Dlighid flaitheas do ghabhail.
Which Hector Boethius has thus rendered into Latin :
Ne fallat fatum, Scoti quocunque locatum
Invenient lapidem hunc, regnare tenentur ibidem.
English Translations.
Except old saws do feign,
And wizards' wits be blind,
The Scots in place must reign,
Where they this stone shall find.
Consider, Scot, where'er you find this stone,
If fates fail not (or lie not), there fix'd must be your throne.
Another from Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 527.
The Scottis sail bruke that realme, as natyve Ground,
(Geif weirdis fayll nocht) quhair euir this chiar is found.
That part of the history of the Lia-faile which is considered
authentic, may soon be told. — It was at an early period
brought from Ireland to Dunstaffnage ; from thence to
Scone, in 842, by Kenneth II. ; and, lastly, to Westminster,
in 1296. In the Wardrobe Account of Edward, for March,
1299, there is the following entry of a payment to "Walter
the painter, for a step to the foot of the New Chair, in which
the Stone of Scotland was placed, near the altar, before the
shrine of St. Edward, in Westminster Abbey, and to the
carpenters and painters painting the said step ; and the gold
and colours to paint it with ; and making a case to cover the
said chair, L. 1 : 19 : 7." — Remarks on the Wardrobe Account,
page xli. Walsingham says, that the use Edward put it to,
was to serve as a chair for the celebrating priests at West-
minster.
In the treaty of peace between Robert Bruce and Edward
III., there is a particular stipulation for the restoration of
this Stone. The Londoners, however, had taken a fancy to
it, and excited a commotion to prevent its removal ; and
Robert had no difficulty to persuade his people to waive the
performance of the agreement. Indeed, so deep-rooted has
been the belief of the Scots in the augury attached to it, that
many looked upon the accession of James to the British
throne as the fulfilment of the prediction. Even in the pre-
remained tame spectators of this fresh outrage,
and relaxed not in their supple assiduities to con-
ciliate the favour of the tyrant. Thus abandoned
by those who ought to have been her protectors,
the distracted country, crushed and bleeding at
every pore, lay convulsed within the coils of this
human Boa. But that Providence which " ruleth
in the kingdoms of men," had foreseen her cala-
mity, and prepared a deliverer, with personal qua-
lifications beyond the common lot of men, and a
mind unendowed with every requisite for the mighty
undertaking.
CHAPTER V.
WALLACE AGAIN TAKES REFUGE IN THE WOODS.
ORGANIZES A SYSTEM OF WARFARE. HARASSES
THE ENGLISH IN THEIR CANTONMENTS. — CONFLICT
OF BEG. — BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES OF HIS EARLY
COMPANIONS. — HIS DRESS AND ARMOUR. — ANECDOTE
OFTHE RELATIVE PERSONAL PROWESS OF WALLACE
AND BRUCE.
WALLACE, who had been stigmatized by the Eng-
lish as an outlaw and a robber, found it necessary,
after the battle of Dunbar, to withdraw to his for-
mer mountainous retreat, from whence he would,
no doubt, observe the gaudy pageant of the feudal
power of England, as it traversed the devoted land
in all the insolent security of conquest. And
while the national distress deepened around, and
every tale that reached him was fraught with
tidings of the misery of his enslaved and degraded
countrymen, the resources of the enemy, and the
possibility of emancipating the beloved land of his
nativity, formed the subject of his unceasing re-
flections. He had observed, that the reverses
which the Scots had sustained in the field, arose
more from a want of subordination and discipline
among themselves, than from any superior valour
on the part of their enemies. He was aware of,
and deeply lamented, the jealousy and treachery
which existed among the nobility, and their readi-
ness to stoop in the most servile manner * to the
will of the Usurper, if they might thereby obtain
sent day, when there is so much anxiety evinced for the
recovery of objects held in national estimation, we do not
hear of any application being made to his majesty for the
restoration of the Lia-faile. There is no doubt but many of
those who witnessed the original aggression, would console
themselves with the reflection, that the "Lang-shanked
Souther one" had caught a Tartar.
* The servility of the Scottish Barons was not always un-
requited. By the Rotuli Scotiae, 19 Edward I. et passim 24,
it appears he gave obligations of the following import : —
Annual Value.
To the Bishop of Glasgow, lands of . £.100
To James the Steward . . . 100
To Patrick Earl of Dunbar . . . 100
To John de Soulis . . . . 100 merks.
To William Sinclair . . . . 100
To Patrick de Graham . . . . 100
To William de Soulis .... 100
Edward afterwards changed his plan, and gave these barons
and prelates gratifications in money, or other value. But
to John Comyn the King gave the enormous sum of
£1563. 14s. Q^d.— Ty tier's Hist, vol. i. p. 99.
CHAP. V.]
RENCOUNTERS WITH THE ENGLISH.
2:$
even a temporary exaltation for their party ; and
he justly conceived, that by banding together a few
resolute spirits, allied to no faction, but, like him-
self, attached to the general good, that more could
be done toward the restoration of his country's
independence, than by all the tumultuous hordes
which the treacherous and disunited chieftains could
bring together. Fully impressed with this con-
viction, his days and nights were passed in extend-
ing the number of his followers, and in organizing
a system of warfare, which was soon destined to
spread terror and dismay among the invaders.
The elite of every district were instructed and dis-
ciplined in a manner peculiarly his own. With
the simple, but well-known sounds of his bugle-
horn, he could regulate all their operations. At
the appearance of danger, he could disperse them,
to seek more secure retreats, — or rally them
around him, as circumstances might require. This
mode of discipline, either by himself or his most
trusty associates, he secretly extended over a great
part of the Lowlands of Scotland ; so that either
amidst the fastnesses of Carrick, the deep recesses
of Cartland, or on the shores of the Lomond, the
rallying note of their country's liberator was fol-
lowed by the prompt appearance of well-armed
warriors at their respective places of muster.
The prowess which he had displayed in his en-
counters with the English — his almost miraculous
escapes — and the prediction g;ven out in the name
of the Seer of Ercildowne*, of his being destined
to deliver Scotland from the tyi-anny of England, —
all conspired to excite the hopes, and gain him the
confidence, of the less wealthy classes of his coun-
trymen.
His tactics were admirably fitted for harassing
the foes he had to contend with. The fortresses
in their possession were surrounded by secret ene-
mies, ever on the watch to discover and convey to
their leader any information that might enable him
to way-lay their convoys, or surprise them in their
strongholds. It was in vain the warders kept
watch on their lofty stations : distant as the eye
could reach, no enemy appeared, no foreboding
sound met their ear, to warrant them in disturbing
the tranquillity of the revellers within. Far in the
woodlands, the sound of a horn might be heard ;
but it passed away unregarded, as proceeding from
some lonely forester going his rounds. The draw-
bridge is let down to admit fuel or provisions for
the garrison ; — the loads are thrown in the en-
trance of the gate ; — the porter knocked on the
head, and the burden-bearers bristle into resolute
or well-armed assailants ; — the wine-cup is dashed
from the hands of the astonished governor, who is
only made sensible of his situation by the carnage
that ensues ; — the castle demolished, and the spoil
* Prophetic announcements respecting him were also, at
an after period, sent abroad by the Scottish clergy.—" Nam
revelatione mirifica ostensum est fide dignioribus diversis,
sanctissimum apostolum Andream, regni Scotiae, protec-
torem et patronum, dicto Willielmo Wallace gladium cruen-
tatum manu aliter commisisse, stricte sibi prsecipiendo eo
utrobique uti ad defensionem regni 'Anglicos propulsando. —
Gustos itaque effectus, misit manum suam ad fortia, An-
glicos prosternens, Anglicatos reconcilians, oppresses rele-
vans, et quotidianis incrementis proficiens." MS. Cu-
prensis. See Fordun's Scotichronicon, vol. ii. p. 170.— This
vision of St. Andrew is also taken notice of by Blind Harry.
—Vide BuJte Sewynd, v. 57.
divided among his followers, who are now allowed
to return home. Wallace, meanwhile, attended
perhaps by a few select worthies, pursues his way,
to call forth the avenging swords of his adherents,
in some more remote part of the kingdom.
Such were the fruits of that admirable system of
warfare which Wallace was engaged in explaining
and enforcing at the meetings of his nonjuring
countrymen, during the winter of 1296, and which
it has been thought proper to allude to at this stage
of the history, in order that the reader may be able
to comprehend the possibility of certain of those
exploits which afterwards obtained for the heroic
champion of the Scots, the applause and admiration
of mankind.
The spring of 1297 had scarcely set in before the
guerrilla-parties thus formed began to molest the
invaders ; and so persevering and successful were
their attacks, that in a very short time, throughout
the whole range of the forest of ' Clydesdale, Wal-
lace and his followers held undisputed sway ; and,
emerging from parts least expected by the enemy,
surprised and cut off their convoys. The English
garrison which occupied Bothwell Castle made
several attempts to drive them from their conceal-
ments in the woods, but all their efforts had ended
in discomfiture and disgrace ; while the prisoners
left in the hands of the Scots were hung up at
different parts, along the skirts of the forest, as
a warning to all hostile intruders. These proceed-
ings of the insurgents alarmed and perplexed the
English, as it kept them in profound ignorance of
the numbers they had to cope with. Left to their
own conjectures, their heated imaginations peopled
the impenetrable recesses of the woods wit}1
swarms of fierce and merciless enemies, headed by
a chief against whose sword the strongest of their
armour afforded but a feeble protection.
While the Scots were thus engaged, their leader
received advice that a strong convoy was on its
way from England for the supply of the garrison
of Ayr, under the command of Fenwick^, the per-
son who headed the attack so fatal to Sir Malcolm
Wallace. Roused by the hopes of avenging the
death of his father, our hero determined to way-
lay the party. For this purpose he selected fifty
of those on whose strength and courage he could
place the greatest reliance ; and thus attended, he
set forward to occupy a position on the road the
enemy had to pass. It was night when the little
band of patriots reached the spot from whence they
meant to make their attack ; but hearing nothing
of the advance of Fenwick, he ordered his men to
take shelter for the night in a neighbouring wood.
The morning was pretty far advanced, when two
scouts, whom Wallace had sent forward at day-
break, returned with the intelligence that the ene-
my was at hand. Having arranged his men for
the onset, his friend, John Blair, offered up prayers
for their success, which were scarcely over before
the English came in sight. Fenwick, on observing
the small body of Scots that awaited his approach,
felt perfectly assured of taking them, and the far-
famed chieftain, whom he suspected to be their
leader, prisoners with him to Ayr ; and congra-
tulated himself on the satisfaction which the cap-
ture of the bold outlaw would afford to his supe-
riors. This pleasing reverie was, however, dis-
turbed by a rapid movement of the Scots, who,
charging with their long spears, threw his advance
24
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. v.
into confusion, and, following up their advantage
with the most daring intrepidity, carried disorder
to the very centre of his squadron ; where, undis-
mayed by the superior numbers that surrounded
them, Wallace and his brave companions fought
with all the fury of exasperated lions. The re-
peated charges of the English were repulsed and
returned with such increasing vigour and resolu-
tion as alarmed and confounded their commander.
Wherever he turned his eyes, the sword of the
Scottish chief seemed clearing a path toward him ;
helmet after helmet disappeared beneath his pon-
derous weapon ; and the whole exertion of his
mighty arm seemed directed towards the hated
Fenwick. Conscious of the justice of that ven-
geance which inspired our hero with more than
usual ferocity, the English chief would gladly have
avoided a personal rencounter. His attempts to
escape, however, were in vain, — the brand of the
vengeful Scot reached him at last ; and the blow,
though broke by the intervening sword of a trooper,
fell with a sufficient force to strike him from the
saddle. Falling on the opposite side of the horse,
Wallace had not the satisfaction of giving the
death-blow ; — this was an honour reserved for Ro-
bert Boyd, one of his most intimate companions.
Although Fenwick was thus slain, yet the conflict
continued with great obstinacy. The English, un-
der one Bowmond, who was second in command,
made great efforts to retrieve the advantages they
had lost. The Scots, however, maintained their
ground with inflexible resolution, while the sword
of their chief was rapidly increasing the gaps in
the ranks of their enemies. Adam Wallace, the
promising heir of Riccardtoun *, had the good for-
tune to come in contact with the leader of the
English ; and, after an obstinate engagement, the
intrepid Bowmond fell beneath the hand of the
youthful Scot. Deprived of their leaders, the
English now fled in the utmost confusion, leaving
one hundred of their companions on the field.
The Scots pursued them only so far as to make
their victory certain ; and, returning to the spoil,
found their labours amply rewarded. A numerous
train of waggons, loaded with flour, wine, and all
sorts of provisions, with warlike stores in abund-
ance, and two hundred draught- horses, besides
money and other valuables, fell into the hands of
the victors, who, after dividing their booty, and ap-
propriating part of it to the relief of the oppressed
inhabitants in the neighbourhood, departed to
secure the remainder in their inaccessible
retreats among the then extensive forests of
Clydesdale.
The result of this affair with Fenwick was not
less encouraging to the Scots, than prejudicial to
the English. The valuable convoy, which the lat-
ter had been thus deprived of, was a subject of
serious regret to Percy ; more particularly, as it
appeared irretrievable — his foraging parties having
already exhausted the district under his control,
and reduced the inhabitants to the most wretched
* " Riccardtoun is evidently a corruption of Richardtown.
It is generally said to have been so called from a Sir Richard
Wallace, who lived in the vicinity of the village, and who is
said to have heen uncle to the celebrated patriot, Sir William
Wallace. Of his house no vestige now remains. The place,
however, where it stood is well known. The village of Ric-
cardtown is within one mile of the market-town of Kilmar-
nock."— Stat. Ace. vol. vi. p. 117.
expedients, in order to maintain their miserable
existence. The fields remained in a great measure
uncultivated ; and those among the commons who
were fortunate enough to possess a cow, endea-
voured to conceal her as their only resource. The
poor starveling was bled as often as nature would
permit ; and the blood, boiled to a consistency,
formed almost the sole repast of the unhappy
owners. Percy, already aware of the impoverished
situation of the country, had husbanded the re-
sources of the garrison, in order to make them
hold out till the arrival of the expected supplies.
Under these circumstances, his disappointment
may be easily conceived, when the disordered re-
mains of Fenwick's party arrived at Ayr without a
leader, to give an account of their disaster, every
man being at liberty to tell his own story ; and, as
might be expected, all of them agreed in exagge-
rating the number of the Scots, and the gigantic
stature and strength of their chief. Percy, even
from the most favourable view of the affair, could
only see the embarrassing situation in which he
was placed. The uncertainty of procuring supplies
by land was but too evident ; and to bring them
by sea was equally precarious, as the Scottish ships
were still numerous on the coast, and had not ac-
knowledged the sovereignty of Edward, but in
the unsettled state of the country, continued to
capture all the English vessels that came in their
tract.
In this battle, which was fought at a place called
Beg*, above Allanton, in the parish of Galston,
few of any note among the Scots were slain. Of
those present on the occasion, the following names
have been handed down — Sir Andrew Murray, Sir
William Douglas, Robert Boyd, Alexander Scrim-
geor, Roger Kilpatrick, Alexander Auchinleck,
Walter Newbigging, Stephen of Ireland, Hugh
Dundas, John Kneland or Cleland, Ruthven, Sir
David Barclay, Adam Curry, John Blair, and
Thomas Gray. In justice, therefore, to these brave
and early confederates of our hero, we shall ap-
propriate the remaining part of this chapter, to
such notices of them as our scanty materials may
afford. The following account of the first of those
worthies is taken from the Peerage and Baronage
of Scotland.
Sir Andrew de Moravia, dominus de Bothwell,
succeeded his brother Sir William Murray, in the
Lordship of Bothwell. This Sir William was
chamberlain to Alexander III., and a man of sin-
gular merit ; but dying without issue in 1294, he
was succeeded by his no less meritorious brother,
who also filled the office of chamberlain under the
short reign of Baliol. Sir Andrew married a
daughter of Sir John Cumin, Lord of Badenoch, by
whom he had two sons, Sir Andrew and Sir Wil-
* " Among other antiquities, there may be mentioned a
place called Beg, above Allinton, where the brave Wallace
lay in a species of rude fortification, with only fifty of his
friends, yet obtained a complete victory over an English
officer of the name of Fenwick, who had two hundred men
under his command. This gallant hero, it is well known,
had several places of retirement towards the head of this
parish, and in the neighbourhood, some of which still retain
his name to this day. Wallace-hill, in particular, an emi-
nence near Galla-law, a place called Wallace-Gill, in the
parish of Loudoun, a hollow glen to which he probably re-
tired for shelter, when pursued by his enemies." — Stat.
Ace. vol. ii. p. 74.
CHAP. V.]
HIS EARLY CONFEDERATES.
25
liam, the former of whom was associated in the
command of the Scottish army when led by Wallace
to the invasion of England. He also was chamber-
lain to Bruce, and regent of the kingdom in the
minority of David II. He married Lady Christian
Bruce, sister of the immortal King Robert, by
whom he had two sons, John and Robert. His
brother William was the progenitor of the Mur-
rays of Abercairnie. The present "Sir Andrew
sat in parliament in 1290, and appears to have
sworn fealty to Edward 1291. When Sir William
Wallace raised the standard of national independ-
ence, and when the other powerful barons deserted
the cause, he was the only person of consequence
who adhered to Wallace."
Sir William Douglas, designated the Hardy, suc-
ceeded his brother Hugh. He was also known by
the name of Long Leg, and reckoned to be a very
handsome and powerful man, surpassing most of
his countrymen in stature. He appears to have
been present in the Parliament at Brigham in
1289, as his name is appended to the letter ad-
dressed by " the community of Scotland," to Ed-
ward I., as " Guillame de Duglas." He swore
fealty to Edward in the Chapel of Thurston, 5th
July 1291. His first wife was Elizabeth, a near
connexion of the Steward of Scotland, who died
shortly after her marriage. His second was Elea-
nor, the widow of William de Ferrier. She being
a ward of the English crown, had an assignation of
the manors of Stubbings and Woodham Ferriers
in Essex (part of her husband's lands), until she
should have her dowry set forth ; which being soon
after assigned to her, she came to Scotland, there
to obtain her right to such lands as her husband
had possessed in that kingdom. But being at Tra-
nent (the manor-house of Helen la Zusche), ex-
pecting the like assignation, Sir William de Duglas
came and forcibly carried her off*. As the lady
had made oath before she left England, not to
marry without the royal consent ; — to save appear-
ances, and to preserve her property, a complaint
was made of the aggression, and Edward sent his
precept to the sheriff of Northumberland, to seize
all the goods and chattels of the said William de
Duglas which were in his bailiwick ; but shortly
after, in 1291, in consequence of a fine of 100<5. to
the King, his permission was ob tamed. In 1296,
Sir William had the command of the Castle of Ber-
wick, which he surrendered to the English, being
allowed to march out with the honours of war, after
taking an oath never to bear arms against England.
Such oaths, however, in that age, it was reckoned
more dishonourable to keep than to break. The
following account of some of his exploits is from
Hume of Godscroft's History of the House of
Douglas : —
" When he " (Sir William) « heard that William
Wallace was risen up, and had taken open banner
against the English, he joined with him ; by which
accession of forces, Wallace's army was much in-
creased and strengthened. Yet they were not al-
ways together ; but, according to the occasion, and
as opportunity did offer, they did divide their com-
panies, and went to several places, where they
hoped to get best advantage of the enemy, and
where there needed no great army, but some few
companies at once. In these adventures, Lord
* Dugdale, vol. i. p. 266.
William recovered from the English the castles of
Desdier and Sanquhair.
" The manner of his taking the castle of San-
quhair is said to have been thus : — There was one
Anderson that served the castle, and furnished
them with wood and fuel, and had daily access to
it upon that occasion. The Lord Douglas directs
one of his trustiest and stoutest servants to deal
with him, or to find some means to betray the
castle to him, and to bring him within the gates
only.
"Anderson, either persuaded by entreaty, or
corrupted with money, gave my Lord's servant,
called Thomas Dickson, his apparel and carriages,
who, coming to the castle, was let in by the porter
for Anderson. Dickson stabbed the porter, and
gave the signal to his Lord, who lay near by with
his companions, set open the gates, and received
them into the court. They, being entered, killed
the captain and the whole of the English garrison,
and so remained masters of the place. The cap-
tain's name was Beauford, a kinsman of his own
Lady Ferrars, who had oppressed the country that
lay near him very insolently. One of the English
that had been in the castle, escaping, went to the
other garrisons that were in other castles and
towns adjacent, and told them what had befallen
his fellows, and withal informed them how the
castle might be recovered. Whereupon, joining
their forces together, they came and besieged it.
Lord Douglas, finding himself straitened, and un-
provided of necessaries for his defence, did secretly
convey his man Dickson out at a postern, or some
hidden passage, and sent him to William Wallace
for aid. Wallace was then in Lennox, and, hear-
ing of the danger Douglas was in, made all haste
he could to come to his relief. The English, having
notice of Wallace's approach, left the siege, and
retired towards England ; yet not so quickly but
that Wallace, accompanied by Sir John Graham,
did overtake them, and killed five hundred of their
number before they could pass Dalswinton. By
these, and such like means, Wallace, with his as-
sistants, having beaten the English from most part
of their strengths in Scotland, did commit the care
and custody of the whole country, from Drumlan-
rig to Ayr, to the charge of the Lord Douglas.
Now, however, there be no mention of these things
in our chronology ; yet, seeing the Book of Wallace
(which is more particular in many things) speaks
of them, and the charter of the house of Syming-
ton, descended lineally of the said Thomas Dickson,
who, for this and his other like services done to
the Lord, and afterward to his good son, Sir James,
got the twenty merk land of Hesle-side, which his
posterity doth still enjoy, holding of the Lords of
Douglas and Angus ; and there is no doubt to be
made, but he hath done much more in his assist-
ance he gave Wallace, than is recorded or extant
any where ; there being no likelihood that, in these
so busy times, these two valiant and brave warriors
did lie idle, although the particulars lie buried in
deep silence." The above account is fully con-
firmed by the manuscript history of the House of
Douglas, written by Thomas Chambers, who adds,
that " Sir William, before the battle of Falkirk,
was betrayed into the hands of the English, and
conveyed to Berwick, and from thence to York,
where he was keeped close prisoner in the castle
until his death, which took place in 1 302, and was
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE,
[CHAP. v.
buried in a little chapel (now decayed) at the south
end of the bridge." The banner of Douglas was
" azure a cliiffe sylmr* "
Sir Robert Boyd, or Boi/t. — This bold and hardy
warrior was also one of those who swore fealty to
Edward I., when he overran Scotland in 1296 ; but
throwing off his disgraceful allegiance in 1297, he
became ever after the inseparable companion of
Wallace. His father, in consequence of the gal-
lantry he displayed at the battle of Largs, obtained
a grant of lands in Cunningham from Alexan-
der III., and was the near neighbour of Sir
Raynald Crawford of Crosby f, the uncle of Wal-
lace ; the castles of the two families could commu-
nicate signals with each other.
Kneland, or Cleland, Edward Little and Thomas
Haliday, all near relatives of Wallace, whose names
are frequently mentioned with applause by the
authors who write of this period.
Stephen of Ireland. — This brave and useful sol-
dier, is sometimes called Stephen Ireland ; but
this is only by modern writers. Blind Harry, and
other ancient authors, invariably designate him as
of Ireland. It is highly probable that he was one
of those self-expatriated Irish noblemen, whose
love of liberty induced them to seek, in foreign
countries, what they could no longer hope for at
home. Whatever his birth may have been, he ap-
pears to have come to Scotland at an early period,
perhaps in the reign of Alexander III., and seems,
from his being occasionally employed as a guide in
the expeditions of Wallace, to have had such a
knowledge of the country, as could only be ac-
quired by a long residence in it. Through all the
variety of fortunes which attended Sir William
Wallace, and amid the desertions of some of his
opulent countrymen, Stephen of Ireland adhered
to him with inflexible fidelity, and also induced
others of his countrymen to come over to the as-
sistance of the Scots.
John Blair and Thomas Gray. — The former of
these worthy ecclesiastics has already been men-
tioned as the schoolfellow of our hero. After quit-
ting Dundee, he went to finish his studies at Paris,
where, under the most eminent masters of the day,
his progress did not belie the early promise of his
genius ; and he returned to Scotland a confirmed
patriot, and an accomplished scholar. The latter had
the pastoral charge of Libertown, yet considered
it no dereliction from his duties to attend and as-
sist in the emancipation of his country. Of his
literary talents we have reason to form the highest
opinion, from the circumstance of John Blair ad-
mitting him into the honour of assisting in com-
* Froisart.
t The ruins which are now called Crosby Castle, are si-
tuated in the district of Cunningham, within a short dis-
tance of the village of West Kilbride. They occupy part of
the ground on which stood the old castle belonging to Sir
Raynald Crawford. By the date on the wall, it seems to
have undergone repairs in 1676. The present building has
never been a place of great strength. From the appear-
ance of the ground, however, and other indications in the
neighbourhood, the former castle must have been of a dif-
ferent character. On the edge of a deep precipitous glen,
well adapted for concealment, it afforded every facility for
eluding the pursuit of an enemy. A noisy brook dashes
from rock to rock down the dark and well-wooded ravine,
whose craggy sides must often have witnessed the meeting
of Wallace and his associates.
posing the history of their far-famed friend. This
work, though it now goes all under the name of
Blair, was then known to have been the joint com-
position of these worthies. Where Thomas Gray
received his education, is a matter of uncertainty ;
but it is highly probable that he also finished his
studies along with his friend at Paris, and returned
with him to Scotland ; as we hear nothing of him
previous to the rencounter with Fenwick. It is
not unlikely that, on this occasion, John Blair was
installed in his office of chaplain ; and that he got
this preference from the circumstance of the other
being already provided for, as they both appear,
from their learning and patriotism, to have been
equally deserving of the affection and confidence of
their countrymen.
Alexander Scrimgeor. — This faithful patriot was
the representative of an ancient and respectable
family in the neighbourhood of Dundee ; and as
he most probably received his education along with
Wallace, he would no doubt have been one of the
association already alluded to. He enjoyed, in
right of his ancestors, the honour of carrying the
banner of Scotland ; and for his faithful discharge
of this duty, he was afterwards appointed by Wal-
lace to the office of Constable * of Dundee ; which
honour being hereditary, remained in the family
till after the restoration of Charles II., when the
representative of the family was created Earl of
Dundee ; on whose death, without immediate
issue, the heirs were unjustly deprived of their
honours and immunities. The family, however,
continues to be represented by the Scrymgeours of
Birkhill, now the Wedderburns of that Ilk.— Stat.
Ace. vol. viii. p. 239.
Walter Newbigging, otherwise Gualter de Somer-
ville. — This gentleman was of English extraction,
and the son of William de Somerville, Baron of
Linton, and Margaret Newbigging, heiress of that
Ilk, the daughter of Walter Newbigging, which
lands he inherited in right of his mother. This
accounts for his being called Walter Newbigging,
or of Newbigging. His father, William de Somer-
ville, distinguished himself at the battle of Largs,
and was a constant attendant at the court of Alex-
ander III., with whom he was in high favour, and
held the office of grand falconer, a place at that
time of considerable importance. Walter, the
subject of our present inquiries, received from his
father a ten merk land within the barony of Linton,
which enabled him to make an early appearance at
court, where his good qualities and noble deport-
ment attracted the notice of Alexander, from whose
hand he received the honour of knighthood, and
distinguished himself at the tournament held shortly
* The Charter of Wallace, by which Scrimgeor held the
Constabulary of Dundee, is still in existence, and will be
given in this work.
The peculiarities of a constable's office, are thus enume-
rated in Bray's History of Surrey, vol. iii. p. 136. "In an
instrument of William de Wickham, dated at Eshu, 19 Ja-
nuary 1379, 3 Richard II., by which he appointed William
de Wimbledon constable, the duty of his office is stated to
be, to keep, govern, and oversee the castle, together with
the manor, lordship, lands, franchises, liberties, parks,
chases, warrens, &c. belonging to the same ; also to hold the
courts and to prosecute, challenge, claim, and defend all
rights and franchises belonging to the bishop and church of
Winchester within the said bailiwick."
HIS EARLY CONFEDERATES.
after in honour of the marriage of Prince Alex-
ander with the daughter of the Earl of Flanders, at
Roxburgh Castle. While in attendance at court,
he formed an acquaintance with Sir David Barclay
of Towie, in Aberdeenshire, whose sister Effie, or
Euphemia, he afterwards married in 125 1 ; and at
Aberdeen, the same year, he entered into a bond
of manrent, or manred, as it was sometimes called,
with his brother-in-law. These obligations were
very common among the gentry of Scotland, and
often productive of great disorder in the country.
By this marriage he had a son named David, whom
he devoted to the cause of his country's indepen-
dence, when he himself joined the standard of
Wallace. This youth we shall afterwards have
occasion to notice. It may not be improper to
remark, that Somerville, the author of " The
Chase," was a scion from the English stock of this
ancient and respectable family.
David de Barclay. — Abercromby mentions a Sir
Fergus Barclay, as being one of the early adhe-
rents of Wallace ; but there is reason to believe
he is partly in error. Sir David Barclay, as we
have already seen; was brother-in-law to Sir Walter
Newbigging, with whom he had entered into a
bond of manrent, by which they were mutually
bound to appear in arms in support of the same
cause, provided it was not against the royal prero-
gative. When we find both the surnames asso-
ciated together on this occasion, we may reasonably
suppose they are the same persons who contracted
the obligation, and had thought the present a very
proper opportunity for acting upon it *.
" Hugh de Dundas was the son of Serle de Dun-
das, who swore fealty to Edward I. in 1296 and in
1300. His son, Sir Hugh,,was a man of singular
merit and fortitude, and joined the brave Sir Wil-
liam Wallace in defence of the liberties of Scotland,
and embraced every opportunity to exert his cou-
rage against the enemies of his country. He died
in the reign of King Robert Bruce, and was suc-
ceeded by his son." — Douglas's Scottish Baronage.
After the foregoing brief notices of the early
companions of Wallace, the curious reader may
not be displeased, if, before concluding this chapter,
we present some account of the dress and armour
in which our hero appeared at the battle of Beg.
The following description is from The Minstrel, and
is given with a minuteness which induces a belief
that it is a literal translation from the work of
* The following is a copy of the " band of manrent"
alluded to, from the original Latin, in the possession of the
family of Somerville.
" Be it kend till all men be thir present letters, me, Sir
Walter of Newbigging, and me, Sir David of Towie, for all
the dayes of our lyves to be obleidged and bound be the
faith of our bodies and thir present letters in mandred, and
sworne counsell as brothers in law, to be with one another
in all actiones, causes, and quarrills pertaineing to us, both
in peace and in warr, against all that lyves and dyes, except-
ing our alleadgeance to our soveraigne lord the king. In
witnes of the whilk thing, and of ther present letters, wee
have hung to our sealles, att Aberdean, the twentieth day of
Apryle, the year of God 1281, before ther witnesses, William
Somervill, our brother, and John Somervill and Thomas
Stelfeir." To this band of mandrey is appended two sealles,
very legible and knowne, for the Somervills and Barclayes
differed nothing from what they are at present, save a little
in the placeing of the armes." — Memorie of the Somervills,
vol. i. p. 75, 76.
Blair, so often mentioned ; — it is at least of value,
not only from its containing the ideas entertained
on the subject by a man of no mean genius, upwards
of three hundred years ago, but as it also agrees
with the description elsewhere handed down, of
the kind of armour in use at the period : —
" A habergione vndyr his goune he war,
A steylle capleyne in his bonet but mar ;
His glowis of plait in claith war couerit weill,
In his doublet a closs coler of steyle ;
His face he kepit, for it was euir bar,
With his twa handis, the quhilk full worthi war."
Buke Thryd, p. 31.
The " habergione " was a piece of defensive armour
early in use among .the Scots, and even worn by
some Highlanders and Isle-men so late as the
seventeenth century. It was a sort of chain or
ringed mail, extremely light and flexible, allowing
the greatest freedom to the motions of the wearer,
and was equally well adapted for combat on foot or
on horseback. It was variously constructed ac-
cording to the prevailing taste. The most approved
were those brought from Asia by the crusaders,
in the early part of the reign of Alexander III.
They consisted of four rings joined to a fifth,
and all rivetted ; — they were sometimes double.
Towards the end of the thirteenth century, this
description seems to have been in general use, both
in England and Scotland. They had the form of
shirts, and were quite impervious to an arrow.
The " goune " which the Minstrel alludes to, as
covering the " habergione," we conceive to mean
the surcoat, or coat of arms, — a fashion introduced
into Britain in the thirteenth century. It is thus
described by Dr. Meyrick : — " The sui-coat, which
had been adopted by the crusaders in the thirteenth
century, to prevent their armour from being heated
by the sun's rays, a mode still continued by the
Mamelukes in Egypt, was at first of merely varie-
gated patterns, but soon became embellished with
the same armorial bearings as the shield ; — hence,
the expression, * coat of arms.' It was a long loose
dress, without sleeves, open before and behind, for
the convenience of riding, and girted round the
waist by the cingulum militare, or belt. It was put
on over the hauberk, and reached to the neck;
and when the hood was placed on the head, it was
covered by it as far as the shoulders. The front
and back were emblazoned alike." '
This piece of dress appears to have been the
same as the tabard. It is thus taken notice of by
Thomas Hearne : " Tabard, a jacket, jerket, man-
dilion, or sleeveless coat, worne in times past by
noblemen in the warrs ; but now only by heralds,
and is called their coat-of-arms in service." Ver-
stegan tells us, in his Restitution of Decayed Intel-
ligence, " That tabert was anciently a short gown,
that reached no further than the mid-leg, that it
remaineth for the name of a town in Germanie and
in the Netherlands, and that in England it is now
the name only of a herald's coat." But what Stowe
tells us, in his Survey of London, is more remarkable,
where, talking of several fair inns in Southwark,
he takes occasion to speak of the Tabard Inn as
the most ancient of them, and thereupon writes
thus : " Amongst the which inn es, the most ancient
is the Tabard, so called of the signe, which, as wee
now term it, is of a jacket, or sleevelesse coate,
whole before, open on both sides, with a square
2«
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. v.
collar; winged at the shoulders : a stately garment,
of old time commonly worne of noblemen and
others, both at home and abroad in the wars ; but
then (to wit, in the warres) their armes embroid-
ered, or otherwise depict upon them, that every
man by his coate of armes might bee knowne from
others : but now these tabards are onely worne by
the heralds, and bee called their coates-of-armes in
service." Allusion is also made, by Wyntown, to
the tabard of John Baliol, who, on being stripped of
the ensigns of royalty by his magnanimous con-
queror, the " pelure" or fur, was also torn from
his tabard. The passage is curious :
" This Jhon the Balliol on purpos
He tuk, and browcht hym til Mwnros ;
And in the castell of that Town,
That than wes famows in renown,
This Jhon the Ballyol dyspoylyd he
Of all hys Robys of Ryalte.
The Pelure thai tuk off hys Tabart,
(Twnie Tabart he wes callyt eftyrwart.)"
Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 88.
The " steylle capleyne" it is very likely, may
have been taken from the "chapelle de for," or
" iron hat," which, the same writer says, had a rim
and convex crown, and was worn over the capu-
chon or hood. u After being placed on the head,
it was kept from turning round, when struck, by
cords, with which it was fastened to the shoulders.
The effigy of Sir Roger de Trompington not only
gives its form, but shows that it was sometimes
held to the body by means of a chain. It was
ornamented in front with a cross fleury, the trans-
verse bar of which was pierced with occularia, or
openings for the sight." That worn by Wallace,
however, does not appear to have had this advan-
tage, for
" His face he kepit, for it was euir bar,
With his twa handis."
The limbs were usually defended at this time,
by being encased in boiled leather, on which knee-
plates of iron, and guards for the shin-bones, were
fixed ; these, with a round or triangular shield,
painted with the armorial bearings of the wearer,
formed the defensive armour of the period.
Wallace's favourite weapon appears to have been
along and ponderous two-handed sword, which
his prodigious strength enabled him to wield with
the greatest ease *. The mace and spear were
* Respecting the armour and sword of Wallace, Doctor
Jamieson has the following note. " In the Castle of Dun-
barton, they pretend to show the mail, and, if I mistake not,
also the sword of Wallace. If he was confined in that for-
tress by Monteith, before being sent into England, as some
have supposed, it is not improbable that his armour might
be left there. The popular belief on this head, however, is
very strong ; of which I recollect a singular proof, which
took place many years ago, and of which I was an eye-
witness. In the procession of King Crispin, at Glasgow, his
Majesty was always preceded by one on horseback, appearing
as his champion. In former times, this champion of the
awl thought it enough to wear a leathern jerkin, formed like
one of mail. One fellow, however, was appointed, of a more
aspiring genius than his predecessors, who was determined
to appear in real mail ; and who, having sent to Dunbarton
Castle, and hired the use of Wallace's armour for a day,
made his perambulations with it through the streets of
Glasgow. I can never forget the ghastly appearance of this
also at times used by him ; and for close rencoun-
ters in castles, peels, and other confined situations,
he was furnished with a dagger for each hand, of a
particular kind, having guards, which extended
above the wrist, between which the hand passed ;
and grasping a transverse bar about an inch from
the spring of the dagger, the weapon projected
from the centre of the first, like the horn of an
unicorn. This sort of dagger was often attached,
by a kind of hinge, to the arm-plate, and could be
folded back under the arm between the wrist and
the elbow when not in use, and secured and con-
cealed in that position by the cloth gloves, which
our hero appeai-s to have worn over his " glowis of
plate *."
poor man, who was so chilled and overburdened by the armour,
that, as the procession moved, he was under the necessity
of frequently supporting himself with a cordial. It was said
that he took to bed immediately after the termination of
this procession, and never rose from it. From that time
forward, his successors in office were content to wear the
proper badge of their profession." — Dr. Jamieson' s Notes on
Blind Harry.
On this extract from the Doctor's invaluable work, the
writer has to remark, that information derived from inquiry
made on the subject, does not entirely confirm the correct-
ness of all the statements that extract contains. That a
man in real armour figured in the procession of King Crispin
at Glasgow, about forty years ago, is a well-known fact ; but
that the armour had belonged to Wallace, is any thing but
certain. If so precious a deposit had been in the charge of
the Governor of Dumbarton Castle, it is conceived he must
have possessed more good nature than became his situation,
if he lent it out to grace any such fooleries. Certain it is, if
such armour was in Dumbarton Castle at the time, it is
unknown to those connected with the garrison at present ;
and we cannot conceive that a relic, so valuable in the esti-
mation of the public, would have totally disappeared, with-
out its being known what had become of it. The inquiries
of the writer enable him to state, that the mail used on this
occasion was lent to the followers of King Crispin by a gen-
tleman belonging to Glasgow, of the name of Wilsone. It
was plate-armour and highly-polished. The sons of the awl,
however, had a taste of their own in such matters, and took
the liberty of painting it in oil, of a colour more to their
fancy. But on being returned in this altered condition, it
was thrown aside by the indignant proprietor. All that they
pretend to show in the Castle of Dumbarton, as having
belonged to Wallace, is a sword of a very antique fashion,
intended to be used in both hands, but by no means of a
weight that would prevent men of ordinary strength of the
present day from wielding it. There is no proof, however,
that it belonged to the Deliverer of Scotland ; and, if we may
credit the account given by old people, of its having been
dragged up from the bottom of the Clyde by the anchor of a
vessel about sixty years ago, its identity becomes more than
doubtful. Such, however, is the prevalence of the report in
its favour, that it was some time since sent to London for
the inspection of certain official characters connected with
the Board of Ordnance. At the time it was sent off, it
wanted several inches of its length, which, it seems, had
been broke off by some accident. Whatever may have been
the opinion of those to whom it Avas sent, respecting its con-
nection with Wallace, we know not; but as they were at
the trouble of getting it repaired, in a manner that reflects
credit on the talents of the artist, and returning it with a
handsome scabbard, they have at least paid a compliment to
the prejudice in its favour.
* A specimen of this formidable weapon the writer has
seen in the Museum at Inverness.
CHAP. VI.]
THE PEEL OF GARGUNNOCK TAKEN.
29
Having said thus much of the dress and equip-
ment of Wallace, the following anecdote respecting
his strength and personal appearance, may not be
unacceptable to the reader ; it is translated from
Hector Boe'ce by the learned editor of Morrison's
edition of Blind Harry, who thus introduces it.
" Though this author (Boe'ce) in general is not
much to be credited, yet it would be hard not to
believe him in an instance which happened near
his own time, and in which, if he had spoken
falsely, he could immediately have been detected.
The anecdote in another respect is curious, as it
affords an example of longevity, not unsimilar to
that of the Irish Countess of Desmond, who at-
tained a still more advanced age.
"The date is the year 1430. At that time,
James I. was in Perth ; and perhaps having heard
Henry the Minstrel* recite some of Wallace's
exploits, found his curiosity excited to visit a noble
lady of great age, who was able to inform him of
many ancient matters. She lived in the castle of
Kinnoul, on the opposite side of the river, and was
probably a widow of one of the Lords of Erskine,
a branch of whose family continued to be denomi-
nated from the barony of Kinnoul, till about the
year 1440. It was Boece's manner to relate an
event as circumstantially as if he had been one of
the parties, and engaged in it ; I shall therefore
give the anecdote in his own manner, by translating
his words :
" ' In consequence of her extreme old age, she
had lost her sight, but all her other senses were
entire ; and her body was yet firm and lively ;
she had seen William Wallace and Robert Bruce,
and frequently told particulars concerning them.
The King, who entertained a love and veneration
of greatness, resolved to visit the old lady, that he
might hear her describe the manners and strength
of the two heroes, who were admired in his time, as
they now are in ours. He therefore sent a mes-
sage, acquainting her that he was to come to her
next day. She received the message gratefully,
and gave immediate orders to her handmaids to
prepare every thing for his reception in the best
manner, particularly that they should display her
pieces of tapestry, some of which were uncommonly
rich and beautiful. All her servants became busily
employed, for their work was in some degree un-
usual, as she had not for a long time been accus-
tomed to receive princely visitors. The next day,
when told the King was approaching, she went
down into the hall of her castle, dressed with as
much elegance and finery as her old age and the
fashion of the time would permit ; attended by a
train of matrons, many of whom were her own
descendants, of which number some appeared more
altered and disfigured by age than she herself was.
One of her matrons having informed her that the
king was entering the hall, she arose from her seat,
and advanced to meet him so easily and gracefully,
* According to Pinkerton and other authorities, Henry
did not finish his work till 1470. It is therefore more pro-
bable that the curiosity of James was excited by the original
narrative of Blair ; a book which, from his long captivity in
England, he had perhaps heard little about, till his return
to Scotland. The rehearsal, therefore, of the heroic achieve-
ments of his illustrious countryman, may have produced all
the excitement which the Editor of the Perth edition sup-
poses, though not made by the Minstrel.
that he doubted of her being wholly blind. At his
desire she embraced and kissed him. Her atten-
dant assured him that she was wholly blind ; but
that, from long custom, she had acquired these
easy movements. He took her by the hand and
sat down, desiring her to sit on the same seat next
to him. And then, in a long conference, he inter-
rogated her respecting ancient matters. He was
much delighted with her conversation. Among
other things, he asked her to tell him what sort of
a man William Wallace was ? what was his per-
sonal figure 1 what his courage ? and with what
degree of strength he was endowed ? He put the
same questions to her concerning Bruce. Robert,
she said, was a man beautiful, and of a fine appear-
ance. His strength was so great, that he could
easily have overcome any mortal man of his time :
but in so far as he excelled other men, he was
excelled by Wallace, both in stature and in bodily
strength ; for, in wrestling, Wallace could have
overcome two such men as Robert was.
" ' The King made some inquiries concerning
his own immediate parents, and his other ancestors ;
and having heard her relate many things, returned
to Perth, well pleased with the visit he had made.' "
(Bom. Hist. i. xvii.)
CHAPTER VI.
PEEL OF GARGUNNOCK TAKEN BY THE SCOTS — THE
BKABFUTES OF LAMINGTON OPPRESSED BY THE
ENGLISH — THE ORPHAN OF LAMINGTON — SIR RAY-
NALD CRAWFORD SUMMONED TO GLASGOW — WALLACE
CAPTURES THE BAGGAGE OF PERCY — RETIRES TO
LENNOX VARIOUS RENCOUNTERS WITH THE
ENGLISH.
THE Scottish insurgents, being now abundantly
supplied with all the munitions of war, and animated
by their success to the highest pitch of enthusiasm,
became impatient to prosecute hostilities against
their oppressors ; and their leader, who was not of
a character to allow the swords of brave men to
rust in their scabbards, soon found them an oppor-
tunity to gratify their wishes.
At Gargunnock, in the neighbourhood of Stirling,
the English had erected a small fortification or peel,
which they had plentifully furnished with provi-
sions. Some of the Scots in that quarter, who
secretly adhered to Wallace, observed the care-
lessness which at times prevailed in setting the
watch, and that the drawbridge was occasionally left
down all night, for the purpose of admitting, in the
morning, the labourers who were still employed
about it, — conveyed the intelligence to their chief,
who resolved to make himself master of the place
the following night. Accordingly, two spies were
despatched to ascertain the probability of success.
Towards evening a column of smoke was seen
rising from a neighbouring hill : it was the signal
agreed upon, if the party were to advance. Wal-
lace instantly set his men in motion, and about
midnight arrived in front of the place which was
the object of attack. As they expected, the draw-
bridge was down, but they found the door strongly
secured within. Impatient at the delay this occa-
sioned, our hero raised a heavy piece of timber,
and, rushing with it against the door, the fastenings
30
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. vi.
gave way with a violence that loosened the stones,
not yet properly cemented, and nearly a yard of
the wall came tumbling to the ground. The porter,
awakened by the noise, attempted to strike him
with a ponderous mace. Wallace avoided the
blow ; and, before he could recover his unwieldy
weapon, laid him lifeless at his feet. Thornton,
the captain of the garrison, now appeared, with the
men under his command ; but the Scots had got
too firm footing within the fort, to be easily ex-
pelled. After a sanguinary conflict, in which the
captain fell by the hand of Wallace, the garrison
were put to the sword, with the exception of the
women and children, who received from the victors
as much courtesy as the rudeness of the age
entitled them to expect. The wife and three
children of Thornton, after being supplied with
what necessaries they required, were allowed to
depart along with the other females, and furnished
with a pass from Wallace, by which they could
proceed in safety to any of the towns in the pos-
session of the English. The Scots found in the
peel of Gargunnock * abundance of all kinds of
necessaries, with a large sum of money, which
Wallace divided equally among his followers ; and,
after distributing what part of the stores they did
not require among his oppressed countrymen in
the neighbourhood, he demolished the fortifica-
tion, and proceeded with his companions on
their crusade against the enemies of their inde-
pendence.
, Though Wallace was thus actively engaged in
harassing the enemies of the country, the calami-
ties and acts of oppression with which particular
families or individuals were visited, neither escaped
his attention, nor failed to call forth that inter-
ference which their circumstances demanded ; and,
amid the many cases of private suffering which
came under his notice, none appeared to affect him
more deeply than the desolation which had over-
taken a respectable and ancient family in the
neighbourhood of Lanark. Hew de Bradfute, a
zealous advocate for the liberties of Scotland, pos-
sessed the lands of Lamington, and left them at
his death to his son, who had imbibed, with all the
ardour of youth, that love of liberty so fondly che-
rished by his father. For some display of these
patriotic feelings, he had incurred the displeasure
of Hasilrig, or Hasliope, the English governor of
Lanark, who found a pretext for attacking him in
his castle, and put him, along with a number of his
friends, to the sword. The house and lands of
Lamington now became the right of a surviving
sister. The youth and beauty of this young gen-
tlewoman attracted the notice of the murderer of
her friends ; and, under the pretence of a regard
for her safety, obliged her to take up her residence
in Lanark. For this protection, considerable sums
were, from time to time, levied upon her property.
The cupidity of Hasilrig, not satisfied with these
; exactions, intended her as a match either for him-
* A little south of the village, there is a conical height
called Kin-hill, which is evidently artificial, and seems to
have been a military work. There are the remains of a ditch
or rampart of a circular form, which proves that it is not of
Roman origin. It is probably of later date, and appears to
have been the place from which Sir William Wallace sallied
forth on the night when he took by surprise the Peel of
Gargunnock.''— Stat. Ace. xviii. 116, 117.
self or his son ; and the helpless girl had no means
of averting this hateful connection, but by pleading
for delay, till her grief for her slaughtered kindred
had abated. Every indulgence of this kind was
accompanied by a fresh exaction on her property,
till the victim of his avarice became an object of
commiseration even to those who were themselves
suffering under the hand of the oppressor. Henry
draws a most fascinating picture of this lovely
orphan ; and we have no reason to doubt the
assemblage of virtues and graces in which he has
arrayed her person and character, particularly as
he is borne out in what he says by the Prior of
St. Serf's, and other respectable authorities.
While attending her religious duties at a church
near Lanark, Wallace first saw this interesting
female. The beauty of her person, the grace and
propriety of her demeanour, added to her forlorn
situation, excited the tenderest sensations in the
bosom of our hero. A circumstance, however,
which occurred about this juncture, served to
divide his attention with the fair object of his
solicitude.
For the purpose of levying fresh assessments on
certain districts of the country, an extraordinary
council of the English authorities was appointed to
meet with the Bishop of Durham at Glasgow,
which see had been now occupied by this ambi-
tious ecclesiastic. Sir Raynald Crawford, the
uncle of our hero, though long since deprived of
his commission, was summoned to attend as sheriff
of Ayr in right of his birth. Whether this was an
indirect attempt to conciliate Wallace, or if it was
merely done on the supposition that the Scots
would submit to their imposts with more patience
if some of their countrymen appeared as the
assessors, cannot now be distinctly ascertained.
The sheriff, however, prepared to obey the man-
date ; while his nephew, always suspicious of the
intentions of the English, resolved, along with two
of his followers, to watch over the safety of his
relative, and observe the motions of the enemy.
In those times the accommodations for travellers
were far from complete. With the exception of
convents, such houses of entertainment as might
be found on the roads, afforded them little more
than shelter -from the inclemency of the weather ;
and travellers who came to spend the night, were
expected to bring their food and other necessaries
along with them, particularly those who journeyed
with retinues. Under such circumstances, Sir
Raynald's party were provided with a sumpter-
horse to carry their provisions.
They had not proceeded far, before they came
up with the servants of Percy, conducting his bag-
gage. One of their horses having met with an ac-
cident, they stopped the sheriff's party, and in-
sisted on having their sumpter-horse, in order to
supply the place of the one that had become dis-
abled. It was in vain to remonstrate with those
who had the power, and were determined to do an
act of injustice. Wallace, from a distance, saw the
load rudely thrown from the back of the horse, and
the animal carried off. The sheriff, in conse-
quence, had to remain at Mearns for the night.
The convoy that protected the baggage of Percy
consisted of five of his personal retainers, and had
reached the vicinity of the little township of Cath-
cart, when they heard the noise of our hero's steed
behind them, followed by his companions ; but as
CHAP. VI.]
SKIRMISHES WITH THE ENGLISH.
31
there appeared to be only three to five, the Eng-
lish determined to stand on their defence. The
contest, however, was soon decided ; and the Eng-
lish, from the loopholes of the neighbouring castle
of Cathcart, saw their countrymen slaughtered,
and the baggage under their protection rifled or
carried off, without venturing to quit their strong-
hold. Money and other valuables, to a consider-
able amount, fell into the hands of the victors, who
lost no time in making their way towards Glasgow,
in order to cross the Clyde at that place, and thus
effect their retreat into the Lennox before Percy
could be apprised of his loss.
Having effected their object, they sheltered
themselves for the night in the neighbourhood of
Dumbarton, and on the morrow proceeded to-
wards the wilds of the Lomond. Here Wallace
was joyfully received by Malcolm Earl of Lennox,
who, with a number of his trusty tenantry, main-
tained, amid the fastnesses of that romantic dis-
trict, a protracted, and sometimes a successful
struggle, for their independence. This nobleman
offered to place his followers under the command
of Sir William, provided he would remain among
them for the defence of the Lennox. His mind,
however, was too deeply impressed with a desire
for the general good of his country, to allow him to
think of confining his exertions within the limits
proposed. On explaining his plan of warfare to
this worthy chieftain, he found no difficulty in
gaining him over to his views, and inducing him
to co-operate in extending the spirit of insurrec-
tion, as well as to create a more powerful diversion
in favour of those who were already embarked in
the cause. With this understanding, Wallace took
his departure, accompanied by a number of his
companions, who had resorted to him on discover-
ing the place of his retreat.
The mortification of Percy, on receiving the ac-
counts of the capture of his baggage, was consider-
ably increased by the subsequent proceedings of
Wallace and his partisans. An express had just
reached Glasgow, announcing the fate of the gar-
rison of Gargunnock when another made his ap-
pearance, giving an account of the slaughter of a
party of English in the neighbourhood of Doune.
Sir Raynald Crawford, who had been put under an
arrest on suspicion of being concerned in the affair
at Cathcart, was now ordered before the council,
and, though he had been able to establish an alibi
with regard to the offence charged against him,
yet, after being strictly interrogated as to his know-
ledge of his nephew's places of concealment, he
was forced. to take an oath against affording him
shelter, or holding any correspondence with him,
directly or indirectly, so long as he remained under
the ban of outlawry ; he was also sworn to afford
the English all the information in his power, in
order that means might be taken for bringing him
to punishment.
While Percy and his coadjutor were thus em-
ployed at Glasgow, Wallace and his followers were
concerting measures, in the depths of Methven
Wood, for an attack on a body of English troops
which were to leave St. Johnstone on the day fol-
lowing ; in order to proceed to Kincleven Castle,
headed by an old veteran knight named Butler,
who had rendered himself peculiarly obnoxious to
the Scots by the cruelties which he had inflicted
upon them. Intelligence of this intended move-
ment was communicated to Wallace, who, having
disguised himself in the dress of a borderer, got
introduced into St. Johnstone under the name of
William Malcolmson. The mayor, before whom
he had to appear, was so well pleased with his
humorous conversation, and the account which
he gave of himself, that he allowed him to go in
search of the employment he pretended to have
come in quest of. By this means he had all the
facilities he could desire for becoming acquainted
with the strength and condition of the garrison.
Having ascertained the intended removal of the
troops alluded to, he hastened back to his retreat
in the woods, where, sounding his horn, he rallied
his associates around him, and found them all
willing to engage in the enterprise.
Sir James Butler, who was esteemed one of the
bravest old warriors among the English, had on
this occasion about a hundred choice soldiers under
his command. With this force he was quietly pro-
ceeding, amid the thick haze of the morning, to
reinforce the garrison of Kincleven, when, from
behind a rock that projected over the road, he was
suddenly assailed by the Scots. The confusion
occasion by their unexpected attack, disconcerted
the English commander, and before he could
recover his troops from their consternation, a fresh
charge threw them into complete disorder. The
strength and valour of the undaunted champion of
the Scots rendered the advantage which their ene-
mies possessed, in point of numbers, of little avail.
It must, however, be allowed, that the disparity in
this instance was not so great as in some previous
rencounters : Wallace, according to some accounts,
having near sixty hardy warriors under his com-
mand, most part of whom had distinguished them-
selves on former occasions. Kerle or Kerle, to
whom he had presented the mace or staff of steel,
taken from the porter at the Peel of Gargunnock,
displayed on this occasion the most determined
bravery ; his formidable weapon being wielded
with a dexterity which admirably seconded the
efforts of our hero. Sixteen of the English had
fallen beneath the swords of the Scots ; but when
Wallace came in contact with Sir James Butler,
the conflict was of short duration. The old veteran
was no match for the young patriot ; and on seeing
their chief fall beneath the arm of his adversary,
the rout of the English became general. The
disordered rabble fled in terror towards Kincleven,
from the battlements of which their discomfiture
had been observed ; and those within hastened to
let down the drawbridge to receive and shelter
their flying countrymen. Onwards came the con-
fused mass of friends and foes, — the' shouts of the
victors mingled with the cries of the vanquished,
and thundering over the drawbridge, the pursued
and their pursuers entered the castle together.
The few soldiers that were in the place could render
them but little assistance in making head against
their enemies ; and the whole, with the exception
of two priests, and some women and children,
were indiscriminately put to the sword.
Having cleared the place of the dead bodies of
the English, and taken precautions against a sur-
prise during the time they might remain, they pro-
ceeded to search the castle, in which was found a
rich booty in money, besides a plentiful stock of
provisions and other stores. A part of this valu-
able pillage they conveyed by night to Shortwood
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. vi.
Forest, where they prepared pits* and other
places for its concealment, there to remain as a
resource against future emergencies.
The nonjurors under Wallace were not as yet
sufficiently numerous to enable him to put garri-
sons in those fortresses which fell into his hands.
It was therefore wisely determined to demolish
every place of strength that was likely to afford
their enemies a footing in the country. Hardy
themselves, and inured to the inclemency of the
weather, they cared little for those comforts which
were indispensable to their more luxurious neigh-
bours. In summer, the forest spread its leafy
canopy over their slumbers ; and, in winter,
their robust and sinewy frames felt little in-
convenience, though exposed, in their dens and
caverns, to all the rigour of the merciless ele-
ments. Such men heard with indifference, and
executed with alacrity, the command which their
leader gave for the destruction of Kincleven
* The concealing of money and other valuables in the
earth, appears to have been a very common practice in Scot-
land, during the calamitous periods of her history; and
many an instance has been recorded of little depots coming
to light ; which it is very probable were composed of the
hard-earned plunder of the military adventurer, whose
ambition, avarice, or duty, called him off to other fields,
where he and his secret perished together.
From the many notices we have seen of the discovery of
hidden treasures, we shall select the following, as alluding
more particularly to the period embraced in our narrative.
We cannot, however, agree with the learned Editor in the
opinion, that the coins in question were hidden by the sol-
diers of Edward ; they held the country by too precarious
a tenure to make such deposits. It is more likely to have
been the share of booty belonging to some patriot Scot, who
had afterwards fallen in the cause of his country's inde-
pendence. " There was lately found, on the farm of Mr.
Rankine, of Whitehall, parish of New Cumnock, Ayrshire,
by a person employed in turning up the ground with a
spade, about two feet from the surface, a small vase, of
antique form, similar to those in the Englefield Collection,
and of very coarse materials, containing about a hundred
silver pennies of Alexander III. of Scotland, and Edward I.
of England, in good preservation, having the head and
characters distinctly legible. The English coins were more
numerous than the Scotch. Those of Alexander represent
him in profile, as do all the coins of his reign, and have
round the head, Alexander Dei Gra.; and on the other side,
Rex Scotorum, with a cross extending to the edge, and a
spur level in each of the quarters. This coin is No. 33,
first page of plates appended to Adam de Cardonnel's
Numismata Scotice. Those of Edward represent him in full
face, with Ediv. Ang.; Dus Hyb. ; and on the reverse of the
diiferent coins, Civitas Cantor, Civitas London, Civitas Lin-
coln, and almost all the mint-towns of England, with the
cross extending to the edge, and three roses in each quarter.
From the great number of these coins found in this part of
the country, it is probable they were deposited in the earth
by the soldiers of Edward, who had taken refuge in these
mountainous regions, when flying from the well-merited
indignation of the Scotch. They must have been placed in
the ground some time about the beginning of the fourteenth
century. Bruce having obtained the crown in the year 1 306,
and relating, as they do, to a most interesting period of our
history, and whichj is embalmed in the memory of every
Scotsman, they are worthy of occupying a place in the
cabinets of the curious. A few of them have been sent to
the Museum of Edinburgh College." — Scotsman.
Within these few years also, a depot was discovered at
Ascog, in the island of Bute, in which four thousand silver
pennies of Edward I. were found, most of them of the
London mintage.
Castle. After securing that part of the iron work
which might be useful in their sylvan retreats, the
remaining furniture and lumber were formed into
piles ; and, at the dead hour of night, the confla-
gration rose in volumes to the sky. From the
lateness of the hour, and the secluded situation of
the castle, its fate remained unknown until the
morning, when the smoke, which continued to
ascend from the ruins, led the country people to
the knowledge of the desolating vengeance which
had overtaken their oppressors. The females, who
had been allowed to depart before the work of de-
struction commenced, carried to St. Johnstone
the melancholy account of their disaster.
The grief and indignation which were felt among
the English at St. Johnstone, on hearing the dole-
ful recital of the slaughter of their countrymen,
induced Sir Gerald Heron,* the governor, to allow
Sir John Butler, son of the forementioned Sir
James, to follow the Scots with all the force of the
garrison, to revenge the death of his father. In
this undertaking he was joined by Sir William de
Lorayne, an officer of reputation, and a great
favourite with the soldiery.
Although the force under these leaders amounted
to nearly a thousand men, from the admirable
management of the Scottish chief, they were kept
in a great measure ignorant of their own vast
superiority. In the forest of Shortwood, a part of
which they endeavoured to invest, their provident
enemy had erected a number of rustic fortifications,
in the form of squares, communicating with each
other, the walls of which were made, by affixing
two rows of planks to the trees, and filling up the
space between with thorns. Each of these squares
had a small opening towards the enemy, and
another at the opposite side, for the purpose of
retreat ; while the advance towards them was
intersected by defences, formed in a similar man-
ner, in order to break, and otherwise prevent the
approach of too great a body of the enemy. By
this means, when the Scots found themselves
obliged to retire for shelter to these intrenchments,
they could only be pursued in broken and strag-
gling detachments. These defences were not fully
completed when the English came in sight ; and
Wallace, therefore, in order to gain time, appeared
at a distant and almost detached part of the wood
with a few of his followers, leaving the rest under
the command of Stephen of Ireland, to complete
the works. On the approach of the English, an
arrow from the powerful and unerring hand of our
hero, brought down one of their advanced-guard.
This had the effect of attracting their attention
towards that part of the wood where he had sta-
tioned his little party, who also sent their arrows
* " This appears to have been the head of the ancient
family of Heron, who held Ford Castle in Northumberland.
In the reign of Henry III. it was in possession of Sir Wil-
liam Heron, who was Governor of the Castles of Barn-
borough, Pickering, and Scarborough, Lord Warden of the
Forests north of Trent, and sheriff of Northumberland for
eleven successive years." — Vide Hutchinson's Northumber-
land, ii. 19. " This Castle has attracted much attention, as
having been the scene of the enchantments of its fair mis-
tress, by means of which our infatuated James IV. was dis-
armed before the battle of Flodden ; and it has acquired addi-
tional celebrity, from the no less bewitching muse of the
Author of Marmion." — Dr. Jamieson's Notes on Blind
Harry.
CHAP. VI.]
SKIRMISHES WITH THE ENGLISH.
33
among the English, though not with such good
effect as their chief, who continued to bring down
his man as they advanced. The enemy, having
observed the opening at which Wallace made his
appearance to discharge his deadly shafts, sent
forward one of the most expert of their Lancashire
bowmen to lie in wait for him, while the rest
directed their missiles at random toward those
parts where they conceived his men to be sta-
tioned. It was not long before the eagerness of
Wallace betrayed him to the practised hand of his
watchful adversary, whose well-directed shaft, after
grazing the collar of steel which he usually wore,
stuck fast in the fleshy part of his neck. His
keen eye, however, soon discovered his lurking foe ;
and, hurrying towards him, intercepted his retreat,
and slew him in front of his companions, who were
so struck with the boldness of the deed, that not
one of them attempted to oppose his return to his
associates. Although the Scots were generally
thought inferior to the English in the use of the
bow*, on the present occasion, having the covering
* It would be rather difficult to assign sufficient reasons
for the inferiority of the Scottish archers to those of England ;
and perhaps it may be one of those popular errors, which,
being once promulgated, has passed unquestioned. The
ridicule which James I. has thrown upon a certain portion
of his countrymen, in his poem of Chryst's Kirk on the
Green, has no doubt tended to confirm, or perhaps to give
rise to the opinion. The advice which Robert Bruce gave
his countrymen, always to attack and disperse the Eng-
lish archers, as early in the engagement as possible, is like-
wise quoted as an instance of the dread which the Scots
entertained for this description of their enemies' force. But
this advice most probably was suggested, more from the vast
multitudes of bowmen which the English had it in their
power to bring into the field,. than from any peculiar or indi-
vidual advantage they possessed at their weapon. The
archers whom Bruce attacked and dispersed at the battle of
Bannockburn were chiefly Welsh ; — when individual trials
of skill occurred, any inferiority on the part of the Scots
•was never very conspicuous ; and there appears no reason it
should have been so. The attention they bestowed on the
art was at least equal to that of their neighbours. This is
evident, from the numerous wapenschaws established all
over the country. In the works of Lindsay of Pittscottie,
we have the following account of a " waigeour of archerie,"
between the Queen Dowager of Scotland and her son
James V. : — " In this yeir cam an Inglisch ambassadour out
of Ingland, callit Lord Williame, ane bischope, and vther
gentlmen, to the number of thrie scoir horss, quhilkis war
all able, wailled gentlmen, for all kynd of pastime, as schot-
ting, louping, wrastling, runing, and casting of the stone.
Bot they war weill assayed in all these or they went home ;
and that be thair awin provocatioun, and almost evir tint,
quhill at the last the kingis mother favoured the Inglismen,
becaus shoe was the king of Inglandis sister : and thairfoir
shoe tuik ane waigeour of archerie vpoun the Inglishmanis
handis. contrair the King hir sone, and any half duzoun
Scottismen, either noblmen, gentlmen, or yeamanes, that so
many Inglisch men sould schott againes them at riveris,
buttis, or prick bonnett. The King, heiring of this bonspeill
of his mother, was weill content. So thair was laid an
hundreth crounes and ane tun of wyne pandit on everie syd.
The ground was chosin in St. Androis ; the Scottis archeris
was thrie landit gentlmen and thrie yeamanes, to witt,
David Weimes of that ilk, David Arnott of that ilk, and
Mr. Johne Wedderburne, viccar of Dundie. The yeamanes
was Johne Thomsone in Leith, Stevin Tabroner, and Alex-
ander Baillie, who was ane pyper, and schott vondrous neir,
and wan the vaigour from the Inglismen ; and thairefter
went in to the toun and maid ane banquett to the king and
the queine, and the Inglisch ambassadour, with the wholl tuo
of the wood to shelter them from the superior
number and direct view of their adversaries, they
managed, by shifting their ground as their enemies
advanced, to keep up a kind of bush-fight till after
noon ; during which time fifteen of the English
had been slain by the hand of Wallace, besides a
considerable number by his companions. Their
arrows being all expended, and having arrived at
a part of the forest, where a high cliff prevented
their further retreat, Sir William de Lorayne
advanced upon them with nearly three hundred
men, while Sir Gerald Heron and young Butler
remained without the forest, in order to prevent
the escape of any of the fugitives. Wallace had
just time to make a short animating address to his
companions ; and placing them so as to have the
advantage of the clift as a protection to their rear,
they stood prepared for the onslaught. The Eng-
lish were astonished to find themselves opposed to
so small a number of Scots as now appeared wait-
ing their attack, and conceived they would have
little else to do than to surround the party and
take them prisoners. The determined valour, how-
ever, with which they received and repulsed their
repeated charges, convinced them that the toils of
the day were not yet over. Wallace, who was
always a tower of strength to his friends in the
hour of danger, displayed, on this occasion, more
than his usual heroism. While the strength which
nerved his resistless arm excited the greatest
enthusiasm among his followers, and spread horror
and dismay through the ranks of their enemies,
Sir William de Lorayne still urged his men on to
the conflict, and they as quickly receded, when
they found themselves opposed to that champion
of whose strength and exploits they had heard so
many appalling accounts. The battle, however,
still continued to rage with unabated fury on both
sides ; — the English, eager to revenge the slaughter
of their countrymen, and the Scots, frantic with
the wrongs they had already sustained, determined
to conquer or die on the spot. At this time their
dauntless chief burst like a thunderbolt amidst the
thickest of the English ; and, having scattered
them before him, ascended a little hillock behind
which they had retreated, and applying his bugle-
horn to his mouth, made the woodlands resound
with a bold and animating war-note. The English
hundreth crounes, and the tuo tunes of wyne. Albeit that
the Inglismen confessed that the Scottismen sauld have
been fried of the payment of that banqueitt, quhilk was so
gorgeous that it was of no les awaill than the said gold and
wyne extended to." — Chronicles of Scotland, by Lindsay of
Pitscottie, vol. ii. p. 347, 348. It may also be observed, that
the value which the Scots set upon the quality of the fea-
thers used for their arrows, bespeaks a considerable pro-
ficiency in the art. Those of the Earn appear, from the
following extract, to have been in the greatest request. " In
the west and north-west of Scotland, there is a great repayr-
ing of the Erne, of a marvellous nature : the people are
very curious to catch him, and punze his wings, that hee
fly not. Hee is of a hudge quantity, and a ravenous kind
as the hawks, and the same qualitie. They doe give him
such sort of meat, in great quantity at once, that hee lives
contented therewith 14, 16, or 20 dayes, and some of them
a moneth. Their feathers are good for garnishing of arrowes,
for they receive no raine nor water, but remaine alwayes of
a durable estate, and uncorruptible. The people doe use
them either when they be a hunting, or at warres." — A
Memoriall of the most Rare and Wonderful Things in Scot-
land.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP, vi
leader, conceiving that this was done in derision,
rallied his forces, and again advanced to the attack.
Wallace and his few hardy veterans were soon
environed by their enraged assailants, and the
battle commenced anew with all the rancour of
their former animosities. Though the Scots fought
with the most inflexible obstinacy, yet some of
them, from the severity of their wounds, appeared
unable to continue much longer the unequal con-
test ; but at this critical juncture, Stephen of Ire-
land, and his party, in obedience to the signal
sounded by their chief, suddenly emerged from the
brush-wood, and fell upon the rear of the enemy
with determined ferocity. Surprised and dismayed
at so unexpected an attack, the English fled in the
greatest confusion, followed by the victors, who
continued the pursuit, making dreadful carnage
among them, till they reached the boundary of the
forest. Here the terrified fugitives were met by
Sir John Butler, at the head of five hundred men.
This accession of force obliged the Scots, in their
turn, to retreat to their defences — the first of
which was carried by the enemy, but at the ex-
pense of a considerable number of the bravest of
their warriors. The English had now the mortifi-
cation to find that their opponents had only retired
to a second enclosure, from which Wallace, sup-
ported by Cleland, Boyd, and a few of the most
resolute of his companions, made a sortie, in which,
after killing a considerable number, Wallace came
in contact with the knight of Lorayne, and at one
blow clove him to the chin. His terrified fol-
lowers shrunk aghast from the ponderous weapon
of their gigantic adversary ; but urged on by
Butler, to revenge the death of their leader, they
again crowded round the little band of heroes.
Again they were dispersed ; and Butler, who had
been foremost in the attack, came within reach of
the sword of the Scottish champion, which de-
scended with a force that would have cut him to
the ground, had not the intervening branch of a
tree saved him from the blow, and his men, rush-
ing forward to his assistance, carried him off" before
it could be repeated. According to some accounts,
Butler is said to have been first wounded, and that
Sir William de Lorayne was slain in attempting to
rescue him from his perilous situation. Whatever
may have been the case, the English were so dis-
couraged by the loss of one leader, and the dis-
abling of the other, that they hastily fell back upon
the troops left at the entrance of the forest under
Sir Gerald Heron. Here a council of war was
held, wherein it was proposed to make a simulta-
neous attack on the defences of the Scots. During
the discussion, however, which ensued on the man-
ner of carrying the proposal into effect, Wallace
and his companions escaped by the opposite side of
the forest, and retreated to Cargyle wood, a situa-
tion which afforded them more natural advantages
hi securing themselves from their numerous as-
sailants.
The English, on the retreat of the Scots, now
commenced a strict search after the booty taken
from Kincleven Castle. Nothing, however, could
be discovered, save the favourite steed of old
Butler, which had been left behind in one of the
enclosures. On this his wounded son was placed,
and the whole cavalcade returned fatigued and
dispirited to St. Johnstone, leaving one hundred
and twenty of their companions dead behind them.
Of the Scots, seven were killed, and the rest more
or less injured.
From an elevated situation, Wallace had ob-
served the English as they retired to St. John-
stone ; and, though still smarting from the wounds
he had received, returned at midnight to the scene
of action with a number of his companions and
dug up the most valuable part of the concealed
plunder, which they conveyed to their new retreat,
along with whatever arms or other booty the light
of the moon enabled them to strip from the dead
bodies that lay scattered around them.
A few days after the above rencounter, Wallace
is said to have returned to St. Johnstone in the
disguise of a priest ; and a story is told of his
having been betrayed by a female, with whom he
had become acquainted during his former visit to
that place. Repenting, however, of the informa-
tion she had given his enemies, she disclosed the
danger that awaited him just in time to effect his
escape. His foes, enraged at the disappointment,
again set off in pursuit of him, taking along with
them a slough-hound * to assist them in discovering
his retreats. A sanguinary battle was again fought,
in which Wallace lost nine of his remaining
followers, and the English leader about one hun-
dred.
In this retreat of the Scots, their chief is also
said to have slain one of his followers, named
Fawdon, an Irishman, whom he suspected of trea-
* " So late as the reign of James I. of England, there is
an order dated A. D. 1616, that no less then nine blood-
hounds should be kept on the Border, upon Esk and other
places mentioned." — Pennant's Tour, 1772. i 77. ii. 397.
John Harding has given a curious account of the means
used by Edward I. for taking Bruce, similar to that here
said to have been employed against Wallace.
" The king Edward with homes and houndes him soght,
With menne on fote, through marris, mosse & myre,
Through wodes also & mountens, (wher they fought),
And euer the kyng Edward hight men greate hyre,
Hym for to take by might conquere ;
But thei might hym not gette, by force ne by traine,
He satte by the fyre when thei (went) in the rain."
The following description of these dogs is from an old
writer, well acquainted with their character. " In Scotland
are dogs of marveylous condition, above the nature of other
dogs. The first is a hound of great swiftnesse, hardiness,
and strength, fierce and cruell upon all wilde beasts, and
eger against thieves that offer their masters any violence
The second is a rach, or hound, verie exquisite in following
the foote, (which is called drawing), whether it be of man or
beast ; yea, he will pursue any maner of fowle, and find out
whatsoever fish haunting the land, or lurking amongst the
rocks, especially the otter, by that excellent sent of smelling
wherewith he is indued. The third sort is no greater than
the aforesaid raches, in colour for the most part red, with
blacke spots, or else black and full of red markes. These
are so skillfull, (being used by practise), that they will pur-
sue a thiefe, or thiefe-stolne goods, in the most precise
maner, and finding the trespasser, with great audacity they
will make a race upon him, or if he take the water for his
safeguard, he shrinketh not to follow him ; and entring and
issuing at the same places where the party went in and out,
hee never ceaseth to range till he hath noysed his footing,
and bee come to the place wherein the thiefe is shrowded or
hid. These dogs are called Sleuth-hounds. There was a
law amongst the borderers of England and Scotland, that
whosoever denyed entrance to such a hound, in pursute
made after felons and stolne goods, should be holden as
accessary unto the theft, or taken for the selfe same thiefe."
—Account of the Red Deer and Wild Beasts in Scotland.
CHAP. VII.]
HIS ADVENTURE IN GASK CASTLE.
35
chery. Of this man, Blind Harry gives the fol-
lowing unprepossessing description : —
" To Wallace thar come ane that hecht Fawdoun ;
Melancoly he was of complexioun,
Hewy of statur, dour in his countenance,,
Soroufull, sadde, ay dreidfull but plesance."
The circumstances of his death, are thus nar-
rated by the same author, who justifies the deed on
the plea of necessity : — •
" To the next woode twa myil thai had to gang,
Off vpwith erde ; thai yeid with all thair mycht ;
Gud hope thai had for it was ner the nycht,
Fawdoun tyryt, and said, he mycht nocht gang.
Wallace was wa to leyff him in that thrang.
He bade him ga, and said the strenth was ner ;
But he tharfor wald nocht fastir him ster.
Wallace in ire on the crag cam him ta
With his gud suerd, and strak the hed him fra.
Dreidless to ground derfly he duschit dede,
Fra him he lap, and left him in that stede.
Sum demys it to ill, and othyr sum to gud ;
And I say her, into thir termyss rude,
Bettir it was he did, as thinkis me.
Fyrst, to the hunde it mycht gret stoppyn be.
Als Fawdoun was haldyn at [gret] suspicioun ;
For he was haldyn of brokill complexioun.
Rycht stark he was, and had bot litill gayne,
Thus Wallace wist : had he beyne left allayne.
And he war fals, to enemyss he wald ga ;
Gyff he war trew, the Sothroun wald him sla.
Mycht he do ocht bot tyne him as it was? "
On the first view of the case, there appears a
degree of barbarity in the conduct of Wallace,
which is quite at variance with that affection and
tenderness which he had uniformly displayed to-
wards his adherents ; and we cannot help con-
demning the sternness of that policy which could
thus deprive a follower of his life, because worn
out with toil, and disabled by wounds, he could no
longer keep up with his companions. But, on reflec-
tion, we find the lives of Wallace, and of the few
that remained of the party, placed in jeopardy by
one, who, from his reluctance to make a little far-
ther exertion, when assured that a place of safety
was at hand, gave good grounds to suspect that he
had become unsound at the core. We may also
remark, that being acquainted with the spot where
the plunder taken from the English was concealed,
Wallace had an additional reason to suspect Faw-
don's motives for wishing to be left behind ; and
it may be urged in support of the justice of this
suspicion, that his countryman Stephen, who intro-
duced him to the little band of patriots, remained
the firm and confidential friend of Wallace through
all his difficulties. This he certainly would not
have done, had Wallace, on slight grounds, inflicted
death on one who was not only his friend and
countryman, but in some degree under his protec-
tion. So far, indeed, was Stephen from feeling
dissatisfaction at the conduct of Wallace, that he
and Kerle lingered behind, and, favoured by the
shades of night, which had now set in, mingled
with the enemy ; and while their general, Sir
Gerald Heron, was in the act of stooping to ex-
amine the body of Fawdon, whose blood had
arrested the progress of the slough-hound, Kerle
watched the opportunity and gave him a mortal
stab in the throat with his dagger. The cry of
" Treason ! " arose among the English ; but, in the
confusion, the two confederates slipped down un-
observed among the underwood that surrounded
them, and made the best of their way towards
Loch Earne, the well-wooded banks of which
afforded them every chance of security. In the
interval, Wallace, and thirteen of his followers, all
that were now left him, made good their retreat to
the deserted Castle of Gask situated in the middle
of a wood. This place possessed few advantages
that could recommend it as a desirable retreat ;
but, to men in their desperate situation, the pro-
spect of shelter from the swords of their pursuers
was a considerable relief, and though it appeared
in a sad state, of dilapidation, a number of the
apartments were entire ; and the courtyard was
surrounded by a wall of great thickness, which,
broken as it might be in some parts, would never-
theless enable them to make a tolerable defence.
With this expectation, therefore, they determined
to secure themselves for the night, and trust to
their good swords for a path through their enemies
in the morning.
CHAPTER VII.
SINGULAR ADVENTURE OF WALLACE IN GASK CASTLE —
KILLS THE ENGLISH LEADER — ESCAPES TO TOR-
WOOD — INTERVIEW WITH HIS UNCLE.
AFTER the confusion produced by the death of the
English leader had subsided, a party of forty men
were despatched with the dead body to Johnstone ;
and Butler, who had so far recovered from his
wound as to be able to take the field under Sir
Gerald, remained, with about 500 men, to look
after the fugitives. With this force he proceeded
to secure all the neighbouring passes, and to take
such other methods as he thought would prevent
their escape.
In the mean time, Wallace and his few remain-
ing friends had put their place of refuge in as good
a state of defence as its ruinous condition would
admit ; and having procured a sheep from a neigh-
bouring fold, they kindled a fire in the court-yard,
and prepared for their evening repast. Wallace
now wisely considered, from the fatigue his follow-
ers had undergone during the day, that however
much they might stand in want of refreshment, a
few hours' repose would be absolutely necessary for
recruiting their wearied and exhausted spirits, and
rendering them fit for the arduous enterprise that
awaited them in the morning. As soon, therefore,
as they had allayed their hunger, he ordered them
to betake themselves to rest, while he undertook to
keep watch by himself.
Surrounded by his sleeping companions, with no
light but what the expiring embers afforded, the
mind of Wallace became overshadowed with melan-
choly forebodings. Though in the late conflicts he
had destroyed a great number of the enemy, his
own little band had been almost annihilated ; and,
in his present situation, he saw little probability of
filling up their places with men on whom he could
put the same dependence. Two of his most devoted
partisans, Stephen and Kerle, had disappeared ;
and he had every reason to suppose they were
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. vir.
either slain, or fallen into the hands of the enemy.
The apathy with which the most powerful of the
nobility continued to witness the exertions of him-
self and his followers for the independence of their
country, filled him with grief and indignation ;
while, from the loss of so many brave friends in
the late encounter, he was apprehensive his few
remaining companions would now consider their
undertaking as desperate. These reflections, aided
by the consideration that he was actually sur-
rounded by a force against which his expectations
of success could not be very sanguine, tended to
excite the most gloomy apprehensions.
From this state of mind he was suddenly aroused
by the blowing of horns *, mingled with fright-
ful yells, which seemed to proceed from a rising
ground in the neighbourhood. Two of his party
were despatched to ascertain the cause of the
uproar ; but these not returning, and the alarm
still increasing, other scouts were sent out, till
Wallace was at last left alone, without any one
to assist in the defence of the place, if it should
happen to be attacked.
It was now past midnight ; and the flame that
still lingered about the remains of the almost extin-
guished faggots, continued, at intervals, to throw
its pale and flickering light on the ruinous walls of
the castle, when Wallace was suddenly startled by
the shadow of a human figure. Though broken
and indistinct at first, yet the moon, which was
slowly emerging from behind a cloud, rendered it
every moment more apparent. From the feet to
the, shoulders, which was all of it that was visible,
it seemed to be of uncommon dimensions ; and
what more particularly rivetted the attention of
the forlorn chief, a human head hung dangling
from its hand, in a manner that gave it the appear-
ance of something supernatural. While gazing
with intense anxiety on this singular object, its
hand was slowly raised, and the head, which it
held, after striking the helmet of Wallace, fell with
considerable violence among the dying embers
before him. Snatching it up, he discovered, by the
light of the moon, the pale and ghastly features of
the " ill-fated Fawdon ;" and, turning towards the
place from whence it was thrown, he observed the
figure of a man endeavouring to descend by a
broken part of the wall. In the excitement of the
moment, he hurled the head after it, and, drawing
his sword, hastened from the castle in pursuit of
the strange intruder.
Henry, or his authority, in narrating the above
circumstance, gives way to the popular belief of his
time, and describes it as the real apparition of the
late faithless associate ; but this evidently arises
from that love for the marvellous peculiar to the
age. When stripped of the poetical embellish-
ments with which it is clothed, the story simply
appears to have been this : — The English, on
coming to the headless body of Fawdon, naturally
conceived that the Scots had quarrelled among
themselves ; and some one thinking it probable,
from the size, that the deceased might be Wallace,
* In the Scottish armies of the thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries, every man was supplied with a horn, generally
that of a hulloek, which he blew with vehemence, as he
rushed on to the charge. The horrible noise this occasioned
had often the effect of throwing the cavalry into confusion.
These horns are sometimes alluded to in our national bal-
lads.
for whose head a considerable reward was offered,
took care to secure the prize. The impatience of
Butler for revenge made him think of a night
attack, provided they could discover the enemy ;
and the horns, therefore, which had been taken
from those Scots who had fallen in the conflict,
were made use of as a ruse to entrap them into the
belief, that it was a party of their countrymen
coming to their assistance. The soldier, who had
got the head into his possession, appears to have
been one of the scouts sent in search of the fugi-
tives ; and no doubt, eager to ascertain the value
of his capture, had ventured forward with more
confidence than his companions. Disappointment
at finding the Scottish chief alive, no doubt, induced
him to throw the head ; and the terror which his
name inspired made him likewise think it prudent
to effect his retreat.
Though the horns still continued to sound, Wal-
lace was too cautious to reply, but wandered about
the forest, searching in silence for his lost com-
panions. His efforts, however, were unavailing ;
and, at the dawn of the morning, he found himself
on the verge of the forest. Here he was observed
by Butler, who had rode out to view the posts.
Dissatisfied with the answer returned to his chal-
lenge, the English leader drew his sword, and
urged forward his steed. Wallace advancing from
under the shade, which partly concealed him,
Butler saw, with astonishment, the formidable foe
he was in quest of, and prepared to fall back on his
nearest position. His retreat, however, was anti-
cipated by a blow which struck him from the
saddle, and, before he could recover himself, the
sword of his powerful antagonist had levelled him
with the dust. Our hero had just reached the
stirrup of his fallen enemy, when he observed an
Englishman, armed cap-a-pie, advancing in full
career towards him, with his spear in rest. By a
dexterous management of his horse, he avoided the
stroke ; and whilst his foe, unable to retover him-
self, was hurrying past, he lent him a blow on the
neck, which sent him headlong to the ground. The
alarm was now spread among the English, whom
Wallace observed collecting from various quarters
to intercept his retreat. Giving the rein to his
charger, he shot like an arrow through a straggling
party of horse that seemed the least formidable,
but who, on recovering from their surprise, set
off in full pursuit, followed by the whole of their
force.
Though, from his superior knowledge of the
country, Wallace was frequently enabled to dis-
tance his pursuers ; yet the keenness with which
they kept up the chase, obliged him several times
to turn and act on the offensive. As this was
always done in situations where he could not be
surrounded, those that were most forward paid
dearly for their temerity ; whilst the suddenness
and fury of his repeated attacks spread a panic to
the rear of his enemy, from the idea that he had
met a reinforcement of his countrymen. Before
the shades of evening had set in, twenty of the
English were strewed along the line of his retreat ;
and those who were foremost, had become very
cautious in approaching within reach of his arm.
A rising part of the ground had, for some time, hid
him from their view ; and when they again came
in sight of him, he appeared leading his jaded
and breathless steed up a steep and rugged pass
CHAP. VII. J
INTERVIEW WITH HIS UNCLE.
between two craggy precipices. Though he was
soon again obscured in the shades of twilight, from
the exhausted state of his horse, they saw little
probability of his being able to effect his escape.
Having with difficulty followed in his track, they
found, on descending a precipitous defile, an exten-
sive morass spread before them, far as the eye
could penetrate, at the edge of which lay the steed
of their late commander, expiring from the wounds
and fatigue it had encountered ; but the object of
their pursuit was nowhere to be seen. Strong
picquets were sent out in every direction, but all
their exertions were fruitless ; and they returned
at midnight to their head-quarters, without obtain-
ing the slightest trace of the fugitive.
It has been mentioned, in the early part of our
history, that the juvenile years of our hero were
spent with a brother of his father, a wealthy eccle-
siastic at Dunipace in Stirlingshire. Though he
was withdrawn from the protection of this relative
at an early age, yet he had been long enough under
his roof to endear himself to all the servants and
dependants. One of the former, a widow, now
lived with her three sons in a secluded part of the
Torwood, then an extensive forest in Stirlingshire.
In the cottage of this woman, Wallace had in
former emergencies found a place of concealment
from his enemies ; and on this occasion, about
the dead hour of night, the faithful inmates were
startled by the well-known signal at the window.
Never did their heroic guest appear before them
in greater distress ; exhausted from fatigue, faint
with hunger, his armour encrusted with blood,
and every part of his dress drenched with water,
showed the hardships and perils he had under-
gone.
After quitting his pursuers at the morass, he
had, by a passage unknown to them, crossed over
to the other side, and made the best of his way
towards the Forth. A large force of the enemy,
however, occupied Stirling, and he was therefore
compelled to take the river at Camskenneth. After
much difficulty, from the weight of his armour, he
succeeded in gaining the opposite bank, and pro-
ceeded forward on his journey, satisfied that he
had got considerably the start of his pursuers.
In the neighbourhood of the house where he had
now taken refuge, was an oak * of huge dimensions,
in a cavity of which he had frequently concealed
himself from his enemies, when the search was too
close to allow of his remaining within doors. To
this retreat he now repaired, after partaking of
that refreshment which his situation so much re-
quired. One of the widow's sons was despatched
to acquaint his uncle with his safety, and to request
his assistance ; while another was sent off towards
the scene of his late conflicts, to obtain, if possible,
some intelligence of his lost companions.
The morning was pretty far advanced, when
Wallace was awakened from his sleep by the sound
of voices, and, starting to his feet, found his uncle
and two of the widow's sons engaged in conversa-
tion, one of whom had been watching him during
his sleep. His uncle, taking him by the arm, led
him apart from the others, and began to inquire
into his situation, representing to him, at the same
time, the difficulties he was still likely to expe-
rience if he continued to persevere in so hopeless a
» See Appendix A.
cause. " Your followers," added he, " are now
either slain or dispersed, and all your efforts in the
district you have been in, have not procured you a
single friend to replace those you have lost ; the
plunder you have taken has either been recap-
tured, or left in places where it would be madness
to hazard yourself in regaining it. Besides, were
you even successful, to your utmost wish, in expel-
ling the English from our country, do you believe
that so powerful, so ambitious a prince as Edward,
one who is considered the most accomplished war-
rior of his age, would allow the laurels to be torn
from his brow by the son of an obscure Scottish
laird ? Would not the whole force of his mighty
kingdom, assisted, if necessary, by his foreign
auxiliaries and vassals, be poured upon our devoted
country ? Would not the inhuman butcheries
which were witnessed at Berwick be again renewed
in all our cities ? Have we not already had too
much experience of his cruelty, to think of increas-
ing our misfortunes by fresh provocations ? Listen,
therefore, my dear son, to what I am authorized to
propose to you. You are aware, that those men,
whose duty and interest it was to have defended
our country, have submitted to our enemies ; if you
will, therefore, give over your fruitless hostility to
Edward, and acknowledge him as your liege lord,
you will, in place of skulking from covert to covert,
have it in your power to become the most powerful
vassal of his crown."
Before his uncle had time to explain, Wallace
withdrew his arm from his grasp. " My situation,"
said he, " is gloomy enough, but not so desperate
as you imagine. I regret nothing that has yet
happened, save the loss of my gallant friends ; but
I know where the sound of my horn can still call
forth as many resolute spirits as will enable me to
revenge their fall. Those who have joined me,
know that the liberty of our country is the only
object I have in view ; and they also know, that I
have always been as ready to expose my own life
as theirs in the quarrel. The liberty which an
unprincipled usurper is endeavouring to deprive
us of, is the birthright we have inherited from our
ancestors, and which belongs to our posterity, to
whom it is our duty to transmit it. If we perish
in doing so, we perish in doing what is right ; and
that God, who made us free men, will avert the
scenes you dread, if we show ourselves worthy of
his gift. If, on the contrary, we basely surrender
what we only hold in trust for our children, the
galling yoke of slavery will be a just retribution
for defrauding them of their sacred inheritance.
As to the proposal, come from whom it may, you
can acquaint them, that the destruction of a single
enemy of my country's independence affords me
more pleasure than all the wealth which our proud
oppressor has it in his power to bestow. Have
you forgot, uncle," said he, while his stern features
relaxed into a smile almost sarcastic — " have you
forgot
" Dico tibi verum, Libertas optima rerum :
Nunquam servili sub nexu vivito, fill — " *
" have you forgot those sentiments which you were
at such pains to impress on my mind in the halcyon
* I tell you a truth, Liberty is the best of all things :
My son, never live under any slavish bond.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHA.P.
days of my childhood *, when peace was in all our
borders, and every man sat under his own vine
and fig-tree, enjoying the fatherly protection of a
righteous sovereign ? And is there to be no effort,
no sacrifice made to bring again those days to our
poor distracted country I " He was proceeding,
when the old man's eyes became suffused, recol-
lections of the past crowded upon his mind, and he
threw himself on the breast of his nephew.
While Wallace was thus engaged with his vene-
rable relative, he was agreeably surprised to see
his two friends, Kerle and Stephen, advancing
towards him, accompanied by a son of his kind
hostess. After mutual congratulations and expres-
sions of 'joy, for the unexpected meeting, had
passed between them, they communicated to each
other the particulars of the events that had taken
place since their separation ; and, after receiving
the benediction of the priest and returning thanks
to the Virgin, they retired to consult about their
future operations.
CHAPTER VIII.
WALLACE JOINED BY SIR JOHN GRAHAM. — PROCEED-
INGS IN CLYDESDALE. — WALLACE VISITS LANARK.
— ADVENTURE WITH A PARTY OF THE ENGLISH,
IT appears, that an oath similar to that which Sir
Raynald Crawford had been compelled to take,
against holding correspondence with, or affording
assistance to Wallace, had also been forced upon
his other relatives, as we find the widow alluded
to in the foregoing chapter made the instrument
of conveying to him the proofs of his uncle's affec-
tion.
Having, by her means, been supplied with a
considerable sum of money, as well as horses for
himself and his companions, they set forward, ac-
companied by two of her sons whom she devoted
to the cause, toward those districts where they had
reason to expect a more cordial co-operation, than
what -they had experienced in the neighbourhood
of St. Johnstone.
At the suggestion of his uncle, Wallace visited
Dundaff Castle, on his way towards Clydesdale.
This fortress, with the lands of Dundaff, Strath-
blane and Strathcarron, belonged to Sir David, or
according to others, to Sir John Graham, an old
warrior, who, in his early years, had recommended
himself by his gallantry to Alexander, Lord High
Steward of Scotland, by whom he is supposed to
have been intrusted with an important command
at the battle of Largs. His son and heir, Sir John,
received, when but a stripling, the honour of
knighthood at Berwick, on account of his conduct
in a border feud with the Percies of Northumber-
* " The uncle of Wallace, a priest, so often inculcated,
and so deeply imprinted, the following lines upon his mind
and memory, that by them he squared all the thoughts of
his great soul, and efforts of his vigorous body :
" Dico tibi verum, Libertas optima rerum ;
Nunquam servili sub nexu vivito, fill."
Scotichron. Maj. lib. 12. cap! iii.— See also Fordun, lib. xii.
tap. iii.
land. During three days which Wallace passed at
Dundaff, he and his companions experienced the
most unbounded hospitality ; and the old chieftain
saw, with delight, those feelings of admiration and
friendship with which his son and their noble guest
appeared to view each other. Before the depar-
ture of the latter, Sir John, with the consent of his
father, devoted himself to the cause of his country's
independence, by swearing fidelity to Wallace as
his chief, and would have instantly accompanied
him, but it was deemed more prudent to remain
with his father, till he was apprised of the number
of followers Wallace could muster in Clydesdale.
Meantime, he was to hold himself in readiness to
advance, with his father's vassals, as soon as he
should receive intimation. After mutual expres-
sions of friendship, Wallace proceeded on his
journey, and lodged the same night at Both well, in
the house of one Crawford, from whom he received
information of the state of the country and the
strength of the enemy. The following night he
reached Gillbank, in the neighbourhood of Lanark,
where he remained with a near relation of his
own ; and from thence he despatched Stephen and
Kerle, one to the west, and the other to the north,
to acquaint his friends of his situation, and appoint
a time and place to meet him.
It seems about this time a report had been cir-
culated among the English, that Wallace had been
slain in a mutiny of his followers. This rumour,
no doubt occasioned by the circumstances attend-
ing the death of Fawdon, had reached Percy, along
with the accounts of the destruction of Kincleveu
Castle, and the slaughter of Butler and the other
English officers ; but though he did not give it
implicit belief, there was a degree of credit
attached to it, particularly by the English in the
upper part of Clydesdale, that caused our hero to
be less taken notice of when he appeared among
them. This was particularly serviceable to him in
the visits which he now made to Lanark. We
have already alluded to an attachment which Wal-
lace entertained for a young gentlewoman of that
place. A degree of obscurity hangs over the his-
tory of this amour. It is supposed, by those
writers who have taken notice of the subject, that
the parties had been privately married shortly
after the battle of Beg, during the time that he
remained in the forest of Clydesdale, and that the
ceremony was performed by John Blair, but whe-
ther in the church, or under the " Greenwood
Tree," is no where stated. Be that as it may, his
situation was too precarious to allow him to re-
move her from her present residence. His visits
were, therefore, made with the utmost secrecy, in
such disguises, and at such hours, as would best
enable him to escape the notice of his enemies.
Meanwhile his sword was not allowed to rust. He
and his companions were continually on the watch
for stragglers from the English quarters ; and as
they always attacked them in situations where
none could escape, their mysterious disappearance
excited the greatest alarm among their country-
men. Various anecdotes are still in circulation
among the peasantry of the Upper Ward of La-
narkshire, regarding exploits performed by him
about this time. Among others, there is a story
still handed down, of the severe retaliation he
inflicted on a party of Englishmen, who, having
come to the same inn at which he and his com-
CHAP. VIII.]
PROCEEDINGS IN CLYDESDALE.
panions were refreshing themselves, had played off
a barbarous attempt at waggery, by cutting the
tails from the horses of the Scots. Blind Harry
alludes to this circumstance ; and the following
address, which Wallace is represented as having
made to their captain before he cut him down,
may be considered as no unfavourable specimen of
the humour of the man : —
" Gud freynd, abid,
Seruice to tak for thi craft in this tyde.
Marschell, thou art with out commaund off me;
Reward agayne, me think, I suld pay the ;
Sen I offlaitt, now come owt off the west
In this cuntre, a harbour off the best
To cutt and schaiff, and that a wondyr gude ;
Now thow sail feyll how I oyss to lat blude."
According to some accounts, the above trans-
action is said to have occurred at Lochmaben, and
that he was afterwards pursued by Sir Hew of
Moreland, who traced the Scots to the Knock-
wood by the blood that still continued to issue from
their horses. Wallace being here joined by six-
teen of his followers who had been lurking in the
wood, an engagement commenced, in which, though
greatly superior in numbers, the English were
defeated, and Sir Hew, with near twenty of his
men, were slain. This account is confirmed by a
tradition still current in the neighbourhood ; and
is thus mentioned in the Statistical Account of the
Parish of Kirkmichael. " There are several indis-
tinct remains of ancient fortifications, but no tra-
dition about any other than a small fort in the
Knock-wood, called Wallace's House, said to have
been thrown up by Sir William Wallace after he
had slain Sir Hew of Moreland and five of his men,
at a place still named from that event, the * Sax
Corses,' i. e. the six corpses, and where there are
two or three large stones which seem to have been
set up in remembrance of some great transaction."
Tradition may be generally relied on when it
marks the spot where any remarkable occurrence
has taken place ; yet the circumstances connected
with it are often mis-stated. The rude defence
alluded to, under the name of Wallace's House,
may have been either hastily formed during the
advance of Moreland and his party — as they are
said to have been seen for some time before they
reached the position occupied by the Scots — or
possibly it may be the remains of some strength
used in former wars. Wallace only seems to have
availed himself of it to protect, for the moment,
his little band from being overpowered by their
numerous assailants ; for we find him immediately
after this victory obliged to quit Knock-wood.
Those Englishmen who escaped having fled to
Lochmaben Castle, a detachment of three hundred
horse were ordered to go in pursuit, under the
command of one Graystock, an officer who had
lately arrived from England with a strong rein-
forcement to fill up the deficiencies which Wallace
had made in the garrisons. Ignorant in a great
measure of the talents and prowess of the man he
had to contend with, he upbraided his fugitive
countrymen with cowardice, when they recom-
mended caution to him in operations against so
wary an adversary ; and, bent on chastising what
he termed the insolence of the freebooter, pressed
forward with the greatest expedition.
The Scots, having supplied themselves with the
horses of their slain enemies, were preparing to
advance into Clydesdale, near the confines of
which Wallace had appointed to meet his trusty
associates, Kerle and Stephen, witli those friends
who had promised to join him, when the formidable
array of Graystock came in sight, at full gallop.
Wallace now ordered his men to form, and retire
with deliberation, taking care to keep their horses
in breath, while he remained in the rear to repress
any sudden attack that might be made. As the
enemy advanced, Wallace, mounted on the horse
of Moreland, kept in front of them, and rode with
so much sang froid, occasionally looking over his
shoulder, that an uninterested spectator might
have supposed he was rather leading the English
party on, than watching for a favourable oppor-
tunity of attacking them, while the terror of his
name prevented any of them from moving from
their ranks. They had thus contrived to follow
the retreating Scots for some time, when Gray-
stock ordered a movement, by which he imagined
he would be able to surround Wallace and his
little band. At this juncture Sir John Graham
suddenly appeared with about thirty horse, fol-
lowed by Sir Roger Kilpatrick of Torthorowald,
a near relation of Wallace by the mother's side,
who, in obedience to the message by the faithful
Stephen, had taken the field with twenty of his
tenantry. Wallace received these worthy confede-
rates with three cheers, and instantly set them an
example, by charging through the centre of the
enemy : his friends having put themselves in
array, pushed forward at their utmost speed, and
soon completed the confusion he had commenced.
The left wing of the enemy was thrown into dis-
order before the impetuous charge of the Scots ;
and Sir John Graham was busily employed in pur-
suing and cutting down the fugitives, when Wal-
lace came up with him, and represented the impro-
priety of killing the common soldiers while tneir
leaders were escaping ; pointing out to him a body
of one hundred of the enemy, which Graystock
was endeavouring to keep entire, and recom-
mended, as his horse were still in good condition,
to charge and disperse them. Sir John quickly
arranged his little squadron, and prepared with
alacrity to execute the commands he had received.
Wallace, who seldom gave orders which he did not
see executed, was soon in the fray. The charge of
Graham had been too impetuous to be withstood.
Wallace found the enemy in confusion, and Gray-
stock engaged hand to hand with the young knight
of Dundaff. The conflict for a few moments
remained doubtful, but the superior strength and
dexterity of Graham soon became apparent ; and
the fall of the English leader was the signal
of flight for his followers, who sought refuge
in the place whence the Scots had been lately
driven.
The victors were hastily recalled from the pur-
suit by the horn of their chief. Having collected
them around him, he complimented them on the
valour they had displayed, and proposed that they
should instantly attack the Castle of Lochmaben ;
representing to them, that as the garrison had
already been put to flight, if they could reach it
before the fugitives returned, the plunder they
might find would amply reward the labours they
had undergone. The proposal was j oyfully received ;
and they instantly set out under the guidance of a
40
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. ix.
person well acquainted with the intricacies of the
country.
As their chief expected, the fortress had been
left to the care of the porter and a few invalids,
who were easily overpowered ; and this place they
found well stored with abundance of every thing
their situation required. While enjoying them-
selves after the fatigues of the day, the remains of
their discomfited enemies were observed hastening
towards the castle. Orders being immediately
given for their admission, on reaching the castle-
yard, they were surrounded by the Scots, and,
after a short conflict, indiscriminately put to the
sword.
The fortress, which had thus unexpectedly fallen
into their hands, was deemed so important an
acquisition, that Wallace thought it advisable to
leave a garrison in it. He then took his depar-
ture, accompanied by Sir John Graham, Kerle,
Stephen, and a few other worthies, for the forest of
Clydesdale.
CHAPTER IX.
ATTACK ON CRAWFORD CASTLE — RETURN TO LANARK
CONFLICT WITH THE ENGLISH — MURDER OF THE
HEIRESS OF LAMINGTON — HER DEATH REVENGED —
THE ENGLISH DRIVEN OUT OF LANARK.
THE Castle of Lochmaben is supposed to have been
the first fortress in which Wallace ventured to
place a garrison ; and it is probable he was ena-
bled to do so in consequence of a great many
in the neighbourhood having joined his standard,
encouraged no doubt by his late successes. This
supposition is confirmed by the circumstance of his
leaving behind him a few of those who had been
in the engagement with Graystock.
While the insurrection was thus spreading
in Scotland, Edward was prosecuting his views
against France. The accounts of the proceedings
of Wallace occasionally reached him, and arrested
his attention in the midst of his victories ; and
though he felt no immediate apprehension from
the attempts of the freebooter, as he was pleased
to call the patriotic leader of the Scots, yet he
considered him such an enemy as it was not alto-
gether prudent to neglect.
The applications, therefore, which were made
from time to time, by Percy and others intrusted
with the management of Scottish affairs, were
promptly attended to, and the requisite supplies
forwarded to the different garrisons. Part of these
supplies, as has been already hinted, had reached
Lochmaben before the late rencounter ; most of
the other fortified places had received their quota ;
and the garrison of the Castle of Crawford were in
daily expectation of their proportion.
This fortress, which had belonged to the mater-
nal ancestors of Wallace *, attracted his attention.
Having learned, from a female whom he stopped
on the moor, that the garrison, which consisted of
about twenty men, were carousing in an hostelry
in the neighbourhood of the castle, he proposed to
Sir John Graham to attempt a surprise. For this
purpose, he directed Graham to follow slowly with
* See Appendix, B.
the others under his command, while, with a com-
panion, he went forward himself to observe the
condition of the revellers. On approaching the
door, the language within had become sufficiently
audible ; and he soon ascertained that he and his
exploits were the subject of discussion ; their cap-
tain, one Martindale, in the heat of his pot-valour,
declaring to his men the pleasure which the pre-
sence of Wallace would afford him. Finding him-
self in request, the fearless Scot stepped forward.
The " Benedicites " on both sides were brief.
Wallace plied his weapon with his usual effect ;
and, aided by his companion, the maudlin brag-
gadocio and his fellows were soon overpowered.
Meanwhile, Sir John Graham, who had reached
the door during the contest, was ordered off to
secure the castle * ; which duty, from the small
number of its defenders, he easily performed.
Having burnt the castle, and divided the spoil
among his followers, Wallace retired to Lanark
on purpose, it is supposed, to concert measures
for withdrawing from that place the object of his
affections, and placing her in some retreat less
exposed to the exactions of Hazelrig.
On this occasion, our hero, for the more effec-
tually disguising himself f, had thrown a green
mantle over his armour, which he fastened with
a belt, from which depended his sword. At the
entrance of the town, his dress, and particularly
the uncommon length of his sword, attracted the
notice of some of the soldiers belonging to the gar-
rison ; and one of them, more insolent than the
others, made a snatch at it. Wallace evaded the
* According to a tradition still current about Crawford,
Wallace is said to have first approached the castle in the dis-
guise of an old beggar, with a patch over one eye, and his
sword concealed under his cloak. In this dress, he entered
into conversation with a woman engaged in washing clothes
in the Clyde. From her he learned, that part of the gar-
rison, amounting to about fifteen men, were carousing in a
"hostelrie" hard by, kept by two brothers of the name of
Watt. To this place he repaired, and getting among them,
it was not long before he discovered that he was the subject
of their conversation. Some, more elated with the contents
of the cup than their neighbours, loudly expressed the satis-
faction they would feel at having a "bout" with the cham-
pion of the Scots ; while he who appeared to bear command
among them, declared how willingly and handsomely he
would reward the man who would bring them together.
Wallace offered, for " sma1 hire," to comply with their
wishes ; and rising, as if for the purpose, drew forth his
formidable weapon, and commenced an attack upon the
party, whom he was fortunate enough, by his superior
strength and dexterity, to overpower and put to death. His
horn was then sounded ; and his companions, quitting their
lurking places, rallied around him, and surprised the castle
in the manner described. The house where the above action
is understood to have taken place, is still to be seen in the
village of Crawford- John. It continues to be occupied by
the descendants of one of the two brothers above alluded to,
who was married to a woman named Dalziel, and whose
progeny continued to rent it as tenants, till about three
hundred years ago, when one of them, who was piper to the
proprietor, received a perpetual feu of the house, and a
small portion of land attached to it, for some piece of service
he had performed. The room in which the above adven-
ture is said to have occurred, is at the end of the building,
nearest to the ruins of Crawford Castle ; and the present
occupant, Mr. Dalziel, with praiseworthy attention, endea-
vours to preserve, as much as possible, the original appear-
ance of the house. The ditch into which the dead bodies of
the English were thrown, is still pointed out.
t Wyntoune, vol. ii. p. 92.
CHAP. IX.]
MURDER OF THE HEIRESS OF LAMINGTON.
41
attempt to deprive him of his weapon ; when a
sarcastic * dialogue ensued, which soon ended in
blows ; and the English, seeing their companion no
match for the Scot, rushed forward to his assist-
ance. Hemmed in on all sides, Wallace became
roused into fury, and dealt his blows around him
with fearful and destructive energy. His pon-
derous blade descended with rapid and crashing
effect among the bucklers and head-pieces of the
enemy, who had begun to retire in confusion, before
his irresistible arm ; when others arriving, who
were unacquainted with the foe they had to con-
tend with, rushed headlong to the fray. Expe-
rience, however, soon taught them to be more
cautious in their advance ; and Wallace had set
them completely at bay, when young Hazelrig
came on with a fresh party to their assistance.
Thus reinforced, and eager to revenge their com-
panions, they were now fast gathering round our
hero, when a door facing him suddenly opened,
and a fair hand beckoned him from the melee.
Wallace quickly embraced the means of escape
thus afforded him ; and the door being instantly
shut against his enemies, gave him an opportunity
of saving himself by an outlet behind the house.
Old Hazelrig f, or, as Wyntown calls him, the
Sheriff, was not in Lanark at the time of this
affray ; but, on hearing the account of it, and
learning the number of English who had been
killed, he hastened to town, and caused the fair
orphan of Lamington to be brought before him.
On discovering her connection with Wallace, and
the assistance she had so opportunely afforded
him, in a paroxysm of rage and disappointment, he
ordered her for instant execution.
In the account of this affair, we have adhered
to the statement of Wyntown J, who adds, that
Wallace, from a place of concealment, had the
heart-rending misfortune to be a spectator of the
execution of his mistress, without having the power
of attempting a rescue. This would not have been
the case, if he had, as the Minstrel says, been
attended by Sir John Graham, and twenty-four of
his associates. Wyntown represents it as a mere
personal adventure of Wallace ; and states, that,
after the melancholy catastrophe, he went in search
of his friends, to assist him in revenging the atro-
city. Having collected thirty of his followers, he
returned with them, for that purpose, to Lanark.
At the dead hour of night, the door of the sheriff 's
apartment was burst from its hinges, and the iron-
grasp of Wallace awakened Hazelrig from his
sleep. On being dragged headlong to the street,
after a stern reproof for his cowardly conduct, the
trembling victim instantly received the reward due
to his villany. The alarm now spread, and the
garrison soon engaged with Wallace and his party ;
but deeply incensed at the late disgusting act of
barbarity, the people of Lanark rose en masse
against their oppressors, who, unable to stand their
ground, were soon overpowered, and driven with
great slaughter from the town.
The inhabitants of Lanark, having thus iden-
tified themselves with the cause of Wallace, saw
no alternative left them, but to join heart and
hand with the avenger of their country's wrongs ;
and the number that now flocked to his standard
* Vide Introduction to this work, p. 26.
t Fordun calls him, Willielmus de Hasliope.
J Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 92-95.
enabled him to take the field openly, and bid
defiance to the enemy. Indeed, so formidable was
the force under his command, that he met and
defeated a considerable body of the English in
a regular engagement in the neighbourhood of
Biggar. It has been alleged, that, on this memo-
rable occasion, Edward commanded in person ; but
such could not have been the case, as the English
monarch was not in the country at the tune. That
a considerable battle was fought in the neighbour-
hood, there is reason to believe, as well from cur-
rent tradition, as from the number of tumuli which
are still to be seen. In the statistical account of
Biggar, the subject is thus taken notice of : — " At
the west end of the town is a tumulus, which
appears never to have been opened ; and there are
vestiges of three camps, each of a roundish figure,
at different places in the neighbourhood. There
is a tradition of a battle having been fought at the
east of the town, between the Scots, under Sir
William Wallace, and the English, who were said
to be sixty thousand strong, wherein a great
slaughter was made on both sides, especially
among the latter."
These accounts, however, are decidedly at vari-
ance with truth, both in regard to the amount of
the English, and the person who commanded. It
is more probable, that the enemy did not exceed
eight, or at most ten thousand men, part of which
appears to have been under the command of Roden,
Lord de Whichenour. On the side of the Scots,
Sir Walter Newbigging*, already referred to,
headed a body of cavalry. His son David, a
youth, at that time little more than fifteen years of
age, held a command under him, and the well-tried
military talents of the father were not disgraced
by the efforts of the young patriot, whose conduct
on this occasion was afterwards rewarded by the
honour of knighthood, probably conferred by the
hand of our hero himself. The family of Newbig-
ging, as has already been noticed, came originally
from England ; and Sir Walter and his son, on
this occasion, found themselves opposed to their
near kinsman, the Lord of Whichenour.
At the head of what might now be called an
army, Wallace kept the field ; and the celerity of
his movements confounded all the calculations of
the enemy. While the main body of his forces
appeared in their formidable intrenchments, occu-
pying the attention of the English, distant garrisons
were surprised, and put to the sword by foes, who
seemed to spring up as it were within their walls,
and of whose approach they had not the slightest
intimation.
About this time, one of those iniquitous acts, so
often met with in the cold-blooded and relentless
policy of Edward, was perpetrated at Ayr, against
the barons and gentry of the west of Scotland.
This part of the country had been the nucleus, as
it were, of the insurrection ; and the ill-disposed
and well-affected had now become equally objects
of suspicion to the usurper's government. Under
the pretext of holding a Justice-Aire, they were
summoned to attend ; and those who appeared
(among whom were Sir Raynald Crawford, Sir
Bryce Blair +, and Sir Hugh Montgomerie) were
* Memorie of the Somervills, vol. i. p. 80, 81.
t The family, from which Sir Bryce Blair is descended,
has come down till the present time. He was third in
succession from William de Blair, mentioned in a contract
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. x.
;reacherously seized, and hung up without even the
formality of a trial.
Wallace heard of the infamous proceeding, and
determined on severe retaliation. Selecting fifty
of his confederates, he hastened to the spot, and
Deing joined by a number of the retainers of the
murdered gentlemen, they surrounded the build-
ngs where the English were cantoned, and who,
ndulging in fancied security arising from the terror
which they imagined the late severity was likely to
impress upon the Scots, had, after a deep carousal,
betaken themselves to rest, little dreaming of the
vengeance that awaited them.
Having procured the necessary combustibles,
Wallace, after disposing of his men, so as to pre-
vent the escape of any of the English, set fire to
the thatch, which being covered with pitch, the
flames soon spread to every part of the buildings,
and rose in one general conflagration ; while the
screaming wretches within, vainly attempting to
escape, were received on the points of the Scottish
swords, and either killed, or forced back, to perish
in the devouring element. It is said that 500 of
the English suffered in this lamentable manner.
The severity of the retaliation can only be palliated
by the nature of the war the parties were engaged
in, and the desperation to which the cruelty of the
invaders had goaded on the wretched inhabitants.
If tradition may be credited, Wallace did not
remain till the flames were extinguished ; for,
when about two miles on his return, at an elevated
part of the road, he is said to have made his men
look back on the still blazing scene of their ven-
geance, remarking, at the same time, that " The
barns of Ayr burn weel." The ruins of a church
are still to be seen on the spot where the chief and
his followers stood to take their last look, and
which is named from the circumstance, " Burn iced
Kirk*:'
CHAPTER X.
AFFAIR OF GLASGOW — DEFEAT AND FLIGHT OF BISHOP
BEK — WALLACE JOINED BY A NUMBER OF THE
BARONS — EXPEDITION TO THE WEST HIGHLANDS —
BATTLE OF BRADHER, AND DEATH OF M'FADYAN.
ABOUT this time Sir William Douglas took the
Castles of Dresdier and Sanquhair, as already
between Ralph de Eglinton and the town of Irvine, in 1205
and who is said to have died in the reign of Alexander II.
betwixt the years 1214 and 1249, leaving a son also namec
William, who, in a charter of Alexander III., is styled Wil
lielmus de Blair, Dominus de eodem, or of that Ilk. This
William left two sons ; 1st Bryce, and 2d David. He was
succeeded by the eldest, Sir Bryce Blair of that Ilk, who
having given umbrage to the English, by joining our hero
was put to death in the treacherous manner described in GUI
history. His brother David, who succeeded to the estates
had submitted to Edward, along with the aristocracy in
1296. Though the head of this family was considered as the
chief of all the Blairs in Scotland, yet their title was ofte
called in question by the Blairs of Balthycock, a family o
great antiquity. The affair was at last brought before
James VI., who decided, that " the oldest man, for the tim
being, of either family, should have the precedency." It i
probable that John Blair, who acted as chaplain to Wallace
was a cadet of tins family.
* See Appendix, C.
tated in the short notice we have given of his
exploits. In conjunction with Wallace, this active
nd powerful baron, assuming the sanction of the
ame of Baliol, endeavoured to enforce the edict
or the expulsion of the English ecclesiastics hold-
ng benefices in Scotland. This edict, issued be-
,ween the time of the taking of Berwick and the
Castle of Dunbar, had been rendered nugatory by,
,he suppression of Scottish independence. It was
now, however, executed with the utmost rigour,
wherever the influence of the insurgents extended.
~n pursuance of this object, Wallace, at the head
of three hundred choice cavalry, proceeding to
" lasgow to dislodge Bishop Bek, who, with a gar-
rison of one thousand men, kept possession of the
;own and episcopal castle, belonging to Robert
Wishart, the Scottish bishop of that place.
As the Scots drew near the spot against which
their operations were directed, Wallace divided his
followers into two bands. Taking the commanO of
one himself, he committed the other to the guidance
of his uncle, the Laird of Auchinleck. " Whether"
said our hero to his gallant kinsman, " do you choose
to bear up the bishop's tail, or go forward and take
his blessing 1 " Auchinleck at once understood the
intended plan of attack, and proposed assailing the
rear of the English, resigning the more honour-
able post to the merits of his nephew, " icho," as he
jocularly observed, " had not yet been confirmed"
Having received the necessary instructions, Wal-
lace enjoined him to be diligent ; " for," said he,
"the men of Northumberland are all good war-
riors." The parties separated ; that under Auchin-
leck to make a compass round the town, so as to
get in rear of the enemy ; and the other, under
the conduct of Wallace, advanced up the principal
street leading to the castle. Their approach, how-
ever, had been discovered ; for, when near the
present site of the college church, the Scots came
in contact with the English, and the inhabitants
had scarcely time to shelter themselves in their
houses, before a dreadful conflict commenced.
The powerful and warlike prelate with whom our
patriots had to contend, possessed a feudal follow-
ing of knights and esquires, inferior only to that of
Edward himself. The narrow street, however, in
which they were engaged was in favour of the
Scots ; and the sword of Wallace told dreadfully
on the helmets and headpieces of the enemy. The
manner in which he swept his antagonists before
him, is still a matter of tradition among the de-
scendants of the early inhabitants of Glasgow.
Though the enemy fought with obstinacy, the
gallantry of the Scots sustained them against the
efforts of their numerous opponents •; and in the
heat of the engagement, Wallace having unhorsed
Henry of Hornecester, a stout monk, who car-
ried the banner of the bishop *, this circumstance
* The family banner of Bek, according to Walter of
Exeter, a cotemporary authority, was, " Gules, with a fer de
moulin of ermine." Though Henry de Hornecester was in
the habit of carrying the banner of St. Cuthbert, it was only
on extraordinary occasions that this unwieldy ensign was
displayed ; and it is not likely that, amid the bustle of so
unexpected an attack, they could spare time to get it ready,
even if the occasion had been a proper one, it being chiefly
reserved for high festivals. As it had been brought into
Scotland the preceding year, it was very likely retained,
along with that of St. John of Beverly, to grace the processions
of the proud and imperious churchman in his new diocese.
HE IS JOINED BY THE BARONS.
43
damped the ardour of some of the superstitious
vansals of the prelate, who now fell back before a
vigorous charge of the Scots. At this juncture,
those under Auchinleck having reached the ele-
vated ground in the rear of the English, and seeing
the turmoil of battle that was raging below, hastily
arranged themselves for the charge, and, before
the enemy were fully apprised of their danger, the
torrent of spears came rushing down upon them
with overwhelming impetuosity. Their dismay
was now complete. A hasty and disordered retreat
ensued, and the by-ways leading from the High-
street were so choked up by the fugitives, that
a number of them were trampled to death by their
companions. Bek * effected his escape, with about
300 horse, and directed his flight towards Eng-
land, carrying with him, it is supposed, the sacred
banner of St. Cuthbert and that of St. John of
Beverly f.
While Wallace was thus employed in expelling
the English ecclesiastics from the west of Scotland,
Sir William Douglas was engaged in forwarding
the same object in the south. In these proceedings
they are charged by the English authors with
extreme cruelty. " The unhappy priests," says
Knighton, " had their hands tied behind their backs,
and in this helpless state were thrown from high
bridges into rivers, their dying agonies affording
sport to their merciless captors." Fordun merely
says, that Wallace pretended to execute the edict
of 1296, which appointed all English ecclesiastics
to be expelled from Scotland. On which Lord
Hailes remarks, " I hope this is not true ; it has
too much the appearance of a political pretext, by
which defenceless individuals might be perse-
cuted £." There was little occasion for his Lord-
ship's sympathy. The thirteenth century was not
the period when churchmen were the objects of
causeless persecutions. Their expulsion appears to
have been the result of their political intrigues
and criminal interference with the records of the
country intrusted to their charge. And from their
placing these documents in the hands of Edward at
Norham, he was enabled to give a colouring of
justice to his attempts upon the independence of
Scotland. The evidence which these falsified
muniments afforded is mentioned by Langtoft §,
as being submitted by Edward to the English
barons for their advice before the business of the
submission respecting the Scottish crown was
entered upon. When the Scots reflected on the
many thousands of their nation, of all ages, who
had already been butchered at Berwick and Dun-
bar, — the oppressions that had followed, — the appa-
rently interminable war entailed upon them in
support of the pretended proofs of the supremacy
of England ; it is not to be wondered at, that they
should attempt to get rid of those canker-worms
who had nestled in their country, and ungratefully
betrayed its sacred and most invaluable interests.
The edict was early published, and at a time when
it could serve no other purpose than a protest
* It lias been asserted that Henry de Percy was killed on
this occasion. It is, however, a mistake ; Percy, at the time
of the rencounter, was either in the eastern part of Scotland,
along with Robert de Clifford, or in attendance on his uncle
the Earl of Warren, in Northumberland.
t See Appendix, D. J Annals, vol. i. p. 299.
§ Vol. ii. p. 2:18.
against the baseness of their conduct. When the
insurrection, therefore, broke out under Wallace,
it was not to be expected that individuals who had
rendered themselves so deservedly obnoxious, would
be treated with much lenity, if they still attempted
to retain their temporalities at the expense of the
people they had endeavoured to enslave *.
Wallace, uniting his forces with those under
Douglas, now made a rapid march upon Scone,
expecting to surprise Ormsby, the Justiciary of
Edward, who was holding his courts in that place.
The attempt was all but completely successful.
They came unexpectedly on the enemy, a great
many of whom were either killed or taken pri-
soners, and a rich booty fell into the hands of the
Scots. Ormsby narrowly escaped ; and, impressed
with terror at the late dreadful acts of retaliation,
fled with precipitation to England. Encouraged by
these successes, a number of the aristocracy joined
the banner of our hero, among whom were the
Steward of Scotland, his brother the Knight of
Bonkill, Alexander de Lindsay, Sir John Stewart
of Husky (or Menteith), Sir Richard Lundin, and
Robert Wishart, Bishop of Glasgow, whom he had
so lately relieved from the obnoxious interference
of the Bishop of Durham. In consequence of this
timely assistance, Wallace was enabled to under-
take an enterprise of considerable importance.
The reader will perceive, by the annexed note f,
* It is hoped that the writer will not be considered as
attempting to justify any thing like wanton cruelty on the
part of Wallace and his compatriots. When he finds au-
thors, Scottish as well as English, bewailing the fate of
these unfortunate churchmen, he considers it but an act of
justice to the accused, that the crime of the other party
should be put upon record, in order that the reader may be
able to ascertain the degree of sympathy to which the
sufferers may be entitled.
t The following diary of the progress of Edward through
Scotland, in 1296, has been lately published by Mr. N. H.
Nicolas, in a volume of the Transactions of the Antiquarian
Society of London. It is translated from a MS. in old
Norman French ; and the names of the places are some-
times a little obscure.
" On the 28th March, 1296, being Wednesday in Easter-
week, King Edward passed the Tweed, and lay in Scotland,—
" At Coldstream Priory.
" Hatton or Haudene, 29th March, Thursday.
" Friday, being Good-Friday, 30th March, Sack of Berwick.
" Battle of Dunbar, April 24, 26, 27.
" Edward marches from Berwick to Coldingham ; 28th
April to Dunbar.
" Haddington, Wednesday, Even of Ascension, May 3.
" Lauder, Sunday, May 6.
" Rokisburgh, Monday, May 7, wheie Edward remained
fourteen days.
" Jedworth, May 23.
" Wyel, Thursday, May 24; Friday, 25, to Castleton ;
Sunday, 27, again to Wyel.
" Jedworth, Monday, May 28.
" Rokisburgh, Friday, June 1.
" Lauder, Monday, June 4.
" Newbattle, Tuesday, June 5.
" Edinburgh, Wednesday, June 6, siege of Edinburgh.
" Linlithgow, June 14.
" Stirling, Thursday, June 14. At Outreard, June 20.
" Perth, Thursday, June 21, where he remained three
days.
" Kincleven on the Tay, June 25.
" Cluny, Tuesday, June 26. Abode there till July 1.
" Entrecoit, Monday, July 2.
" Forfar, Tuesday, July 3.
44
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. x.
that though Edward had made a triumphal march
with his army from Berwick to Elgin ; yet that
interesting and extensive portion of Scotland, com-
prising the West Highlands and Islands, had never
been profaned by the foot of the usurper. This
may have been partly averted, by most of the
chieftains coming forward and taking the oath of
allegiance, and partly by the extreme difficulty of
leading a numerous army through a country so
intersected by arms of the sea, and rendered almost
inaccessible by its rocky and mountainous barriers.
In order to have some control over a people so
isolated, the policy of Edward at first suggested
the idea of carrying along with him those chieftains
whose influence was considered the most extensive.
This measure, however, he soon perceived was not
so effectual as he anticipated, and he accordingly
determined on sending a colony 'of Irish to fix
themselves in some central part of the country he
wished to overawe. With this view he compelled
MacDougal of Lorn, whom he had carried with
him to London, to exchange his patrimony for an
equivalent of lands belonging to himself.
Having effected this, he gave a grant *, of no
very certain limits, to a creature of his own named
M'Fadyan, who, with a tumultuous horde of Anglo-
Irish and renegade Scots, amounting to about
fifteen thousand, landed in Lorn, and proceeded
to ravage the country with fire and sword, — com-
mitting the most revolting atrocities on such of the
inhabitants as refused to join them. Much obscu-
rity hangs over the birth, connections, and cha-
racter of the leader of this cloud of locusts.
According to Blind Harry, his origin was low,
" Fernwell, Friday, July 6.
1 Montrose, Saturday, July 7. Abode there till the 10th.
' Kincardine in the Mearns, Wednesday, July 11.
1 Bervie, Thursday, July 12.
' Dunn Castle, Friday, July 13.
' Aberdeen, Saturday, July 14.
" Kinkell, Friday, July 20.
" Fyvie, Saturday, July 21.
" Banff, Sunday, July 22.
" Invercullen, Monday, 23.
" In tents on the river Spey, district of Enzie, Tuesday,
July 24.
" Repenage, in the county of Moray, Wednesday, July 25.
" Elgin, Thursday, July 26. Remained for two days.
" Rothes, Sunday, July 29.
" Innerkerack, Monday, July 30.
" Kildrummie, Tuesday, July 31.
" Kincardine in the Mearns.
" Kildrummie, Tuesday.
" Kincardine in the Mearns, Tuesday, August 2.
" Brechin, Saturday, August 4.
" Aberbrothoc, Sunday, August 5.
" Dundee, Monday, August 6.
" Baligarnach, the Redcastle, Tuesday, August 7.
" St. Johnston's, Wednesday, August 8.
" Abbey of Lindores, Thursday, August 9. Tarried Friday.
" St. Andrew's, Saturday, August 11.
" Markinch, Sunday, August 12.
' Dunfermline, Monday, August 13.
' Stirling, Tuesday, August 14. Tarried Wednesday 15th.
' Linlithgow, Thursday, August 16.
' Edinburgh, Friday, August 17. Tarried Saturday 18th.
' Haddington, Sunday, August 19.
" Pykelton, near Dunbar, Monday, August 20.
" Coldingham, Tuesday, August 21.
" Berwick, Wednesday, August 22.
" Having spent twenty-one weeks in his expedition."
* This grant included Argyle as well as Lorn.
although high in favour at the English court. He
seems to have held some situation of importance
in Ireland, as the Minstrel) referring to those Irish
refugees who took shelter in Scotland under Wal-
lace, says,
" Sum part off tham was in to Irland borne,
That Makfadyan had exilde furth beforne ;
King Eduuardis man he was suorn of Iiigland,
Off rycht law byrth, supposs he tuk on hand."
BukeFeyrd, 180.
Having talents and ambition he allied himself to
the enemies of his country, and, like other mush-
rooms, throve amid the raukness of that corruption
with which he had surrounded himself. A wretch
that had risen by oppressing and assisting to bind
the necks of his free-born countrymen to the yoke
of slavery, was a very fit instrument to employ in
forwarding the views of Edward in the subjugation
of Scotland.
He had not, however, proceeded far before the
Crann-tair, or fiery cross, was seen hurrying on, by
hill and glen, to gather the children of the Gael to
repel their savage assailants. Duncan of Lorn,
the uncle, or, according to some, the younger
brother of the chief, unable to withstand the
superior force of the enemy, had retreated towards
Loch-Awe, to obtain the protection of Sir Niel
Campbell. This brave man, along with his brother
Donnchadh dubh nan Caisteal (Black Duncan of the
Castles), had collected a body of three hundred
Gall-oglaich (well armed warriors), part of whom
were the vassals of Malcolm MacGregor of Glen-
urchy *. With this force he continued to em-
barrass the enemy, by attacking their foraging
parties and cutting off their supplies. This deter-
mined Mac Fadyan to follow him through the
fastnesses of the country, and endeavour to over-
whelm him by his superior numbers. Sir Niel
managed his retreat with great dexterity. After
leading his unwary adversary round by the head
of Bradher Pass, he hurried down that dangerous
and difficult defile, and, crossing the narrow and
ill-constructed fabric which served for a bridge, he
broke it down ; and thus being secure from imme-
diate pursuit, found himself in one of the strongest
* This person was the chief of the ancient and warlike
clan Gregor, and one of the few of the West Highland
chiefs who took a part in the struggle for the independence
of the country. He remained steady in his loyalty to Robert
Bruce, whom he is said to have rescued from John of Lorn
at Dalreoch. On this occasion he was mounted on a milk-
white steed. He afterwards harboured the King in a large
cave near Cragcrastan, which is to this day called " Uagh na
rioffh, or the King's Cave," from which he crossed over and
met the Earl of Lennox at Lochlomond. Malcolm fought at
the Battle of Bannockburn, and is said to have been the
person who brought the relict of St. Fillan's arm from the
country of that name, then part of his property, to King
Robert's chaplain, who very adroitly passed it off for a mi-
racle, and thereby excited the hopes and stimulated the
valour of the army. So sensible was Bruce of this piece of
service, that he founded a priory in honour of the saint in
Straihfillan in 1314. Malcolm was much celebrated in the
songs of the bards. He fought under King Edward Bruce in
Ireland ; and having received a wound at the battle of Dun-
dalk, he retired home in consequence; and as he never
entirely recovered, he was called ever after, " M6rfhsar
bacnch" or the lame lord.
CHAP. X.]
BATTLE OF BRADHER.
45
positions imaginable. His front was defended by
a castle, which, commanded the only approach by
which he could be assailed ; while his rear was
protected by the Awe, a deep and rapid river, run-
ning out of a loch of the same name. The almost
perpendicular barrier of rocks which lined the side
of the Awe — down which, as has already been
mentioned, Sir Niel and his party had to make
their way, before they could place the river be-
tween them and their pursuers — was of such a
nature, that a man could not get on without the
assistance of his hands, to prevent him from slip-
ping down into the deep and eddying abyss below ;
and even with this assistance, at the present day,
it is a passage of considerable danger, from the
enormous masses of loose stones with which the
sloping face of the rocks is covered, from the brink
of the water to their summits, which are of great
elevation. The least accidental derangement of
the stones at the bottom, never fails to put those
above in motion, when an immense rush takes
place, attended often with serious consequences to
the parties underneath. The reader may readily
conceive the facility, therefore, with which, thus
circumstanced, Sir Niel and his followers could,
from the opposite side of the river, retard the
advance of even a larger army than that of
M'Fadyan. The difficulty of the pass is not per-
ceptible till the angle of the rock is fairly turned,
consequently the Irish army had no opportunity
of covering their advance by discharging their
missiles. They were obliged to follow each other
singly ; thus affording, as they came creeping along,
fair marks for the arrows of the Scots, part of
whom plied their deadly shafts, while others were
engaged in throwing stones from their slings against
the face of the rocks, and thus bringing down
masses of the loose fragments upon the heads of
their already embarrassed pursuers.
The castle to which Sir Niel retired, though
small, possessed great natural advantages. Situated
on a rocky knoll at the edge of a deep ravine, it
could only be approached from the road through
which M'Fadyan had to advance, and that by
means of a ladder which the party within always
kept on their own side. When they wished to
admit any one, a rope was thrown over that he
might pull the ladder towards him ; he then de-
scended to the bottom of the ravine, when, placing
the ladder against the opposite rock, in this manner
he ascended and reached the castle *.
When Sir Niel Campbell had determined on his
line of retreat, he despatched Duncan of Lorn,
and an old, but swift-footed Highander, named
Michael or Gillemichel, to acquaint Wallace of his
perilous situation, and to crave his aid in driving
the invaders from the country. Wallace, aware of
the importance of preventing the establishment
intended by Edward, lost no time in complying
* The rock on which the castle stood, was then known,
as it is to this day, by the name of Crag-an-aradh, or the
rock of the ladder. The Minstrel calls it Crage-unyn. This
deviation is extremely small, and more in the orthography
than the orthoepy. The West- Highlanders pronounce crag-
an-aradh, nearly as if spelled craganari. The difference
may have easily occurred in the act of transcribing. The
mode of crossing the ravine as above described, was in use
till the present road was made by government, when a bridge
was substituted for the less commodious expedient of a
ladder.
with the request of his old confederate ; and Sir
Richard Lundin having joined him with five
hundred men, he now found himself enabled to
march to the relief of the West Highlanders, at the
head of two thousand soldiers.
In Duncan of Lorn and his servant, Wallace had
sure and intelligent guides. At that time nothing
but intricate footpaths, known only to the natives,
existed in the Highlands ; and as they were often
formed by deer-stalkers, while tracing their game,
they frequently led through places both perilous
and perplexing to the stranger.
By the time the Scottish army had reached the
Chapel of St. Phillan, part of the foot soldiers
began to flag, and get disordered in their ranks.
Wallace, therefore, stopped, and thus addressed
them. " Good men," said he, " this will never do.
If we come up with the enemy in such broken
array, we may receive serious injury ourselves,
but can do them very little hurt in return. It is
also necessary that we should be up with them as
soon as possible ; for if they hear of our approach,
they may choose a plain field, where their numbers
will give them advantage. To prevent this, I will
go forward with those who are able, and leave the
rest to follow at more leisure." Accordingly,
taking with himself two hundred of the tried ve-
terans of Ayrshire, and placing another hundred
under the command of Sir John Graham, with
Sir Richard Lundin at the head of his own follow-
ers, they crossed a mountain in their front, and
descended into Glendouchar. Here they met a
scout, whom they had previously sent forward,
acting as guide to Sir Niel Campbell and his three
hundred Highlanders. This wary leader, on hearing
of the advance of Wallace, thought it proper to
retire towards him, and leave the passage free to
M'Fadyan, who, he knew, if he followed, could
make choice of very few positions where his num-
bers would be of any advantage. Having given
our hero a detail of what information he possessed
respecting the state of the invaders, Gillemichel
was again sent forward to watch the motions of the
enemy ; and the tough old mountaineer having
fallen in with a scout from M'Fadyan, who had
been sent to track the route of Sir Niel, managed
to despatch him with his claidh rnor, and returned
with the intelligence to his chief.
The ground having now become impassable for
cavalry, the Scots dismounted, and proceeded on
foot. Their march had not been perceived by the
enemy, and, from the superior knowledge they had
of the country, they managed to surprise the Irish
in a situation where flight was almost impracti-
cable, and the superiority of their numbers became
rather a disadvantage. The conflict continued for
two hours, with unexampled fury on both sides.
Multitudes of the Irish were forced over the rocks
into the gulf below. Many threw themselves into
the water to escape the swords of the Scots ; while
various bands of Highlanders, stationed among the
rocks, sent down showers of stones and arrows
where the enemy appeared most obstinate in the
strife. Wallace, armed with a steel mace, at the
head of his veterans, now made a charge, which
decided the fate of the day. Those Scots who had
joined the Irish, threw away their arms, and on
their knees implored mercy. M'Fadyan, with fif-
teen of his men, having made his way over the
rocks, and attempted to conceal himself in a cave,
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xi.
" wndyr cragmor," Duncan of Lorn requested per-
mission of Wallace to follow and punish him for
the atrocities he had committed ; and it was not
long before he returned, bringing his head on a
spear, which Sir Niel Campbell caused to be fixed
on the top of the rock in which he had taken
shelter.
After the defeat of M'Fadyan, Wallace held a
meeting of the chiefs of the West Highlands, in
the priory of Ardchattan ; and having arranged
some important matters respecting the future de-
fence of the district, he returned to his duties in
the Low Country, having received an accession to
his numbers, which covered any loss he had sus-
tained in the late engagement. The spoil which
the Scots collected after the battle is said to have
been very considerable ; any personal share in
which, our hero, as usual, refused *.
CHAPTER XI.
ROBERT BRUCE JOINS THE STANDARD OF WALLACE
PERCY AND CLIFFORD SENT TO SUPPRESS THE
INSURRECTION — NIGHT SKIRMISH IN ANNANDALE —
DISAFFECTION OF THE SCOTTISH NOBLES — WALLACE
RETIRES TO THE NORTH — BATTLE OF STIRLING
BRIDGE.
THE success of the insurrection excited by Wallace
has. been attributed by some English authors — and
by Langtoft °t in particular — to the foolish parsi-
mony of Cressingham, who had disgusted the
English soldiery by withholding their pay, at a
time when their services might have been of the
greatest advantage. In consequence of this unjust
procedure, many of the yeomen and pages, finding
little else than danger to be met with in the service,
deserted their posts, and returned to their own
country. Although the impolitic and avaricious
character of the English treasurer is a matter on
which the authors of both countries are agreed,
the precipitation with which the garrisons of the
Usurper now retreated on the approach of the
Scots, shows that the severe examples which had
already been made were not without their effect.
While our hero was thus following up his plan
for the emancipation of his country, his standard
was unexpectedly joined by the younger Robert
Bruce. s This powerful baron, it seems, had in-
curred the suspicion of the Warden of the Western
Marches, who summoned him to attend at Carlisle,
on pretence of business relating to the kingdom.
Afraid to disobey, Bruce made his appearance, ac-
companied by a numerous retinue of his followers,
and was there obliged to make oath on the conse-
crated host, and the sword of Thomas a Becket,
that he would remain the faithful vassal of the
King of England. In order to prove his loyalty,
and do away with the mistrust attached to him,
he made an inroad on the estates of Sir William
Douglas, who at the time was acting with Wallace,
and carried off his wife and children to one of his
own fortresses in Annandale. Having thus lulled
the suspicions that had been awakened, he next
assembled his father's vassals, and endeavoured to
See Appendix, E.
t Vol. ii. p. 297.
persuade them to join him in attempting the de-
liverance of their country. In this, however, he
was disappointed : he therefore collected his own
retainers, and marched to the quarters of Wallace ;
consoling himself with the reflection, that the Pope
would easily absolve him from his extorted oath.
The insurrection in Scotland had hitherto been
regarded by Edward more as the unconnected
operations of banditti, than any thing like an or-
ganized scheme for regaining the national inde-
pendence. Having most of the Scottish barons in
his power from whom he thought he had any thing
to apprehend, and conceiving that their vassals
would not dare to move without the warrant of
their superior, — he looked upon the affair as one
which the troops he had left behind were more
than sufficient to suppress. In this opinion he was
confirmed both by the English and the Scotch
barons whom he had along with him. The latter,
either ignorant, or pretending ignorance of the
talents and resources of our hero, represented their
presence as being absolutely necessary before any
formidable force could be brought into the field ;
and Langtoft* charges the English barons with
deceiving their sovereign in the affair, and con-
cealing from him the real state of the country. It
is a matter of notoriety, that about this time,
Edward and his nobles were not on the best of
terms. Having now, as he thought, in addition to
Wales, insured the subjection and obedience of
Scotland, and remembering the facility with which,
by the aid of 30,000 Scots lent him by Alexander
III., he overawed and suppressed the Earl of
Gloucester and those who took part with him ; he
began to assume towards the English nobility an
imperious and haughty demeanour, which both
alarmed their fears and excited their jealousy.
The unprincipled stretches of power which he had
attempted since his triumphal entry into London
after his victories in Scotland, had also sown the
seeds of dissatisfaction among the inferior classes,
who, no longer dazzled with the splendour of his
achievements over the freedom of their neighbours,
began to reflect on the encroachments which their
ambitious sovereign was making on their own.
When Edward, therefore, became fully apprised
of the serious nature of the revolt in Scotland, he
paused in the midst of preparations for an expe-
dition to Flanders, and despatched orders to the
Earl of Surrey for the suppression and punishment
of the insurgents. This distinguished and powerful
nobleman, the most efficient perhaps of all Ed-
ward's generals, was at that time residing in
Northumberland for the recovery of his health.
Having associated with him in the command, his
nephew Lord Henry Percy, and Robert de Clifford,
he sent them forward with forty thousand foot and
three hundred cavalry, a force which he deemed
sufficient to restore the country to the allegiance of
his master "I*.
While the troops under Percy and Clifford were
on their march through Annandale, their camp was
attacked during the night by a body of Scots, led
on by Wallace and Douglas. The darkness pre-
vented the English from at first discovering the
numbers of their assailants. Much confusion in
consequence ensued ; and many were either killed
or driven into the adjacent morass. In this ex-
* Vol. ii. p. 197.
f See Appendix, F.
CHAP. XI.]
DISAFFECTION OF SCOTTISH NOBLES.
47
tremity, the English set fire to a number of their
own tents ; and, by the light thus obtained, they
were enabled to form their ranks, and repulse the
enemy, who were too inconsiderable in number to
attempt any thing beyond a surprise. Hence, it
may be inferred, that Bruce and his Annandale
vassals were not engaged in the affair.
The English army lost no time in following the
track of the Scots, who retired towards those dis-
tricts where the cause of national liberty had gained
the greatest ascendancy. On reaching the neigh-
bourhood of Irvine, the English commander found
Wallace and the insurgent barons encamped on a
well chosen position, and able, from their numbers,
to have given battle, had they not been woefully
enfeebled by dissension. The feuds among them
ran so high, that Sir Richard Lundin, whose ser-
vices had lately proved so useful, went over in dis-
gust to the enemy, declaring that " he would no
longer remain with a party at variance with itself."
His example was speedily followed by others, most
of whom, as they were the cause of the dissension,
could not assign the same reason for their conduct.
Pride of birth, and reluctance on the part of the
higher barons to submit to the only man among
them who had talents * to meet the emergency,
have been assigned, with great probability, as the
cause of this unfortunate disagreement. The
Steward of Scotland ; his brother, the Knight of
Bonkill ; Robert Bruce ; William Douglas ; Alex-
ander de Lindsay ; and Wishart, Bishop of Glas-
gow, with their followers, were among those who
submitted to the enemy. The Bishop negotiated
the terms on which they were to be admitted to
the peace of their " Lord Paramount :" — an ac-
knowledgment of their errors, and hostages for
their future obedience, were the basis of the treaty ;
and a copy of the deed, to which their seals were
appended, was sent to Wallace, in expectation of
his following their example. The high-minded
patriot, however, entertaining views of a more
elevated nature, treated this record of their deser-
tion of the liberties of their country with merited
disdain.
At the head of his personal adherents, and a
large body of the " liberi firmarii" or free yeo-
manry of Scotland, Wallace retired indignantly
towards the North. This latter class of men con-
sisted of the tenants, and descendants of tenants,
of the crown and church-lands, or those who occu-
pied farms on the demesnes of the barons, ibr
which they paid an equivalent rent in money or
produce. They had the privilege of removing to
whatever place they might think most desirable,
and owed no military service except to the King
for the defence of the country. Among them the
independence of Scotland always found its most
faithful and stubborn supporters. These "liberi
firmarii," for so they are called in the chartularies,
and chamberlains' accounts, were considered so
useful from their superior industry, and agricultural
knowledge, that during the minority of the Maid
of Norway, a sum of money appears to have been
* The military genius of Bruce had not yet developed
itself. Nothing can exhibit a greater contrast than the
early and the later career of this illustrious individual. The
indecision and inertness which mark his first appearance in
public life, and the sublimity of heroism to which he after-
wards attained, almost entitle him to be considered as the
Cimon of Scottish history.
distributed among them as an inducement to remain
on the crown lands of Libertoun and Lawrence-
town, which they were preparing to leave in con-
sequence of a mortality among their cattle. They
formed a striking contrast to the cottars or villeyns,
who were entirely subject, both in body and means,
to the will of the landholder, and were sold or
transferred along with the estate ; and could be
claimed or brought back to it, if they removed, in
the same manner as strayed cattle *. These formed
the bulk of the degraded horde who followed the
banners of the recreant barons, and whose ser-
vility, ignorance, and ferocity, often made them
dangerous to the liberties of the country ; while
the former class, along with the freemen of the
boroughs, supplied the materials from which Wal-
lace recruited the ranks of his patriotic battalions.
Aware, from former experience, of the difficulty
of bringing Wallace to action if he were not so
inclined, Percy and Clifford appear to have with-
drawn their forces, satisfied with having detached
the aristocracy from his standard ; none remaining
with our hero save the gallant Sir Andrew Murray,
Sir John Graham, and a few of his own personal
friends.
But the system which Wallace had organised for
the emancipation of his country, was not liable to
any material derangement, in consequence of the
defection of a few timid and interested barons.
It is true, the desertion of such men as Sir William
Douglas must have occasioned him considerable
regret, being thereby prevented from meeting the
enemy openly in the field, with such an equality of
force as would have insured success. This feeling,
however, did not retard his exertions, but rather
stimulated him to fresh undertakings ; for we find
that he shortly afterwards surprised and garrisoned
the Castle of Dunotter. Tyberf, or Tiber, on
the banks of the Nith, he also took and destroyed.
Forfar, Brechin, and Montrose, were either taken
or deserted by their garrisons on his approach.
Aberdeen, which the enemy set on fire, and then
retreated to their ships, afterwards fell into his
hands. He then led his troops against the Castle
of Dundee, and had already made considerable
progress in the siege of that strong-hold, when he
was apprised of the advance of an English army
under the Earl of Warren, and Cressmgham the
treasurer.
Edward, dissatisfied with the imperfect measures
which had been taken for the suppression of the
Scottish revolt, and irritated by the accounts which
were daily received of the operations of the insur-
gents, had despatched peremptory orders for
Warren to proceed in person to the North. He
also directed his writs to the Bishop and Sheriff of
Aberdeenshire, commanding them to adopt strong
* Some curious and authentic information on this subject
may be found in vol. i. p. 252—260, of Tytler's History of
Scotland, — a valuable work at present in the course of pub-
lication.
t The vestiges of Tiber Castle, which has been a large
building, are to be seen on the banks of the Nith. A small
part of the wall next the river remains ; fosses are visible ;
and some intrenchments, where it was most accessible. It
is supposed that the barony of Tiber is named from Tiber,
or Tiberius. There is a Roman encampment too. The
English had a garrison in this castle, in the time of Sir Wil-
liam Wallace, who took it by surprise." — Stat. Ace. Parish
of Penpont, i. 209.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xi.
and effectual means far extinguishing the flame of
rebellion within the boundaries of their jurisdic-
tion. They were likewise required to furnish what-
ever supplies might be wanted by William de
Warren* for the defence of the Castle of Ur-
quhart, a strong and extensive fortress on the
banks of Loch Ness, of which he was governor.
Warren was also ordered to be at his post, and
fully prepared to meet any attempt of the enemy.
On learning the movements of the English,
Wallace collected those of the burgesses of Dundee
who were able to bear arms, and, placing them
under the command of their townsmen, Sir Alex-
ander Scrymgeour, enjoined them, at the peril of
" lyf and lyme f," to continue the siege. He then
retired, with his followers, who were now consi
derably increased, to watch the motions of the
advancing army.
In cases of invasion, a favourite plan adopted by
the Scots for the defence of their country was to
convey their cattle and other valuables to the more
inaccessible districts north of the Forth. By this
measure, they not only secured their own supplies,
but, by depriving their enemies of the means of
subsistence, compelled them to an early retreat as
the only resource against the miseries of starva-
tion. On the present occasion the usual precau-
tion was not omitted f.
* William de Warren was the son of John, Earl of War-
ren and Surrey (according to Dugdale), by Alice, daughter
of Hugh le Brun, Count of March, uterine sister of Henry
the Third. In 5th Edward I., he was sent into Wales on
the King's business. In 22nd Edward I., he was employed
in pressing ships in the southern and western counties, and
in cutting down timber for the use of the Royal Navy,
which was to rendezvous at Portsmouth. In the 25th Ed-
ward I., he was taken prisoner by the Scots, on which occa-
sion the King committed the care of his lands to his own
attorney, William de Berquey. According to Dugdale, he
had a claim, through his wife Mary, to the Isle of Man ;
but Edward having reserved the Island for his own use, it
is uncertain what compensation, or, if -any, was made.
He appears to have allowed her, by the name of Regina
Manniae, quondam uxor Domini William filii Warren, for
her support, the value of two hogsheads of wine, forty
quarters wheat, and forty of malt, amounting to 311. 6s. 8d.,
but on what account is not stated. William died during
his father's lifetime, leaving his wife enceinte of John, who
succeeded his grandfather in his honours. See Observations
on the Wardrobe of Edward I., p. 58, 59.
t Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 97, and Fordun, lib. xi. cap. xxix.
j This system of warfare, from the following effusion,
appears also to have met the approbaiion of the immortal
Bruce :—
' Scotica sit guerra pedites, mons, mossica terra :
Silva; pro muris sint, arcus, et hasta securis.
Per loca stricta greges munientur. Plana per ignes
Sic inflammentur, ut ab hoslibus evacuentur.
Insidice vigiles sint, noctu vociferantes.
Sic male turbati redient veluf ense fugati
Hastes pro certo, sic rege docente Roberto."
Scottish version, ex edit. Hearn.
On fut suld be all Scottis weire,
Be hyll and mosse thaim self to weire.
Lat wod for wallis be bow and speire,
That innymeis do thaim na dreire.
In strait placis gar keip all stoire,
And byrnen the planen land thaim before :
1 Famis ense MSS. Cupr. and Perth. — See Fordun, vol. ii.
p. 232. [Edin. Ed. 1775.]
The success which had attended our hero, since
the affair of Irvine, and the formidable character
of the well-disciplined force which now adhered to
his banner, occasioned a wavering among a number
of those barons who had so shamefully submitted
to the usurper. Their situation, it must be allowed,
had become one of great difficulty. The character
of Wallace was stern and decisive. The punish-
ment he inflicted on such offenders, they had
reason to know was seldom mitigated by any con-
sideration for the high rank of the parties * ; and
the English had repeatedly shown, that they were
unable to protect the serviles from the vengeance
of their indignant countrymen. It was therefore
with no slight alarm that the party heard of the
house of the Bishop of Glasgow being attacked,
and pillaged, and his family carried off they knew
not whither. The selection which Wallace had
made of Wishart, as an example to the others,
had no doubt been suggested party by the ingra-
titude of that churchman, in deserting the cause,
after having been, by means of the patriots, so
lately restored to his diocese ; and partly from his
being so instrumental in the disgraceful negotiation
with the enemy. The sacredness attached to his
character, as a priest, would speedily disappear
before the heinous offence of assisting to detach,
in the hour of need, the swords of a Douglas, a
Lundin, and a Bruce, from the service of their
country. ^ Meanwhile the hostages for their fidelity
had been carelessly exacted ; and when soon after
called for by Warren, (whose remiss conduct had
so far incurred the displeasure of Edward, that he
sent Brian Fitz Alen to supersede him as lieute-
nant), he found them more inclined for a new
arrangement, than willing to fulfil the terms of the
former. They wished, in particular, to introduce
some stipulations respecting the liberty of Scotland,
a proposal no doubt made for the purpose of allay-
ing in some degree the indignation of their patri-
otic countrymen. The continued obstinacy, and
increasing power of Wallace, was made a pretext
for their non-compliance ; and they could now with
apparent justice decline the final ratification of a
deed of "treason against the independence of their
country, when protection from the consequences
was so extremely uncertain.
In this dilemma the Steward and the Earl of
Lennox sought permission of Warren to open a
communication with the leader of the Scots, under
pretext of bringing him over to the interests of
Edward. In consequence of this arrangement,
these chiefs ventured to visit the Scottish army,
which, by this time, had reached the neighbour-
hood of Stirling, and taken up a strong position
Thanen sail thai pass away in haist,
Quhen that they find nathing hot waist.
With wyllis and wakenen of the nicht,
And mekill noyes maid on hycht.
Thanen sail they turnen with gret affra^
As thai were chasit with several away.
This is the counsall and intent
Of gud King Robert's testament.
* The grettast Lordis of oure land
Til hyrn he gert thame be bowand :
lid thai, wald thai, all gert he
Bowsum til hys Byddyng be :
And til hys Byddyng qwhay war noucht bown
He tuk, and put thame in Presown.
Wyntown, vol. ii.. p. 96.
j CHAP. XI. J
BATTLE OF STIRLING BRIDGE.
49
near the bridge, where it appeared determined to
wait the approach of the English. The retiring
population had left little behind them that could be
useful to the enemy ; all their cattle and provisions
being now secured in the rear of the protecting
columns of their countrymen. This rendered the
position of Wallace still more valuable, prepared,
as he was, in the event of a defeat, to fall back to
certain supplies, while his opponents would be still
farther removed from their resources.
But if feuds had rendered the Scots inert and
submissive to the enemy at Irvine, the councils of
the English were now, in their turn, distracted
from the same cause. The mind of Warren ap-
peared more occupied in brooding over his late
disgrace, than in attending to the details of the
campaign ; while Cressingham *, a haughty, ambi-
tious, and imperious churchman, assumed addi-
tional importance on learning that his colleague
had incurred the royal displeasure. Conflicting
measures, supported by querulous aud acrimonious
language, engendered a dangerous spirit of ani-
mosity between them. Cressingham, on the plea
of economy, ordered the disbanding of a body of
eight thousand foot and three hundred cavalry,
commanded by Lord Henry Percy, a force which
Warren wished to retain as a reserve ; and during
the altercations which this occasioned, the com-
munications of the Steward and the Earl of Len-
nox with the Scottish camp were injudiciously
allowed to continue.
On the arrival, however, of the English in front
of the position occupied by the Scots, those noble-
men returned. With well feigned displeasure they
announced their inability to make any pacific im-
pression on Wallace and his followers ; and then
took their leave, for the alleged purpose of bringing
up a number of their mounted vassals to join the
English, who were to defile along the bridge in the
morning.
Five thousand foot and a body of Welsh archers
had passed the bridge before Warren had left his
bed "f • Whether this sluggishness on the part of
the English general arose from indisposition or
chagrin, is not explicitly stated. The troops, how-
ever, on finding that they were not supported by
the rest of the army, returned to their station.
Warren, who arose about an hour after, — feeling,
perhaps, reluctant to attack the Scots in their pre-
sent position, and not deeming it prudent to calcu-
late on the recurrence of the same mistake which
had given him so easy a victory at Dunbar, —
despatched two friars to make a last attempt at
pacification.
The answer returned was evidently intended to
exasperate the English, and bring them on head-
long to the fray. After a bold declaration of inde-
pendence, a taunting allusion was made to the
conquerors of England. " We came not here,"
said the intrepid assertor of Scotland's rights, " to
negociate, but to fight ; and were even your mas-
ters to come and attack us, we are ready to meet
them at our swords' point, and show them that our
* See Appendix G.
t Langtoft partly attributes the loss of this battle to the
indolence of the English general. The return of so consi-
derable a body of troops, on account of their not being sup-
ported by the rest of the army, would no doubt encourage
the ScotSj and perhaps suggested to their leader the admir-
able manoeuvre which he afterwards put in practice.
country is free." Enraged at this stern and pro-
voking defiance, the English became clamorous to
be led on.
A council of war being called, it was proposed
by Cressingham that the army should instantly
cross the river and attack the Scots. In this he
was opposed by Sir Richard Lundin, who pointed
out the many difficulties they would have to en-
counter in attempting to defile along a bridge, so
narrow, in presence of so wary an enemy ; and
offered to guide them to a ford not far distant,
where they could pass with less hazard. Cressing-
ham,— either displeased at being contradicted, — or
not placing full reliance on the fidelity of Lundin,
who had but recently joined the English, told
Warren, — who appeared to hesitate, that, as trea-
surer of the King of England, he (Cressingham)
could not be answerable for squandering the money
of his master in protracted warfare with a handful
of enemies, who, — in order to be defeated, had
only to be attacked, and would always be formid-
able,— provided they were never brought to an
engagement. Stung by the reproach conveyed in
these remarks, Warren gave orders for the troops
to move onwards.
Sir Marmaduke Twenge, a knight belonging to
the North-Riding of Yorkshire, of much expe-
rience and distinguished personal prowess, assisted
Cressingham in leading the van. When nearly
one half of the English had cleared the bridge
without opposition, an attempt was made to dis-
lodge the Scots from the ground they had chosen ;
and for that purpose, Sir Marmaduke rather im-
patiently charged up-hill with a body of heavy-
armed cavalry. The consequence was, however,
fatal to the assailants, as the enemy, from their
vantage-ground, drove them headlong before them
with their long spears. In the mean time, the
communication between the bridge and the van of
the English army was cut off by a masterly move-
ment of a division of the Scots, who .afterwards
kept up such an incessant discharge of arrows,
darts *, " gavelocks," and other missiles, as com-
pletely interrupted the progress of the enemy.
Wallace contemplated, for a moment, the success
of his plan, and instantly rushed down to the
attack with an impetuosity which the scarcely
formed battalions of the English were ill prepared
to withstand. Giving way to the shock, they fell
into irretrievable confusion, while the repeated
charges of the compact bodies of the Scottish
spearmen were fast covering the ground with the
splendid wreck of the chivalry of England. The
scene now became animating beyond measure ;
and many of those who had defended the bridge
forsook their companions to join in the desperate
melee. The passage being thus left comparatively
open, the royal standard of England, displaying
" Three gold leopards courant, set on red," was
advanced to the cry of—" For God and St. George !"
attended by a strong body of knights, who, with
their triangular shields, defending themselves
from the missiles which still showered thick upon
the bridge, rushed forward to aid their fellow-com-
batants. The banner of Warren next appeared,
chequered with gold and azure, and followed by his
numerous vassals. The day, however, was too
far gone to be retrieved, even by this powerful
Langtoft, vol. ii. p.. 297.
E
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xi.
assistance. Finding no room to form, they only
increased the confusion, and swelled the slaughter
made by the Scottish spearmen, before whose
steady and overwhelming charges thousands were
either borne down or driven into the river.
While Warren, with inexpressible anxiety, be-
held from the opposite bank the destruction of the
flower of his army, the Steward of Scotland and
the Earl of Lennox were seen approaching with a
strong body of horse ; but, as might be expected,
instead of joining the English, they assisted their
countrymen in pursuing and killing those who
were attempting to save themselves. Sir Marma-
duke Twenge gallantly cut his way to the bridge,
and escaped.*
The panic now became general, and the face of
the country was covered with a confused mass
of terrified fugitives, hurrying on to avoid the
swords of their conquerors, and increasing, as they
fled, the disorder of their retreat, by throwing
away their arms and their standards, in order to
facilitate their flight.
Wallace having crossed the ford alluded to by
Lundin, the pursuit was followed up with the most
destructive perseverance. The day of retribution
had arrived ; — the butcheries of Berwick, the
carnage of Dunbar, with a long list of national
indignities and personal sufferings had now to be
atoned for. Conscious of the provocation which
had roused to frenzy the vengeance of an infu-
riated people, Warren turned with dismay from
the scene of havoc, leaving twenty thousand of his
soldiers to manure the fields of those they had so
lately oppressed. Cressingham, the most detested
of all the tools of Edward, was among the number
of the slain ; — and when Wallace came up, a party
were employed in flaying the body. According to
the MS. Chronicle of Lanercost, he is said to have
ordered only as much of the skin to be taken off
as would make a sword-belt ; and his men, per-
haps, imitating his example, might have appro-
priated the rest. This, says a respectable author f,
is no doubt the origin of the tale told by Aber-
cromby and some other historians, of the Scots
having used it as girths to their horses. An order
of this kind, given in the heat of the pursuit, was
perhaps never thought of afterwards ; at least, we
have no account of Wallace ever wearing such an
appendage. The circumstance, however, shows
* This man, though a brave soldier, it seems, was no
swimmer. Being advised by some of his companions to
throw himself into the river, he replied, " It shall never be
said of me, that I did voluntarily drown myself. God forbid,
that such a dishonour should fall upon me, or any English-
man ;" and, setting spurs to his horse, rushed into the thick
of the battle, killing many of his opponents, and was fast
making his way to the bridge, when he was called to by his
nephew, who was wounded, to save him. " Get up and
follow me," was the answer. " Alas! I am weak, and can-
not," returned the other. Sir Marmaduke's squire dis-
mounted, and placed him behind his uncle, who brought
him off in safety to Stirling Castle, where they both found
refuge.
Notwithstanding this unfortunate expedition, Sir Mar-
maduke returned the following year to the Scottish wars.
He was also engaged 29th and 32nd Edw. I. and 1st
Edw. II., and died 16th Edw. II., leaving issue by Isabel,
his wife, William, his son and heir. He himself succeeded
Robert de Twenge, to Cleveland and other possessions in
the North of Yorkshire.— Due/dale.
t P. F. Tytler, Esq.
the deep-rooted detestation with which the indi-
vidual was regarded.
Warren, who fled rapidly to Berwick, was most
probably, like another English general of more
modern times, the first herald of his own discom-
fiture. The consternation which his disaster occa-
sioned among his countrymen hi Scotland was so
great, that few or none would venture to wait the
approach of the enemy ; but abandoning their
strongholds, they hurried southward with the
greatest precipitation, justly conceiving that the
terms they were likely to obtain from one who fol-
lowed up his victories with so much energy, were
hardly worth staying for. The loss on the part of
the Scots was comparatively small ; none of note
having fallen, save the brave Sir Andrew Murray
of Bothwell *.
In this manner was Scotland once more restored
to that liberty of which she had been so unjustly
deprived. Nor was the benefit conferred on the
country less than the glory which redounded to
her gallant liberator. The brilliant and decisive
victory at Stirling Bridge was gained on the llth
September, 1297, exactly twelve months and eleven
days from the return of Edward to Berwick, after
what he conceived to be the final subjugation of
the kingdom.
The state of Scotland in the early part of 1297,
was such as might well have extinguished the
ardour of any mind possessed of less energy than
that of Wallace. He saw his country humbled
and debased at the feet of a tyrant, whose talents
and power forbade every hope of emancipation,
while the boldest of her nobles dared not express
a Avish to be free. His own indignant feelings
blazed forth, and, with his kindling enthusiasm, he
breathed into his torpid and enslaved countrymen,
the breath as it were of a new existence. The
regenerating influence of his heroic example was
quickly caught by those whose bosoms still beat re-
sponsive to the call of honour ; and in the short space
we have mentioned, those banners which had lately
waved over hecatombs of butchered Scots, and
had been paraded through the land with all the
triumphant arrogance of conquest, were now
trampled under foot, and the colossal power by
which they were sustained, overthrown before the
virtuous indignation of a people determined to be
free. When we contemplate the might and the
resources of Edward, who, in addition to those of
his own kingdom, had Ireland, Wales, and his
continental possessions to depend upon ; it is im-
possible not to feel impressed with admiration at
the greatness of that mind, which, with the frac-
tions of a divided and dispirited people, could form
the idea of braving a force so overwhelming : but
* Among those who distinguished themselves in this
memorable engagement, there is reason to believe that the
burgesses of Stirling, and the tenants of the Abbeylands at
Cambuskenneth, were particularly active; and it is sup-
posed, that, from their behaviour on this occasion, they
were allowed to assume an allusion to the battle in the
town's seal, which, after the date of the above transaction,
displayed on the obverae a bridge, composed of seven
arches ; in the centre appeared a crucifix, on the south side
of which stand three soldiers with bows (the national wea-
pon of the EngHsh), endeavouring to force the passage, and
on the north side are the same number of soldiers, armed
with spears, the characteristic weapon of the Scots. The
legend is, " Hlc armit Brutl Scoli stant, hlc cruce tuti.'
CHAP. XII.]
HE IS APPOINTED GUARDIAN.
51
when we find those plans which he had conceived
in the deep recesses of his woodland retreats, not
only perseveringly carried on against a tide of
adverse circumstances — in defiance of the aris-
tocracy of his own country, and the opposition of
secret and avowed enemies — it may with truth be
said, that, however highly he may have been ex-
tolled, a tithe of his greatness has not yet been
appreciated. Much has been said of romance being
mixed up with the accounts given of him ; but it
would be difficult for any of those who delight in
nibbling at great names, to point out any tradition
respecting Wallace, sufficiently romantic to outstrip
the simple facts that stand recorded of him in the
authentic annals of British history.
Deserted by the barons at a time when he con-
ceived he had united in the sacred cause all that
was noble, and all that was high-minded in the
land, it required no common intrepidity to bear up
against their heartless and unseemly defection ;
and to recruit his ranks after so serious a dimi-
nution, required talents of the highest order, and
exertions beyond the reach of ordinary men. This,
however, he not only accomplished, but also reco-
vered a number of fortresses, — drove the enemy
from the North, and, with a numerous and gallant
army, sat down in a well-chosen position, to await
the advance of the legions of England, — all within
two months of the disgraceful negociation at
Irvine.
After a victory achieved in the face of diffi-
culties so formidable, with what feelings must the
hero of Stirling Bridge and the Scottish aris-
tocracy have regarded each other ! The mighty
force of him whom they had acknowledged as their
Lord Paramount, was now broken and dispersed
before the superior valour and steadiness of one
whom they had so rashly abandoned. In the rich
harvest of laurels which had been acquired, they
had excluded themselves from all participation ;
and, though conscious that they could not lay
claim to a single leaf, they were sensible that the
heroism of their late companions would soon be
emblazoned through every country in Europe ;
while they had the mortification to reflect, that the
tale of their own pusillanimous submission, would
be held up as a counterpart to the gallantry of
those friends whom they had so shamefully for-
saken in the road to immortality.
CHAPTER XII.
WALLACE APPOINTED GUARDIAN OF THE KINGDOM —
INVADES ENGLAND — INROAD OF DE CLIFFORD ON
THE SOUTH OF SCOTLAND.
STIRLING CASTLE capitulated immediately after the
battle, and Sir Marmaduke Twenge *, who had
taken shelter in it, was sent prisoner to Dum-
barton. The surrender of the castle of Dundee
followed ; and, with the exception of the garrisons
* Langtoft tells an improbable story of the Scots having
induced him to surrender, by a promise of returning to the
allegiance of Edward. Twenge must have been a noted
simpleton indeed, if he could have been so easily imposed
upon. — See Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 300.
remaining in Roxburgh, Berwick, and Dunbar,
Scotland was once more completely cleared of her
invaders. These places, with the exception of the
last, were also given up, as soon as they were sum-
moned by the leaders of the Scottish army ; and
about this time, at a meeting held in the Forest-
kirk, Selkirkshire, Wallace was elected, or de-
clared Regent of Scotland, in the name of King
John ; the appointment being sanctioned by the
S'esence of the Earl of Lennox, Sir William
ouglas, and a number of the most powerful
among the nobility.
Thus armed with legitimate authority, the newly
appointed Guardian began to exercise it in the
manner that he conceived would be most con-
ducive to the general interest and welfare of the
country. He had often experienced the difficulties
which feudal vassalage presented to his efforts in
behalf of the national independence. The nume-
rous serfs who were retained in bondage by the
more powerful barons, could be either restrained
from taking up arms, or withdrawn at the caprice
of their masters, even when their services were of
the greatest importance. A power so dangerous
in the hands of a party comparatively small, had
been productive of the most ruinous consequences.
To reform a system pregnant with mischief, and
one at the same time so much in favour with the
prejudices of the age, required wisdom and energy,
such as he possessed. Aware of the opposition
which an open and declared attempt to emancipate
the adscripti glebce would create, — he attacked the
system in the only part where it appeared to be
vulnerable. Having divided the country into dis-
tricts, he caused a muster-roll to be made out,
containing the names of all who were capable of
bearing arms between the ages of sixteen and sixty.
These he divided and subdivided in a manner pecu-
liarly his own. Over every four men he appointed
a fifth ; over every nine, a tenth ; over every nine-
teen, a twentieth ; and thus continued the gradation
of rank till it reached the chiliarch, or commander
of a thousand *. In the different parishes, gibbets
were also erected to enforce obedience to these
regulations ; and whoever refused to appear for
the defence of his country when summoned, was
hung up as an example to others. Those barons
who interposed their authority to prevent their
vassals from joining the ranks of the patriots, were
either punished with imprisonment, or confiscation
of property.
Though the active and restless mind of Wallace
may now seem to have had full employment in the
various duties of his office, — yet, amidst the multi-
plicity of objects of internal policy which occupied
his time, the resuscitation of the foreign trade of
the kingdom appears to have had its proper share
of his attention. The advantage which Scotland
derived from her foreign commercial intercourse,
as has been already stated, was too important to be
soon forgotten ; and the heroic and faithful conduct
of the Flemings at the siege of Berwick, was too
recent not to be dwelt on with grateful remem-
brance. In order, therefore, to renew the con-
nection with those useful strangers, accredited
persons appear to have been despatched with
letters to the free towns of Hamburg and Lubeck f.
* Fordun a Goodall, vol. ii. p. 170.
* See Appendix, H.
E2
52
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xn.
Having provided for the necessary supplies of
men, the Guardian determined on retaliating the
injuries Scotland had sustained at the hands of her
late oppressors. Meanwhile a famine, — the natural
consequence of the neglect of agriculture during
the unsettled state of the country, had begun to
make its appearance ; and was soon followed by a
pestilence, — occasioned, doubtless, by the multi-
tude of putrid carcases which remained, partially
at least, if not altogether, exposed after the recent
carnage. To alleviate, as far as possible, the misery
consequent on those dreaded calamities, he com-
manded all the standing crops to be carefully
gathered in, and stored up in barns and yards
unde^ proper regulations, to meet the exigencies
of the country during winter. In order, at the
same time, to concentrate the strength and re-
sources of the country, and establish that unani-
mity so necessary for its defence, he summoned all
the'vassals of the Scottish crown to meet him at
Perth. From this parliament, which was pretty
numerously attended, Patrick, Earl of Dunbar,
thought proper to absent himself. The great power
and military experience of this baron, joined to the
circumstance of his occupying a fortress which was
considered as the key of the eastern part of the
kingdom, made it an object of some importance
that his allegiance should be unquestionable. An
early partisan of Edward, he had as yet shown no
disposition to relinquish his unnatural connection
with the enemy. When the subject of his absence
came, therefore, to be discussed before the Scottish
nobles, they unanimously resolved on proceeding
against him without delay. Wallace, however,
proposed the more gentle expedient of remon-
strance, before having recourse to extremities ;
and a deputation was accordingly sent, to request
his attendance as a Scottish peer, in order to take
part in the government of the country, and to aid,
with his counsel and his arms, in the establishment
of the national independence. Possessed of large
dominions in England, as well as an extensive
inheritance in Scotland, this Earl felt little inclina-
tion to incur the displeasure of his Lord Para-
mount in the South, by a too ready accession to
the cause of liberty in the North ; and he accord-
ingly returned a haughty and scornful answer, no
way calculated to allay the prejudice which his
former contemptuous behaviour had excited against
him. As soon, therefore, as the various objects
which had engaged the attention of the parliament
were disposed of, Wallace proceeded, with a select
body of 400 men, to reduce the turbulent chieftain.
A little to the east of Dunbar, the Guardian found
the Earl awaiting his approach at the head of 900
followers ; and a desperate conflict immediately
commenced, which ended in the flight of Patrick,
who escaped to England *. The castle of Dunbar
was in consequence surrendered to the victor, who
gave it in charge to Sir Christopher Seton, with a
competent garrison for its defence.
1297. Early in October a proclamation was
issued for every one capable of bearing arms to
appear on the moor of Roslin. An immense multi-
tude attended. The most vigorous and the best
equipped were then selected ; and having thus
embodied an efficient, numerous, and gallant army,
Wallace excited their ardour by a short and ani-
* See Appendix, I.
mating address, in which he told them, that, united
as they were, with only one glorious object in
view, they had nothing but victory to expect, —
their country had been stripped of its wealth by their
late oppressors, and it was now their duty and
interest to recover it, and punish the aggressors.
The army * then proceeded in high spirits towards
the English frontier, — their leader rightly judg-
ing, that, by withdrawing so many men, a larger
quantity of provisions would remain for those left
behind "; and by adopting this measure, his soldiers
also, while they escaped from the contagion which
had appeared in Scotland, would be moreover
rewarded for their past labours, by the riches they
would find in the more flourishing regions of the
South ; which, having enjoyed a long interval of
peace, might be conceived to be overflowing with
that description of wealth most desirable in the
estimation of the needy adventurers of the North ;
— and the latter, no doubt, as they drove home
their lowing and bleating prey from the rich pas-
tures of Durham and the neighbouring counties,
considered that they were merely removing their
own property, of which they had been unjustly
deprived by the tyranny of the English.
In this expedition, Wallace divided the com-
mand of the army with Sir Andrew Murray of
Bothwell, the promising son of the brave Sir
Andrew, who fell in the late engagement. This
honour he may have thought due to the patriotic
conduct of the father, in adhering to the fortunes
of his country, amidst the general defection of the
Scottish barons. And — as it might tend to give
the lie to those reports which began to be cir-
culated of an intention to aggrandize himself at the
expense of the aristocracy, — the appointment was
evidently a measure of judicious and honourable
policy.
On the approach of the Scottish army, the in-
habitants of Northumberland deserted their dwell-
ings, and fled to Newcastle, carrying with them
their wives and children, their cattle and household
stuff. The Guardian, however, for a short time
delayed his advance ; and having received notice
that several of the burgesses of Aberdeen, and
others in that quarter, had disobeyed his summons
to appear at Roslin, he hurried back to the North,
where, on apprehending the parties, those whose
excuses were inadmissible, he ordered for imme-
diate execution. Hastily rejoining his forces, he
crossed the Border, and succeeded in surprising
the English, who, thinking the storm had blown
over, were returned to their homes.
The Scots now commenced their destructive
reprisals, by wasting with fire and sword the coun-
ties of Cumberland and Northumberland. In this
work of devastation they were assisted by Robert
de Ros of Werk, a great northern baron, who, as
we have already observed, had deserted the
standard of Edward in 1295. It is presumed that
the same influence wkich formerly seduced him
from his loyalty, still existed ; and it is a pity that
the name of the lady who made so patriotic a use
of her charms, has not been preserved by the
historians of her country.
The former inroads of the Scots were trifling,
* Of this army the Campbells and M'Gregors formed a
part, and no doubt a number of the Perthshire clans were
included.
HE INVADES ENGLAND.
compared with the wide-spreading desolation which
now marked their career. The havoc they made,
and the spoils they collected, are feelingly dwelt
on by the English writers of the day. Langtoft
thus expresses himself : —
" To werre than ros thei eft, tille God thei mad a vowe,
That no thing suld be left, that ir.yght to Inglond prowe,
Mercy suld none haue, tille alle thei suld do wo,
Kirke suld no man saue, hot brenne ther in & slo.
In Northumberland ther first thei bigan,
& alle that com tille hande, they slouh and ouer ran
To Flandres tille Edward tithinges men him sent,
That Scottis com in hard, the North is nere alle brent,
& more salle zit be lorn, hot if we haf socoure.
Nouht standes tham biforn, toun, castelle ne toure."
Vol. ii. p. 21)8, 299.
Hemingfcrd says, "At this time the praise of
God was not heard in any church or monastery
through the whole country, from Newcastle-upon-
Tyne to the Gates of Carlisle ; for the monks and
canons regular, and other priests who were minis-
ters of the Lord, fled with the whole people from
the face of the enemy ; nor was there any to
oppose them, except now and then a few English
who belonged to the castle of Alnwick, who ven-
tured from their strongholds, and slew some strag-
glers. But these were but slight successes ; and
the Scots roved over the country * from the Feast
of St. Luke to St. Martin's day, inflicting on it all
the miseries of rapine and bloodshed f."
* Fordun states, that the Scots army remained in Eng-
land from All Saints day till Christmas, 31st October till
25th December. Wyntown also agrees with him, and thus
expresses himself on the subject.
" And syne fra the Alhalowmes
In Yngland till Yhule he bydand wes.
All Allyrdayle as man of Were
That tyme he brynt wyth his Powere :
And wyth gret Prayis owt of that Land,
Come eftyr the Yhule in-til Scotland."
Wyntown, B. viii. c. 13. v. 177—182.
t In the invasion of England, one Grimesby acted as
guide to the Scottish army. This person we have alluded
to at page 19, as carrying the banner of St. John of Beverley,
in the army of Edward. He was afterwards rewarded by
the Usurper with the promise of the first benefice of twenty
merks or pounds which should become vacant in Scotland.
This prospect of preferment, however, did not prevent him
from joining the liberator of his country. He appears to
have been long in the service of England, and was most
probably one of those 30,000 Scots who were sent by Alex-
ander III. to the assistance of Henry III., when opposed by
his barons. Though it be uncertain if he accompanied
Edward to the Holy Land, it is however pretty evident that
he attended him in his various expeditions to France ; and,
in his character of pursuivant, he obtained a very intimate
acquaintance with the localities of that country, as well as
of England. His intimate knowledge of the latter rendered
Kis services of much importance to his countrymen. Henry
represents him as a steady and useful adherent to Wallace,
and describes him to be of great stature, and as having
acquired among the English the name of Grimesby, on
account of his grim or stern visage. This, however, is more
fanciful than correct. Grimesby is of Danisli origin, and
though among the Scots he was called Jop, his real name ap-
pears to h ve been Gilbert Grimesby. He acted as herald, as
well as guide ; and often marshalled the Scottish battalions
on the eve of battle.
The Guardian having summoned in all his plun-
dering parties, and concentrated his army, directed
his march towards Carlisle. The sack of this city
would have been most desirable to the invaders,
not only on account of its riches, but also as in
some measure enabling them to avenge the injuries
inflicted upon Berwick. The place, however, was
strongly fortified ; and the Scots not being pro-
vided with a battering train, they had to content
themselves with sending a summons ; which, being
disregarded by the garrison, they passed on, and
laid waste Cumberland and Allerdale, from Ingle-
wood Forest to Derwentwater and Cockermouth.
Winter now advanced : — the frost set in with
uncommon severity, — and the Scots, who had cre-
ated a desert around them, began also to dread
the miseries of famine, as well as the inclemency
of the season. Their encampments could now be
traced by the frozen bodies of those who had
perished during the night from the intensity of the
cold. Under these circumstances, Wallace gave
orders for their return to Scotland.
On their reaching Hexceldsham *, the monastery
of which had been plundered during their advance,
the following singular scene is said by Heming-
forcl to have occurred. Three monks, all who had
the courage to remain, were observed in a small
chapel. Thinking that the danger was over, they
had forsaken their concealments, and were endea-
vouring to repair the damages of the late visitation,
when, in the midst of their labours, they disco-
vered the Scottish army returning, and fled in
dismay to the oratory. The soldiers, however,
with their long spears, were soon among them ;
and brandishing their weapons, commanded them,
at their peril, to give up the treasures of the
monastery. " Alas ! " said one of the monks, " it
is but a short time since you yourselves have seized
our whole property, and you know best where it
now is." At this juncture Wallace entered, and
commanding his soldiers to be silent, requested
one of the monks to perform mass : he obeyed,
and the Guardian and his attendants heard the
service with becoming reverence. When the ele-
vation of the host was about to take place, Wallace
retired for a moment to lay aside his helmet and
arms. Instantly the avarice and ferocity of the
soldiers broke out. They pressed upon the priest,
snatched the cup from the high altar, tore away
the ornaments and sacred vestments, and even
stole the book which contained the ceremony.
When their leader returned, he found the priest
in fear and horror at the sacrilege. Wallace,
indignant at such conduct, gave orders that the
villains should be searched for, and put to death.
In the mean time, he took the monks under his
own special protection.
As some atonement for the outrage committed,
the Guardian granted to the monks of Hexcelds-
ham a charter of protection for twelve months,
from the 7th November, 1297f, by which their
lives and property were held sacred. " The pro-
hibition," says Lord Haiies, " to slay any eccle-
siastic of the monastery of Hexceldsham, shows
that the Scots had been guilty of uncommon bar- l)ro-
barities." Had his Lordship said that the conduct-oy the
of the Scots was merely an humble imitationoon after-
the example which the English had set th
Hexham.
t See Appen'"
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xm.
their " Good Friday " revelries at the sack of Ber-
wick, he would have been nearer the truth. We
find no such restraint put upon the English sol-
diery, who were allowed to murder their lay and
clerical victims indiscriminately ; not even except-
ing nuns, whose sex, independent of every other
consideration, ought to have been their protection.
If a shadow of humanity can be discovered in the
mode of warfare carried on by the two nations, it
certainly belongs of right to those who published
a prohibition of such enormities. In the invasion
by the Scots in 1296, there is no charge brought
against them of killing priests. Langtoft says,
vol. ii. p. 273, that in coming to Hexham and
Leynertofte, they merely chased out the canons,
and took away their goods. Their subsequent
severity must therefore have been forced upon
them by their enemies.
English writers have lamented, with eloquence
and pathos, the cruelties exercised in this invasion ;
and from their silence respecting the atrocities of
their own -countrymen, have endeavoured to fix
the stain of exclusive barbarity on the arms of
Scotland. This is all natural enough, and quite
consistent with that national prejudice by which
the people of every country are more or less im-
bued ; but it is painfully mortifying, when we
find Scotchmen of acknowledged talent and pene-
tration forgetting what is due to themselves and
to their country ; and from a weak fear of being
thought illiberal, following humbly in the train of
such authors, and echoing their reflections ; or
favouringly assenting to their ex parte statements,
in place of standing forward and showing the
world, that their countrymen, in resorting to
such severities, merely exercised a system of
fair retaliation, for the purpose of repressing
enormities of the deepest dye, committed in
support of an aggression of the most unparalleled
baseness.
During the time the Scottish army was engaged
in ravaging the northern counties of England,
Robert de Clifford, at the head of one hundred
men-at-arms, and twenty thousand foot, left Car-
lisle, and proceeded to plunder in Scotland. His
success, however, was not great, having killed
three hundred and eight Scots, burned two villages,
and taken a few prisoners, with whom he returned
home about Christmas.
Whilst the Guardian was thus successfully pro-
secuting the cause of his country's independence,
his efforts, at the same time, were becoming daily
more beneficial to the real liberties of the very
people to whom he was opposed. Elated, first by
the conquest of Wales, and afterwards by that of
Scotland, Edward had already begun to stretch
forth the iron rod of oppression over the legiti-
mate subjects of his own native kingdom ; and,
trusting to the assistance he should receive from
the barons of his newly acquired conquests, who,
he might naturally suppose would not be found
reluctant to act as instruments in holding their
late conquerors in subjection, he assumed, towards
the nobles of England, an air of haughty supe-
riority that awakened their j ealousy, and alarmed
,their fears. But as the investigation of this sub-
t would interrupt the course of our narrative,
N' reserve jt till the end of the volume *.
* 'See Appendix, L.
CHAPTER XIII.
WALLACE RETURNS TO SCOTLAND — ENVIED BY THE
NOBILITY EDWARD LANDS IN ENGLAND WALLACE
MEETS HIS ARMY AT STANMORE BATTLE OF BLACK-
IRONSIDE LEGALITY OF WALLACE'S REGENCY
EDWARD INVADES SCOTLAND — TREACHERY OF TWO
SCOTTISH NOBLEMEN.
DURING the time that Wallace remained in Eng-
land, his army was occasionally renewed ; for as
soon as the quota of men belonging to one clan or
parish had collected a sufficient share of booty,
they were allowed to retire and secure it in the
North, while their places were supplied by fresh
hordes of not less hungry adventurers. By such
means the spoil of England became pretty equally
divided throughout the several districts of Scot-
land, and the inhabitants began to experience the
benefits of returning plenty. Having, in this man-
ner, enriched his own country at the expense of
her enemies, the intrepid Guardian returned — poor
it is true, in wealth, but rich in fame — to behold
the prosperity he had so gallantly achieved *. This
expedition, however, though it had increased his
reputation among the common people, failed not
to awaken the envy of the nobles, who could ill
brook the popularity of one whose actions had
thrown them so much into the shade ; and his
praise, which they heard on all sides, sounded in
their ears like so many reproaches against them-
selves, who, possessing wealth and power, either
could not, or from treachery would not, do what he,
so much their inferior in wealth and influence, had
taken in hand and finished, with glory to himself
and honour to the country. Hence the private
heartburnings which arose among these noblemen,
whose consciences whispered that they had been
either traitors or sluggards when the liberty of
their country was at stake.
1298. In the mean time, Edward having com-
plied with the demands of his subjects, the Barons
of England collected an army, and advanced
towards the Border. On the 14th March, the
King himself landed at Sandwich, and instantly
summoned the Scottish barons to a Parliament at
York. According to Abercromby, he also ad-
* It is probable that some of our readers may be dis-
pleased with our passing over the interview which Wallace
is said to have had with Queen Margaret, during the time
his army was encamped in the north of England ; but we
always wish to have some authority for what we commit to
our pages ; and as we can find nothing in support of it,
either in English or Scottish records, we are inclined to look
upon it as a minstrel's tale, introduced for the purpose of
effect. The subject excited the inquiries of the learned
Dr. Jamieson, who has been at considerable pains to ascer-
tain whether or not such an interview actually took place ;
and all his researches tend rather to throw discredit on the
affair, in addition to the doubt which naturally arises from
the silence of history. Henry, in whose work the tale is
only to be found, represents Edward as being then in
Britain, while it is agreed on all hands that he was, at the
time, prosecuting the war in Flanders. Though the Min-
strel be a favourite with us, still we like to see his state-
ments corroborated; and we conceive, that the English
Queen appearing in the Scottish camp in the manner be
describes, was a circumstance too flattering to the national
pride of the Scots, to be left to the pen of one solitary nar-
rator.
CHAP. XIII.]
MEETING AT STANMORE.
55
dressed letters to the Guardian, and in a strain
more impassioned than courteous, upbraided him
for his audacity in disturbing the tranquillity of
Scotland, and in presuming afterwards to invade
England, — a line of conduct which, he observed,
would not have been ventured upon, had he (Ed-
ward) been in the country ; and concluded, by
commanding Wallace to redeem his errors by an
immediate submission to his authority. To these
letters the Guardian replied, that in availing him-
self of the absence of Edward, in order to regain
the liberty of his country, he had done no more
than his duty, and that the baseness lay with the
English monarch in taking advantage of the dis-
union of a free people to enslave them. As to
invading England, he had done so in order to indem-
nify Scotland for the injuries she had so unjustly
sustained ; and in respect to submission, as he
intended soon to be in England again, he would
then give him his answer in person.
The active and undaunted Guardian was in-
stantly at the heels of his messenger, and on the
20th of March came in sight of the English army
at Stanmore. Scottish historians say, that Edward's
force though much superior to that of Wallace,
was composed chiefly of raw militia hastily raised,
few or none of his veterans having been yet landed,
and that the English monarch, struck with the
appearance and admirable discipline of the Scots,
and, unwilling to risk his fame in a conflict so
doubtful, — when about five hundred paces from
the enemy, turned his banners and marched off
the field. Wallace, afraid of an ambush, restrained
his soldiers from the pursuit, and repressed their
ardour by telling them, that the victory they had
already gained was the more glorious, as it was
got without blood and against the first captain of
the age, at the head of an army which, to all
human appearance, was able, from its numbers, to
have swallowed them up ; concluding his address,
by ordering thanksgivings to Heaven for so great
an interposition in their favour.
This account, however, is not corroborated by
English historians. They allege that the King was
not present ; and in this they are certainly in the
right. Edward, on his arrival in England, was
detained by matters of importance, in such a man-
ner as to render his presence at Stanmore on the
20th March utterly impossible. That the Scots
may have come in sight of the English army on
the borders, is not at all unlikely ; or that the lat-
ter should decline risking a general engagement,
' after their late reverses, without the presence of
their King, who was daily expected, is extremely
probable. It may also be observed, that the char-
ters of their rights, though granted at Ghent, had
not as yet been confirmed in England. . The con-
duct of the English leaders, under such circum-
stances, may be considered as highly prudent and
judicious.
But if the Scots were disappointed in not coming
to blows with their enemies at Stanmore, it was not
long before they had an opportunity of trying the
mettle of their swords. Aymer, or Aldomer de
Vallance, son of the Earl Pembroke, a youth at
that time of eighteen years, had raised himself
high in the estimation of Edward, by the ready
manner in which he accompanied him to Flanders.
The abilities and discretion, which he soon dis-
played, obtained for him so much of the confidence
of his master, that he was employed in various
important matters of state. On the truce with
France being concluded — for the furtherance of
which he was appointed a commissioner — Edward,
it appears, had ordered him to sail for Scotland
with the force under his command, for the purpose
of co-operating in the invasion which he meditated
on his arrival in England. Various circumstances
contributed to retard the projected attempt ; and
it was not till Midsummer that Aldomer and Sir
John Siward (a recreant Scot, son of the traitor of
Dunbar) landed in Fife with a considerable body
of troops, and began to lay waste the country.
Their destructive operations, however, were soon
interrupted by the arrival of Wallace and his Scots,
who fell upon them in the extensive foi'est of
Blackironside, and, after an obstinate conflict, the
invaders were defeated with the loss of 1,580 men.
This engagement, which is sometimes called the
Battle of Dillecarew, was fought on the 12th June.
The loss of the Scots was comparatively trifling ;
and, with the exception of Sir Duncan Balfour,
Sheriff of Fife, and, according to some, Sir Christo-
pher Seton *, few, if any, of note, were killed, — Sir
John Graham being only wounded. Sir John
Ramsay of Auchterhouse, with Squires Guthrie
and Bisset f, are particularly mentioned as having
distinguished themselves in this brilliant rencounter.
On his return to Scotland, after the affair at
Stanmore, Wallace applied himself to rectify the
abuses and disorders which had arisen from the
disorganized state of the country. For this pur-
pose, he seems to have made a tour through the
kingdom, and on 29th March we find him presiding
in an assembly of the Barons at Torphichen. At
this assembly, which was most probably held in
the preceptory of the Templars, various meritorious
individuals were rewarded for their patriotic exe -
tions in the cause of independence. Among these,
Alexander Scrymgeour had the constabulary of
Dundee conferred upon him and his heirs, for his
"faithful aid in bearing the Royal Banner of Scot-
* See Appendix, M.
t Respecting these two meritorious individuals, few par-
ticulars appear to be known. Guthrie is said to have been
the ancestor of the Guthries of that Ilk, and was frequently
employed as the confidential agent of his countrymen.
Bisset is also mentioned as the progenitor of the Bissets
of that Ilk ; and according to Henry, he was killed on this
occasion by the hand of Siward, who, in his turn, was cut
down by Wallace. By the chamberlain's accounts it appears,
that one John Bisset, a poor monk of Haddington, received
from King Robert Bruce a pension of 20s. per annum for
clothing. Whether this was given in consequence of any
relationship to the gallant patriot of that name, is not stated.
The battle of Blackironside appears to have been a pro-
tracted forest-fight for the greater part of the day; and the
heat of the weather induced the combatants at times, as if
by mutual consent, to pause amid the deadly strife.
On one of those occasions, Wallace it is said unclasped
the helmet of a dead Englishman, and, repairing to a neigh-
bouring fountain, still unstained with the carnage of the
day, he dipped it. into the stream, and continued to carry the
water along the ranks of his fainting soldiers. When he
had in this manner allayed their thirst, he afterwards par-
took himself; and declared, that the cooling beverage was
mi -re grateful to his palate, than the richest wines he had
ever tasted. The effect which this mark of attention pro-
duced on the minds of his followers, was evinced by the
vigour they displayed in the charge which they soon after-
wards made on the enemy.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xin.
land, u-hich service he actually performs ." This docu-
ment appears to have been made with the consent
and approbation of the Scottish nobility, and is
dated 29th March, 1298 *.
Some authors assert, that the election of Wallace
to the Guardianship took place after his return
from the invasion of England. Lord Hailes says,
he assumed the title of Guardian subsequent to
that event. This we consider extremely impro-
bable ; as the degree of popularity he had attained
among his countrymen would have certainly anti-
cipated any assumption on the part of their de-
liverer. Although Abercromby be not a first-rate
authority, we conceive that he is right in placing
the election before the advance of Wallace to the
south. The immense preparations necessary for
an invasion of England, required the sanction of
something like legitimate authority to carry it into
effect ; and the measures which he resorted to for
the good of the country, immediately posterior to
* For the satisfaction of the reader, we will here give the
charter referred to, as it is preserved in Anderson's Diplumata
et Numismata Scotits (Edin. 1739) — from the original at that
time in the possession of Mr. David Watson, writer, Edin-
burgh.
CHARTA
Domini Gulielmi Wallaev, Cuslodis Scotia;, nomine Jo-
hannis Balliol Regis, cum sigillo ejusdem Johannis.
" Willelmus Walays miles, Gustos Regni Scocie, et Ductor
exercituum ejusdem, nomine preclari Principis Domini
Johannis, Dei Gracia Regis Scocie illustris, de consensu
communitatis ejusdem Regni. Omnibus probis hominibus
dicti Regni ad quos presens scriptum pervenerit, eternam in
Domino salutem. Noverit universitas vestra, nos, nomine
predict! Domini nostri Regis Scocie, per consensum et
assensum magnatum dicti regni, dedisse et concessisse, ac
ipsas donationem et concessionem presenti carta confirmasse
Alexandro dicto Skirmischur sex marcatas terre in territo-
rio de Dunde, scilicet, terrain illam que vocatur campus su-
perior, prope villam de Dunde ex parte boreali, cum acris
illis in campo occidentali que ad partem regiam spectare
solebant prope villam de Dunde ex parte occidentali, et
etiam pratum regium in predicto territorio de Dunde, et
etiam constabulariam castri de Dunde, cum suis pertinen-
ciis, libertatibus et asyamentis sine aliquo retinemento, pro
homagio predicto Domino Regi et heredibus suis vel suis
successoribus faciendo, et pro fideli servicio et succursu suo
predicto regno impenso portando vexillum regium in exer-
citu Scocie tempore confectionis presentium, tenenda et
habenda predicto Alexandro et heredibus suis de predicto
Domino nostro Rege et heredibus suis vel suis successo-
ribus, libere, quiete, integre, pacifice et honorifice in per-
petuum, cum omnibus pertinenciis, libertatibus et asya-
mentis ad dictam terram et pratum prenominatum, et pre-
fatam constabulariam spectantibus vel quoquo modo spec-
tare valentibus in futurum, faciendo inde annuatim Domino
Regi et heredibu* suis vel suis successoribus, scilicet pro
predictis terra, prato, et constabularia cum suis pertinenciis,
libertatibus, et asyamentis, servicium quod pertinet ad dic-
tam constabulariam tantum pro omnibus que de predictis
exigi poterunt in futurum. In cujus rei testimonium,
sigillum commune predicti Regni Scocie presenti scripto
est appositum. Datum apud Torpheichyn vigesimo nono
die Marcii, Anno Gracie millesimo ducentesimo nono-
gesimo octavo."
From the above document, it will appear that Wallace
was sole Regent ; and that, when he associated the name
of the younger Sir Andrew Murray along with his own, it
may be considered as only a respectful compliment to the
memory of the gallant and patriotic father, whose example
the young warrior was thereby excited to emulate.
the battle of Stirling, were not of a less decisive
character than those which marked his policy on
his return from England. Abercromby also states,
that he held a commission of Regency under the
seal of Baliol*, which was privately executed
during the captivity of the latter in the Tower of
London. To this statement, tradition unites her
testimony, and adds, that Wallace likewise obtained
a bond from the principal barons of Scotland, au-
thorizing any measures he might adopt for the
recovery of the kingdom. This bond, it is asserted,
he held in terrorem over the heads of the aristo-
cracy, for the purpose of compelling them to their
duty.
The authority of Wallace, "however, whether
conferred or assumed, unfortunately for his country,
was not destined to be of long duration. Soon
after the defeat of the Earl of Pembroke, Edward,
now reconciled to his barons, entered Scotland by
the eastern marches, with a formidable army, con-
sisting, according to English writers, of 3000 horse-
men, armed at all points, 4000 of a lighter descrip-
tion, called hobelars, and 80,000 foot. A further
reinforcement overtook him on his march, which
swelled his forces to upwards of 1 00,000 fighting
men, a great proportion of whom were veterans,
inured to arms in the French wars. To oppose a
power so overwhelming in the open field, the
Guardian well knew would be in vain ; he, there-
fore, again resorted to those measures which had
already been found so effective : the population
retired with their cattle and provisions before the
approaching enemy, after destroying whatever they
conceived might be useful to the invaders. While
the Scottish army kept far in the a'dvance, a strict
surteillance was exercised over the motions of their
adversaries, so that few of the English scouts were
able to return with any satisfactory account of the
position or numbers of their opponents ; and though
most of the fortified places made little or no re-
sistance, yet the supplies the conquerors found in
the garrisons, did little to relieve that scarcity
which soon began to be severely felt among the
multitudes who followed the banner of England.
In the mean time, the fleet which Edward had
ordered to attend him with provisions being de-
tained by contrary winds, he was compelled to
wait their arrival ; and, for this purpose, he fixed
his head-quarters in the preceptory of the Knights
Templars at Torphichen f ; while part of his army
* This deed Baliol could have no great difficulty in exe-
cuting ; for though residing in the Tower, he enjoyed the
full liberty of twenty miles round, and a princely retinue to
attend him. That he transmitted a commission of Regency
to Wallace, is not only highly probable, but placed almost
beyond a doubt, not merely from the suspicions entertained
by Edward, and the severe treatment which Baliol latterly
experienced in consequence of his supposed duplicity, but
also from the fact of Wallace possessing and using, in his
character of Regent of the kingdom, the seal of the de-
throned monarch ; and that in the presence, and with the
sanction of the assembled nobility. Evidence to this effect
is furnished by the charter granted to Alexander Scrymgeour,
given in the preceding note ; and as the lands which were at
that time conferred are declared to have belonged to the
crown, the full and unrestricted authority with which Wal-
lace was invested becomes thereby the more apparent.
t Lord Hailes, on the authority of Hemingford, says
" Temple-liston," and thus condescends to notice a respect-
able writer: — " Sir Robert Sibbald, Comment, in Relat. et
CHAP. XIII.]
EDWARD INVADES SCOTLAND.
occupied Temple-liston, thus keeping open his
communication with the sea.
Edward, in his march, had met with little annpy-
ance, except from the stronghold of Dirleton, and
two other castles in his rear, the garrisons of which
made frequent sorties, and cut off several of his
foraging parties. The Bishop of Durham was
therefore ordered to lay siege to these fortresses.
His efforts, however, were at first unsuccessful ; he
was driven from the walls of Dirleton with con-
siderable loss ; and as the force under his com-
mand was in want of provisions, as well as of a
sufficient battering train, he sent Sir John Fitz-
Marmaduke to represent his situation at head-
quarters. " Go back," said Edward, " and tell
Antony that he is right to be pacific when he is
acting the Bishop, but that in his present business
he must forget his calling : and as for you, Mar-
maduke," addressing the messenger, " You are a
relentless soldier ; I have often had to reprove you
for too cruel exultation over the death of your
enemies ; but return now whence you came, and be
as relentless as you choose, you will deserve my
thanks, not my censure ; — but look you do not see
my face again till these three castles are razed to
the ground *."
While lying inactive in the preceptory of the
Templars, Edward appears to have amused him-
self by raising a number of young squires to the
rank of knighthood ; and — a few ships, affording a
temporary supply, having1 very opportunely arrived
— a donation of wine was distributed on the occa-
sion among the soldiers, the effects of which liber-
ality soon became apparent. Intoxicated with
Blair, p. 31, says 'at Torphichen,' because Blind Harry says
so. It was an admirable fancy to correct W. Hemingford by
Blind Harry! Had Edward fixed his head quarters at
Torphichen, his communication with Edinburgh and the
Frith of Forth would have been speedily cut off."
This is scarcely doing Sir Robert justice. It is more
reasonable to suppose that he said so, after weighing the
probabilities of the case. That Torphichen was a place of
some importance, and possessed accommodation, appears
certain, from the circumstance of Wallace having, only a
few months before, assembled the Scottish Barons to a par-
liament there ; and it was, as aas been already mentioned,
the station of a preceptory of the Templars, within the pre-
cincts of which Edward was more likely to fix his head-
quarters, than in any part of the desolated country around
him. Durirtf his stay, we also find him employed in con-
ferring the honour of knighthood on a number of young
esquires ; — an idea very naturally produced by his residence
in such a spot. That Edward's communication with Edin-
burgh and the Frith of Forth became thereby liable to any
interruption, is a supposition more to be admired for sim-
plicity than depth of reflection. The distance between
Torphichen and Temple-liston is but a very few miles.
Edward was at the head of an army consisting of 7000
cavalry, and about 100,000 foot; a multitude that could find
little more than tent-room in the space between the two
places. Had the English monarch, therefore, been the most
imbecile general that ever led men to the field, — with such
a force he could have no difficulty in keeping open his com-
munication to a much greater extent than what was re-
quired in such a position. That a portion of the English
army was stationed at Temple-liston, is not to be doubted ;
and it seems equally certain, that Edward made the more
convenient station of Torphichen his own head-quarters.
Sir Robert, therefore, had reason, as well as the authority of
Blind Harry, in support of his statement.
* See Appendix, N.
their allowance, the national animosity of the Eng-
lish and Welsh troops broke out in a dangerous
mutiny. The latter, inflamed by wine, and irritated
by the privations they had already suffered, at-
tacked the English in their quarters during the
night, and murdered eighteen ecclesiastics ; where-
upon the English cavalry, in revenge, rode in upon
the assailants, and slew eighty of their number.
The Welsh, who amounted to 40,000, now with-
drew from the English in high displeasure at the
slaughter of their countrymen ; and Edward,
having at first made light of the affair, afterwards
found it necessary to exert himself, in order to
effect a reconciliation. Meantime, the scarcity
continued to increase in his camp to such an ex-
tent, as induced him to issue his orders for a
retreat.
The Scottish army, by the prudence of its leader,
had hitherto been kept as it were invisible from
the enemy, who were only aware of its existence,
by the desolation with which it surrounded them ;
and the excellent generalship of Wallace was now
to all appearance about to be crowned with its
usual success, when his plans were rendered abor-
tive by the treachery of his pretended adherents.
Two Scottish noblemen* found means to commu-
nicate to the Bishop of Durham the position of the
Scottish army, and their intention to surprise the
English by a night attack, and afterwards to hang
upon their rear, and harass them in their retreat.
Edward received this news with ecstasy. " Thanks
be to God ! " he exclaimed, " who hath hitherto
extricated me from every danger. They shall not
need to follow me, since I shall forthwith go and
meet them ;" and, instantly countermanding the
orders for a retreat, he prepared to go in search of
the Scottish army.
Though the utmost diligence was used by Ed-
ward and his officers, morning was pretty far
advanced before the immense concourse of war-
riors could be put in motion. The distant stations
which an army so numerous must necessarily have
occupied, rendered an instant removal altogether
impossible ; and a whole summer's day was there-
fore consumed in enabling them to reach an exten-
sive heath to the east of Linlithgow ; where, for
that night, they rested in their armour. In the
mid-watch, however, an alarm spread, that the
enemy were at hand, and considerable confusion
ensued. It originated in an uproar, occasioned by
an accident which happened to the King : — His
war-horse, which stood beside him, had it seems
become restive, and trampled on him as he lay on
the heath ; and his domestics having raised the cry,
that the King was wounded, every man grasped
his weapon, and stood on his defence. Philip de
Belvey, the King's surgeon, however, soon quieted
their apprehensions, and they again betook them-
selves to rest.
* These noblemen, it is said, were the Earls of Dunbar
and Angus. With respect to the first, there is certainly a
mistake, as he does not appear ever to have joined the
standard of Wallace, and the other, with more propriety,
may be called an Anglo-Scot. What share he may have
had in the treason, is uncertain. That the plans of Wal-
lace were betrayed by those in his confidence, is evident ;
but who the guilty parties were, remains doubtful. The
subsequent conduct of Cumyn excites a strong suspicion
against him.
58
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xiv.
CHAPTER XIV.
THE ENGLISH ARMY ADVANCE TO LINLITHGOW
BATTLE OF FALKIRK, FROM THE ACCOUNTS GIVEN
BY ENGLISH AND SCOTTISH WRITERS — MISCEL-
LANEOUS TRANSACTIONS.
DAY broke on the army of England moving onward
to Linlithgow in one long and variegated column.
To those whom sanctity of character, or local
situation, enabled to await its approach, the spec-
tacle, which was now at hand, must have been
fearfully interesting. Since the days of the Romans,
the present army was perhaps the largest that had
traversed the plains of Scotland. Many alterations
had been introduced about this time into Europe
by the crusaders ; and Edward, who was no inapt
scholar in the military art, had, during his re-
sidence in Palestine, and his expeditions to France,
availed himself of every invention that came under
his observation. His army, therefore, might justly
be considered as the most perfect in discipline,
equipment, and feudal splendour, that Christendom
could boast of at the time. As it approached,
it seemed to lengthen, — the interminable array
issuing, as it were, from some inexhaustible source
on the verge of the horizon : its glittering mazes
occasionally appearing and disappearing among the
inequalities of the road, might be aptly compared
to the undulating movements of one of those
enormous serpents that figure in the pages of
romance, some of whose coils are at times seen
while its extremities are concealed amid the dark-
ness of the den from whence it is represented as
issuing forth. Most of the inhabitants fled before
the unwelcome intruders, except a few Carmelite
friars, who stopped to gaze on the warlike pageant.
The confused hum of this living mass increased
as it advanced, till the deserted walls of Linlithgow
resounded to the braying of clarions, the thun-
dering of kettle-drums, and the prancing of war-
steeds in flowing caparisons, bestrode by warriors
mailed to the teeth, having long two-handed swords
depending from their girdles, while their right
hands held lances, and their left supported tri-
angular shields painted with the various devices of
their families.
Henry de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln *, and Humphry
de Bohun, Earl of Hereford, and Constable of
England, led the first division. The second was
under the charge of Bishop Bek, who, having exe-
cuted the commission Edward had sent him by
John Fitz-Marmaduke, next appeared in this por-
tentous march, attended by thirty-nine banners ;
for this proud ecclesiastic spared no expense to
render his retinue as magnificent as possible. In
the third division under the command of the King,
besides the royal standard (three leopards courant),
there waved, the sacred banner of St. John of
Beverley, that of St. George (white with a red cross),
that of St. Edmond, King of the West-Saxons (blue
with three gold crowns), that of St. Edward the Con-
fessor (blue, with a cross fleury between five martlets,
gold}, and also the ominous standard of Henry III.,
* The banner of the Earl of Lincoln was of yellow silk,
with a purple lion rampant. That of the Constable was of
deep blue silk, with a white bend between two cotises of fine
gold, on the outside of which he had six lioncels rampant. —
Walter of Exeter.
by the unfurling of which the army were apprised
of the vicinity of the enemy, and the certainty of
an approaching battle. This gorgeous emblem of
war was never displayed, except to announce a
positive intention to fight : it was formed of red
satin, bearing a dragon embroidered in gold, having
sapphii-e eyes, and the tongue ingeniously contrived
to seem continually moving *.
Amongst those who followed the royal banner,
was Brian Fitz- Allan f, the late Governor of Scot-
land, attended by his vassals, and those Scots who
still ventured to oppose the liberties of their coun-
try. Of the latter, we find Brian le Jay, preceptor
of the Scottish Templars, who probably joined
Edward at Torphichen. What number of knights
accompanied him to the field in this formidable
crusade against the freedom of that people who
fostered them, cannot now be ascertained ; we
may, however, venture to include John de Sautre,
" Maister de la Chiralerie de Templi en Ecosse."
The immense multitude of Welsh collected by
Edward, as being better acquainted with mountain
warfare, were dispersed among the different divi-
sions of the forces. Being mostly archers, and
clothed in white tunics, they were easily distin-
guished from the other troops.
Tradition asserts, that this grand army took a
whole day to deploy through the town of Linlith-
gow. This perhaps may be true respecting the
parties escorting the heavy war-engines, suttlers
attending the camp, and other stragglers ; but the
advanced guard of the English came in sight of
the Scottish outposts early in the day. The latter
occupied the ridge of a hill ; and as the English
marched up to attack them, a thick mist intervened,
and prevented the intended rencounter.
When the day cleared up, the Scottish army was
discovered in the distance, taking up their positions,
and preparing for battle. Their numbers did not
exceed 30,000 — not a third part of the force opposed
to them ; and aware of the immense advantages
which Edward possessed, and extremely averse to
risk the safety of the country on the issue of a
single battle, the Guardian would gladly have pro-
tracted the warfare, by retiring farther to the
north. Divisions, however, prevailed among the
leaders of the Scots ; and, before they could agree
on the measures necessary to be adopted, the near
approach of the English, and the great superiority
of the latter in cavalry, rendered retreat extremely
hazardous.
The Scottish army, which consisted principally
of spearmen or lancers, was arranged in four divi-
sions or schiltrons. Those in the centre held their
long spears perpendicular, and stood ready to fill
up a vacancy, while each intervening rank gra-
dually sloped their weapons till they came to a
level. The front rank kneeling, and the whole
closely wedged together, presented to the enemy
the appearance of four enormous, impenetrable
porcupines, the space between each being filled up
with archers.
Edward, on seeing these dispositions for battle,
hesitated to give orders for the attack, and pro-
* In an encampment, this ensign was placed near the
royal tent, on the right of the other standards. It was
intended to be expressive of destruction to the enemy, and
of safety to the weary and wounded among the English.—
Fide Illustrations of British History.
t See Appendix, O.
CHAP. XIV.]
BATTLE OF FALKIRK.
posed that his followers should pitch their tents,
and allow the soldiers and horses time for rest and
refreshment. This was opposed by his officers, as
being unsafe in their present situation, — a small
rivulet only intervening between the two armies.
"What, then, would you advise?" exclaimed
Edward. " An immediate advance ! " was the
reply ; " the field and the victory will be our's."
" In God's name, then, let it be so ! " said the
King.
The Earls of Lincoln and Hereford, accordingly,
led the first squadron to the attack. Their pro-
gress, however, was retarded by an extensive
morass, which covered the front of the Scots, and
obliged their enemies to make a circuit to the west.
While thus employed, the powerful squadron under
the Bishop of Durham managed to get in front of
the enemy. Bek, however, on observing the for-
midable appearance of his opponents, wished to
delay the charge till supported by the column
under the command of the King. " Stick to thy
mass, Bishop," said Ralf Basset of Drayton, " and
teach us not what to do in the face of an enemy."
" On, then," said Bek, " Set on, in your own way ;
we are all soldiers to-day, and bound to do our
duty." Instantly they rushed forward, and soon
became engaged with the first schiltron, which
was almost simultaneous attacked on the opposite
quai-ter by the first division which had cleared, the
morass. "The cavalry of the Scots, and a large
body of the vassals of John Cumyn, immediately
wheeled about, and left the field without awaiting
the attack. The schiltrons of spearmen, however,
stood firm, and repulsed all the efforts of their
numerous and heavy-armed assailants, who recoiled
again and again from before the mass of spears
which their enemies presented. Baffled in then-
attack, the cavalry of Edward charged upon the
archers, who, less able to stand tlieir ground against
the weight of their mail-clad adversaries, gave way.
In this confusion, Sir John Stewari of Bonkill, bro-
ther to the Steward of Scotland, was thrown to the
ground, while attempting to rally his vassals, the
archers of Selkirk ; and though many of them
rushed forward to his assistance, their exertions
were in vain : — their gallant leader fell, surrounded
by the bodies of his faithful tenantry.
Though heavy squadrons of cavalry were con-
tinually pushed forward against the Scottish spear-
men, still the latter maintained their ranks, and
displayed such admirable discipline and stubborn
resolution, that Edward, convinced of the inability
of breaking their array, suspended the charges
of his horsemen, and ordered all his archers and
slingers to advance *.
Langtoft thus describes the conduct and appear-
ance of the Scottish infantry : —
" Ther formast conrey, ther bakkis togidere sette,
Ther spares poynt ouer poynt, so sare & o thikke
& fast togidere joynt, to se it was ferlike.
Als a castelle thei stode, that were walled with stone,
Thei wende no man of blode thorgh tham suld haf gone
* Langtoft says, the Welsh, amounting to 40,000, would
not act against the Scots at Falkirk.
" The Walsch folk that tide did nouther ille no gode,
Thei held tham alle bi side, opon a hille thei stode.
Ther thei stode that while, tille the bataile was don."
Vol. ii. p. 306.
Ther folk was so mykelle, so stalworth & so clene,
Ther foyntes forward prikelle, nonhut wild thei wene,
That if alle Inglond fro Berwik vnto Kent,
The folk therin men fond had bien thider sent,
Stength suld non haf had, to perte tham thorgh oute,
So wer thei set sad with poyntes rounde aboute."
Vol. ii. p. 304, 30,5.
The formation of these Scottish schiltrons was
admirably adapted for defence ; and had they been
supplied with a sufficient body of cavalry to have
pi-otected them from the assaults of the archers,
they might have kept their ground, in defiance of
every effort of the enemy. But, deserted by their
own cavalry, they now stood helplessly exposed to
a storm of missiles which assailed them in all
directions ; for though those in the centre bravely
pressed forward to fill up the chasms in front,
cloud after cloud of arrows, mingled with stones,
continued to descend among their ranks with
increasing and deadly effect, till the ground was
encumbered around them ; while their former as-
sailants sat with their horses on the rein, ready
to burst in upon them at the first opening that
would offer. The Scots at last became unsteady,
under the incessant and murderous discharge of
the English artillery. The cavalry then dashed
forward, and breaking in upon their ranks, com-
pleted the confusion.
Wallace now saw that retreat was the only
expedient left by which he could save the remnant
of his countrymen ; and having, with incredible
efforts, rallied a number of his most determined
'adherents, he attacked the foremost of the pur-
suers, and by that means covered the retreat of the
fugitives. Amongst the slain, Brian le Jay * is
particularly mentioned. The death of this Tem-
plar, which took place in Callender-wood, damped
the ardour of his companions, and enabled the
Scots to make good their retreat. In this sangui-
nary conflict, 15,000 Scots are said to have been
left on the field ; the most distinguished of whom
were Sir John Graham of Dundalk, Sir John
Stewart of Bonkill, and MacDuff, grand-uncle to
the Earl of Fife. The extent of the English loss,
from the stubborn opposition of their enemies,
must also have been considerable. After the
battle, Wallace fell back on Stirling, which he
burnt, in order to prevent it from falling into the
hands of the English.
Respecting this battle, Scottish authors give a
very different account from the preceding, which
is chiefly taken from the pages of English his-
torians. According to the former, the envy of the
nobles towards Wallace, and the dissensions inci-
dent thereto, were the chief, if not the sole occa-
sion of the disaster. The Scottish army, say they,
consisted of three divisions of ten thousand men
each, under the command of Sir John Cumyn,
Lord of Badenoch, chief of the powerful clan of
that name ; Sir John Stewart, brother to the Lord
of Bute, who, in addition to his own tenantry,
headed those of his absent brother ; and Sir Wil-
liam Wallace, — three of the most powerful men in
the country, the two former from their birth and
influence, the latter from the great fame acquired
by his military achievements. On the brink of the
engagement, an imprudent and unfortunate dis-
agreement arose among the leaders. Stewart in-
* Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 305, 306.
(50
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xiv.
impatient at the resistance he had already met
with, ordered Robert Bruce and the Bishop of '
Durham to advance with the forces under their
command. While Wallace was engaged in secur-
ing the retreat of his unfortunate countrymen,
Bruce made a circuit round the hill which he occu-
pied, and gaining the ascent, obliged him to quit
his position, and endeavour to force his way
through the enemy beneath. The charge of this
fresh body of Scots, composed of the stoutest and
best disciplined warriors in the country, was but ill
sustained by the division they attacked, which,
giving way before their impetuous descent, was
thrown into confusion ; and Wallace, availing him-
self of their disorder, directed his troops to cross
the Carron, and occupy a post which commanded
the ford. In the mean time, with a small but
choice body of his friends, he kept in the rear, and
continued to charge and repulse those that were
most forward in the pursuit. In one of these
efforts, Wallace advanced alone from the midst of
his little band, and, with a single blow, slew Sir
Brian le Jay, a knight templar * of high military
renown, who had shown himself most active in
harassing the retreating Scots. This action ren-
dered the others more cautious in their approaches.
Sir John Graham, however, giving way to a gallant
but imprudent ardour, advanced too far amongst
the enemy, where he was surrounded and slain ;
and Wallace, after repeated endeavours to revenge
the death of his friend, rejoined his followers. This
he effected with great difficulty, from the influx of
the tide, and the weakness .of his horse, which is
said to have been so worn out with the fatigues of
the day, and the wounds it had received, that the
noble animal expired as soon as it had placed its
master beyond the reach of his pursuers. By the
attention of his trusty follower Kerle, who stood
an anxious spectator on the danger of his chief,
Wallace was furnished with a fresh horse ; and
the two friends, as they moved slowly along the
banks of the river, were gazing with silent and
sorrowful interest on the scene of carnage they had
left, when Bruce, from the opposite bank, having
recognised the Guardian, raised his voice, and re-
quested an interview. This was readily granted,
and the warriors approached each other from oppo-
site sides of the river, at a place narrow, deep, and
rocky. When on the margin of the stream, Wal-
lace waved his hand, to repress the curiosity of his
followers, while he eyed his misled countryman
with stern, but dignified composure. Bruce felt
awed by the majestic appearance and deportment
of the patriot, and his voice, though loud, became
* This warrior is thus described by Langtoft, who claims
him as an Englishman : —
" Was no man Inglis maynhed no dede that day,
Bot a templer of pris, Sir Brian the geay
Maister templere he was on this half the se,
He folowed the Scottis pas, whan the bigan to fle
Per in tille a wod ; men calle it Kalenters,
Ther in a mire a mod, withouten help of pers,
Slauk thei Sir Brian alone withouten mo."
Vol. ii. p. 305, 6.
By Rymer, however, he is noticed as swearing fealty to
Edward in Edinburgh Castle, July 1291, after the convoca-
tion of Brigham, and designated as preceptor templi in
Scotia ; and, by the same authority, it appears his example
was followed by John de Sautre, and those under his control.
sisted upon taking command of the army, being, as
he conceived, entitled to that honour, as the repre-
sentative of his brother, who was Lord High
Steward of Scotland ; Cumyn claiming it, in his
own right, on account of high birth, and near rela-
tionship to the crown ; and Wallace, as Guardian
of the kingdom, refused to admit the pretensions of
either to a command which he, as representative
of their absent sovereign, conceived himself every
way entitled to, even though he had not earned
that honour by former services. Stewart, in the
heat of the altercation, is said to have upbraided
Wallace with the lowness of his birth, and charged
him with encroaching on the rights of the nobility,
which reminded him, he said, " of the owl in the
fable, who, having borrowed a feather from one
bird, and a feather from another, became vain of
his plumage, and endeavoured to lord it over his
betters. The application is not difficult," con-
tinued he ; " for, if every nobleman in Scotland
were to claim his part of those vassals which now
follow your banners, your own personal retainers
would make but a sorry appearance in support of
your high-flown pretensions." Wallace heard, with
stern composure, those ill-timed remarks of the
haughty chieftain. " I am not ignorant," said he,
" of the source whence this insulting language has
proceeded ; and since you, my Lord, condescend
to utter their sentiments, you may be also induced
to imitate their example : and even this," glancing
a look of indignation at Cumyn, " I am not alto-
gether unprepared for. Your fable of the owl is
not quite applicable ; for 1 always showed myself
in the face of day, asserting the liberty and inde-
pendence of my country, while some others, like
owls, courted concealment, and were too much
afraid of losing their roosts, to leave them for such
a cause. As to my followers, I wish no man to
follow me who is not sound at the heart in the
cause of his country ; and either at the head or in
the ranks of these, I will always consider it my
glory to be found. In the mean time, till it appear
who are entitled to that character, I will make an
alteration in my position." Having thus spoken,
he removed those under his command to a strong
position on the face of a hill immediately behind.
Edward, as if aware of the feud that thus ex-
isted in the Scottish camp, and though suffering
from the effects of his late accident, ordered the
Earl of Hereford, Constable of England, to ad-
vance with a body of thirty thousand men, to
attack the division under Cumyn ; who, on seeing
them approach, turned his banners, and marched
off the field, leaving Stewart and his Brandanes
(as the inhabitants of Bute were then called), and
the archers of Selkirk, his immediate vassals, ex-
posed to all the fury of the charge. They sus-
tained it with the firmest resolution ; but the great
mass of assailants against whom they were en-
gaged, left them little chance of success. Stewart,
in the early part of the battle, while giving orders
to a body of archers, was thrown from his horse
and slain. His followers, however, far from being
discouraged by the loss of their chief, continued
the conflict with the greatest bravery. MacDuff,
with a great part of his retainers, were cut off, in
their endeavours to retrieve the fortunes of the
day, yet numbers forced their way through the
ranks" of the English, and joined the division under
Wallace. This was observed by Edward, who,
CHAP. XIV.]
OPINIONS OF HISTORIANS.
tremulous as he thus addressed him : — " I am
surprised, Sir William, that you should entertain
thoughts, as it is believed you do, of attaining to
the crown of Scotland ; and that, with this chime-
rical object in view, you should thus continue to
expose yourself to so many dangers. It is not
easy, you find, to resist the King of England, who
is one of the greatest princes in the world. And
were you even successful in your attempts, are you
so vain as to imagine, that the Scots will ever
suffer you to be their King ? " The Guardian did
not allow him to say more. " No," replied he, " my
thoughts never soared so high, nor do I intend to
j usurp a crown I very well know my birth can give
me no right to, and my services can never merit.
I only mean to deliver my country from oppression
and slavery, and to support a just cause, which
you have abandoned. You, my lord, whose right
may entitle you to be king, ought to protect the
kingdom ; it is because you do it not, that I must,
and will, while I breathe, endeavour the defence of
that country I was born to serve, and for which, if
Providence will have it so, to die. As for you,
who, in place of exerting your talents to turn the
tide of battle in your country's favour, choose
rather to live a slave, if with safety to your life
and fortune, than free, with the hazard of losing
the latter, you may remain in possession of what
you so much value, while the hollow praises of our
enemies may blind you to the enormity of your
conduct ; but remember, my lord, they whom you
are thus aiding to bind the yoke of slavery on the
necks of your countrymen, will not long consider
that conduct praiseworthy in you, which they would
condemn as infamous in themselves ; and if they
are successful in rivetting our chains, you will find
your reward in the well-earned contempt of the
oppressor, and the hearty execrations of the op-
pressed. Pause, therefore, and reflect ; if you
have but the heart to claim the crown, you may win
it with glory, and wear it with justice. I can do
neither ; but what I can I will — live and die a free
born man." These generous sentiments, uttered
in a clear, manly, and determined tone of voice,
came home to the heart of Bruce, with all the
sternness of deserved reproof ; and he was about
to reply, when the ringing of harness, followed by
the appearance of a number of helmets, over-top-
ping the ridge of a neighbouring hillock, made it
prudent to break off the conference.
Such are the particulars of this memorable
battle, as related with some trifling variations, by
most of, if not by all, our old Scottish historians.
As modern commentators, however, consider them-
selves justified in denying some of the material
points ; particularly the feud among the leaders —
the presence of Bruce in the engagement — and,
consequently, his conference with Wallace, we shall
in this place devote a few pages to their consideration.
These objections are chiefly founded on the
authority of Hemmgford and Trevit, two English
monks, who are said to have had their information
from eye-witnesses. This may be all true ; but
when we find one of them (Hemingford) asserting,
that "ffiy thousand Scots were slain in the battle,
many drowned, three hundred thousand foot taken
prisoners, besides a thousand horse," we may reason-
ably suppose the possibility of the eye-witnesses
being so much occupied in counting their killed
and captured enemies, that matters of such com-
paratively trifling importance may not have had
thj: requisite share of their attention. Lord Hailes,
however, lends the weight of his highly respect-
able name in support of those who deny the truth
of this portion of our national annals, and thus
expresses himself on the points in question : " It
would be tedious and unprofitable to recite all that
that has been said on this subject by our own
writers, from Fordun to Abercrombie, how Wal-
lace, Stewart, and Comyn quarrelled on the punc-
tilio of leading the van of an army, which stood
on the defensive ; how Stewart compared Wallace
to an owl, with borrowed feathers ; how the Scot-
tish leaders, busied in this frivolous altercation,
had no leisure to form their army ; how Comyn
traitorously withdrew with ten thousand men ;
how Wallace, from resentment, followed his ex-
ample ; how, by such disastrous incidents, the
Scottish army was enfeebled, and Stewart and his
party abandoned to destruction. Our histories
abound in trash of this kind. There is scarcely
one of our writers who has not produced an invec-
tive against Comyn, or an apology for Wallace,
or a lamentation for the deserted Stewart. What
dissensions may have prevailed among the Scottish
commanders, it is impossible to know. It appears
not to me, that their dissensions had any influence
on their conduct in the day of battle. The truth
seems to be this :— The English cavalry greatly
exceeded the Scotch in numbers — were infinitely
better equipped, and more adroit. The Scottish
cavalry were intimidated and fled : — had they
remained in the field, they might have preserved
their honour, but never could have turned the
chance of that day. It was natural, however, for
such of their party as survived the engagement,
to impute the disaster to the defection of the
cavalry : — National pride would ascribe their flight
to treachery rather than to pusillanimity. It is not
improbable, that Comyn commanded the cavalry ;
hence a report may have spread, that Comyn be-
trayed his country : the report has been embel-
lished by each successive relation. When men are
seized with a panic, their commander must of neces-
sity, or will from prudence, accompany them in
their flight. Earl Warren fled with his army from
Stirling to Berwick, yet Edward did not punish
him as a traitor or a coward.
" The tale of Comyn's treachery and Wallace's
ill-timed resentment, may have gained credit,
because it is a pretty tale, and not improbable in
itself ; but it always amazes me that the story of
the congress of Bruce and Wallace, after the battle
of Falldrk, should have gained credit. I lay aside
the full evidence which we now possess, 'that
Bruce was not at that time of the English part}',
nor present at the battle' — for it must be admitted,
that our historians knew nothing of those circum-
stances which demonstrate the impossibility of the
congress — but the wonder is, that men of sound
judgment should not have seen the absurdity of a
long conversation between the commander of a fly-
ing army, and' one of the leaders of a victorious
army. When Fordun told the story, he placed
* a narrow but inaccessible glen ; ' between the
speakers. Later historians have substituted the
river Carron in place of an inaccessible glen ;
and they make Bruce and Wallace talk across the
river like two young declaimers from the pulpits
in a school of rhetoric."
62
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xiv.
With all due deference to his Lordship, we con-
ceive that the strength of his first objection lies
chiefly in adhering too literally to the words " lead-
ing the Tan," made use of by some of our old
writers ; others, who mention the quarrel, do not
so express themselves. Now, we do not see any
thing so improbable in a discussion arising among
these chiefs, who considered themselves indepen-
dent of each other, about who should have the
supreme command in directing the operations of
the day, which, we presume, is all that is to be
understood in this instance by " leading the van."
The obvious advantage of having a commander-in-
chief in so momentous an occasion, could not have
escaped the merest tyro in military tactics ; and
that no person was appointed to this office, even
his Lordship does not deny. That Wallace, from
past services, as well as from being Guardian of the
kingdom, had reason to consider himself entitled to
this distinction, cannot be disputed ; and it is not
likely, from the talents and foresight he had dis-
played on former occasions, that he would have
come to the field against so powerful and so ex-
perienced an adversary, without having previously
formed some plan for conducting the operations of
the day, so as to counteract the great superiority
of force, which the English monarch had brought
into the field. The thwarting of his plans, by the
envy and hauteur of his colleagues, affords a plain
and obvious solution of his conduct ; and his resig-
nation of the Guardianship after the battle (which
his Lordship does not deny), very strongly corro-
borates the account given by our Scottish his-
torians, of the treatment which he received on the
field ; and this treatment must have been attended
with circumstances which convinced him of the
utter hopelessness of his being able to direct the
resources of the country to advantage. Strong
indeed must have been the reasons which induced
this brave, intrepid, and prudent pilot, to relinquish
the helm of affairs at so critical a juncture. That
an unfortunate animosity existed, we have the
most ample testimony ; and though his Lordship
conceives it to have been so very trifling in its
nature, as not to influence the parties in the dis-
charge of their duty, yet we have respectable and
incontrovertible evidence that it not only did so,
but was the principal, if not the sole cause of the
disasters which overwhelmed the country. Wyn-
town this expresses himself, on the occasion : —
" For dyspyt and gret inwy
The Comynys Kyn all halyly
Fyrst left the Feld ; and, as behowyd,
Syne Willame Walayis hym remowyd;
For he persawyd gret malys
Agayne hym scharpyd mony wys."
• |
And again,
" Before than couth na man say,
Na nevyr wes sene befor that day,
Sa hale wencust the Scottis men :
Na it had noucht fallyn then,
Had noucht Falshed and Inwy
Devysyd theme sa syndryly."
Here there is no national pride interfering, to
conceal the extent of the discomfiture of the Scots ;
and it is surprising his Lordship should conceive,
that any one would think it necessary to invent
what he calls a "pretty tale" for the purpose of
soothing the national feelings. Thirty thousand
Scots, we presume, may be defeated by ninety or a
hundred thousand English, without being very much
disgraced by the affair ; whereas the English au-
thorities may have been silent on circumstances
which tended to diminish the glory of their victory,
even had they come to their knowledge.
That Cumyn commanded the cavalry is merely
a conjecture of his Lordship ; but allowing it to
have been the case, we conceive there is a mate-
rial difference between a leader joining in the
general flight of his army, and one riding off with
part of the forces, and leaving the rest to stand
the brunt of the engagement. If Warren had
acted so, we presume he would either have been
punished as a traitor, or cashiered as a coward.
That Cumyn was afterwards elected one of the
regents of the kingdom, affords no satisfactory
evidence of his having acted correctly. He was at
the head of the only entire body of troops in the
country, and his faction unbroken — of course, there
could be no opposition to his election. And the
wonder is, considering the ambition of the man,
that under these circumstances he was not ap-
pointed sole regent, in place of sharing a divided
authority, as will be seen in the sequel, with one
who was his inferior in birth, talents, and influence.
We cannot see any great improbability of the
" congress " (as his Lordship calls it) having taken
place in the manner described, provided that Bruce
was present. Wallace had already secured his
troops from immediate pursuit. Bruce might think
it a favourable opportunity to palliate his conduct
at Irvine ; and Wallace, who was seldom afraid to
come in juxtaposition with any one, might have
been easily induced to stand when he hailed him.
His Lordship's objection is founded chiefly on the
length of the conversation. Now, if any one will
peruse it, even in the most verbose of our histo-
rians, he will find that it could no;t have occupied
more than five minutes, which certainly cannot be
called " a long conversation," or at least so long
as to afford any thing like a plausible objection to
its occurrence. As to Fordun having placed " a
narrow inaccessible glen " between the parties, it
does not in the least affect the credibility of the
account. Few glens are to be found in Scotland,
without a river or stream of some description run-
ning through them ; and in speaking of any of
these, it is no uncommon thing for one person to
allude to the glen, and another to the river or
stream so connected with it.
That all our ancient authors should agree in the
circumstance of Bruce being present at the battle,
is very singular, provided he was not there. How
they should all be in this state of ignorance is ra-
ther unaccountable, considering the facility they
had of informing themselves ; as some of them
must have written from authority, if not of eye-
witnesses, at least of those who derived their ac-
counts from such. It is not at all probable that
Bruce, who is universally acknowledged to have
been a monarch of great political sagacity, would
have allowed a tale, so likely to injure him in the
opinion of his subjects, to get into general circula-
tion, while the contrary statement, if true, would
have tended to exalt him in their estimation. There
appear so many irreconcilable circumstances in-
volved in the belief of this opinion, that we feel
CHAP. XIV.]
OPINIONS OF HISTORIANS.
much inclined to suspect some little discrepancy in
the evidence to which his Lordship so confidently
alludes *, more particularly as Wyntowne, whose
authority is highly appreciated by all writers, is so
very pointet in asserting the presence of Bruce in
the English ai*my. The words are, —
" Bot yhit the lele Scottis men,
That in that feld ware feychtand then,
To-gyddyr stwd sa fermly
Strykand before thame manlykly,
Swa that nane tliare thyrl thame mycht,
Bot Robert the Brows than wyth a slycht,
(He thare wes wyth this Kiny Edwart,
Set he oure Kyng wes eftyrwart)
Wyth Schyre Anton the Bek a wyly man,
Of Durame Byschape he wes than,
A-bowt ane hill a well fere way
Owt of that stowre than prikyd thay ;
Behynd bakkis alsa fast
Thare thai come on, and layid on fast ;
Swa made thai the dyscumfytowre."
Here our author, not satisfied with stating, that
" Robert de Brows " was with " King Edwart ;"
but, in order to establish the identity of the person,
and guard against his being confounded with the
elder Robert Bruce, or any other of the same
name, he says expressly,
" Set he oure Kyng wes eftyrwart"
If Bruce was at this time on the side of the
patriots, as his Lordship says, it is singular that
he did not appear among them on this eventful day,
in a manner becoming his birth, talents, and great
territorial influence. When all the chiefs of the
party had collected their followers for a grand
national struggle, Bruce is represented as employed
in guarding, what his Lordship, for the sake of
effect, calls the " important castle of Ayr," which,
it seems in those days, "kept the communication
open, with Galloway, Argyllshire, and the Isles *f\"
* Among the various documents which his Lordship ap-
pears to consider authentic, is the following, which he thus
introduces : — " I have seen the title of a public instrument,
which runs thus : — ' Acte contenant les responses faites par
Pierre Flotte, Seigneur de Revel, commis par le Roy (de
France) pour traitter et conferer avec les Ambassadeurs
Anglois, touchant 1'execution du traite de treve, et repara-
tion des infractions d'icelle. Simon de Meleun 1'arbitre
nomme par le Roy, offrit au Roy d'Angleterre de delivrer
tous les prisonniers Anglois en rendant par lui le Roy de
Escosse et son fils, et les Escossois detenus en Angleterre et
ailleurs, ou les mettant en la garde d'un prelat Francois qui
les gardera soubs le nom du Pape pendant que le Pape ju-
gera de leur differend.' The original, if extant," says Lord
Hailes, " might serve to explain several circumstances re-
specting this treaty ; particularly, that Edward Baliol was
in captivity, together with his father, and that the Pope
proposed himself as umpire between Edward I. and his
disobedient vassal."
Now, the above is all good modern French, and the or-
thography exactly as at present, with the exception of the
following words, responses, traitter, Eacosse, soubs, which
appear to have had their spelling antiquated a little, to give
the document a venerable air ; — it has, on the whole, a very
clumsy appearance, and shows that it cannot be older than
the seventeenth century. If the "full evidence" referred to
be liable to similar objections, it will not appear very sur-
prising, that our early writers should have been so much in
the dark respecting it.
t Vol. i. 311, 312.
Had the possession of this "important castle"
been of any use to an army stationed between
Linlithgow and Falkirk, it certainly could have
been defended by a person of less consequence
than Bruce, whose military talents and numerous
vassals would have been of infinitely greater ser-
vice in the field. When Wallace was straining
every nerve to collect the strength of the country,
to oppose the formidable invaders, and with his
utmost efforts could not muster more than 30,000
soldiers, can it be supposed, that he would have
failed to summon to the standard of liberty a baron
of such influence as the Earl of Carrick, if he
thought there were a chance of the summons being
obeyed ?
Though his Lordship asserts that Bruce had
deserted the cause of Edward, yet he does not at-
tempt to show that any communication took place
between him and the Scottish army ; nor by what
authority he assumed the defence of the castle of
Ayr, which was a fortress at that time belonging to
the Crown. If Hemingford, on whose authority
his Lordship chiefly relies, could have gone so
egregiously astray from every thing like probability
in the account he gives of the casualties of the
battle, we may, without injustice, receive his tes-
timony on this, or on any other subject, with sus-
picion ; particularly when it goes to contradict
historians of acknowledged veracity, who had op-
portunities of being at least equally well informed
on the subject as himself. It has been advanced
by the learned annalist, in evidence of the truth
of Hemingford's statement, that lands and castles
belonging to Bruce were plundered and taken by
the English army. By a parity of reasoning, if
these lands and castles had been exempt from the
general outrage, it would have proved that Bruce
was in the interest of England ; and the Guardian
and Barons of Scotland would thereby have stood
convicted of the unparalleled folly of allowing
lands to be occupied, and castles to be held, in the
very centre of the country, by the open and de-
clared partisan of their enemy. That the title of
Bruce to his Scottish estates was in abeyance, and
his castles garrisoned for the safety of the com-
monwealth of Scotland, is the most probable state
of the affair. When the half-famished soldiers of
Edward, therefore, pillaged the lands, and attacked
the castles of Bruce, they did what their King,
under such circumstances, neither could nor would
restrain, whether his vassal had renounced his
allegiance or not. This conduct on the part of the
English, therefore, can afford no evidence what-
ever of Bruce being at the time " in arms against
England."
These observations the writer has thought it
expedient to make, in support of the relation given
of the battle of Falkirk by the ancient historians
of Scotland. As the talents, however, which Lord
Hailes has displayed in his researches into Scottish
history, are held by the public in high, and in many
instances, deserved estimation ; and though it is
with reluctance that we differ from one whose
opinions in general are entitled to credit;, yet, as
we find him in this instance at variance with most
of our ancient Scottish authorities, we have thought
it our duty to endeavour to lay both sides of the
question fairly before the reader, in order that he
may be able to form his own opinion of the mat-
ter.
-»
U-i LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE. [CHAP. xv.
Was na man thar fra wepyng mycht hym rafreyn
CHAPTER XV.
For loss off him, quhen thai hard Wallace pleyn.
Thalcaryit him with worschip and dolour,
NOTICES RESPECTING SIR JOHN GRAHAM AND SIR
In the Fawkyrk graithit him in sepultour."
JOHN STEWART CONDUCT OF CUMYN — WALLACE
RESIGNS THE GUARDIANSHIP EDWARD RETURNS
HOME TRIUMPHANT PROCESSION OF THE LONDON-
ERS IN HONOUR OF HIS VICTORY AT FALKIRK
REVIEW OF THE CAMPAIGN.
In this monody, we have a highly finished por-
trait of a warrior and a gentleman ; and the as-
semblage of rare and shining virtues which are
thus said to have met in this illustrious individual,
have never been denied or depreciated by the most
THE retreat of Wallace from the field of Falkirk,
may justly be considered as a masterpiece of gene-
ralship. The formidable bodies of horse at the
fastidious of our critics ; while all our historians
bear uniform testimony to the correctness of the
character *. Having discharged this duty to his
disposal of Edward, afforded him ample means of
following up and cutting off the retiring army of
* His Grace the Duke of Montrose (one of whose titles
the Guardian. That so large a body of the Scots,
is Viscount Dundaff), possesses an antique sword, on which
though deserted by their own cavalry, should how-
is the following inscription : —
ever have effected their escape in presence of a
force so powerful, so well appointed, and headed by
one of the first generals of the age, is truly asto-
nishing ; and can only be accounted for by sup-
posing, either that the English must have suffered
" ' SIR IONE YE GRAME, VERRY VICHT AND WYSE,
ONE OF YE CHIEFES RELIEVIT SCOTLAND THRYSE.
FAVGHT VITH YS SVORD, AND NER THOUT SCHAME,
COMMAND!! NANE TO EEIR IT EOT HIS NAME.'
severely in the action, or that the conduct dis-
" The Duke is also proprietor of Dundaff, where Sir John
played by Wallace was such as awed them from
Graham of Dundaff s castle is seen in ruins.
the attempt.
" The grave-stone of Sir John de Graham is in the church-
According to the Minstrel, the Guardian, after
yard of Falkirk, having the following Latin motto, with a
withdrawing his troops to a place of safety, re-
translation : —
turned to the field, accompanied by Malcolm Earl
of Lennox, Ramsay of Auchterhouse, Sir Richard
' MENTE MANVQVE POTENS, ET VALL.32 FIDVS ACHATES ;
Lundin, Wallace of Riccarton, Sir Crytell Seton *,
CONDITVR HIC GRAMVS, BELLO INTERFECTVS AB ANGLIS.
and a number of their followers, to seek for the
XXII. JVLII ANNO 1298.'
body of Sir John Graham — the English being by
this time removed to Linlithgow.
' Heir lyes Sir John the Grame, baith wight and wise,
Ane of the Cheefs who rescewit Scotland Ihrise,
Considering the great affection our hero enter-
Ane better Kniyht, not to the world was lent,
tained for this gallant and accomplished warrior,
Nor was gude Grame, of truth a?id hardiment.'
the circumstance is not improbable. The high
value he placed on his services was such, that, in
" While some of Cromwell's troops were stationed in
speaking of Graham, he used to designate him as
his " right hand." The regret which he felt at his
Falkirk, an officer desired the parochial schoolmaster to
translate the Latin. This he did as follows :—
death, would no doubt have been embittered by the
reflection, that his friend might easily, from the
' Of mind and courage stout,
Wallace's true Achates ;
state of the wounds which he had received at the
Here lies Sir John the Grame,
affair of Blackironside, have absented himself from
Felled by the English Baties.'
the battle of Falkirk, without the slightest injury
to his reputation. The distress of Wallace, on
" There are now three stones upon the grave. When the
seeing the dead body, is thus finely depicted by the
iorementioned author : —
inscription on the first had begun to wear out by the influ-
ence of the weather, a second was put above it, with the
same inscription ; and a third was lately added by William
" Amang the ded men sekand the worthiast,
Graham of Airth, Esq. At a little distance, upon the left, is
The corss off Graym, for quham he murned mast.
an unpolished stone, said to cover the remains of the gallant
Quhen thai him fand, and gud Wallace him saw,
knight of Bonkill." — Nimmo's History of Stirlingshire.
He lychtyt down, and hynt him fra thaim aw
With regard to Stewart of Bonkill being buried in Fal-
In armyss vp ; behaldand his paill face,
kirk, we are inclined to be a little sceptical, not so much
He kyssyt him, and cryt full oft, ' Allace !
from the silence of the Minstrel, as from the great proba-
My best brothir in warld that euir I had !
bility of his having been conveyed to Bute by the surviving
My afald freynd, quhen i was hardest stad !
tenantry of that island. In a small ruined chapel, about
My hop, my heill, thow was in maist honour !
half a mile west of Rothesay, there is still to be seen all that
My faith, my help, my strenthiast in stour !
remains of " the auld Stewarts of Bute" where, amidst a
In the was wyt, fredom and hardines ;
number of dilapidated monuments, well worth the attention
In the was treuth, manheid, and nobilness;
of the antiquary, appears a stone figure, said to represent
In the was rewll, in the was gouernans ;
the gallant knight of Bonkill, in complete armour of
In the was wertu with outyn warians ;
the thirteenth century. In a recess in the opposite wall
In the lawte, in the was gret largnas ;
there is also to be seen another figure, representing Jean
In the gentrice, in the was stedfastnas.
M'Rudrie, heiress of Bute. This lady appears to have been
Thow was gret causs off wynnyng off Scotland ;
descended from a sea-officer, or pirate, named Rudrie, who is
Thocht I began, and tuk the wer on hand,
thus noticed in the Norwegian account of the expedition of
I wow to God, that has the warld in wauld,
King Haco : — " The wind was not favourable ; King Haco,
Thi dede sail be to Sotheroun full der sauld.
however, made Andreas Pott go before him, south to Bute,
Martyr thow art for Scotlandis rycht and me ;
with some small vessels, to join those he had already sent
I sail the wenge, or ellis tharfor de.'
thither. News was soon received, that they had won a
* The son of Sir Chrytell, slain at Blackironside.
cepted terms of the Norwegians. There was with the
CHAP. XV.]
HE RESIGNS THE GUARDIANSHIP.
departed friend, Wallace rejoined his followers in
the Torwood ; and, on the following night, he is
said to have broken into the English camp on Lin-
lithgow muir, and, after killing a number of the
enemy, and spreading alarm through the whole
army, effected his retreat without loss.
Edward, incensed at the frequency with which
these night attacks were repeated, now determined
on pursuing the Scots with his whole forces. His
nimble adversaries, however, retired before him,
and, having burned Stirling, continued to waste the
country as they went along ; so that the enemy
was put to the greatest inconvenience, from the
want of forage for his numerous cavalry.
While the Guardian and his little army of
patriots were thus engaging the attention of the
invader, Cumyn and the partisans of Stewart were
loud in their expressions of disapprobation at the
conduct of our hero. The latter charged him with
the loss of the battle, by his refraining to assist
Stewart till it was too late ; and the former, con-
scious of his own misconduct, in order to supply
something like a pretext for having treacherously
deserted his countrymen, accused the Guardian
with an intention of usurping the sovereign autho-
rity ; declaring, " that it was more honourable
for men of birth to serve a great and powerful
monarch, though a foreigner, than subject them-
selves to the tyranny of an upstart of yesterday."
While such sentiments were circulating among
the adherents of these two powerful families, to the
manifest injury of the cause of liberty, Cumyn was
still increasing the number of his followers ; and it
appeared uncertain, whether he intended to assist
his countrymen, or take part with the invader.
Wallace now saw, that, without involving the king-
dom in all the horrors of civil war, he could not
exercise his authority so as to compel this factious
chief to the discharge of his duty ; and as the views
of Cumyn with regard to the crown, had, on many
occasions, been too palpably displayed, to have
escaped the observation of Wallace, his late unac-
countable retreat had completely opened the eyes
of the Guardian to the line of policy he was pur-
suing. Indeed, had both divisions of the Scottish
army been destroyed, Cumyn would have found
little difficulty in obtaining the crown from Ed-
ward, on the same terms as it had been awarded
to Baliol : for being at the head of a powerful body
Norwegians a sea-officer called Eudri ; he considered Bute
as his birth-right; and because he had not received the
island of the Scots, he committed many ravages, and killed
many people, and for that he was outlawed by the Scottish
King. He came to Haco and took the oaths to him, and,
with two of his brothers, became his subjects. As soon as
the garrison, after having delivered up the stronghold, were
gone away from the Norwegians, Rudri killed nine of them,
because he thought he owed them no good will." After the
treaty between Alexander and the Norwegians, it would
seem that Rudrie had been allowed to hold the island of
Bute as a vassal of the Scottish crown; and there is every
reason to believe that the Janet M'Rudrie above-mentioned
was either his daughter or grand-daughter, who, by her mar-
rying Alexander Stewart, became the mother of Sir John
Stewart of Bonkill.
The present noble proprietor, whose family came to the
possession of Bute in the reign of Robert II., has made
some slight repairs about the walls where these figures are
reclining. It is, however, to be regretted, that a little more
attention is not paid to the preservation of such valuable
antiques.
of men, with great family interest, and having
already made a favourable impression on the
English king, by his conduct at the battle of Fal-
kirk, it is highly probable that any lingering par-
tiality which Edward might still entertain for
Bruce — whom he had long amused with hopes of
the crown — would soon disappear before the pre-
tensions of a more useful claimant. But as Cumyn
made the ambition of Wallace the pretext for his
refraining to co-operate against the English, with a
promptitude which showed his mind as decisive as
his sword, when the interest of his country was at
stake, the latter called the Estates together, and
solemnly renounced the Guardianship of the king-
dom, reserving to himself no other privilege than
that of fighting against the enemies of Scotland, at
the head of such friends as might be inclined to
adhere to him. This resignation was accordingly
followed by the election of a Regency, consisting of
Cumyn, Soulis, and William Lamberton, Bishop of
St. Andrew's * ; and by this conduct on the part of
Wallace, Cumyn was left without the shadow of an
excuse for withholding his assistance against the
common enemy ; while the talents, prowess, and
patriotism of the late Guardian acted as a check in
restraining him from sacrificing the interest of the
country to his own personal aggrandizement.
Edward reached Stirling four days after the late
battle, and took up his quarters in the convent of
the Dominicans. Here he remained fifteen days,
waiting his recovery from the wound inflicted on
him by his horse, and for the arrival of his long-
expected fleet. The Castle of Stirling having been
partly demolished by Wallace, in his retreat,
Edward now applied himself to repair it ; and
therein, as a place of safety, he deposited those
unwieldy engines of war he had brought with him
for the purpose of battering the fortifications, and
which he found would be troublesome, while pur-
suing his enemies over the rugged and mountainous
country that lay before him.
The accession of strength which the cause of
liberty acquired, by the prudent measures of our
patriot, enabled the Scots more effectually to em-
barrass the movements of the enemy. While he,
with his brave followers, continued to surprise
the foe, by breaking into their camp where least
expected, the other leaders were engaged in pre-
venting supplies from reaching the English ; and
Edward, at last, became apprehensive of advancing
too far into the sterile regions of the North. A
scarcity had already begun to be severely felt in
his army, and he now prudently directed his march
towards the more fruitful districts in the neigh-
bourhood of Perth. But there also his unwearied
and restless enemy continued to assail those parts
of the army that appeared most vulnerable ; and
having at last cut off a part from the main body of
the English forces, by breaking down the bridge
over the Tay, in three successive engagements he
* Lamberton appears to have succeeded Frazer in the
Bishopric of St. Andrew's. This secret emissary of Edward
died at Paris in 1297, to which place he probably thought
proper to retire on the success of Wallace. According to his
own request, his heart was brought to Scotland, and " layed
in halowyed sepultour" in the wall of the cathedral over
which he presided. His body was interred in the cemetery
of the Preaching Friars at Paris. Lamberton, his successor,
a man of learning and good reputation, had been Chancellor
of Glasgow. — Wyntown, vol. ii. p. 99.
GG
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xv.
defeated them with great slaughter. The English
army, however, was still too numerous for the
Scots to risk a general engagement ; and Edward,
finding no probability of bringing the war to a satis-
factory conclusion, after wreaking his vengeance
on the most fruitful parts of the country, returned
home through Ayrshire and Annandale, carrying
with him all the spoil he could collect. A body of
troops under the command of Henry de Lacy, made
a similar inroad in Fife, destroying whatever came
in their way, in revenge, no doub ,, for the gallant
stand the inhabitants had ma^e under MacDuff,
their late unfortunate chief. After destroying St.
Andrew's *, he laid siege to the castle of Cupar,
which surrendered about the end of July *{•.
Edward now led his army homewards, after
leaving a force to protect the southern part of
Scotland, the reduction of which was all his mighty
efforts had been 'able to accomplish. To have
defeated Wallace, however, a name which had
filled England with dismay, was considered by his
subjects an achievement deserving of the highest
eulogium. The disasters of the campaign were
accordingly forgotten, and bands of minstrels issued
from the different towns on his route, to welcome
the conqueror at Falkirk. The Londoners decreed
him a triumphal procession in honour of his vic-
tory, and the different corporations vied with each
other in the richness of their banners and the
splendour of their emblematical representations.
Stowe thus mentions the affair ; and if we may
judge of the appearance of the other professions
by the display made by the fishmongers on this
joyous occasion, the whole must have exhibited
a mass of barbaric magnificence not easily to be
surpassed : — " The citizens of London hearing of
the great victory obtained by the King of England
against the Scottis, made great and solemn re-
joicings in their citie, every one according to their
craft, especially the fishmongers, which with solemn
procession passed through the citie, having, amongst
other pageantes and shows, foure .sturgeons gilted,
carried on four horses, then four salmons of silver
on four horses, and after five and fortie knights
armed, riding on horses made like luces of the sea,
and then Saint Magnus with a thousand horsemen.
This they did on St. Magnus' day, in honour of the
King's great victory and safe return."
Before closing this chapter, it may not be amiss
to take a retrospect view of this most interesting
campaign. At the commencement of it, Scotland,
by the wisdom and energy of her intrepid Guardian,
had again taken her place among the independent
nations of Europe. His noble achievements had
not only become a theme for the Troubadours of
France, but also the subject of conversation and
applause at all the courts on the Continent. To
Edward, who had not only distinguished himself
by his warlike exploits in Syria, but had also, in
a tournament held at Calais, baffled and disgraced
the most renowned of the chivalry of France, the
* Stowe.
t Observations on the Wardrobe Account of 28 Edward I.
p. Ix. The monastery of Cupar was also plundered on this
occasion. By the inventory of Edward's jewels taken in
1300, there appear eighteen silver cups, and one silk girdle
richly ornamented, which are stated to have been taken
from the monastery of Cupar. This, no doubt, would form
a part of the King's share of the booty. — Vide Wardrobe
Account, p. 353.
plaudits bestowed upon a rival so far beneath him
in rank, was peculiarly mortifying, and excited
in him the most inveterate hostility toward the
nation thus rescued from his thraldom. Wallace,
though making every effort for the safety of his
country, found no abatement of that feeling of
jealous animosity which existed in the minds of
a great majority of the aristocracy. It was in vain
he endeavoured to ensure their confidence, by
refusing all participation in the fruits of their
victories, — thus showing that self-aggrandisement
formed none of the objects of his ambition. Still
they yielded with reluctance that obedience which
his rank as Guardian entitled him to expect ; and
their language in private continued to be, " We
will not have this man to reign over us."
Cumyn, whose conduct had hitherto been sus-
picious, had strengthened his interest at the Eng-
lish court, by means of a marriage which he
contracted with the sister of Adomer de Vallance *,
a cousin, and one of the principal favourites of
Edward ; and the Steward, brother to the knight
of Bonkill, had made his peace with the invader,
and taken the oath of allegiance. In consequence
of which, according to the policy of the English
monarch, though the tenantry of the Steward were
arrayed against him, yet the banners of the family
floated among those of the other vassals of the
English crown, while the knight of Bonkill himself
(who had but recently joined the standard of his
country's independence) had as yet given no proof
of the sincerity of his attachment to the cause.
Under these circumstances, it became Wallace to be
particularly circumspect in his movements, having
to guard against the chance of treachery on the
one hand, and a powerful adversary on the other ;
while his country's safety, and his own well-earned
laurels, depended alike on the prudence of his con-
duct. We have already hinted at the great impro-
bability of his appearing before so formidable an
enemy, without having formed a regular plan of
operation, and made provision for the contingencies
that might occur. That he had arranged such
a plan, and was prevented, by the jealousy of his
colleagues, from putting it into execution, appears
sufficiently obvious, even from the meagre details
of which we are possessed. What this plan was,
cannot now be fully ascertained ; but if we may
judge from the circumstances on record, we may in-
fer that it was not his intention to risk a general
engagement with the enemy at Falkirk, but merely
to retire as they advanced, and to lead them as far
as possible into the barren districts of the North,
where their numerous cavalry would be rendered
in a great measure unavailing. But the conduct
of Cumyn, and the profitless display of valour on
the part of Stewart, brought him unavoidably into
contact with the enemy ; respect for his own repu-
tation prevented him from retiring, while part of
his countrymen were so seriously engaged ; and
by remaining, he not only covered the retreat of
the remains of Stewart's division, but also, by his
commanding attitude, prevented the enemy from
pursuing the fugitives with that destructive celerity
which their numerous cavalry would have enabled
them to do, had he acted otherwise. We have
been induced to make these remarks, as Wallace
is too rashly blamed for " remaining a passive
* See Appendix, P.
CHAP. XVI.]
HE RETIRES TO DUMBARTON-
spectator of the destruction of Stewart." This,
according to the generality of writers, is the only
stain upon his character. However, from a careful
review of all the circumstances of the case, we can
find no foundation whatever for the chai-ge ; on
the contrary, taking into consideration the pecu-
liarly embarrassing situation in which he was
placed, we conceive that, during the whole of his
brilliant career, the wisdom, talents, and patriotism
of Wallace, never shone forth with more resplendent
lustre than at the battle of Falkirk.
CHAPTER XVI.
STATE OF SCOTLAND AFTER THE RETURN OF EDWARD
VARIOUS EXPLOITS OF WALLACE BALIOL DELI-
VERED OVER TO THE POPE THE SCOTS BESIEGE
STIRLING CASTLE EDWARD RAISES AN ARMY FOR
ITS RELIEF — THE ENGLISH BARONS REFUSE TO
ACCOMPANY HIM SURRENDER OF STIRLING CASTLE
— CONDUCT OF CUMYN.
ON retiring with his army, as stated in the last
chapter, Edward left behind him a considerable
force to protect that part of Scotland which lay
contiguous to England, and which he seemed deter-
mined, if possible, to annex to his own dominions.
Although his invasion had been productive of very
disastrous consequences to the Scots, they did not
suffer so much on this, as they had done on former
occasions. The judicious orders issued by the
Guardian, for driving the cattle — which formed the
principal part of their wealth — to inaccessible parts
of the country, contributed not only to their safety,
but also to the disappointment and distress of the
enemy. On the retreat, therefore, of the grand
army of Edward, the inhabitants were far from
being that wretched and dispirited race, which
they had appeared after the battle of Dunbar.
Several of the chieftains, it is true, had repeated
their oaths of fidelity to the invader, but the defec-
tion from the cause of liberty was by no means
general. The principal places of strength, with
the exception of Stirling, were in the hands of the
Scots ; and the impregnable fortress of Dumbarton *
* The strength and importance of Dumbarton castle is
thus described by an English spy who visited Scotland during
the regency of the Duke of Albany, and afterwards in the
reign of James I. It would appear, that in those days the
rock was completely surrounded by water at every influx of
the tide.
passe on forthwarde to Dumbertayne,
A castell stronge and harde for to obteine.
In whiche castell S. Patryke was borne,
That afterwarde in Irelande dyd wynne,
About the whyche floweth, euen and morne,
The westerne seas without noyse or dynne,
Twyse in xxiiii. houres without any fayle,
That no man may that stronge castell assayle.
Vpon a rocke so hye the same dothe stande,
That yf the walles were beaten to the roche,
Yet were it full harde to clymbe with foot or hande,
And so to wynne, yf any to them approche,
So strong it is to get without reproche ;
That without honger and cruell famyshemente,
Yt cannot bee taken to my iudgemente.
John Hardyng's Chronicle, p. 426.
had beon given, by Wallace, in consequence of
his services in the cause of his country, in charge
to Sir John Stewart of Rusky, better known by
the name of Menteith. This man had been pre-
sent with Wallace at the burning of the barns of
Ayr, as well as in many other situations of danger
and difficulty. According to Henry, when the
Guardian bestowed this change upon him, he sti-
pulated for the erection of a &mall house for him-
self within the portress, in the building of which
considerable prog\>ss had been made, when. the
English army ent&.^sd Scotland. Some writers
allege, that the reaso^. which induced Wallace to
make choice of such actuation, wa^ the great
friendship which existed between him and Men-
teith, to whose society, they say, he w:as much
attached, and which, by thiy means, he would
have a better opportunity of enjoying. With this
opinion, however, we cannot agree. That Men-
teith ^ was high in the confidence of Wallace, is
sufficiently evident from his appointing him to so
important a trust — for, besides the governorship
of the castle, his situation naturally gave him the
command of a considerable part of the district of
Lennox — yet we conceive that Wallace had other
motives for selecting such a place of retirement,
than the mere pleasure of enjoying the society of a
friend, however valued that friend might have
been. The hostility which he 'had excited in the
breast of Edward by his conduct in Scotland, as
well as by his invasion of England, gave him every
reason to dread the revenge of that haughty and
crafty potentate ; while the vacillating character
of a great proportion of the nobility — joined to that
inextinguishable jealousy which existed against
him in the minds of some of the most powerful
families — made it both desirable and prudent to
look out for a place where, in the decline of life, he
might be secure from the attempts of his country's
enemies, as well as the machinations of his own.
The more immediate cause, however, may have
been the safety of his surviving relations. The
circumstance of so many of them having already
suffered on his account, would, no doubt, make him
consider it as a duty incumbent on him to provide
for those that remained. His uncle, the parson
of Dunipace, he had but recently relieved from a
dungeon, into which the English had thrown him ;
and his mother had frequently been obliged to fly
from the fortilace of Elderslie, in order to preserve
herself from falling into the hands of the enemy.
These we presume to have been the motives which
induced him to stipulate for this little sanctuary,
and not an overweening affection for the society of
Menteith. His selection of him, however, for this
purpose, shows the entire confidence he had in his
fidelity.
With regard to the building itself *, we have it
on record, that the workmen on one occasion had
to desist from their operations, in consequence of
* On the summit of Dumbarton rock is to be seen the
ruins, of a.building, known by the name of Wallace's house.
Judging by what remains, it appears to have been of very
limited extent, and though well calculated for security,
would afford but scanty accommodation to the inmates. Its
form is circular, and the site commands an extensive view ;
it, however, could make but a precarious resistance to an
enemy possessed of the lower fortification. From the fol-
lowing lines in Barbour, it appears very probable that this
was the place in which Lord William Soulis was detained
F 2
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xvi.
the English having taken possession of the town :
they were, however, soon dislodged by Wallace,
who surprised them at midnight, and drove them
out with great slaughter. This affair is supposed
to have taken place after the battle of Falkirk *.
Aware that the appro-ach of winter would render
the conveyance of military stores almost imprac-
ticable, after his rety.rn to England, Edward lost
no time in despatching to the castles of Stirling,
Dumfries, Lochmaben, and the other fortresses in
his possession, th-ose necessaT'^'. of which they
were most likely to be in wr/^ f. But the active
and persevering character ' the enemy he had to
contend with, made him/ Apprehensive that they
would avai/i themselves of his absence, and the
inclemency of the season, to recover the strengths
they ha/il lost in the last campaign ; and in this he
was riot mistaken, for winter had scarcely com-
menced, before Wallace and the Scottish regents
a state prisoner for life, in consequence of his conspiring
against Robej t Bruce : —
The lord the Sowllis has grantyt thar
The deid in to plane parleament,
Tharefor sone eftre he was sent
Till his pennance to Dunbertane ;
And deid thar in a tour off stane.
The Bruce, Buke Threttene, 406—410.
* Henry states, that after Wallace had driven the English
out of Dumbarton, which he accomplished by an ingenious
stratagem put in execution at night, he proceeded towards
the castle of Roseneath, which was occupied by the enemy,
and having learned that a marriage was to take place among
them on the ensuing day, he posted his men in ambush on
the road between the castle and the church, situated on
the "Garlouch" where the ceremony was to be performed.
The cavalcade approached, accompanied by most of the
soldiers of the garrison. The Scots, at the signal of their
chief, burst from their concealment, and having with little
difficulty overpowered and put their astonished adversaries
to the sword, they took possession of the fortress, which they
found amply supplied with provisions of all kinds, intended,
no doubt, for the joyous occasion.
The above anecdote induces the writer again to remark
on the accuracy of Henry's topography. If his work be not
a faithful translation from the narrative of an eye-witness,
his knowledge of the localities of the country is truly won-
derful.
t For the gratification of the reader who may feel curious
respecting the nature of the supplies required for the sup-
port and defence of an English garrison in the 13th century,
we have made the following extract from the Wardrobe
Account of the munitions, sent on this occasion to Stirling :
viz. 1000 stockfish, 610 ling, 4 lasts herrings, 104 cheeses,
6000 onions, 30 cwt. tallow, 1 barrel honey, 1 1 barrels pitch,
20 Ib. wax, 20 Ib. cummin, 2 Ib. crocus, 6 Ib. round pepper,
10 bundles steel or iron, 4 large plates with handles,
100 dishes ditto, 100 cups, 100 salt-cellars, 2 large balista;,
(de vicio) 18 balistce, (ad unum pedem) 18 doz. bow-strings,
50 bows, 2 furnace-stones, 22 cwt. hemp, 200 goose-wings
for darts and arrows, 3 horse hides untanned, 6 bullocks do.
ditto for the bottom of the engines, twine, thread, needles,
1 doz. parchment, 2 Ib. inkpowder, 18 pieces cloth, for cloth-
ing the men, 1 piece blue cloth, being clothing for John
Sampson, constable of the castle, 2 chaplains and 1 clerk,
1000 ells linen, 30 fur-skins for great-coats for the servants
of the King's household, stationed in said garrison, 4 lamb
skins for hoods for the use of said constable, chaplains, and
1 clerk, 240 pair shoes, and 500 ells canvas1.
1 The above goods were sent by John the son of Walter,
master of the vessel called the Godale of Beverley.
laid siege to, and recaptured, several places of
importance.
During 1299, while hostilities were still going on,
Baliol appears to have become an object of nego-
ciation between the Pope and the English court,
although the Pontiff had solemnly and repeatedly
declared his fixed determination never to inter-
fere in the affairs of Scotland ; assuring Edward
of his conviction " that the Scots were a false and
treacherous people," and that he believed they had
a design against his life. Still his liege-lord held
the King of Scotland in unmitigated captivity*,
till, at the urgent entreaty of the Pope, he was
delivered over to the Papal Nuncio, with liberty to
dispose of him and his English possessions as the
Pontiff thought proper. It is possible that the
renunciation of the guardianship on the part of
Wallace, conduced as much as any thing else to
Baliol's release ; and it is likely that the crafty
usurper conceived the measure might distract the
regency, by exciting anew the jealous competition
among the former claimants of the crown. If this
were his intention he must have felt grievously
disappointed on learning that the regents, awed,
no doubt, by the watchfulness and influence of the
late Guardian, continued to act in concert, and had
even laid siege to the strong castle of Stirling,
which he had been at such pains to repair and
pro vision f. The vigour with which the operations
against this fortress were carried on, soon com-
* It is very probable that Edward had evidence in his
possession of the commission of regency he had granted
to Wallace. The English monarch had too many secret
emissaries in Scotland, to remain long ignorant of a matter
of such importance. What Baliol might say to the contrary
would therefore meet with little credit ; and his apparent
duplicity, no doubt, prompted the following remark, which,
according to Walsingham, Edward made use of, on deliver-
ing him to the Nuncio. " I send him to the Pope as a per-
jured man, and a seducer of the people."
t Independent of all the difficulties which Wallace had
to encounter in the Low country, the turbulent state of the
Highlands prevented him from receiving any assistance of
consequence from that quarter. The chieftains there
seemed to consider their interests as very little connected
with the safety or independence of the Lowlanders ; and they
carried on their feuds with as much inveteracy, as if no
foreign enemy had been in the country. We find, that
"about the year 1299, there was an insurrection made
against the Earl of Ross, by some of the people of that pro-
vince, inhabiting the mountains called Clan-Iver-Clan-Tall-
wigh, and Clan-Leaive. The Earl of Ross made such dili-
gence, that he apprehended their captain, and imprisoned
him at Dingwall : which so incensed the Highlanders, that
they pursued the Earl of Ross's second son, at Balnegowen,
took him, and carried him along prisoner with them, think-
ing thereby to get their captain relieved. The Monroes and
the Dingwalls, with some others of the Earl of Ross his
dependers, gathered their forces, and pursued the High-
landers with all diligence ; so, overtaking them at Beallogh-
ne-broig, between Ferrindonell and Lochbrime, there ensued
a cruel battle, well foughten on either side. The Clan-Iver-
Clan-Tall-wigh and Clan-Leaive, were almost utterly ex-
tinguished. The Monroes had a sorrowful victory, with a
great loss of their men ; and carried back again the Earl of
Ross his son. The Laird of Kildun was there slain with
seven score of the surname of Dingwall. Divers of the
Monroes were slain in the conflict; and among the rest,
there were killed eleven of the house of Foulis, that were to
succeed one another ; so that the succession of Foulis fell
unto a child then lying in his cradle. For which service the
Earl of Ross gave divers lands to the Monroes and Ding-
walls."— Conflicts of the Clans.
CHAP. XVII.]
EDWARD AGAIN INVADES SCOTLAND.
69
pelled the besieged to despatch messengers to
Edward to acquaint him with their situation ; and
fully aware of the importance of the place, and
determined to relieve it, the latter assembled his
army at Berwick early in November. His barons,
however, he found intractable. Certain charters
had not been confirmed, and certain lands in Scot-
land had been gifted away to strangers without
their consent, and contrary to his engagements ; in
consequence of which they resolutely refused to
proceed beyond Berwick, alleging, among other
causes, the impolicy of undertaking a campaign
beset with so many dangers, at such an advanced
season of the year. Edward and his barons were
alike obstinate, and the latter retired in dudgeon ;
while he, in the same humour, marched forward
with the remains of his army to the relief of Stir-
ling, He had not, however, proceeded far, before
he became acquainted with the numbers and formid-
able position occupied by the Scots. Thus cir-
cumstanced, he retraced his steps, and allowed the
garrison to negociate a surrender * ; in conse-
quence of which, the castle was shortly after given
up to Lord Soulis, one of the Regents, who placed
it under the charge of Sir William Olifant, a brave
knight, who proved himself in every respect de-
serving of the trust reposed in him.
John Cumyn, the other Regent, is said to have
also gained advantages over the enemy, and to
have, in other respects, conducted himself so as
in a great measure to efface the remembrance of
his former offences. Indeed, so well pleased were
the generality of his countrymen with his proceed-
ings on the commencement of the regency, that
we find some of the old historians applying to him
the epithet of the " Crude Scottisman" From this
osed that John
circumstance, some have
Cumyn, the Regent here alluded to, was not the
same who behaved with such treachery at the
battle of Falkirk. In this opinion they at first
sight appear to be countenanced by Wyntown, who
styles him"Jhon Comyn, that was Jhon Comyn's
swn;" but, it must be recollected that there were
three Cumyns of the name of John, father, son,
and grandson.
The gleam of popularity which at this time
shone out upon Cumyn, is not to be wondered at.
Placed in a situation desirable, on account of the
prospect it opened up to his ambition — and which
he could only retain by a line of policy in unison
with the spirit of liberty which his predecessor
had infused into the people — he not only exerted
himself against the common enemy, but used every
effort in his power to gain the affections of his
countrymen. His large possessions and great
wealth, which, it is said, were never equalled by
those of any family in Scotland, enabled him to
relieve the people from various imposts necessary
for the support of the government ; while the
applications which the Regency made to France,
» In the Wardrobe Account, 28th Edward I., there is an
entry of 6s. 8d. paid to Ralph de Kyrkby, the messenger who
brought to the King the conditions and surrender of Stir-
ling. The following notice respecting this intended expe-
dition appears in the same document. "To a monk of
Durham, to carry St. Cuthbert's banner into Scotland, when
the King intended to go in person to raise the siege of Stir-
ling Castle, 20 days, at Is. per day." One of the vicars of
Beverly College had 8d. per day for carrying St. John's ban-
ner, and Id. per day to carry it back.
for troops to assist them in the defence of their
independence, were answered by supplies of grain
and wine, which, being a boon, were sold out to
the people at half their current value.
This procedure would no doubt ensure him the
;ood opinion of that class of his countrymen, who
ould not see the high price, which, in a national
point of view, was paid for the comforts thus pro-
cured them. The more thinking party however,
saw through the policy of France, in thus attempt-
ing to cajole the S^ots with a few cargoes of wine,
instead of fulfilling the >erms of the treaty, offen-
sive and defensive, tiN^t existed between them.
From the dissatisfaction ^vruch this conduct, on the
part of their allies, occasioned among the Scottish
nobility, it was determined to send commissioners
to France, to demand that ass:' stance which they
were bound to afford ; and, if unsuccessful, they
were instructed to proceed to Rome, and lay their
grievances at the feet of the Apostolic Father, and
to solicit his interference to restrain the English
monarch from renewing his aggressions upon their
country.
CHAPTER XVII.
EDWARD AGAIN INVADES SCOTLAND — SIEGE OF CAR-
LAVEROCK — MISCELLANEOUS OCCURRENCES DURING
THE SIEGE.
THE accounts which Edward was daily receiving
of the progress of the Scots, determined him to
renew hostilities, as soon as circumstances would
permit. Having regained the good will of his
barons, by a gracious compliance with their de-
mands, by writs tested, on 29th December 1299, he
summoned all who owed him military service in
England and elsewhere, to attend at Carlisle on the
feast of the nativity of John the Baptist.
1300 " On the day appointed," (1st July,) says
an eye-witness *, " the whole host was ready, and
the good King, with his household, then set forward
against the Scots, not in coats and surcoats, but on
powerful and costly chargers, and, that they might
not be taken by surprise, well and securely armed.
" There were many rich caparisons embroidered
on silks and satins ; many a beautiful pennon fixed
to a lance ; and many a banner displayed.
" And afar off was the noise heard of the neigh-
ing of horses ; mountains and valleys were every
where covered with sumpter-horses and waggons
with provisions, and sacks of tents and pavilions.
" And the days were long and fine. They pro-
ceeded by easy journeys, arranged in four squa-
drons."
The first squadron was led by Henry de Lacy,
Earl of Lincoln *!".
The second was under John, Earl of Warren
and Surrey.
* Walter of Exeter, an historical bard, who accompanied
the expedition, and of whose interesting work on the siege
of Carlaverock Castle, written in old Norman French, an
admirable translation has been given to the public, with
notes and valuable biographical sketches, by Nicholas Har-
ris Nicolas, Esq., a name highly appreciated by all who
have any taste for the pleasures arising from antiquarian
research.
t See Appendix, Q.
70
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xvii.
King Edward conducted the third squadron him-
self, and, says the fore-mentioned author, " brought
up the rear so closely and ahly, that none of the
others were left behind. In his banner were three
leopards courant of fine gold, set on red ; fierce,
haughty, and cruel ; thus placed, to signify, that,
like them, the King is dreadful, fierce, and proud
to his enemies, for his bite is slight to none who
inflame his anger ; not but his kindness is soon
rekindled towards such as seek his friendship or
submit to his power." This part of his character,
the Scots would not call i11 question.
The fourth squadron ^s' led by " Prince Ed-
ward, a youth of sev^feen years, and bearing
arms for the first time. He was a well-propor-
tioned and handsome person, of a courteous dispo-
sition, and intelligent ; and desirous of finding an
occasion to display his prowess. He managed his
steed wonderfully well, and bore1 with a blue label
the arms of the good King his father." John de
St. John, an experienced warrior, was in close
attendance upon the Prince, ready to instruct him
in what his duty required.
Eighty-seven of the most illustrious vassals of
the CroVn of England, with their retainers, were
in this array, including knights of Bretagne, Lor-
raine, and renegades of Scotland, among whom we
find Alexander de Baliol, brother to the King of
Scots, Patrick, Earl of Dunbar, and his son, Sir
Simon Frazer, Henry de Graham, and Richard
Siward. This formidable and splendid assemblage
of feudal power, which completely filled the road
from Newcastle, halted about nine miles south of
Dumfries, for the purpose of besieging the Castle
of Carlaverock, a stronghold belonging to Herbert
Maxwell, chief of a powerful border clan of that
name, and who had refused to surrender to a sum-
mons which Edward had sent forward. The siege
of this place has been passed over, or very slightly
noticed, by the historians of both countries. Lang-
toft merely says —
" A pouere hamlete toke,
The Castelle Karelauerok,"—
passing over, in this brief manner, a siege which
not only engaged the attention of the King, but
also interrupted the progress of his whole army.
The account which is given by Walter of Exeter,
is not only valuable from its being the only well-
authenticated description extant, by an eye-witness
of the leaguer of any of the Scottish fastnesses
during this period, but also from its being ex-
tremely interesting, by the minuteness of its de-
tails, and the graphic manner in which the author
has pourtrayed the appearance and demeanour of
the combatants. It would be doing the reader
injustice to present it to him otherwise than in the
nervous, elegant, and appropriate language of the
accomplished translator.
" Carlaverock was so strong a castle, that it did
not fear a siege, therefore the King came himself,
because it would not consent to surrender. But
it was always furnished for its defence, whenever
it was required, with men, engines, and provisions.
Its shape was like that of a shield ; for it had only
three sides all round, with a tower in each angle ;
but one of them was a double one, so high, so long,
and so large, that under it was the gate, with a
draw-bridge, well made and strong, and a suffi-
ciency of other defences. It had good walls, and
good ditches filled to the edge with water ; and I
believe there never was seen a castle more beauti-
fully situated ; for at once could be seen the Irish
sea towards the west, and to the north a fine
country, surrounded by an arm of the sea, so that
no creature born could approach it on two sides,
without putting himself in danger of the sea.
"Towards the south it was not easy, because
there were numerous dangerous denies of wood,
and marshes, and ditches, where the sea is on each
side of it, and where the river reaches it ; and
therefore it was necessary for the host to approach
it towards the east, where the hill slopes.
" And in that place by the King's commands,
his battalions were formed into three, as they were
to be quartered ; then were the banners arranged,
when one might observe many a warrior exercising
his horse : and there appeared three thousand
brave men at arms ; then might be seen gold and
silver, and the noblest and best of all rich colours,
so as entirely to illuminate the valley ; conse-
quently, those of the castle, on seeing us arrive,
might, as I well believe, deem that they were in
greater peril than they could ever before remem-
ber. And as soon as we were thus drawn up, we
were quartered by the Marshall, and then might
be seen houses built without carpenters or masons,
of many different fashions, and many a cord
stretched, with white and coloured cloth, with many
pins, driven into the ground, many a large tree cut
down to make huts ; and leaves, herbs, and flowers
gathered in the woods, which were strewed within ;
and then our people took up their quarters.
" Soon afterwards, it fortunately happened, that
the navy arrived with the engines and provisions ; *
* For the sake of illustration, we submit the following
items, taken from the wardrobe account of Edward I. for
the year 1300, being part of the expenses incurred in the
siege of Carlaverock : —
Extract from Wardrobe Account, Edward I., 1299-1300.
Account of Ade de Glasham, Carpenter, (p. 267.)
For hire of 7 carriages, for conveying a certain
engine, belonging ;to the Castle of Lochmaben,
from thence to the Castle of Carlaverock, for
the use of the King's army, employed in the
siege of that castle, viz.
5 carriages for 7 days, from\ fc ^ &
2sHaEsfor4days'from) «"5£ £-1 1 e
4 days of a smith and his assistant, employed
in the Castle of Lochmaben repairing said
engine, at 6d. a day — wages of assist-
ant, 4d 034
Coals furnished for said repairs . 010
Hire of one artilleryman for one day,
making a band or strap for said engine
at Carlaverock . . . 004
. 048
Paid for delivering said engine at Skynburness,
and putting it on board a vessel for Loch-
maben 040
Paid at Dumfries, 2d Nov. £.110 2
Account of Stephen Banyng, Shipmaster, (p. 272.)
For freight of a certain engine, from Skynburness
to Carlaverock— master's wages for 2 days, from
July 10, at 6d. a day— 10 seamen at 3d. a day £.060
CHAP. XVII.]
SIEGE OF CARLAVEROCK.
and then the footmen began to march against the
castle ; then might be seen stones, arrows, and
quarreaux, to fly among them ; but so effectually
did those within exchange their tokens with those
without, that in one short hour there were many
persons wounded and maimed, and I know not how
many killed.
" When the men-at-arms saw that the footmen
had sustained such losses who had begun the
attack, many ran there, many leaped here, and
many used such haste to go, that they did not deign
to speak to any one. Then might there be seen
such kind of stones thrown as if they would beat
hats and helmets to powder, and break shields and
targets in pieces ; for to kill and wound was the
game at which they played. Great shouts arose
among them, when they perceived that any mis-
chief occurred.
" There, first of all, I saw the good Baron Ber-
tram de Montbouchier, on whose shining silver
shield were three red pitchers, with besants, in a
black border.
" With him Gerard de Gondronville, an active
and handsome bachelor. He had a shield neither
more nor less than vaire. These were not resting
idle, for they threw up many a stone, and suffered
many a heavy blow.
" The first body was composed of Bretons, and
the second were of Lorrain, of which none found
the other tardy ; so that they afforded encourage-
ment and emulation to others to resemble them.
Then came to assail the castle, Fitz-Marmaduke,
with a banner and a great and full troop of good
and select bachelors.
" Robert de Willoughby I saw bore gold fretty
azure.
Account of Richard de Geyton, Master of the Nicholas de
Geyton, (p. 273.)
For freight of 20 bullocks (carcos' bourn) to Car-
laverock, for the use of the garrison of Dum-
fries Castle — wages of self and 5 seamen for
8 days, at the above rate . . . . £. 0 14 0
Pilotage between Kirkcudbright and Carlaverock,
for that time ... 020
Account of William Boterel, Master of the Grace of God of
Ross, (p. 274.)
For freight of 5 tuns of wine (dolia) from Kirk-
cudbright to Carlaverock — wages of self and 7
seamen for 10 days, from 19th to 29th August,
as above 126
IN.B. — The engagement with 30 vessels,
during this expedition to Scotland, appears
to have been at the rate of 6d. a day for the
master, and 3d. for the seamen, from
23d July till 26th September, 1300.— Ad-
miral of the fleet, 2s. a day. — Captains of
ships, from the ports of Sandwich and
Dover, Is. — Chaplain of the fleet, to con-
fess sailors, 6d. a day, p. 275-8.]
Paid Robert de Wodehons, viz. (p. 259.)
Paid Peter de Preston and his 9 companions,
mounted on horses, with full harness, and
charges of 660 bowmen, from Lancashire to
Carlisle, and from Carlisle to Carlaverock, to
join the king on 8th July, 2 days — horsemen
at Is.— bowmen 2d. a day . . . . £. 12 11 0
"Robert de Hamsart I saw arrive, fully pre-
pared, with five followers, holding a red shield by
the straps, containing three silver stars.
" Henry de Graham had his arms red as blood,
with a white saltire and chief, on which he had
three red escalop shells.
" Thomas de Richmont, who a second time col-
lected some, lances, had red armour, with a chief
and two gemells of gold. These did not act like
discreet people, nor as persons enlightened by
understanding ; but as if they had been inflamed
and blinded with p ~ide and despair, for they made
their way right for\v >rds to the very brink of the
ditch.
" And those of Richmont passed at this moment
quite to the bridge, and demanded entry ; they
were answered with ponderous stones and cornues.
Willoughby in his advances received a stone on
the middle of his breast, which ought to have
been protected by his shield, if he had deigned to
use it.
" Fitz-Marmaduke had undertaken to endure as
much in that affair as the others could bear, for he
was like a post ; but his banner received many
stains, and many a rent difficult to mend.
" Hamsart bore himself so nobly, that from his
shield fragments might often be seen to fly in the
air; for he, and those of Richmont, drove the
stones upwards, as if it were rotten, whilst tho^e
within defended themselves by loading their lieadV
and necks with the weight of heavy blows.
" Those led by Graham did not escape, for there
were not above two who returned unhurt, or
brought back their shields entire.
" Then you might hear the tumult begin. With
them were intermixed a great body of the King's
followers, all of whose names, if I were to repeat,
and recount their brave actions, the labour would
be too heavy, so many were there, and so well did
they behave. Nor would this suffice, without those
of the retinue of the King's son, great numbers of
whom came there in noble array ; for many a
shield, newly painted, and splendidly adorned,
many a helmet, and many a burnished hat, many
a rich gambezon, garnished with silk, tow and
cotton, were there to be seen, of divers forms and
fashions.
" There I saw Ralph de Gorges, a newly dubbed
knight, fall more than once to the ground from
stones and the crowd, for he was of so haughty a
spirit that he would not deign to retire. He had
all his harness and attire mascally of gold azure.
" Those who were on the wall, Robert de Tony
severely harassed ; for he had in his company the
good Richard de Rokeley, who so well plied those
within, that he frequently obliged them to retreat.
He^ had his shield painted mascally of red and
ermine.
" Adam de la Forde mined the walls as well as
he could, for the stones flew in and out as thick
as rain, by which many were disabled. He bore,
in clear blue, three gold lioncels rampant crowned.
"The good Baron of Wigtown received such
blows, that it was the astonishment of all that he
was not stunned ; for, without excepting any lord
present, none showed a more resolute or unem-
barrassed countenance. He bore, within a bordure
indented, three gold stars on sable.
" Many a heavy and crushing stone did he of
Kirkbride receive, but he placed before him a
72
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xvin.
white shield with a green cross engrailed. So
stoutly was the gate of the castle assailed by him,
that never did smith with his hammer strike his
iron as he and his did there. Notwithstanding
there were showered upon them such huge stones,
quarrels, and arrows, that with wounds and bruises
they were so hurt and exhausted, that it was with
great difficulty they were able to retire.
" But as soon as they had retreated, he of
Clifford, being advised of it, fmd lik£ one who had
no intention that those within should have repose,
sent his banner there, and as juany as could pro-
perly escort it, with Bartholomew de Badlesmere,
and John de Cromwell, as chose who could best
perform his wishes ; for wnilst their breath lasted,
none of them neglected to stoop and pick up the
stones to throw them, and to attack.
" But the people of the castle would not permit
them to remain there long. Badlesmere, who all
that day behaved himself well and bravely, bore
on white, with a blue label a red fess between two
gemelles. Cromwell, the brave and handsome, who
went gliding ^between the stones, bore on blue, a
white lioix rampant, double-tailed, and crowned
with gold ; but think not that he brought it away,
or thaj/it was not bruised, so much was it battered
and defaced by stones before he retreated.
"/After these two, La Warde and John de Gray
returned there, and renewed the attack. Those
xwithin, who were fully expecting it, bent their
bows and cross-bows, and prepared their esprin-
galls, and kept themselves quite ready both to
throw and to hurl.
" Then the followers of my Lord of Brittany
recommenced the assault, fierce and daring as lions
of the mountains, and every day improving in both
the practice and use of arms. Their party soon
covered the entrance of the castle, for none could
have attacked it more furiously ; not, however, that
it was so subdued, that those who came after them
would not have a share in their labours ; but they
left more than enough for them also.
" After these, the people of my Lord of Hastings
assembled there, where I saw John de Cretin ques
in danger of losing a horse. When upon it, one
came beneath pricking it with an arrow ; but he
did not seem to be dissembling, he used such haste
to strike him. On his white shield he caused to be
depicted a red chevron, with three mullets.
" He who bore a dancette and billets of gold on
blue, John Deincourt by name, rushed on to the
assault, and there extremely well performed his
duty.
" It was also a fine sight to see the good brothers
of Berkeley receiving numerous blows ; and the
brothers Basset likewise, of whom the eldest bore
thus, — ermine, a red chief indented, charged with
three gold mullets ; the other, with three shells ;
found the passages straitened. Those within cbn-
tinually relieved one another ; for always, as cine
became fatigued, another returned fresh and stout ;
and, notwithstanding such assaults were made upon
them, they would not surrender, but so defended
themselves, that they resisted those who attacked,
all that day and night, and the next day until
tierce. But their courage was considerably de-
pressed during the attack, ,by the brother Robert,
who sent numerous stones from the robinet, with-
out cessation, from the dawn of the preceding day
until the evening. Moreover, on the other side, he
was erecting three other engines, very large, of
great power, and very destructive, which cut down
and cleave whatever they strike. Fortified town,
citadel, nor barrier — nothing is protected from
their strokes. Yet those within did not flinch,
until some of them were slain ; but then each be-
gan to repent of his obstinacy, and to be dismayed.
The pieces fell in such manner, wherever the stones
entered, that when they struck either of them,
neither iron cap nor wooden target could save him
from a wound.
" And when they saw that they could not hold
out any longer, or endure more, the companions
begged for peace, and put out a pennon ; but he
that displayed it was shot with an arrow, by some
archer, through the hand into the face ; then he
begged that they would do no more to him, for
they will give up the castle to the King, and throw
themselves upon his mercy. And the marshal and
constable, who almost remained on the spot, at that
notice forbad the assault, and these surrendered
the castle to them."
The besieged, who had thus retarded the pro-
gress of this mighty host, were now passed in re-
view before Edward, and, including all ranks, were
found to amount to " sixty men," " who were," says
our author, " beheld with much astonishment." —
" They were all kept and guarded, till the King
commanded that life and limb should be given
them, and ordered to each of them a new gar-
ment :" " But this account of the treatment of the
prisoners," says Mr. Nicolas, " differs entirely
from that in the Chronicle of Lanercost, where it
is said that many of them were hung."
The banner of Edward now waved on the bat-
tlement of Carlaverock Castle, along with those of
St. Edmond, St. George, St. Edward, Sir John
Segrave, the Earl of Hereford, and that of Lord
Clifford, to whom Edward had given it in charge.
The army then proceeded on their march *.
CHAPTER XVIII.
WINCHELSEA, ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, READS A
BULL FROM THE POPE, IN THE ENGLISH CAMP
BEFORE CARLAVEROCK — EDWARD'S ANSWER — EARL
WARREN ADVANCES TO IRVINE --CRUELTY OF THE
ENGLISH AT LESMAHAGO — EDWARD AGREES TO A
TRUCE WALLACE VISITS FRANCE — CAPTURES A
FRENCH PIRATE — NOTICES OF LONGUEVILLE.
WHILE the English army were encamped before
Carlaverock, Winchelsea, Archbishop of Canter-
bury, arrived with a bull, directed to Edward,
from the Pope.
The application which, as has already been
stated, the Scottish commissioners were instructed
to make to King Philip for the stipulated assist-
ance having at first been evaded, and afterwards
finally refused — the embarrassing situation of his
own affairs affording him a plausible pretext for
withholding the aid necessary for the relief of his
allies — the Scots, according to their instructions,
proceeded to lay their complaints before the Court
of Rome. Boniface listened with complacency to
* See Appendix, R.
CHAP. XVIII.]
EDWARD'S REPLY TO THE PAPAL BULL.
73
their grievances, and readily undertook to interpose
his authority in their behalf. For this purpose, he
addressed to Edward a letter of admonition, ex-
horting him to desist from any further attempts to
subvert the liberties of a kingdom over which he
had no lawful claim. The groundless nature of
the pretensions he had set up, the Pontiff pro-
ceeded, at considerable length, to explain — being,
no doubt, enabled to do so, from the information
furnished him by the commissioners. Among other
matters, he reminded him, that the mere circum-
stance of his having negociated with the Scots, for
the marriage of his son with the heiress of Scot-
land, must prove fatal to any plea he might ad-
vance in favour of his being the feudal lord of that
kingdom, as he would find no one weak enough to
believe that he would have submitted to negociate,
when he had a right to command. "He also,"
says a respectable historian, "mentioned several
striking facts which fell within the compass of
Edward's own knowledge, particularly that Alex-
ander, when he did homage to the King, openly
and expressly declared in his presence, that he
swore fealty not for his crown, but for the lands which
he held in England ; and the Pope's letter might
have passed for a reasonable one, had he not sub-
joined his own claim to be liege lord of Scotland, a
claim which had not once been heard of, but which,
with a singular confidence, he asserted to be full
and entire, and derived from the most remote an-
tiquity." This letter Boniface concluded, by ex-
horting him, in his name, to set at liberty all those
ecclesiastics and others belonging to the country
whom he had imprisoned, and to remove all officers
he had appointed to places of trust in the kingdom,
contrary to the wishes of the people ; directing
him, if he conceived he had still any reasons to
allege in support of his pretensions, to send persons
properly authorized to Rome, where he, the Pope,
would hear the case, and within six months give
an impartial decision. To these exhortations the
Archbishop added his own, urging, among other
things, the propriety of his yielding obedience to
so sacred an authority, observing, that Jerusalem
would not fail to protect her citizens, and to che-
rish, like Mount Zion, those who trusted in the
Lord. At the conclusion of this address, which
was made in the presence of Prince Edward and
the assembled nobles, the King became furious,
and with a great oath exclaimed, " I will not be
silent or at rest, either for Mount Zion or for Jeru-
salem, but, as long as there is breath in my nos-
trils, I will defend what all the world knows to be
my right." On calmer reflection, however, he saw
the necessity of returning a milder answer to the
admonition of his adviser, in which he promised to
consult his parliament, and send messengers to
Rome to acquaint his Spiritual Father with the
result of their deliberations.
In a parliament assembled some time after at
Lincoln, the Pope's bull was submitted to the con-
sideration of the English Barons ; and in his reply,
Edward attempted to prove the superiority of Eng-
land by historical facts, deduced from the period
of Brutus the Trojan, who, he said, founded the
British monarchy in the age of Eli and Samuel.
He then supports his position by all the events
which passed in the island before the arrival of the
Romans : and, after laying great stress on the
extensive dominions and the heroic victories of
King Arthur, he vouchsafes at last to descend to
the time of Edward the Elder, from which period
he has chosen to begin his claim of superiority.
He asserts it as a fact notorious, and confirmed by
the r lords of antiquity, that the English monarchs
had o ^ten conferred the kingdom of Scotland on
their c i subjects — had dethroned those vassal-
kings whei' unfaithful to them, and had substituted
others in t'\eir stead. He displays, with great
pomp, the full and complete homage which William
had done to Henry II. — without mentioning the
formal abolition Ox that extorted deed by King
Richard, and the renunciation of all future claims
of the same nature. Ye\ in this paper he begins
with a solemn appeal to the Almighty, the searcher
of hearts, for his own firm persuasion of the justice
of his claim ; and no less thrn a hundred and four
barons, assembled in parliament at Lincoln, con-
curred in maintaining before the Pope, under their
'seals, the validity of the pretensions. At the same
time, they took care to inform Boniface, that al-
though they had justified their causve before him,
they did not acknowledge him as theL* judge : the
crown of England was free and sovereign : they
had sworn to maintain all its prerogative^ ; and
would never permit the King himself, were* he
willing, to relinquish its independence. <"
Edward, on leaving Carlaverock, now advanced
into Galloway, and took several castles in that pro-
vince. He appears to have been at Lochroieton^
on the 17th July, and at Kirkcudbright on the
22d of same month. On 29th August he returned
to Carlaverock.- He was at Dumfries on the 24th
October, and again at Carlaverock on the 1st
November *. His own operations appear, on this
occasion, to have been in a great measure confined
to the south of Scotland^. Detachments of his
* See account of the King's progress, page 67 of Remarks
on Wardrobe Account of Edward I.
t The following items, which appear in the above Account
for 1300, as having reference to this campaign, and to the
manner in which Edward was employed, may be interesting
to some of our readers.
Donation to Henry de Cornwall, wounded by the Scots
near Columtach, in Galloway. For his return and medicines,
by the hands of William de Toulose, who lent him the money,
one half merk (dimidium marce).
To a stable-boy, hurt by one of the King's horses at Kirk-
cudbright, five shillings.
Alms and Offerings at Scottish Chapels.
7th July.— At the altar of St. Nicholas, 7s., and St. Thomas
the Archbishop, 7s. — in the parisli church of Applegarth.
10th July.— At the high altar of the Friars Minors, Dum-
fries, 7s. and 16th, 7s.
12th July.— Do. of his own chapel at Carlaverock, at
St. Thomas, 7s.
At the high altar, Kirkcudbright priory, and in his chapel
there, July 19th, 7s. ; 20th, 7s. ; 22d, 7s. ; 25th, 7s. ; 27th, 7s.
29th August. — At his own chapel Carlaverock, 7s.
In his own chapel at Dumfries, October 24th, for good
news about the Scots, 7s. ; 28th, 7s. ; November 1st, 7s. ;
and November 3d. at his own altar at Carlaverock , 7s.
14th Oct. — At his own chapel (Holm), for the report he
heard of the success of the men-at-arms of the Castle of
Roxburgh, 7s.
There is also, in the same year, an offering at the high
altar of the Royal Chapel of Westminster, for good news
against the Scots ; and £5. 10s. lOd. for 190 masses in honour
of different saints, by the King's chaplains, both in England
and Scotland, between November 20th, 1299, and Novem-
ber 19th, 1300.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
TCHAP. xviu.
army, however, extended themselves in different
directions ; and various conflicts took place be-
tween them and the Scottish guerilla parties under
Wallace. A strong division of the English army,
commanded by the Earl of Warren, advancer1 also
as far as Irvine, and came in contact with th :>: Scot-
tish forces, headed by the Regents. The ;41d was
keenly contested for some time ; but ''the Scots
were at last compelled to fall back Mfore the re-
peated charges of their more numerous opponents.
Another portion of the Engl^h army laid waste
Clydesdale ; and after destroying Bothwell, ad-
vanced to Lesmahago— to/the Abbey church of
which, a number of the inhabitants had fled for
safety. This sanctuary, however, according to
tradition, did not avail .them. Their merciless in-
vaders set fire to the afacred edifice, and many of
the Scots perished miserably in the flames. During
the perpetration of/ this tragic act, Wallace, who
followed the tract/ of the destroyers, was forced, it
is said, to conceal himself in a cave, four miles dis-
tant from the s*ene of barbarity, carefully watching,
by his Beppu, the motions of the enemy. This
cave stilt/goes by his name, and is pointed out by
the co/untry people as an object of curiosity to
stra:$gers.
W/hile this warfare was carrying on by his de-
tached squadrons, Edward was concerting mea-
sles for permanently annexing to his own domi-
nions the district he had overrun. For this purpose,
he employed numerous bodies of his own subjects,
in repairing and fortifying the different places of
strength which had surrendered to his arms ; and
the reluctance of the Scots to assist in the subju-
gation of their country, appears evident from his
being compelled to bring labourers, at a consider-
able expense, from the northern counties of Eng-
land ».
A large portion of the provisions required for
* The curious reader may perhaps take some interest in
the following notices of the workmen employed about these
fortresses, and the rate of wages they received for their
labour. They are taken from the Wardrobe Account. The
authenticity of the document is unquestionable.
Repairs at Lochmaben, October, 1300.
Octr. 24. Hire of 44 ditchers (fossatores) from the
neighbourhood of Lochmaben, (in-
cluding one overseer at 6 pennies a
day) for one day £0 8 0
25. Do. of 34 do. (including one overseer
at 6 pennies a day) for 3 days . 0 19 0
31. Do. of 50 do. (including 3 overseers at
6 pennies each per day) for 4 days 117 4
Nov. 2. Do. of one manager, at 6 pennies a day,
and 178 ditchers, including 9 over-
seers from the county of Northum-
berland, for 3 days . . .4150
Paid William of Lochmaben, overseer,
and 25 labourers from the neigh-
bourhood of Lochmaben, for 3 days
(from 27th of Octr.) . . . 0 13 6
Nov. 2. Hire of 76 labourers from Cumberland,
including 4 overseers as above, by
the King's order (ad mandatum Regis)
for 1 day . . . .0134
Do. of 4 men inspecting the work of
said ditchers, from 23d till 30th Octo-
ber, 8 days, at 4 pennies a day each 0 10 8
Do. of 7 women helping to clean the
ditches for one day (Oct. 24) at 1J
pennies . . . . 0 0 10£
his troops he seems also to have been under the
necessity of bringing from Ireland. Between
Whitehaven and Carlaverock we find William de
Torni, master of a vessel belonging to the Isle of
Man, employed in carrying flour for the supply of
the army. In the Wardrobe Account there is also
an entry *, from which it may be inferred, that the
destruction of the mills formed part of the system
which the Scots resorted to for the annoyance of
their enemies f.
As the campaign had hitherto been productive
of no result adequate to the expense incurred, Ed-
ward now affected to listen to the remonstrances of
Do. for 9 women (Oct. 27) 3 days at l£d. 0
Do. for 10 (Oct. 28) > _ h
Do. for 14 (Oct. 29) $ as aU°ve
Do. for 25 (Oct. 30) 0
Extra gratification to said ditchers,
being King's bounty
Carriage of workmen's tools from Nor-
thumberland, through Carlisle to
Dumfries
Hire of 2 smiths from said county, from
17th Oct. till Nov. 1st, 16 days, at 4
pennies a day
3 44
3 4J
3 IJ
1 5 7
0 10 0
1 1 4
£13 4 li
Amount paid to Henry Braundeston, for Ade de St. Ed-
munds.— See page 269 of Wardrobe Account.
Hire of 2 men employed in Inglewood-forest, making char-
coal for the smiths, 4 days, 2s.
* Paid Simon Kingesman, master of the Margaret of
Kipavene, for freight of 30 quarters of wheat from Kirk-
cudbright to Dublin, to be ground there, and carriage of the
same to Ayr, for the use of the King's army in that place-
Wages for self and 12 seamen, from 2 till 15 August, both
included, 15 days . . .£290
To the same, for pilotage of said vessel . 068
£2 15 8
Paid Wewmund Gegge, of the Savoy of Tynemouth, freight
of 143 quarters of wheat, from Kirkcudbright to White-
haven, to be ground, and carriage of the same to Ayr, for
the King's army in that place— Wages for self and 9 seamen,
5 till 14 August, both included, 10 days . .£176
[N.B. Wages of master 6d. and seamen 3d. per day,
during the expedition to Scotland in 1300.]
Average wages per day, viz.
Labourers . . . . 2d. Carpenters . . . . 4d.
Plasterers .... 3d. Smiths 4d.
Miners 3d. Boys, or Apprentices . 2d.
Masons 4d.
Price of Oats per quarter.
1300. Jan. At Holderness . . .2s. 2d. p. 212
July. At Newcastle-upon-Tyne . 2s. 6d. p. 113
Price of Wheat per quarter.
1300. June. At Cawode, near York . 4s. p. 108
Prices in Scotland in 1285.
Oats 4d., and Bear 8d. and lOd. per boll. Wheat, 16d. and
20d.1
t From the following entry in the Wardrobe Account, it
would appear, that in this expedition the English were pro-
vided with nets for fishing in the rivers and lakes of Scot-
land. " Reginaldo Janetori pro 2 retk'empt, per ipsum ad
piscandum in repariis el stagnis in partibus Scocie ad opus
Regis per manus proprias, apud Kirkudbright." 4s. 2d.
Vide Wardrobe Account for the year 1300. p. 65.
1 It has been already stated (page 2) that the money of
both countries was of equal value at this time.
CHAP. XVIII.]
HE VISITS FRANCE.
Philip and Boniface, and agreed to a truce with the
Scots in arms against him. The negociation took
place at Paris between the English envoys and the
Scottish commissioners at the French court, and
was finally ratified by Edward at Dumfries on the
30th October, 1300, when he expressed himself
highly offended with the English envoys for allow-
ing BalioFs name, as King of Scotland, to appear in
the treaty. This truce was to last from Hallowmas
to Whitsunday * ; and in consequence of it, all the
English troops except those in garrison were with-
drawn from Scotland and disbanded. Edward
then summoned his parliament at Lincoln, and
returned the answer to Boniface to which we have
already alluded.
1301. After the conclusion of the treaty, Wal-
lace is supposed to have gone on a visit to France,
in consequence of the repeated invitations of Philip,
who was no doubt anxious to behold a man whose
name had become familiar at every court in
Europe, and whose exertions in his own country
had so often, relieved himself from the hostile visits
of the King of England.
On his way, the vessel in which he had embarked
along with a few select friends, is said to have been
attacked by a noted pirate of the name of Longue-
ville, at that time the terror of the seas, and the
Paul Jones of his day. After a desperate conflict,
Wallace and his party succeeded in boarding the
enemy ; and Longueville, being vanquished in a
personal combat with Wallace, surrendered at dis-
cretion. The gallant manner, however, in which
he acted during the fight, gained him the esteem
of our hero, who subsequently discovered that he
was a French nobleman, and, at one time, high in
favour at court, but who had fallen under the dis-
pleasure of the King, in consequence of having
killed a knight in the royal presence ; for which
offence his estates were forfeited, and himself
banished from the kingdom. Smarting under these
indignities, he had commenced a system of piracy,
for which he was outlawed, and every avenue to
the royal clemency shut against him. Wallace, on
arriving at Paris, found himself so well received
by the French monarch — who no doubt expected
his assistance against the English in Guienne — that
he ventured to solicit, and, after some difficulty,
obtained a pardon for Longueville, who had accom-
panied him to Paris in disguise.
Various stories are told of the adventures of
Wallace in France ; but as the histories of that
country are in general silent regarding them, most
of our authors have considered them fabulous ; and
some even carry their incredulity so far as to doubt
of his ever having been there. But as he appears
evidently, on one or more occasions, to have with-
drawn himself from Scotland, and as those writers
who doubt of his being in France have not ac-
counted for the chasms that his absence naturally
makes in his history, nor appear to have anything
to urge against his visits to that country but their
doubts; we cannot allow unsupported misgivings to
stand in opposition to the recorded testimony of
ancient writers, who ought to have known more of
transactions near their own days than authors who
wrote many ages after them — particularly as the
circumstance in question could serve no political or
party purpose at the time ; and of course, could
* Wyntown.
afford no temptation for mis-statement. We
may also remark, that the adventure with Longue-
ville is corroborated by traditions still existing
in the country, as well as by the fact of a family
in Scotland, not long extinct, having derived their
pedigree from that brave man ; who, according to
the law of arms in those days, thought himself
bound to follow the fortunes of his conqueror.
Longueville is said to have accompanied Wallace
to Scotland, where he had lands assigned him ; and
the following notice in the Statistical Account of
the parish of Kinfauns, goes a considerable way to
establish the truth of what is here related : — " In
the castle of Kinfauns is kept a large old sword, pro-
bably made about five hundred years ago, and to
be used by both hands. It is shaped like a broad-
sword, and is five feet nine inches long, two and
a half inches broad at the hilt, and of a proportion-
ate thickness, with a round knob at the upper end,
near eight inches in circumference. This terrible
weapon bears the name of Charteris's Sword, and
probably belonged to Sir Thomas Charteris,
commonly called Thomas de Longueville, once
proprietor of the estate of Kinfauns. Sir Tho-
mas Charteris, alias Longueville, was a native
of France, and of an ancient family in that coun-
try. If credit can be given to accounts of such
remote dates, when he was at the court of Philip
le Bel, in the end of the thirteenth century, he had
a dispute with, and killed a French nobleman, in
the King's presence. He escaped, but was refused
pardon.
" Having for several years infested the seas as a
pirate, known by the name of the Red Reiver,
from the colour of the flags he carried on his ship,
in May, 1301 or 1302, (by Adamson's chronology,)
Sir William Wallace, in his way to France, en-
countered and took him prisoner. At Wallace's
intercession, the French King conferred on him a
pardon, and the honour of knighthood. He accom-
panied Wallace on his return to Scotland, and was
ever after his faithful friend, and aiding in his
exploits. Upon that hero's being betrayed and
carried to England, Sir Thomas Charteris retired
to Lochmaben, where he remained till Robert
Bruce began to assert his right to the crown of
Scotland. He joined Bruce, and was, if we may
believe Adamson, who refers to Barbour *, the first
who followed that King into the water, at the
taking of Perth, January 8, 1313.
" Bruce rewarded his bravery by giving him
lands in the neighbourhood of Perth, which appear
to be those of Kinfauns, and which continued in
the family of Charteris for many years. It is to
* " That tyme wes in his cumpany
A knycht off France, wycht and hardy ;
And quhen he in the watyr swa
Saw the king pass, and with him ta
Hys leddyr wnabasytly,
He saynyt him for the ferly,
And said ; 'A Lord ! quhatt sail we say
Off our lordis off Fraunce, that thai
With gud morsellis fayrcis thair pawnchis,
And will bot ete, and drynk, and dawnsis ;
Quhen sic a knycht, and sa worthy
As this, throw his chewalry,
Into sic perill has him set,
To wyn a wrechyt hamillet ! ;
With that word to the dik he ran ;
And our eftre the king he wan."
The Bruce, Buke Sext, p. 177-8.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xix.
this ancient knight, and to the antique sword
above-mentioned, that Adamson refers in these
lines (Book VI.) of his ' Muses Threnodie : '
' Kinfauns, which famous Longoveil
Sometime did hold ; whose auncient sword of steele
Remaines unto this day, and of that land
Is chiefest evident.' — p. 158.
" About forty years ago, upon opening the bury-
ing vault under the aisle of the church of Kinfauns,
erected by this family, there was found a head-
piece, or kind of helmet, made of several folds of
linen, or some strong stuff, painted over with broad
stripes of blue and white, which seems to have
been part of the fictitious armour wherein the body
of Sir Thomas Longueville, or Charteris, had been
disposed *.
" Some persons of the surname of Charteris,"
says the editor of the Perth edition of Wallace,
"lairds of Kinfauns, and of Cuthilgourdy, were
provosts of Perth, and would make a distinguished
figure in the heroic annals of Perth, if the old
writs of that city were properly displayed."
According to the same authority there were
families of the name of Charteris in Scotland, long
before the time assigned to Thomas de Longue-
ville. Andrew de Charteris, who swore fealty to
Edward in 1296, is said to have been the ancestor
of the noble family of Wemyss.
CHAPTER XIX.
EDWARD AGAIN INVADES SCOTLAND — SIR SIMON FRA-
ZER DESERTS THE ENGLISH, AND JOINS HIS COUN-
TRYMEN— WALLACE RETURNS TO SCOTLAND — BATTLE
OF ROSLIN.
THE truce which circumstances had extorted from
Edward, was no sooner expired, than the campaign
was opened by a fresh invasion of Scotland. The
English army again advanced as far as Linlithgow,
where, fixing their head-quarters, they commenced
building a fortress for the same object as had in-
duced them to rear similar structures in the south.
The treaty of peace had not yet been concluded
with the King of France ; and Edward anxiously
endeavoured to detach him from the interests of
the Scots. In this he was successful ; for, by
giving up his allies, the Flemings, to the chastise-
ment of Philip, and sacrificing a lucrative branch
of trade, in order to gratify his enmity against the
Scots, he obtained the King of France's consent to
a separate peace, stipulating only for a truce with
Scotland, to endure till St. Andrew's day, 1302, —
after which period, Edward was left at liberty to
prosecute his views against that country.
In the mean time, the cause of independence
acquired a valuable accession in the person of
Sir Simon Frazer, who at last — awakened to the
* This circumstance is thus corroborated by a note at-
tached to the Perth edition of Wallace. The editor, it
would seem, had been present on the occasion :
" About thirty years ago, when the burying vault of the
parish church of Kinfauns happened to be opened, I was
showed a helmet made of thick leather, or of some such
stuff, painted over with broad stripes of blue and white,
which I was told was part of the fictitious armour in which
the body of Thomas of Longueville had been deposited.
Henry says, he was of large stature, and the helmet, indeed,
•was a very large one." — P. 24 of Notes in 3rd volume.
injuries of his country, and a just sense of his own
unnatural conduct — deserted the standard of Ed-
ward, and enrolled himself among the asserters of
the liberty of Scotland *. The talents and bravery
of this leader more than counterbalanced the loss
which the patriots had sustained in the defection
of the Bishop of Glasgow ; who, on the 7th Oc-
tober, 1300, at Holmcoltrum, had renewed his
former fealty to Edward, swearing upon the con-
secrated host, and upon the Groyz G-neytz^ and
Black Rood of Scotland ; in consequence, as is
supposed, of remonstrance from Boniface, who
now thought proper to espouse the interest of
Edward.
On hearing of the situation of Scotland, Wallace
withdrew from the French court, and returned
home. What services he was enabled to render his
country during his absence, do not appear in any
of our records.
1302. After the expiry of the truce, Edward
sent John de Segrave with an army of 20,000
men into Scotland, who, having advanced to the
neighbourhood of Roslin, divided his troops into
three divisions, for the purpose of procuring forage.
In the mean time, John Cumyn and Simon Frazer,
having collected a body of eight thousand Scots,
suddenly fell upon the first division, which they
defeated with great slaughter. WTiile engaged in
collecting the spoil, the second division came in
sight, on which the Scots, elated with the success
they had already obtained, stood resolutely to their
arms, charged, and, after a desperate conflict,
again drove their enemies from the field. After
this double victory, the Scots, exhausted with the
fatigues of the day, were preparing to refresh
themselves, when their scouts brought notice that
the third division of their enemies was at hand.
Their leaders flew from rank to rank, beseeching
them to make one effort more to preserve the
glory they had acquired ; and having equipped the
followers of the camp in the arms of their slain
enemies, they again commenced the bloody strife,
with that enthusiasm which the remembrance of
their former victories inspired. The fury of the
Scottish charge decided the third battle : the Eng-
lish were once more thrown into confusion, and
fled in the greatest terror, leaving behind them all
their camp-equipage a prey to the conquerors.
The advantages resulting from this day's successes
were not thrown away : the Scots every where
flocked to the assistance of their countrymen ; and
the fortresses which Edward possessed in the south
of Scotland, were quickly recovered, and garri-
soned by their lawful masters.
Respecting the events of this day of triumph
for the Scottish arms, the historians of the two
countries are not exactly agreed. According to
Langtoft, Sir John de Segrave, with his son and
* See Appendix, S.
t The Croyz Gneytz was held in great veneration, in con-
sequence of its being supposed to contain part of the wood
of the real cross. The Black Rood of Scotland was one of
the national monuments carried off by Edward. Its sanctity
was considered equal to that of the black stones of lona;
and an oath made upon it, gave the same stability to a con-
tract. It was the favourite crucifix of Queen Margaret.
The cross was of gold, about the length of a palm — the
figure of ebony, studded and inlaid with gold. A piece of the
true cross was also supposed to be enclosed in it.
Aldred, p. 349, apud Twisden.—Hailes, vol. i. p. 41.
CHAP. XX.]
HIS SECOND VISIT TO THE FRENCH COURT.
77
brother, were surprised in their beds by the Scots,
who captured sixteen knights, among whom were
Sir Thomas Neville and Sir Ralf de Cofferer, the
treasurer of Edward, who, on interceding with Sir
Simon Frazer for his life, was sternly reminded by
him of the defalcations he had committed in his
office, by defrauding himself and others of their
wages. Having upbraided him with his unpriestly
conduct, he struck off his hands, as being polluted
with the wages of iniquity, and afterwards severed
his head from his body, by a blow with his sword.
CHAPTER XX.
SECOND VISIT OF WALLACE TO THE FRENCH COURT —
ENCOUNTERS AN ENGLISH PIRATE — THE ENGLISH
AGAIN ENTER SCOTLAND — SUBMISSION OF THE NO-
BLES— WALLACE RETURNS — CONFLICTS WITH THE
ENGLISH — EDWARD DESTROYS AND CARRIES OFF
THE RECORDS OF THE MONASTERIES — MARCHES
THROUGH THE COUNTRY — WALLACE FOLLOWS THE
INVADERS.
THERE is no certain account of Wallace having
been present at the battle of Roslin : — if he was, it
must have been only in a private capacity, he not
being mentioned by any author as holding a com-
mand on that occasion. According to some, he
was absent from the country at the time ; but
this, however, seems to be contradicted by the
Scotichronicon, where it is said, that, after the bat-
tle of Roslin, he went on board of a merchant ves-
sel, and, with a few companions, again sailed for
France. Henry, whose strong partiality would
not have omitted so excellent an opportunity for
aggrandizing his hero, had there been any autho-
rity hi the narrative of Blair for so doing, passes
over the circumstance in silence. This conduct in
an author so strongly biassed in favour of the sub-
ject of his biography, is not only a proof of the
absence of Wallace from the field of Roslin, but a
strong argument in favour of the general accuracy
of his own details. The laurels, therefore, that
were gathered at Roslin, will fall to be divided be-
tween Sir Simon Frazer and the lord of Badenoch.
That Wallace returned a second time to the
court of France, is asserted in the most positive
manner by the Minstrel, and is in part corroborated
by the Scotichronicon. The particular periods of
his history, however, which those visits occupied, it
is rather difficult to ascertain. That the first oc-
curred after the battle of Falkirk is without doubt ;
and the second immediately before, or soon after
the affair of Roslin, is almost equally certain. As,
in the first voyage, Wallace is said to have fallen
in with and captured a French pirate ; in the se-
cond, he is represented as having a similar ren-
counter with an Englishman of the same profes-
sion, who carried on his depredations principally
against the Scottish vessels. Had the Minstrel's
work been one of pure fancy, this sameness of in-
cident, we presume, would not have occurred ; —
for the judgment of the poet would no doubt have
suggested the propriety of a change of adventure.
The English pirate, who is called John of Lyn, is
first seen by the Scots, making his way out of the
Humber, displaying a red sail, and a flag at his
mast-head bearing three leopards courant, the
well-known insignia of Edward. The Scottish mer-
chants, who knew his ferocious disposition, were
appalled at first ; but encouraged by Wallace and
his companions, they prepared themselves for ac-
tion, by stuffing sheep-skins with wool, which ap-
pears to have been their cargo ; and thus making
a kind of defensive armour, to protect them against
their better equipped assailants. On their re-
fusing to surrender, the battle commenced by a
heavy discharge from bows and cross-bows on the
part of the English ; and the Scots, who were not
so well supplied with missiles, kept themselves as
much as possible out of the way of the shot, till it
was nearly expended ; — when, laying their vessel
alongside of the enemy, Wallace and his compa-
nions threw themselves on board the pirate, and
attacked the crew with the greatest fury. The
commander, seeing the desperation of the Scots,
and the havoc they were making amongst his men,
would gladly have made off ; but the sword of Wal-
lace was not to be evaded. The two leaders, there-
fore, engaged, and after a short rencounter, John
of Lyn was cut down by his opponent, and his men
submitted to the conqueror. In this conflict none
distinguished themselves more than Longueville,
and John Blair, the chaplain of Wallace — the lat-
ter of whom, with three successive arrows, shot
three of the enemy, and otherwise conducted him-
self with the greatest heroism. As it would not
have been becoming in Blair to have narrated such
deeds of himself, we are told by Henry, that the
account of them was inserted in the memoir of
Wallace by Thomas Gray, who acted as steersman
on the occasion. In this there is consistency, as
we are elsewhere informed, that Gray occasionally
assisted in writing the achievements of the cham-
pion of the Scots *.
On arriving " in the Sloice-hawyn," says Henry,
Wallace made a division of the spoil among his
followers, and, presenting the merchants with the
ship, took his departure for Paris.
The reception he met with from Philip is re-
ported to have been highly flattering ; and our hero
soon became involved in a number of adventures,
all sufficiently romantic ; but as the French histo-
* In Dr. Jamieson's edition of Blind Harry, this circum-
stance is thus printed : —
" Bot maister Blayr spak nothing offhimsell,
In deid off armes quhat awentur he fell.
Schir Thomas Gray was than preyst to Wallace,
Put in the buk how than hapnyt this cace
At Blayr was in, [and] mony worthi deid,
Offquhilk him selffhad no plesance to reid."
B. x.
In the Perth edition of Wallace, the words in the third
line stand thus : — "/ Thomas Gray, yanpreistto Wallace"
&c. On this reading, the Perth editor, with propriety,
founds a very strong argument in favour of the existence of
Blair's work, and of the fidelity of Henry's translation. The
difference in the two editions appeared so very important,
as to induce a friend of the writer to refer to the original
manuscript in the Advocates' Library, when it was found
that the rendering of the Perth editor was strictly conform-
able to the original text, "thus affording," as the above-
mentioned friend observes, "a triumphant argument in
Henry's favour ; for it seems to represent him as in the very
act of versifying his ' auctor.' " What authority Dr. Jamie-
son has for the version he has given, must remain with
himself to explain.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xx.
rians appear, from their silence, to have been ig-
norant of them, we must refer the curious reader
to the pages of the Minstrel. We shall only re-
mark, that it has been asserted by various writers,
that the name of Wallace was frequently found in
the songs of the ancient Troubadours. This, how-
ever, may have arisen as much from the fame he
had acquired in his own country, as from any
chivalrous exploits he had performed in France.
But in whatever manner he was employed in the
service of Philip, the proceedings of Edward soon
recalled him to his native land.
The mortification which the reverses at Roslin
occasioned the King of England, was greatly in-
creased by the praises that were every where be-
stowed upon the gallantry of the Scots : and the
noise which their triple victory made at the differ-
ent courts of Europe, excited a deeper and more
determined inveteracy in his mind. It is probable,
that, but for the discomfiture at Roslin, the reso-
lution which he had so long displayed, of reducing
Scotland to subjection, might have gradually given
way before the reflections occasioned by the im-
mense losses which he had sustained in his various
expeditions * ; and perhaps he would have con-
tented himself with retaining possession of that
part of Scotland which bounded his own kingdom.
The defeat, however, of his lieutenant, and the
subsequent proceedings of the victors, awakened
afresh all the rancorous hostility of his ambitious
and unprincipled mind ; and he resolved, by one
mighty effort, to overwhelm the Scots, and efface
their name from the number of the nations. In
order to accomplish this project, all the ultramarine
vassals of his crown were summoned to his standard.
In his own kingdom of England, large levies of
men and horses were raised, and the din of pre-
paration was heard from one extremity of the land
to the other. A powerful fleet was also equipped,
to attend the motions of the land army, and prevent
the chance of scarcity from interfering with that
work of destruction he had in contemplation.
1303. Wallace heard with sorrow, of the mighty
preparations that were making for the annihilation
of his country's independence j and he resolved
again to join his old associates, and brave along
with them the fury of the storm that was about to
burst upon their heads. To his friends, who lis-
tened with increasing apprehension to the progress
of the coining war, the hope of his return came
like a sunbeam through the tempest that was black-
ening around them. Before, however, the French
monarch would permit his departure, the countless
host of the invader had crossed the Tweed, and
spread its desolating squadrons over the adjacent
country f ; and those places which manifested the
» See Appendix, T.
t The havoc made, and the oppressions sustained by the
inhabitants.are thus described by Barbour, p. 9, vol. i. of The
Bruce.
" Fra Weik anent Orkenay,
To Mullyrs nwk in Gallaway ;
And stuffy t all with Ingliss men.
Schyrreffys and bailyheys maid he then ;
And alkyn othir officeris,
That for to gowern land afferis,
He maid off Ingliss nation ;
That worthyt than sa rych fellone,
And sa wykkyt and cowatouss,
And swa hawtane and dispitouss,
slightest disposition to defend their liberties, were
consigned to indiscriminate carnage. Among the
few which made any resistance, the castle of
Brechin appeared eminently conspicuous. Under
the command of the governor, Sir Thomas Maule,
this garrison maintained a most heroic defence, and
did not give in till the death of their commander
obliged them to surrender.
Wherever the army of Edward now appeared,
the chieftains were found anxiously waiting to ten-
der their submission, and again repeat their oaths
of allegiance. Some of the principal nobility, in
order to claim the merit of an early repentance,
even met the invader on the borders, and thus
procured more advantageous terms than they other-
wise would have obtained. Among those who
thus started for the goal of slavery, few shared
more largely in the wages of iniquity than Sir
John Menteith. Having met Sir Aymer de Val-
lance at Annan, he found means to acquire so much
of his confidence, as to induce that favourite of
Edward to obtain for him, not only a confirmation
of the governorship of Dumbarton castle, but also
an extension of his authority, over the whole of the
district of Lennox.
While affairs were in this situation, accounts
were brought to the English camp, that the bugle
of Wallace had been heard at midnight among the
woods on the banks of the Tay ; and a body of
troops,- under the command of Sir John Butler,
were despatched in pursuit of him. This officer,
two of whose relations had already fallen by the
hand of Wallace, set forward with alacrity to
execute the service assigned to him. But, after
ranging the country in all directions, he was
at last obliged to return without having once
seen the object of whom he was in search, al-
though the reports brought him by his scouts,
as well as the evasive answers of the inhabitants,
convinced him of the certainty of Wallace being
in the country.
In the early part of our narrative, we alluded to
the admirable discipline which Wallace had intro-
duced among his countrymen, and the facility with
which, by the sound of his horn, he could rally
them around him in cases of emergency. From
the frequency with which these calls bad been
made, there was scarcely a district in Scotland
That Scottis men mycht do na thing
That euir mycht pleyss to thar liking.
Thar wyffis wuld thai oft forly,
And thar dochtrys dispitusly :
And gyff ony of thaim thair at war wrath,
Thai watyt hym wele with gret scaith ;
For thai suld fynd some enchesone
To put hym to destructione.
And gyff that ony man thaim by .
Had ony thing that wes worthy,
As horss, or hund, or othir thing,
That war pleasand to thar liking ;
With rycht or wrang it wald have thai.
And gyff ony wald them withsay ;
Thai suld swa do, that thai suld tyne
Othir land or lyff, or leyff in pyne.
For thai dempt thaim eftir thair will,
Takand na kep to rycht na skill.
A ! quhat thai dempt thaim felonly !
For gud knychtis that war worthy,
For litill enchesoune, or than nane,
Thai hangyt be the nekbane."
CHAP. XX.]
HIS RETURN TO SCOTLAND.
where his war-note was not understood and obeyed
with alacrity. Though this was the case, we do
not mean to say, that all who attended its summons
were animated by pure and disinterested patriotism.
To the ears of many, it probably sounded only as
an invitation to divide the property of their more
wealthy enemies ; whom — under so daring and
fortunate a leader — they never doubted of being
able to conquer ; and it is likely that they would
have obeyed the call with the same promptitude,
had it summoned them to a foray against some
neighbouring clan : but the generosity with which
he divided his own share of the booty among those
who had suffered most, or had borne themselves
with the greatest gallantry in the conflict, gained
him a complete ascendancy over the discordant
materials of which his little armies were frequently
composed ; and rendered him more formidable to
an invader, than all the jarring aristocracy put
together. It is therefore not surprising that the
report of his return should have caused alarm
among the English.
On the night referred to, Wallace had landed in
Scotland, accompanied by Sir Thomas de Longue-
ville, John Blair, Thomas Gray, and a few other
friends who had attended him in France ; and
being near one of his old places of resort, he wished
to gain some knowledge of the state of the country,
to enable him to regulate his further proceedings ;
for this purpose he raised his bugle, and before the
reverberations had died away among the wood-
lands, a rustling was heard among the underwood,
and presently an unarmed Scot stood before him.
From this ready adherent, who had been watching
the landing of the party, Wallace learned the si-
tuation of the kingdom, the slaughters committed
by Edward, the submission of the regency, and the
terror that pervaded the nobility. Finding, from
the number of the English that were in the neigh-
bourhood, the necessity of betaking himself to some
place of concealment, he and his party were con-
ducted by their informer to a farm-house in a se-
cluded part of the country, occupied by a relation
•of Wallace, of the name of Crawfurd. Here he
was joyfully received, and a hiding-place artfully
constructed in the barn, for him and his compa-
nions, where they lurked during the search made
for them by Butler.
In this retreat they might have remained, till
some favourable occurrence had enabled them to
appear more openly ; but it seems the unusual
quantity of provisions which Crawfurd was obliged
to purchase for the maintenance of his guests,
awakened the suspicions of the English at Dundee ;
and on his return, having mentioned the examina-
tion he was subjected to, Wallace and his party
thought it prudent to retire to a neighbouring
thicket, and wait the result. They had not long
adopted this precaution, before a body of the
English made their appearance ; and having sur-
rounded the dwelling of Crawfurd, they discovered,
in the course of search, the lair of the fugitives.
The wife of Crawfurd having refused to answer
their inquiries regarding the route of her visitors,
they were proceeding, by violent measures, to
compel her to disclose the place of their retreat,
when Wallace, ascertaining the danger to which
she was exposed, advanced from the thicket, and
sounded a bold defiance to the enemy. The situa-
tion he had chosen was such as could only be
assailed from three narrow and rugged paths.
These he proposed to guard, by dividing his little
party, which consisted only of about twenty men,
into three divisions ; — with the smallest of these
he undertook to defend the path that was most
exposed to the enemy's attacks. Butler was not
long in commencing the assault, which he did by a
simultaneous movement on all those little parties
of the Scots. The resistance, however, which
he met with, aided by the rugged nature of the
ascent, rendered all the ardour of his troops un-
availing. As the evening advanced, he called
them off; and having beat a chamade,he attempted
to persuade Wallace to surrender, by representing
the folly of continuing a resistance which must
at last terminate in the ruin of himself and his
friends. Our hero replied, by advising him to
stand to his arms ; for in place of surrendering, he
intended, before morning, to become the assailant ;
and he gave him this warning, in return for the
care which he had shown for himself and his com-
panions. Irritated by this coolness, Butler deter-
mined to take every precaution to prevent his
escape ; and for this purpose he kept his men under
arms all night. Wallace, however, was as good
as his word ; for at daybreak, under cover of a
thick mist, he descended at the head of his little
band, and, before the enemy was aware of his
approach, toroke into that quarter where Butler had
his station. The surprise occasioned by his sudden
appearance, threw the English into confusion,
which their uncertainty as to the number of their
assailants greatly increased ; and availing him-
self of the disorder into which they were thrown,
Wallace pressed forward, and came in contact \^ith
Butler, who, after a slight resistance, fell beneath
his arm. The Scots having forced their way
through the enemy, Wallace now discovered that
their faithful host Crawfurd had been left behind.
Returning, therefore, to the charge, he was for-
tunately in time to save him from the spear of an
English soldier, whom he slew ; and grasping his
wounded friend in one of his arms, he carried him
off in triumph to his companions. Favoured, by
the denseness of the fog, the gallant little band
were soon lost to their pursuers. Though thus
relieved from their perilous situation, they are said
to have suffered the greatest privations in the wild
and unfrequented solitudes to which they were
now obliged to retire. However, their indefati-
gable chief, always fertile in expedients, found
means to preserve them from actual starvation,
till Edward withdrew his troops, for the purpose of
resuming his march of subjugation throughout the
kingdom.
The time which the English monarch spent in
the southern part of Scotland, it appears had not
altogether been employed in the chastisement of
those who were most active in the late insurrec-
tion. With a policy worthy of himself, he endea-
voured to obliterate the remembrance of national
independence, by ransacking the monasteries, and
carrying off, and committing to the flames, all the
ancient records they contained ; so that the Scots
in future might have no documents to produce
which could falsify his claims to sovereignty over
them *. In this proceeding he might have been
* On the charge which has been made against Edward,
for destroying the records and monuments of Scotland, Lord
80
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xx.
partly influenced, by the discussion he had been
engaged in with Boniface. Having, to his spiritual
Hailes thus expresses himself: — " While the English were
at Scone, they carried cff some of the charters belonging to
the abbey, and tore the seals from others. This is the only
well-vouched example which I have found of any outrage
on private property committed by Edward's army. It is
mentioned in a charter of Robert I. ; and we may be assured
that the outrage was not diminished in the relating." Had
this escaped from any other pen than that of a lawyer, it
might have been considered as proceeding from ignorance ;
but being from a Judge on the Bench, we are at a loss what
term to apply to it. The charter of Robert I. (Chart. Scone,
26.) was given in order to confirm former grants, and thus
replace those which either had been carried off, or had their
seals torn from them. To have inserted a narrative of all
spoliations of a similar nature, which Edward and his army
had committed in Scotland, would have been irrelevant;
and we conceive that the expense of engrossing into a private
charter what belonged to the annals of the country, would
not have been relished by the brethren of Scone. Had a
case of expenses, incurred, in a manner so uncalled for,
come under his Lordship's review, we presume he would
have sustained the objections of the defender. All that
could appear with propriety in the charter, was an account
of the destruction of those prior grants, which rendered a
new charter necessary ; and this document, if it proves any
thing, proves the wanton and destructive malice of the
invaders, when they would not permit even private pro-
perty, the destruction of which could be of no service to
themselves, to escape their violence. It would be of no
avail, where Lord Hailes is concerned, to quote Scottish
authorities in support of the charge against Edward, as a
destroyer of public records ; we shall therefore give the fol-
lowing extract, from the works of a learned, intelligent, and
candid Englishman — an evidence which, we presume, few
of his Lordship's admirers will object to :— " King Eugene
VII., about the beginning of the eighth century, is said to
have ordered the depositing of all records, and books relating
to the history of Scotland, at Icolm-kill; where he caused
their old library (much neglected and decayed) to be pulled
down and rebuilt in a very splendid manner, for this sole
use and purpose. How long they continued there, and how
well that excellent King's design was answered, I know
not ; but it is now too sad a truth, that most of these vene-
rable remains of antiquity are quite perished ; and it is
generally agreed, that they were destroyed on three remark-
able occasions. The first of these was, when our King
Edward the First, having claimed the sovereignty of Scot-
land, made a most miserable havock of the histories and laws
of that kingdom; hoping that, in a short time, nothing
should be found in all that country, but what carried an
English name and face. To this end, he forbad, on severe
penalties, the keeping of any such books or records ; and
proceeded so far as even to abolish the very name of
Claudius Caesar in his famous round temple, which he
ordered to be called, as it is to this day, Arthur's Hoff,
pulling away the stone which preserved the memory of that
great emperor and his conquests. That a great deal of this
story is true, appears from the scarcity of Scotch records in
our State-archives in England. Amongst the foreign treaties
in the Exchequer, there are about 70 original instruments,
bagged up, and inscribed, ' Scotia ante Unionem :' And in
the Tower, about 100 Rolls, relating to the affairs of that
kingdom, under the title of Scotia. The former of these
begin at the reign of Edward the First, and end with that of
Queen Elizabeth ; and the latter commences as before, but
falls no lower than the reign of Edward the Fourth, the rest
being to be looked for in the Chapel of the Rolls. But these
are all the produce of our own country; and, instead of
enriching us with the spoils of our neighbours, seem rather
to prove, that King Edward had an equal spite at the ancient
records of both kingdoms — so little is there of apology to be
made for so notorious a destroyer of the public registers,
father, so solemnly asserted the justice of his claim,
it was but natural that he should wish to possess
or destroy every evidence which might establish
his asseverations ; and this object being, as he con-
ceived, so far accomplished, he proceeded with his
army, by slow marches, towards the North, exer-
cising the same Gothic barbarity as he went along,
and demolishing those fortresses which made any
show of resistance.
According to Henry, a number of the old asso-
ciates of Wallace, before his return from France,
had fled for shelter to the islands and other places
for security. Seton, Lauder, and Lundy retired to
the Bass. Malcolm, Earl of Lennox, and Sir Niel
Campbell, had sought concealment along with
Bishop Sinclair in Bute * ; and these last men-
tioned worthies, on hearing of the arrival of Wal-
lace, despatched a messenger to find him out, and
explain the difficulties of their situation, and their
readiness to join him as soon as he approached
their present places of refuge. They had not to
wait long, before our hero issued forth with his
little band, and collected those who were still
inclined to struggle for the liberties of Scotland.
At the head of such he followed the invading army,
and appearing now in front, and now in rear, made
frequent and impressive attacks upon them as they
struggled through the deep and rugged defiles of
the country. But all his efforts could not retard
the march of the invaders. They advanced to the
extremity of the kingdom, unmolested by any save
the hardy followers of our hero, who, however, as
they had attended the motions of their foes in their
laborious progress through the rough and moun-
tainous regions of the North, now waited their
return, and resumed the same harassing system of
warfare. Often, from an eminence, Edward could
together with the private monuments, evidences, and con-
veyances of lands ! I do not doubt but the reason of such
barbarity has been justly enough assigned, by those who
represent him as ' having a jealous eye over any thing that
might encourage his new vassals to rebel, endeavouring to
root out all memorials of the nobility, and to embase their
spirits, by concealing from them their descent and qualities-.'
I have seen a manuscript list of such records as were carried
off by his order. It begins, Ista monumenta subscripta capta
fuerunt in thesaurario de Edinburg in presentia Abbatum de
Dunfermelyn 8? de S. Cruce de Edinburg, &j Johannis de
Lythegranes, Guil-de Lincoln, fy Thos. de Fisseburn 8? Guil-de
Dumfreys, custodis rotulorum regni Scotice ; et deposita sunt
apud Berwick per prcsceptum Edwardi regis Anglies fy supe-
rioris domini Scotia;. Videlicet, &c. After the recital of
them, the catalogue ends : In quorum omnium testimonium
tarn predictus dominus rex Edwardus Angliae Sf superior
dominus Scotia quam predictus dominus Joh: de Balliolo
rex Scolice, huic scripto, in modum chirographi confecto,
si ff ilia sua alternatim fecerunt apponi. dat. apud Novum Cas-
trum super Tynam 30 die mentis Decembris anno dom. 1292,
8j regni predicti domini Edwardi regis Angliee fy superioris
domini Scotice, 2lmo. The second great loss of the Scotch
records happened upon the mighty turn of the Reformation ;
when the monks, flying to Rome, carried with them the
register-books, and other ancient treasure of their respective
monasteries. The third, and killing blow, was given them
by Oliver Cromwell, who brought most of the poor remains
that were left into England ; and they likewise were mostly
lost in their return by sea." See Nicolson's Scottish Historical
Library, p. 71, 72, 4to edition.
* It is possible that these noblemen may have been some
way or other connected with the depot of silver, alluded to
at page 32, as having been found at Ascog in Bute.
THAP. XXI.]
HE REJECTS EDWARD'S OVERTURE.
81
distinguish the lofty plume of the Scottish leader, as
he dashed forward to charge some isolated corps
of the English army ; and while he beheld the
enthusiasm with which his conduct inspired his
followers, and saw the disorder of his own soldiers,
hurrying to gain the protection of the main body,
his heart misgave him as to the stability of his
conquest, while Scotland contained a man whose
appearance alone was capable of inspiring his
friends with so much confidence, and his enemies
with so much dread.
CHAPTER XXI.
EDWARD'S POLICY RESPECTING THE SETTLEMENT OF
SCOTLAND — ENDEAVOURS TO GAIN WALLACE TO HIS
INTEREST — SIEGE OF STIRLING IT SURRENDERS
CONDUCT OF EDWARD TOWARDS THE PRISONERS
HALIBURTON UNDERTAKES TO BETRAY WALLACE.
EDWARD having returned from the bleak regions
of the North, took up his quarters in Dunferm-
line *, judging that his presence in the country,
during the winter, would contribute much towards
establishing his authority, as he had formerly
observed, that the places he had conquered from
the Scots in summer, were generally retaken when
the severe weather set in. He accordingly took
every precaution for the comfort of his troops ;
large supplies of provisions being ordered, both by
sea and land, that his army might not be placed in
such difficulties as had formerly compelled him to
retreat into England.
In order, also, to secure his present conquest,
he began to assimilate the state of the country
as much as possible to that of his other domi-
nions ; and, for this purpose, he abrogated all
the old laws and customs — substituting those of
England in their stead f. In the prosecution of
this object, he announced a parliament at St.
Andrew's, which was attended by all Scotsmen of
any note, except Sir William Wallace, Sir Simon
Frazer,and Sir William Oliphant, governor of Stir-
ling Castle, the latter of whom refused either to
appear or surrender the trust, which had been com-
mitted to him by Lord Soulis, who happened then
to be in France. Of this fortress, which was now
the only one that held out against him, Edward de-
termined to gain possession as soon as the season
would permit. As to Wallace, it is said, that, at
* If we may credit Langtoft, Comyn, Frazer, and Wallace
were lurking in the neighbourhood of Dunfermline at the
time, and supported themselves by plunder. His words are,
" The lord of Badenauh, Freselle & Waleis
Lyued at theues lauh euer robband alle weis.
Thei had no sustenance, the werre to mayntene,
Bot skulked opon chance, & robbed ay betuene."
t " He brint all the Chronicles of Scotland, with all maner
of bukis, als weill of devyne seruyce as of othir materis, to
that fyne that the memorye of Scottis suld peris. He gart
the Scottis wryte bukis efter the vse of Sarum, and constranit
thaym to say efter that vse." — Boeth.
" Salysbery oyss our clerkis than has tane."
Wallace, B. x. 1006.
this time, among other great offers, he tendered
him the crown of Scotland, provided he would
accept of it in fee of the crown of England ; to
which, with his usual dignity, Wallace replied,
that as he had been born a free man, he was deter-
mined to die one ; and that he preferred rather
to be the subject of his lawful sovereign, than the
crowned slave of one who had no right to his
allegiance *. That Edward was sincere in this
offer, is a matter of considerable doubt ; — he had
already cajoled others by similar proposals, and he
might naturally conceive, that although Wallace
should not be caught by the bait, the offer would
have the effect of exciting the suspicions of his
countrymen, and thereby weakening his influence
among them. But whatever his motives may have
been, Wallace sternly rejected all compromise, and
remained the only Scotsman who never acknow-
ledged his authority. On the present occasion, Sir
Simon Frazer followed his example, for which the
tyrant passed sentence of banishment and outlawry
against him. This gallant gentleman, who now
adhered to the fortunes of Wallace, had given
great offence to Edward, by the conspicuous part
he had acted at the battle of Roslin, as it was
generally believed to have been owing principally
to him that the English sustained the mortifying
defeat.
1304. Early in the spring Edward discovered,
that, through the exertions of Wallace and Frazer,
a body of troops had been got together ; in order to
disperse which, before it became too formidable,
he took the field, and proceeded towards Stirling,
in the neighbourhood of which it had assembled.
The force under the patriots, however, when com-
pared with the enemy, was so very insignificant,
that they prudently retreated to their former places
of refuge. On the 21st April the siege of Stirling
commenced, and continued without intermission
till the 24th July ; thus occupying Edward and
his army for three months and three days, during
which time every artifice was put in practice, and
every piece of mechanism then known was directed
against the besieged.
The stubbornness of the garrison, however,
seemed to increase as the means of annoyance mul-
tiplied around them ; and the anxiety of Edward
to gain this last strong hold of the liberties of Scot-
land was displayed, by his close and unremitting
* Fordun relates, that when this offer was made to Wal-
lace, and on his being pressed by his friends to comply, he
thus expressed himself : — "O! desolated Scotland, too cre-
dulous of fair speeches, and not aware of the calamities
which are coming upon you \ If you were to judge as I do,
you would not easily put your neck under a foreign yoke.
When I was a boy, the priest, my uncle, carefully inculcated
upon me this proverb, which I then learned, and have ever
since kept in my mind :—
' Dico tibi verum, Libertas optima rerum ;
Nunquam servili sub nexu vivito, fili.'
' I tell you a truth,— Liberty is the best of things, my
son, never live under any slavish bond.'
" Therefore, I shortly declare, that if all others, the natives
of Scotland, should obey the King of England, or were to
part with the liberty which belongs to them, I and those
who may be willing to adhere to me in this point, will stand
for the liberty of the kingdom ; and by God's assistance, will
only obey the King, viz. John Baliol, or his Lieutenant."
G
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xxi.
attendance on the details of the siege. Though
now advanced in years, he is represented as ex-
posing himself with all the imprudent gallantry of
a youthful warrior ; and on one or two occasions
he had nearly fallen a victim to his temerity.
While riding near the walls, a stone, from one of
the engines at work on the rampart, struck the
ground before him with so much violence, that his
horse backed, and fell under him ; and at another
time, a javelin, thrown by a soldier on the wall,
struck him on the breast, and stuck between the
plates of his armour. The point of the missile,
however, had not pierced the skin. Pulling it out
with his hand, he shook it in defiance, and loudly
proclaimed that he would hang the villain who had
hit him. In the mean time, the engines belong-
ing to the castle were so well managed, and the
enormous stones which they threw, so skilfully
directed, that great numbers of the besiegers were
destroyed.
Edward now saw, that, without still greater
efforts, the place was not likely soon to capitulate.
He therefore wrote to London, and other towns in
England, ordering the most powerful engines to be
sent him, with supplies of javelins, quarrells, and
other missiles ; and the lead was torn from the roof
of the Cathedral of St. Andrew's to furnish mate-
rials for the siege. Thirteen engines of the largest
size were at last brought to bear upon the castle,
one of which, called by Langtoft " the Ludgare *, or
Lurdare of Strivelyn," was of the most formidable
description. This " hidous engyn," when put in
operation, made tremendous breaches in the walls,
which the besieged in vain attempted to repair ;
and after many destructive sallies, and " fulle and
hard affrays," and a siege unparalleled in the his-
tory of the war — their provisions exhausted, and
their walls torn to pieces — Sir William Oliphant
and his brave little garrison were forced to sur-
render at discretion. Every possible indignity
which a tyrannical mind destitute of generosity,
and exasperated by opposition, could inflict, was
now heaped upon the gallant defenders. They
were compelled to go in procession to the tent
of Edward, and — denuded of every garment save
their shirts, their heads and feet uncovered — on
their bended knees, with uplifted hands, had thus
to implore his clemency ; upon which their 'mag-
nanimous conqueror condescended to spare their
lives, and sent them to expiate their offences in
the dungeons of England. The garrison, according
to Langtoft, consisted of Sir William Oliphant,
Sir William Duplin, twenty gentlemen of inferior
degree, a preaching friar, a monk, and thirteen
" maydens and ladies." The common soldiers are
said to have amounted to 140, whose names, it is
to be regretted, have not been preserved. The
following are all that remain on record : —
Domini Willielmus Olyfard.
"Willielmus de Dupplyn,
milites.
Fergus de Ardrossan.
Robinus de Ardrossan,
frater ejus.
Willielmus de Ramseya.
Hugo de Ramseya.
Radulfus de Haleburton.
Domini Thomas de Knell-
hulle.
Thomas Lellay.
Patricius de Polleworche.
Hugo Olyfard.
Walterius Olyfard.
Willielmus Gyffard.
Alanus de Vypont.
Andreas Wychard.
* This is evidently a corruption of Loup de guerre.
Domini Godefridus le Botiller. Frater Willielmus de
Johannes le Naper. Keth, ordinis Sancti
Willielmus le Scherere. Dominici Prsedicato-
Hugo le Botiller. rum.
Johannes de Kulgas. Frater Petrus de Ederes-
Willielmus de Anart. ton de domo de Kel-
Robertus de Ranfru. sou, ordinis Sancti
Walterus Taylleu. Benedicti.
Simon Larmerer.
The proceedings of Edward at length gave
umbrage to Cumyn and Bruce. These chieftains,
after Baliol, had the nearest pretensions to the
crown, and they had both been amused by Edward
with hopes of the kingdom. In the destruction,
however, of the fortresses, and the alterations he
had made in the constitution of the country, they
saw little that tended towards the fulfilment of the
promises he had made them. Cumyn, therefore,
having found an opportunity, broke the matter to
Bruce, by lamenting the state to which their coun-
try was reduced by the power or policy of Edward,
who endeavoured to sow discord among those
whose interest it was to be friends ; and by taking
advantage of the animosities he thus excited, fur-
thered his own ambitious and tyrannical designs.
These remarks begat the confidence of his rival,
who communicated without reserve the promises
that had been held out to him by Edward ; which
drew from Cumyn a proposal for the delivery of
their country, in which he offered to give Bruce
his estates, on condition that he relinquished his
claim, and assisted him to gain the crown ; or
to accept of Bruce's estates on the same terms.
Bruce, who considered his claim to be better
founded than that of Cumyn, agreed to make over
his estates on attaining to the kingdom through
the assistance of Cumyn ; and a private bond was
entered into between them for this purpose *. In
* The existence of the bond or covenant between Bruce
and Cumyn, though subjected to the doubts of Lord Hailes,
is recorded by all our respectable authorities. The objec-
tions of his Lordship arose from the difficulty the parties
would have experienced in effecting the contract. "It must
be held extraordinary," says our learned annalist, " that the
two conspirators met together, should have committed such
a secret to writing, as if it had been a legal covenant to have
force in a court of justice ; but more extraordinary still, that
they should have done this at the imminent hazard of
intrusting their lives and fortunes to the fidelity of a third
party ; for I presume, it will be admitted, that two Scottish
barons, in that age. could not have framed such an inden-
ture without assistance." His Lordship, in his 2eal to
diminish the authority of preceding historians, often forgets
the manners and customs of the age respecting which he
writes, and assimilates them too closely to those of his own
times. Were it not for this, he would have seen neither
difficulty nor danger in two barons of such extensive terri-
torial possessions and feudal influence, procuring a person
properly qualified, and whose secrecy, had it been doubted,
they would have had no hesitation in effectually securing,
either by imprisonment or otherwise. Even if their power
did not extend to this, as the bond was not left in the pos-
session of the drawer, where was the danger ? Would any
person whose education enabled him to frame such an instru-
ment, have been so extremely foolish as attempt to charge
two of the most powerful noblemen of the kingdom with
treason, without the least shadow of proof to support the
accusation ? Bonds of manrent were never intended to be
brought into a court of law, and all his Lordship's expe-
CHAP. XXI. ]
HALIBURTON UNDERTAKES TO BETRAY HIM.
order to cover their intentions, Bruce agreed to
accompany Edward to London, and leave his
brother, Edward Bruce, to attend to his interest in
Scotland.
The English monarch having now, as he thought,
completely depressed the spirit of the Scots, and
brought them effectually under his yoke, began to
make preparations for his return to England ; and
with this view, he appointed Adomer de Vallence
regent or viceroy of the kingdom, filling all places
of trust with Englishmen, or such creatures among
the Scots as he found suitable to his purpose.
Having made these, and such other arrangements
as his policy suggested, he returned home in
triumph, firmly persuaded that he had finally re-
duced the kingdom of Scotland to the condition of
a province of England.
rience would not have furnished him with a single instance
of an attempt to enforce the fulfilment of such a contract by
legal means. Bonds of this kind were entered into for the
purpose of strengthening the feudal connections of the par-
ties ; and infidelity under such compacts carried its punish-
ment along with it, by the want of confidence it created
among the other feudal proprietors. That such bondsmen
were looked upon with extreme jealousy by the Legislature,
is sufficiently evident from the conduct of James II. towards
Lord Douglas; "a court of justice," therefore, was not the
place to get their penalties recognized.
The transaction is thus related by Wyntown, with whom
Barbour agrees in every particular, and by which it will be
seen, that "the two conspirators" did not "meet together,"
as his Lordship asserts, but were riding together to Stirling;
and the instrument was drawn and sealed the same night in
that place : —
" Quhen all this sawe the Brws Robert,
That bare the Crowne swne eftyrwart,
Gret pytte of the folk he had,
Set few wordis tharof he mad.
A-pon a tyme Schyr Jhon Cwmyn,
To gydder rydand fra Strevylyn,
Said til hym, ' Schyr, will yhe noucht se,
How that governyd is this cuntre ?
Thai sla cure Folk but enchesown,
And haldis this Land agayne resown;
And yhe thar-of full Lord suld be.
For-thi gyve ye will trow to me,
Yhe sail gere mak yhow thare-of Kyng ,
And I sail be in yhoure helpyng,
Wyth-thi yhe gyve me all the Land,
That yhe hawe now in-til yhoure hand,
And gyve that yhe will noucht do swa,
Na swilk a State a-pon yhowe ta,
All hale my Landis sail yhowris be;
And lat me ta the State on me,
And bryng this Land owt of Thryllage.
For thare is nother man n& page
In all this Land na thayne sal be
Fayne to mak thaime selfyn fre.'
" The Lord the Brws hard his karpyng,
And wend he spak hot faythful thyng :
And for it lykyd til his will,
He gave swne his Consent thare-til,
And sayd, ' Syne yhe will, it be swa,
I will blythly a-pon me ta
The State ; for I wate, I have Rycht :
And Rycht oft makis the febil wycht.'
" Thus ther twa Lordis accordyt are.
That ilke nycht than wryttyne ware
Thare Indentwris, and Aithis made
Til hald all, that thai spokyn had."
V. ii. p. 123.
Edward, however, had scarcely arrived in Lon-
don, before accounts from the North convinced him
of the uncertain nature of his conquest, so long as
Wallace remained at large in the country ; and
as neither threats nor promises could subdue his
inflexible fidelity to the liberties of his native land,
large rewards were offered for securing his person,
dead or alive. Influenced by the great promises
held out to him, Ralph de Haliburton *, one of
* It is with regret that we find this recreant's name in the
list of the defenders of Stirling. Emancipation from a dun-
geon, and the prospect of attaining to great riches, were no
doubt powerful motives. Whether the following relation in
Henry has any subsequent connection with this individual,
we must leave our readers to determine. If it does, he
appears to have received from the hand of our hero the
recompence of his labours.
The small party of adherents which still clung to the
fortunes of Wallace and the cause of independence, were
reduced to the greatest distress for want of provisions. Our
hero had left them, in order to look out for a place where
they might obtain supplies ; and, while wandering through
the wilds of Lorn, overcome by hunger and fatigue, he threw
himself down in despair at the entrance of a forest, when
the following adventure occurred to him :—
" Out off thair sycht, in till a forest syd,
He sat him doun wndyr ane ayk to bid ;
His bow and suerd he lenyt till a tre,
In angwyss greiff, on grouff so turned he.
His petows mynd was for his men so wrocht,
That off him seifflitill as then he roucht.
1 0 wrech ! ' he said, ' that neuir couth be content
Off our gret mycht that the gret God the lent :
Bot thi fers mynd, wylfull and wariable,
With gret lordschip thow coud nocht so byd stable ;
And wylfull witt, for to mak Scotland fre ;
God likis nocht that I haiff tane on me.
Fer worthyar of byrth than I was born,
Throuch my desyr wyth hungyr ar forlorn :
I ask at God thaim to restor agayn ;
I am the causs, I suld haiff all the pain.'
Quhill studeand thus, whill flitand with him sell,
Quhill at the last apon slepyng he fell.
Thre days befor thar had him folowed fyve,
The quhilk was bound, or ellis to loss thair lyff:
The erl off York bad thaim so gret gardoun,
At thai be thy ft hecht to put Wallace doun. ,
Thre off thaim was all born men offlngland,
And twa was Scottis, that tuk this deid on hand ;
And sum men said, thar thrid brothir betraissed
Kyldrome eft, quhar gret sorow was raissed.
A child thai had, quhilk helpyit to her mett
In wildernes amang thai montans grett.
Thai had all seyn disseuyring off Wallace
Fra his gud men, and quhar he baid on cace ;
Amang thyk wod in cowert held thaim law,
Quhill thai persawyt he couth on sleping faw.
And than thir fyve approchit Wallace neir ;
Quhat best to do, at othir can thai speir.
A man said thus : ' It war a hie renoun,
And we mycht qwyk leid him to Sanct Jhonstoun,
Lo, how he lyis ; we may our grippis waill ;
Off his wapynnys he sal get nane awaill.
We sail him bynd in contrar off hys will,
And leid him thus on baksyd off yon hill,
So that his men sail nothing off him knaw.'
The tothir thre assentit till his saw ;
And than thir fyve thus maid thaim to Wallace,
And thocht throw force to bynd him in that place.
Quhat, trowit thir fyve for to hald Wallace doun 1
The manlyast man, the starkest off persoun,
Leyffand he was ; and als stud in sic rycht,
We traist weill, God his dedis had in sycht.
G 2 Thai
OJb' SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xxn.
thfc- prisoners whom Edward nad carried with him
into England, undertook the perfidious office, and
for that purpose was allowed to return to Scot-
land. Of his after proceedings, we have, however,
but a very imperfect outline ; and from all that we
can collect, his exertions in his villanous mission
appear to have been limited to one or two at-
tempts ; in the last of which, from his knowledge
of Wallace and his retreats, he contrived to have
him beset by a strong body of cavalry, in a situa-
tion where he had no way of escape, but by spring-
ing his horse over a precipice. This he effected ;
and his pursuers, drawing back with horror, left
him to pursue his retreat on foot, his gallant steed
having perished in the fearful enterprise.
After this, it is supposed that Haliburton,
alarmed for the consequence of his conduct, and
dreading the vengeance of his countrymen, re-
turned with precipitation to England.
CHAPTER XXII.
STATE OF THE COUNTRY — BRUCE INVITED TO TAKE THE
CROWN — CONDUCT OF CUMYN TOWARDS BRUCE —
NOTICE OF CUMYN TRADITION RESPECTING THE
CLAN CUMYN — NOTICE OF KERLE — WALLACE BE-
TRAYED BY MENTEITH.
THE situation of Scotland, after the departure of
Edward, was such as well warranted the repre-
sentation that had been transmitted to England.
Though there had as yet been no open insurrec-
tion, still there was that in the bearing of the
people, which betokened any thing but good will
towards the existing state of things. The national
sports and customs of the English, which it had
been attempted to introduce among them, were
shunned and disregarded by the oppressed and
scowling population ; while those chiefs who had
formerly shown the greatest attachment to the
cause of independence, were seldom heard of, ex-
cept when discovered holding their conferences in
those sequestered retreats, where they considered
themselves secure from all, save the wandering
spies employed by the faithless part of their own
countrymen.
Thai grippyt him, than out off slepe he braid ;
' Quhat menys this ?' rycht sodandly he said,
About he turnyt, and wp his armys thrang ;
On thai traytouris with knychtlik fer he danj.
The starkast man in till his armys hynt he,
And all his harnys he dang out on a tree.
A sword he gat son efter at he rayss,
Campiounlik amang the four he gais ;
Euyr a man he gert de at a dynt.
Quhen twa was ded, the tothir wald nocht stynt ;
Maid thaim to fle ; bot than it was na but,
Was nane leyffand mycht pass fra him on fut.
He folowed fast, and sone to ded thaim brocht ;
Than to the chyld sadly agayn he socht,
' Quhat did thow her?' The. child with [ane] paill face,
On kneis he fell, and askyt Wallace grace.
' With thaim I was, and knew nothing thair thocht ;
In to seruice, as thai me bad, I wrocht.'
' Quhat berys thow her ? ' ' Bot meit, the child can say.'
Do, turss it wp, and pass with me away,
Meit in this tym is fer bettyr than gold.'
Wallace now saw that the state of the country
required a different remedy from that which had
hitherto been applied. Baliol, whom he had
acknowledged as his righteous sovereign, though
detained a prisoner in England, had, through the
menaces of Edward, made over to that monarch
his right to the crown and kingdom of Scotland.
This act, in the opinion of Wallace, released him
from his allegiance to one who had all along acted
a part unworthy of his attachment ; for, though
he admitted his right to resiyn the crown, yet he
could not recognise a right to transfer it to a
stranger, to the exclusion of the lawful heir ; and
as Edward, the son of Baliol, was also the prisoner
and tool of the King of England, he naturally fixed
his attention on Bruce, as the person best fitted,
from his birth and talents, to infuse that confidence
in the people which necessarily arises from the
presence of a person invested with lawful autho-
rity. Having found no difficulty in impressing Sir
Simon Frazer, and those other chiefs who adhered
to him, with the same sentiments, a negociation
was entered into with Edward Bruce, for inviting
his brother from England to assume the crown ;
and it is also said, that a special herald* from
Wallace and his confederates found his way to
Bruce in disguise, who appointed to meet with
our hero on a certain night on the burrow-muir of
Glasgow.
1305. In the meantime, Wallace and his friends
were active in organizing the insurrection, which
was to burst forth as soon as Bruce appeared
among them, and who was at the same time to
have been proclaimed king. How far Cumyn was
consulted on the occasion, by Wallace and his as-
sociates, does not appear. From the very little
intercourse which seems to have subsisted between
them since the fatal battle of Falkirk, it is highly
probable that the accession of our patriot and his
party, to the proposal for placing Bruce on the
throne, was communicated to Cumyn through the
medium of Edward Bruce — the fiery temperament
of whose mind was not always in unison with those
maxims of sound policy necessary for conducting
affairs of such moment. Whether Cumyn had
ever been sincere in the agreement entered into
with the Earl of Carrick, or whether he afterwards
repented of the bargain he had made, is a point
not easily to be ascertained ; but with a duplicity
worthy of his conduct on a former occasion, he is
said to have despatched the bond between himself
and Bruce to Edward ; urging, at the same time,
the arrestment of his rival, as necessary to prevent
the disturbance that was on the eve of breaking
out in Scotland.
It might be considered by our readers an omis-
sion, were we to bring our labours to a close, with-
out embodying in our pages a more particular ac-
count of this subtle and talented baron, than what
has hitherto appeared in the course of the narra-
tive. To obviate this objection, perhaps the fol-
lowing brief outline, in addition to what has already
been stated, may suffice.
John Cumyn, or as he is called by the Gael,
Ian Ruadh Mhac Ian Ruadh Chiumein (Red John,
the son of Red John Gumming), was Lord of Bade-
noch, Lochaber, and other extensive districts, and
* According to Henry, Gilbert Grymsby, or, as he is called
by the Scots, Jop, was employed in this mission.
CHAP. XXII.]
TRADITION OF THE CLAN CUMYN.
85
the head of the most potent clan that ever existed
in Scotland. His power was more formidable than
any of his fellow-competitors for the crown. Up-
wards of sixty belted knights and their vassals
were bound to follow his banner ; and the influence
of the family was such, that during the minority of
Alexander III., after driving from Scotland a
strong faction, formed and supported by the in-
terest of England, the Cumyns and their adherents
negociated a treaty with Llewellyn, a prince of
Wales. In this instrument, John, the father of the
subject of the present notice, appears as Justiciary
of Galloway. This document is preserved in Ry-
mer's Fcedera, vol. i. p. 653. Those, however, who
may not have access to that work, may have their
curiosity gratified, by referring to Tytler's History
of Scotland, vol. i. p. 424.
It is uncertain at what time John Cumyn suc-
ceeded to his father. He appears, however, in
1289, as joint agent along with James the Steward,
in the letter of the community of Scotland, directed
to Edward I., from Brigham. According to Henry,
he was married to a cousin of the King of England ;
and this, from all authorities, seems to have been
the case, for he espoused Joan, the sister of Aymer
de Vallence, whose father, William de Vallence,
Earl of Pembroke, was uterine brother to Henry III.
With this powerful connexion, he no doubt ex-
pected a different decision in the submission re-
specting the throne of Scotland. This disappoint-
ment, in all probability, made him afterwards more
ready to join the insurrection under Wallace ; and if
it had not been for the odium which he afterwards
drew upon himself by his conduct at the battle of
Falkirk, he might have figured in the annals of his
country with a fair and honourable reputation.
While regent of Scotland, his behaviour was not
only unexceptionable, but often praiseworthy. This
however may have been partly owing to the strict
surveillance which Wallace still exercised in the
affairs of the country, or partly from a wish to con-
ciliate his countrymen, in the event of a favourable
opportunity occurring for his obtaining the crown,
— an object of ambition of which it is pretty evi-
dent he never lost sight.
The treachery towards Bruce, which has been
charged against him by all authorities except Lord
Hailes, also tended to deepen the stain on his cha-
racter. This charge, whether true or false, we
have no means of ascertaining. A number of the
objections stated by his Lordship against it are,
however, of considerable weight. That a bond
existed between them of the tenor already de-
scribed, there is little doubt ; and that the terms
of this bond became afterwards matter of dispute,
there is some reason to believe, as the fulfilment of
it would have been dangerous to both. For had
Bruce been placed on the throne by the assistance
of Cumyn, and the latter had received the estates
of Bruce, according to agreement, he would have
been a subject far too powerful for the crown ; and
vice versa in the case of Bruce. The quarrel,
therefore, which subsequently took place in the
chapel of Dumfries, and which ended in the death
of Cuinyn (the particulars of which are known to
every reader), might have arisen in an altercation
respecting the difficulties involved in the comple-
tion of the bond, without either party having been
guilty of a breach of faith. It was no doubt the
policy of Bruce and his confederates, that the
stain of treachery should be affixed on the name of
Cumyn, as it afforded the only plausible excuse
for committing a murder in a place of such reputed
sanctity. Indeed the circumstance of the latter
having requested an interview within the precincts
of a church, showed nothing like a premeditated
intention to quarrel ; but since the deed was com-
mitted, it seemed necessary to the future safety
and views of Bruce and his faction, that with the
influence the character of the Cumyns should be
diminished. That they assisted in this last object
themselves, is but too apparent ; otherwise it would
be difficult to account for that odium which after-
wards became attached to them. For while the
Scots, in the Low country, cried out against the
" fause Cumyn's Kyn," their vassals in Badenoch
and Lochaber re-echoed the charge, till the very
name became cognominal with deceit ; so much
so, that the following proverb is at this day re-
membered in those parts of the Highlands to
which their influence extended :
" Fhad's a bhios crann an c6ille,
Bi'dh foill an Cuimeineach."
" While there are trees in a wood, there will be deceit in
a Cumyn."
We will not however assert, that the enmity of
the Gael arose from the conduct of the Cumyns in
the Low country ; for if we may credit tradition
still current in the West Highlands, this once
powerful and oppressive family gave sufficient
cause, in their own territorial bounds, for the an-
tipathy of their neighbours and vassals. The
atrocities which they committed in their castles of
Inverlochy, Badenoch, and other strongholds which
they polluted with their crimes, at last roused the
slumbering vengeance of the people ; and tradition,
in her vague manner, dates the downfal of this
potent clan, from the time of " Cumyn's flight from
Onnich." At what period this occurred, cannot
now be exactly ascertained ; but with the particu-
lars of the story we shall close this imperfect
notice : —
The Cumyns, it seems, in the plenitude of their
power, paid little attention, when it suited their
wishes, to the abrogation of the infamous law of
Evenus, and the " mercheta mulierum " was gene-
rally spurned, when the charms of the bride hap-
pened to please the eye of the chief. It would
seem that three marriages were about to take place
at Onnich, a little town on the borders of Lochaber.
The women were beautiful, and the men spirited
and brave. The half-merit had been tendered at
the gates of Inverlochy, by the bridegrooms and
their friends, and the refusal of it by the chief gave
them reason to apprehend the fate that was in-
tended for them. The case excited deep interest.
The day of marriage approached, and brought
along with it the Lord of Badenoch and his two
sons, with their usual retinue. The half-merk was
again tendered, and refused. The men drew their
swords, determined to guard the purity of their
fair ones. A conflict ensued ; friends gathered to
the assistance of the injured ; the two sons of
Cumyn were killed ; while he, with the remains
of his myrmidons, betook himself to flight. The
country arose and made after him, till the affair
swelled to a general insurrection. All his train
were sacrificed to the fury of the pursuers, many,
8G
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. XXIT.
no doubt, having more serious grievances to re-
venge. The flight continued till their obnoxious
chief reached a hill near the present site of Fort
Augustus ; — where, overcome with fatigue, he was
seen to sit down apparently to rest himself. On
coming up to him, however, they found that the
wretched man had already paid the forfeit of his
crimes. He was carried down and buried on the
spot where the fort now stands, which is still known
to old Highlanders by the name of " Gill Chiumein,"
or the burial-place of Cumyn ; and the hill on
which he died retains to this day the appellation of
" Suidh Chiumein" or Cumyn's Seat. Very few of
the clan are now to be found in these districts.
To return to our narrative : Wallace, who, as
he conceived, among other friends, had secured
the co-operation of Sir John Menteith to the mea-
sures then in agitation, for the purpose, it is sup-
posed, of giving as early notice as possible of the
arrival of Bruce, had retained near his person a
young man related to Menteith *, who was to" have
been despatched with the news to Dumbarton, as
soon as their future monarch should arrive, when
that important fortress was to have declared in his
favour.
Confiding in the arrangements thus made, Wal-
lace, as the time appointed by Bruce drew near,
collected his followers round Glasgow, and dis-
posed of them in such a manner, as to be able to
bring them together on the shortest notice f. For
the better concealment of his design, he retired to
a small lonely house at Robroyston, about three
miles north-west of Glasgow. Here he waited
with impatience for the night on which Bruce had
appointed to meet him, little dreaming of the dan-
ger to which his intended sovereign was exposed,
through the conduct of Cumyn, nor of the treachery
that was hatching against himself.
The means which were employed to accomplish
the destruction of Bruce, would have been of very
little avail towards securing the objects intended,
so long as his brother and our hero — who had now
identified himself with the interest of the Brucian
party — remained to head the insurrection that was
expected to break out ; and as all the magnificent
promises of Edward had been unable to subdue the
stern virtue of the patriot, his emissaries now be-
thought themselves of assailing the fidelity of those
friends in whom he seemed chiefly to confide. Un-
fortunately for the cause of liberty, their allure-
ments were but too successful ; and the honour of
his early friend, Sir John Menteith, gave way to
the arts of the tempter.
On the night of the 5th of August, 1305, Sir
William, and his faithful friend, Kerle J, accom-
* This young man is said by Henry to have been a son of
Menteith's sister. Langtoft calls him a servant, and says
his name was Jock Short.
t From Robroyston Wallace could easily make his way to
the Clyde ; cross the river and keep his appointment with
Bruce, who was to have approached from the south, without
coming in sight of any of the English stationed at Glasgow.
The burrow-muir was situated on the south side of the
Clyde.
J The circumstance of this person being the last friend
whom our hero w-as destined to behold, would, independent
of his own personal merits, have rendered him an object of
curiosity to a great proportion of our readers. The following
account is taken from the notes of the editor of the Perth
edition of Blind Harrie ; and, as any thing which the writer
_ f
panied by the youth before-mentioned, had betaken
themselves to their lonely retreat at Robroyston * ;
to which place their steps had been watched by a
spy, who, as soon as he had observed them enter,
returned to his employers.
At the dead hour of midnight, while the two
friends lay fast asleep, the youth, whose turn it was
to watch, cautiously removed the bugle from the
neck of Wallace, and conveyed it, along with his
arms, through an aperture in the wall ; then slowly
opening the door, two men-at-arms silently entered,
and, seizing upon Kerle, hurried him from the
apartment, and instantly put him to death. Wal-
lace, awakened by the noise, started to his feet,
and, missing his weapons, became sensible of his
danger, but grasping a large piece of oak, which
had been used for a seat, he struck two of his as-
sailants dead on the spot, and drove the rest head-
long before him. Seeing the fury to which he was
roused, and the difficulty they would have in taking
him alive, Menteith now advanced to the aperture,
and represented to him the folly of resistance, as
the English, he said, having heard of his place of
resort, and of the plans he had in contemplation,
has yet met with, rather tends to confirm than invalidate the
statement, he shall submit it to the reader in the words of
the learned and intelligent author : —
" William Ker, commonly called Kerlie, or Ker Little,
was ancestor of the Kers of Kersland. He, as well as many
others, was compelled to swear the unlawful oath of fealty to
Edward, August 5, 1296.
" He joined Wallace at the castle of the Earl of Lennox,
September 1296, and went with him immediately on his
first northern expedition. He and Stephen of Ireland were
the only two of Wallace's men who survived the battle
along the north side of the River Erne, November 1296.
" He was the constant friend and companion of Wallace
on all occasions, and is sometimes called his steward. In
1805, when Wallace was taken prisoner at Robrastoun, a
solitary village near Glasgow, William Ker only was with
him. They were found both asleep, and Ker was killed in
the scuffle.
" Henry says, that William Ker had large inheritance in
the district of Carrick, in Air-shire. That his ancestor was
brought from Ireland by King David I., and defeated, with
the assistance of seven hundred Scots, nine thousand Nor-
wegians who had landed at Dunmoir. Some of the Nor-
wegians were drowned in Doun, and others slain upon the
land. King David gave him the lands of Dunmoir in re-
ward of his bravery. *,
" It may be remarked, that Dun Hill, or, as it is com-
monly called, Norman or Northman Law, a high hill on the
estate of Dunmure, in the north-east part of Fife, and parish
of Abdie, has on the top of it the remains of Danish in-
trenchments. The hill on the north side declines all the
way to the river or Frith of Tay, which has Dundee at the
mouth of it. The constant tradition is, that the Danes or
Norwegians carried the spoil of the country to the top of
this hill, where the natives could have no access to them ;
and. after having collected it there, carried it down on the
other side to their ships in the river."
* " At Robroy stone Sir William Wallace was betrayed
and apprehended by Sir John Menteith, a favourite of Ed-
ward I. of England. After he was overpowered, and before
his hands were bound, it is said he threw his sword into
Robroyston loch. An oaken couple, or joist, which made
part of the barn in which the Scottish hero was taken, is
still to be seen in this neighbourhood, and may yet last for
ages."— Stat. Ace. viii. 481, 482.
The latter part of the above quotation is perfectly correct.
The oaken joist was to be seen till within these ten years
past ; it has now entirely disappeared, being carried off by
that tribe of pseudo-antiquarians, ycleped Relic -fanciers.
CHAP. XXIII.]
HIS TRIAL AND EXECUTION.
were collected in too large a force to be withstood ;
that if he would accompany him a prisoner to
Dumbarton, he would undertake for the safety of
his person ; — that all the English wished, was to
secure the peace of the country, and to be free
from his molestation ; — adding, that if he consented
to go with him, he should live in his own house in
the castle, and he, Menteith, alone should be his
keeper ; — that even now, he would willingly sacri-
fice his life in his defence ; but that his attendants
were too few, and too ill-appointed, to have any
chance of success in contending with the English.
He concluded by assuring Wallace, that he had
followed in order to use his influence with his ene-
mies in his behalf, and that they had listened to
him on condition of an immediate surrender ; but
that if he did not instantly comply, the house would
soon be in flames about him. These, and other
arguments, were urged with all the seeming sin-
cerity of friendship ; and our patriot, confiding in
early recollections, and the private understanding
that subsisted between them, allowed himself to be
conducted to Dumbarton Castle.
On the morrow, however, no Menteith appeared
to exert his influence, in order to prevent the unfor-
tunate hero from being carried from the fortress ;
and strongly fettered, and guarded by a powerful
escort, under the command of Robert de Clifford
and Aymer de Vallence, he was hurried to the
South, by the line of road least exposed to the
chance of a rescue.
CHAPTER XXIII.
TRIAL, EXECUTION, AND CHARACTER OF WALLACE.
As the capture of Wallace was an event wholly
unexpected by the English, the news of it, which
spread with the rapidity of lightning, produced, in
every part of the kingdom, a deep and universal
sensation. Labour of every kind was abandoned,
and people of all ranks flocked to those points of
the road where it was expected the illustrious cap-
tive would passJ At Carlisle the escort halted for
a night ; and the tower in which he was secured,
long afterwards retained his name. As the cortege
approached London, the crowds became more
numerous ; and, on entering the capital, his con-
ductors found their progress retarded by the mul-
titudes that were collected ; — while every elevation
or projection, however perilous, from which he could
be seen, was occupied with, or clung to, by anxious
spectators, eager to behold a man who had filled
England with terror, and the fame of whose
achievements had resounded through every coun-
try in Europe. After much exertion, the caval-
cade at length reached the house of William
Delect, a citizen in Fenchurch Street, where their
prisoner was lodged for the night. From the cir-
cumstance of his having been taken to a private
house, rather than to a place of greater security,
it has been imagined by some, that Edward in-
tended to make a last effort to gain Wallace over
to his interest. This conjecture, however, is not
sufficiently supported by subsequent proceedings,
to entitle it to any degree of credit ; and we are
more inclined to believe, that the difficulty which
the party encountered in making their way through
the dense multitudes who had blocked up the
streets and lanes leading to the Tower, may, with
greater probability, be assigned as the cause for
taking him to the house of Delect.
The thirst for revenge existed too keenly in the
ruthless mind of Edward, to admit of much delay
in the sacrifice of his victim. Though a considera-
tion for the opinion of the more enlightened of his
subjects, and the manner in which his conduct
might be viewed at foreign courts, obliged him to
have recourse at least to the formality of a trial —
the indecent haste with which it was brought on,
made the mockery of judicial procedure but too
apparent. The day after his arrival, he was con-
ducted on horseback, from the house which his
brief residence had made the scene of universal
attraction, to take his trial in Westminster Hall.
His progress from Fenchurch Street, according to
Stowe, appears to have been a sort of procession,
Lord John de Segrave, the fugitive of Roslin,
acting as Grand Marshal of England, and armed
cap-a-pie, rode on one side, while Geoffrey de Hartle-
pool, Recorder of London, equipped in a similar
manner, rode on the other. The Mayor, Sheriffs,
and Aldermen followed, attended by a number of
official characters on horseback and on foot,
arranged according to their respective grades *.
On reaching the spot where the solemn farce was
to be performed, he was placed on the south bench
of the great hall ; and, in consequence of an absurd
report f, which had been circulated in England, of
his having said that he deserved to wear a crown
in that place, a crown of laurel was put upon his
head. The noble appearance of the man, joined
to his calm and unruffled demeanour, entirely dis-
armed this silly attempt at ridicule of its intended
effect $.'
Sir Peter Malory, the King's Justice, then rose,
and read the indictment, wherein the prisoner was
charged with treason against the King of England,
burning of towns, and slaying of the subjects of
his Majesty. To the first of these counts Wallace
answered, that, as he had never been the subject of
the King of England, he owed him no allegiance,
and consequently could be no traitor. As to the
* See Appendix U.
t This report may have originated in some facetious
remark, which probably escaped from him on hearing that
one William Wallace had, by the voice of his fellow-citizens,
attained to the honour of being Lord Mayor of London,
when the success of the Scots compelled Edward to grant
an extension of the liberties of his people. His election is
stated, at p. 14, of this work, to have taken place in 12%.
This mistake the author begs leave to correct; the election
occurred in April 1298. The coincidence is rather singular.
See Lambert's Survey of London, vol. i. p. 167.
t That Edward was mean enough to subject Wallace to a
piece of mockery of this kind, appears evident, from the
same contemptible artifice, to excite derision, being again
resorted to in the case of Sir Simon Frazer, who was not oniy
habited in ; n unbecoming and ridiculous garb, but also had
" a gerland on ys heued of the newe guyse." This expres-
sion is taken from the ancient ballad made on the execution
of Frazer, a may be seen in the account we have given of
that warrior and which seemed evidently to allude to the
recent exhibition made of Wallace, on whose person " the
newe guyse" was no doubt first introduced;— and, as Sir
Simon was executed only about twelve months afterwards,
the phrase would be perfectly applicable, as the circumstance
must have been fresh in the minds of the people. — See
Appendix S.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. XXIII.
other offences, he frankly admitted, that, in the
discharge of his duty to his country, he had done
all that was stated. On this admission, the follow-
ing atrocious sentence was pronounced : —
For treason, he was to be first dragged to the
place of execution. For murder and robbery, he
was to be then hung a certain time by the neck ;
and, because he had burned abbeys and religious
houses, he was to be taken down alive from the
gibbet, his entrails torn out, and burnt before him,
his body to be quartered, and the parts afterwards
to be disposed of as the clemency of Majesty
might suggest *.
When the necessary preparations were made for
carrying this sentence into execution, the late
champion of Scottish independence was brought
forth from the place where he had been kept in
confinement, heavily ironed, and chained to a bench
of oak. He was then placed on a hurdle, and, sur-
rounded by a strong guard of soldiers, ignomini-
ously dragged to the Elms, in Smithfield. That
self-possession and undaunted demeanour which he
evinced during the trial, appeared equally con-
spicuous on the scaffold. Looking round with un-
disturbed composure on the assembled multitude,
he addressed himself to a person near him, and
asked for a priest to whom he might make confes-
sion. This request, on being made known to
Edward, he is said to have sternly -refused ; and
the rancorous old man forbad any clergyman to
retard the execution for such a purpose. On hearing
this undignified command of his sovereign, Win-
chelsea, Archbishop of Canterbury, the same indi-
vidual who so faithfully discharged his duty at
Carlaverock, stepped boldly forward, and, after
earnestly remonstrating with Edward, declared his
determination to officiate himself. When the cere-
mony usual on such occasions was finished, Wallace
rose from his knees, and the Archbishop having
taken leave of him, instantly departed for West-
minster, thus declining to witness the sequel of an
act so revolting to humanity, and which he no
doubt considered as fixing a deep stain on the
character of his country.
The spectacle which was now exhibited to the
gaze of the inhabitants of the metropolis of Eng-
land, was such as perhaps has never before been
presented to the populace of any land. The LAST
FREEMAN of an ANCIENT PEOPLE, not less renowned
for their bravery, than for their love of independ-
ence, stood a calm and unshrinking victim, ready
to be immolated at the shrine of despotism. That
powerful arm which had long contended for liberty
was now to be unstrung beneath the knife of the
executioner ; and that heart, replete with every
ennobling virtue, which never quailed in the stern-
est hour of danger, was doomed to quiver in the
purifying flames of martyrdom.
During the pause which preceded the unhallowed
operations, Wallace turned to Lord Clifford, and
requested that a Psalter f, which had been taken
from his person, might be returned. His desire
being complied with, he asked a priest to hold it
open before him. This book had been hus constant
companion from his early years, and was perhaps
the gift of his mother or his uncle, the parson of
Dunipace.
* See Appendix X.
t This appears to have been the only article of property
that Wallace died possessed of.
After hanging for a certain time, the sufferer
was taken down, while yet in an evident state of
sensibility. He was then disembowelled ; and the
heart, wrung from its place, was committed to the
flames in his presence. During this dreadful pro-
cess, his eyes still continued to linger on the
Psalter, till, overpowered by his sufferings, he
expired among their hands with all that passive
heroism which may be supposed to belong to so
elevated a character. The body was afterwards
dismembered ; the head fixed on London-bridge,
the right arm on the bridge of Newcastle-upon-
Tyne, the left at Berwick, the right leg at Perth,
and the left at Aberdeen.
Thus fell this great and exemplary patriot, a
martyr to the rights and independence of his coun-
try, than whom, if we consider his extraordinary
personal and mental endowments, — joined to his
inextinguishable and disinterested love of liberty,
a greater hero is not to be found in the annals of
any people. Born to a slender inheritance, and
unconnected by birth with the opulent families of
his country, he derived no advantage from those
circumstances which often assisted other distin-
guished characters in attaining that place in the
temple of fame to which their ambition was di-
rected. To his own genius he was indebted for
a system of tactics eminently calculated for the
contest he had in view ; and with his own arm he
gave the first impulse to the cause of freedom,
which afterwards, on the field of Bannockburn, was
crowned with such glorious and decisive success
under a kindred spirit — on whom the inspiring
mantle of our patriot descended, as he winged his
flight to the regions of immortality.
In person, Wallace was admirably fitted to grace
that elevated station among mankind, for which
his genius and talents so eminently qualified him.
His visage was long, well proportioned, and exqui-
sitely beautiful ; his eyes were bright and piercing ;
the hair of his head and beard auburn, and inclined
to curl : that on his brows and eye-lashes was of
a lighter shade ; his lips were round and full. Un-
der the chin, on the left side, was a scar *, the only
one visible, although many were to be found on his
person f ; his stature was lofty and majestic,
rising the head and shoulders above the tallest men
in the country. Yet his form, though gigantic,
possessed the most perfect symmetry ; and with a
degree of strength almost incredible, there was
combined such an agility of body and fleetness in
running, that no one, except when mounted on
horseback, could outstrip, or escape from him,
when he happened to pursue. All-powerful as a
swordsman, and unrivalled as an archer, his blows
were fatal, and his shafts unerring : as an eques-
trian, he was a model of dexterity and grace ;
while the hardships he experienced in his youth,
made him view with indifference the severest pri-
vations incident to a military life. In common
intercourse, his accents were mild, and his manners
grave and urbane. In the field, when addressing
his soldiers, his discourse was brief and animating,
and the sound of his voice thrilled through their
hearts like the spirit-stirring notes of the clarion
Great and varied, however, as were the accomplish-
ments nature had lavished on his person, the graces
* This, in all probability, was the mark of the wound
inflicted by the Lancaster bowman mentioned at page 33.
t See Appendix Y. J See Appendix Z.
CHAP. XXIII.]
HIS CHARACTER.
with which she had enriched his mind threw a
radiance over all the rest of her gifts. Untaught
himself in the military art, he became the in-
structor of his countrymen, and his first efforts
were worthy of the greatest captain of the age.
If we may judge from his regard to the sanctity
of an oath, his ideas of morality appear to have
been much at variance with the corrupt practice of
the age. Uncontaminated by the pernicious ex-
ample of the great men of the country, he rather
chose to bear hunger and every other privation
the unsheltered outlaw might, be exposed to, than
purchase the advantage so much prized by others,
at the expense of taking an oath he had no inten-
tion of holding sacred : — still, this inflexible recti-
tude of soul could not shame the aristocracy from
their convenient perjuries ; for the bands by which
he strove to unite them together, became like ropes
of sand in the hour of trial. Notwithstanding,
however, all the difficulties that were thrown in
his way, the vigour of his own character, and the
wisdom of his measures, enabled him to achieve
the deliverance of his native land. To the charges
of ambition and usurpation that were brought
against him, he gave the noblest refutation, by
resigning the bauble of power into the hands of
those little spirits, who would otherwise have
betrayed the cause of national independence, or
involved their country in all the horrors of civil
war. Thus, his virtuous self-denial preserved the
people whom his valour had set free.
In the biographical notices that have been sub-
mitted, the reader will perceive the formidable
array of talent and power with which Wallace had
to contend. To an aristocracy, at that time per-
haps unrivalled in Europe, and headed by a mo-
narch as distinguished for ambition, sternness of
purpose, and warlike propensities, as he was noto-
rious for the absence of those virtues which con-
stitute the redeeming traits in the character of a
soldier — the magnanimous patriot had at first little
to oppose, save the innate energies of his own
invincible heart, and the resources of a genius
which Heaven seems peculiarly to have fitted for
the task. That Scotland, distracted by faction, and
deprived of all foreign aid, should, under the
guidance of one who ranked among the humblest
of her nobles, have again advanced herself to the
dignity of an independent state, in defiance of the
power of England, backed by the resources of
Ireland and Wales, was considered by her adver-
saries as too humiliating to their national character
to admit of their relinquishing the contest *. The
* This circumstance seems to have been keenly felt and
lamented, as a subject of national disgrace, by some of the
historians of England. In addition to the anathemas poured
forth by Peter Langtoft, on account of the obstinacy of their
northern neighbours — the mortification evinced by Hardyng
in the following lines, is highly complimentary to the inde-
pendent spirit of Scotland. This acknowledged spy, and
detected forger, was sent down by his government, in the
reign of Henry V., for the mean purpose of stealing away the
treaty with Robert Bruce, in which the independence of
Scotland was recognised.
" Englande and Wales as to their soueraygne
To you obey, whiche shuld thinke shame of ryght,
To se Scotlande thus proudly disobeyne,
Agayne them two that bene of greate myght,
It is a shame to euery mannes syght,
renewal of every invasion was, however, met by
an increasing stubbornness of opposition ; and the
chivalrous conqueror in Palestine the "high-
souled " Plantagenet, at last condescended to steal
away the enemy he could neither bribe nor subdue,
and thus purchase the brief and delusive sem-
blance of a victory, at the price of everlasting
dishonour.
The mind of Wallace was imbued with the most
exalted ideas of independence ; and the stern and
inflexible spirit with which he guarded his own
and his country's honour, could only be equalled
by the scrupulous delicacy he exercised towards
the feelings of others. Loving freedom for her
own sake, he considered her sanctuary, wherever
placed, as too sacred to be violated. Among the
many proofs of this elevation of mind, the follow-
ing may be mentioned : — On the surrender of de
Longueville, the high-spirited Frenchman was
anxious to know the name and the character of his
conqueror. On the name of Wallace being an-
nounced to him, he fell on his knees, and thanked
God that so worthy an enemy had been his victor ;
and, according to the custom of the age, he ten-
dered his service, along with his sword. " Service
from you, Sir Thomas," said the gallant Scot, with
an accent of kind familiarity, " I cannot accept ;
your friendship is what I desire." On another
occasion, in the heat of an engagement, having, as
he conceived, given orders to Sir John Graham in
a manner too peremptory — after the victory had
been secured, he came up to his brave friend, and
surprised him with a humble apology for any thing
like harshness he might have displayed in his man-
ner of expressing himself. Graham, however, was
quite unconscious of hearing any thing that he had
reason to take amiss ; and expressed a hope that
he would always act towards him and others in the
same manner, when the interest of their country
was at stake.
Sith lohn Baylioll his ryght of it resygned
To kyng Edward, why is it thus repugned?"
Hardyng 's Chronicle, p. 413-414.
In the two last lines the writer of the Chronicle founds
the pretensions of England to the superiority over Scotland,
on the resignation of Baliol. This title he no doubt consi-
dered as preferable to any claims previously got up ; and we
would recommend Dr. Lingard to follow his example ; for
bad as it is, the supporters of it are not liable to meet with
those stubborn historical facts which stand in the way of the
advocates for a more venerable antiquity. To show the sin-
cerity which dictates this advice, we shall revert once more
to pages 443 and 444, vol. iii. of the Doctor's work, where we
are told, on the authority of Rymer, that the words " liber-
tates, dignitates, honores debiti," &c. "mean the allow-
ances to be made, and the honours to be shown, to the King
of Scots, as often as he came to the English court, by the
command of his lord the King of England, from the moment
that he crossed the Border till his return into his own terri-
tories." Had the vassalage of the King of Scotland been of
that unqualified nature which the Doctor labours to establish,
how comes it that his "allowances" only commence from
the moment he crossed the Border, and ceased as soon as he
returned to his own territories — merely, we presume, because
he was in his own territories. Had it been otherwise, he
would doubtless have been found entitled to those expenses
or allowances, from the time he left his own domicile, in
whatever part of Scotland that domicile may have been
situated.
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xxiv.
In the division of spoil, the portion that fell
to the share of Wallace he set apart as a fund
from which those were rewarded who had distin-
uished themselves by their valour or good con-
uct, while contending for the liberty of their
country — thus stimulating their efforts in their own
cause, by the sacrifice of his personal advantage.
The delicacy, also, which he evinced, in excluding
his relations from any participation in those grants
and emoluments with which he rewarded the ser-
vices of others, showed him exempt from any
selfish or mercenary feeling, and decidedly averse
to the aggrandizement of his family * at the na-
tional expense. In those times, when driven to
the woods and natural fastnesses of the country,
where his little party were exposed, from the
scarcity of provisions, to the greatest distress, the
expedients he had recourse to for their relief, and
the self-denial he exercised in order to husband
the slender supplies for their use, impressed his
followers with sentiments of admiration and grati-
tude. The system which he introduced, during
the short period of his regency, of disciplining and
subdividing the nation, evinced the clear and com-
prehensive views he entertained of the true inter-
ests of the country ; and had his successors in
power followed up the same measure, it would
doubtless have been productive of incalculable
benefit to the kingdom ; as, independent of the
great force the Legislature might thus have been
enabled to bring into the field in cases of emer-
gency, it would have undermined, and eventually
overthrown, the feudal superiority of the barons,
and those petty confederations among clans, which
have been for so many ages the bane and curse of
Scotland. His views, however, for the immediate
and permanent prosperity of the country, took
even a more extensive range than what is embraced
by the above wise and salutary measure. Aware
of the benefit which Scotland had formerly derived
from her commercial intercourse with the Con-
tinent, we find his attention, within a month after
the battle of Stirling, seriously turned towards the
re-establishment of this important object ; and
while the nation was mustering at Roslin for the
invasion of England, her leader was actively en-
gaged in despatching intimation to the different
Hanse-towns, that the ports of Scotland were again
open to the trade of all friendly powers -f*. The
plan which he pursued in his invasions, was the
most efficient for exhausting the enemy's country,
enriching his own, and encouraging his countrymen
to flock to his standard. Though often severe in
his retaliations, yet, towards women and children,
he always exercised the greatest humanity.
During his Guardianship, the country was be-
ginning to feel the return of her former prosperity.
With the spoil of the enemy he had diffused plenty
over the land ; the poor were protected ; thieves
were promptly and severely punished ; cheats and
liars were discouraged ; and good men met the
reward of their virtues. The vigilance with which
he watched over the public weal was unremitting,
and never for a moment gave place to any object
of personal consideration. Even those duties which
* See Appendix A A.
t However singular this statement may appear to some,
the author is happy in having it in his power to produce the
most incontrovertible evidence of the fact. — See App. H.
are often considered paramount to every other,
were with him secondary to the interest of his
country ; for, on the death of his mother, his pre-
sence being required elsewhere, he intrusted the
performance of her obsequies to his friend, John
Blair, and a confidential servant ; — which duty
they discharged with becoming solemnity in the
cathedral of Dunfermline. To this cemetery, it is
conjectured, the fragments of his own body were
secretly collated by his companions, after the bar-
barous and impolitic exposure had taken place.
At his execution, that self-command and nobleness
of soul, which formed such luminous traits in his
character, never for a moment forsook him. With-
out deigning to breathe a murmur, either at the
injustice of the tyrant who condemned, or the un-
happy man who betrayed him *, he submitted to
his fate with that becoming dignity which extorted
even from his enemies expressions of unqualified
admiration.
A revulsion, the natural consequence of the
inhuman cruelty of Edward, and the undaunted
demeanour of his victim took place in the minds of
the people of England immediately after his exe-
cution ; and the story of an English f monk who
pretended to have seen a vision of angels conduct-
ing Wallace out of purgatory with much honour,
was quickly circulated, and received with pleasure,
all over Britain.
The following lines, translated from the original
Latin by Hume of Godscroft J, are understood to
have been composed some time after the execution
of our illustrious patriot, by his afflicted friend and
chaplain, John Blair ; and with this elegant and
pathetic tribute of genius at the shrine of departed
greatness, we shall close the present chapter : —
" Envious death, who ruins all,
Hath wrought the sad lamented fall
Of Wallace ; and no more remains
Of him — than what an urn contains !
Ashes for our hero we have —
He, for his armour, a cold grave.
He left the earth — too low a state !
And by his acts o'ercame his fate.
His soul Death had not power to kill,
His noble deeds the world do fill
With lasting trophies of his name.
O ! hadst thou virtue loved, or fame,
Thou could'st not have insulted so
Over a brave, betrayed, dead foe,
Edward, nor seen those limbs expos'd
To public shame — fit to be clos'd
As relics in an holy shrine.
But now the infamy is thine.
His end crowns him with glorious hays,
And stains the brightest of thy praise."
CHAPTER XXIV.
CONCLUSION.
THE wisdom of the ancient Egyptians has been
much celebrated, but in no respect does it appear
more conspicuous than in the uses to which they
applied the historical records of their country. By
their laws, the hand which kept a faithful tran-
* See Appendix B B. t See Appendix C C.
t See Appendix D D.
CHAP. XXIV.]
CONCLUSION.
script of passing events, and registered with strict
impartiality the transactions and characters of their
kings, was removed from the knowledge and in-
fluence of those whose deeds were thus related.
On the accession of every new monarch, it was
part of the ceremonial to read in his presence the
records of his predecessor's reign. By this means
he was apprised of the faults he ought to avoid,
and admonished of the virtues it was incumbent on
him to emulate ; while the reflection arising from
the certainty that after death his name also would
be consigned over to posterity— either to receive
the meed of grateful remembrance, or the impress
of merited reprobation, according to his actions —
operated on the royal mind as a useful and salutary
restraint.
Other nations aspired to imitate the Egyptians ;
but national imitation is too often like that among
individuals. The faults and blemishes of the ori-
ginal are more readily caught than its beauties and
perfections. Thus, while the grossness of Egypt's
mythology was most servilely copied, one practice
which gave dignity and utility to her history was
entirely overlooked, and the pen of the historian,
in place of being wielded by the impartial, fear-
less, and untrammelled friend of public virtue, was
more frequently found in the hand of the needy
parasite ; employed in the base and degrading oc-
cupation of varnishing the enormities of the er-
mined tyrant, whose ambitious progress to dis-
tinction had been marked by the subversion of the
rights, and the carnage of his fellow-men. This
prostitution of the historic muse is not unknown
among modern authors, and may be often attri-
buted to an unworthy desire of administering to
the feelings of a favourite party, or a wish to con-
ciliate the national prejudices of their readers.
Though compelled, by the general increase of
knowledge, to give a more faithful narrative of
facts than the writers of antiquity, when it may
suit any of the purposes that have been mentioned,
the subject of their biography is seldom dismissed
without being made to undergo a sort of purgation
in the general estimate of his character, and which
is often found to be at antipodes to the actions with
which it stands connected. Perhaps the annals of
England cannot afford a more striking instance of
this perversion of all that is valuable in historical
literature, than in the porti-aits which some his-
torians have drawn of Edward I.
Without attempting to delineate the character of
this ambitious disturber of the peace of Britain,
the writer will merely notice a few of the leading
circumstances of his history, and leave the reader
to discover by what curious process of literary
chemistry those crudities have been made to har-
monize, in order to produce so fair a display of
political sagacity and kingly greatness.
The littleness which appears to have been in-
herent in the mind of Edward was laid open to
the Londoners in 1263, by his breaking into the
treasury of the Knights Templars, and carrying off
1000£. deposited there by the citizens. This rob-
bery was looked upon by the people as an act so
thoroughly base, that they instantly flew to arms,
and assaulted the houses of those among the no-
bility who were supposed accessory to the theft.
Edward was at this time in his 26th year ; of
course youthful indiscretion cannot be advanced as
an excuse for the crime.
His aggression upon Scotland has been indul-
gently placed to the account of those enlightened
and statesman-like views which he entertained of
the true interests and general welfare of Britain,
and the advantages he discovered would result
from the resources of the two countries being con-
solidated under one head. This " reason of state,"
has been held up in extenuation of the nefarious
means which he resorted to for the accomplishment
of his purpose. But by the extracts which we are
about to make from the pages of an author every
way inclined to treat the faults of Edward with
lenity, the reader will perceive, that though the
enlightened views " which he took of the solid in-
terests of his kingdom," may have found a place
in the imagination of the historian, they do not
appear to have occurred to the monarch. The
extinction of every thing like rational liberty, and
the establishment of an extensive and uncontroll-
able autocracy, seem to have been the undisguised
objects of his ambition. In proof of which, we
have only to refer to his demeanour towards his
barons, and the unwarrantable appropriation of
the effects of his subjects, mentioned in the extracts
alluded to. His conduct in respect to Scotland
being thus stripped of the only palliation that can
be offered, it stands forward on the page of history
in all its native deformity, unrelieved by one so-
litary extenuating circumstance, while the following
transaction gives it, if possible, a darker and more
disgusting complexion.
1 n 1267, Henry and Prince Edward, being driven
to the greatest extremity by the Earl of Gloucester
and other Barons, whom their oppressions and un-
lawful exactions had forced to take up arms, when
every hope failed them, and even the Tower of
London was besieged by a numerous army of en-
raged assailants, they were very opportunely re-
lieved from their perilous situation by the assistance
of 30,000 Scots, whom Alexander sent to their re-
lief: and with these auxiliaries they were enabled
to withstand, and afterwards to subdue, their ex-
asperated and refractory subjects. The debt of
gratitude which was thus incurred, Edward had
not an opportunity of discharging, till after the
death of Alexander, when the Scots, with a gene-
rous confidence, which their own conduct naturally
inspired, applied to him to act as umpire in settling
the succession to the crown. How honourably he
acquitted himself in the discharge of the duties of
the trust thus reposed in him, and how generous
was the return he made for their good offices, the
reader requires not to be told. Two nations, who
had for nearly a century regarded each other with
feelings of mutual good-will, and had lived in a
state of friendly intercourse highly beneficial to
both, were suddenly transformed into the most
inveterate enemies ; and an implacable spirit of
animosity engendered between them, which it re-
quired the slow revolution of ages to soften and
obliterate. The guilty ambition of this short-
sighted tyrant entailed upon the British states a
quarrel the most bloody, the most expensive, and
the most insane that perhaps ever existed between
two nations. By the ridiculous pretensions of the
one, the improvement of both countries was re-
tarded, and their frontier populations demoralized
into cut-throats or plunderers, who wandered in
search of their prey over a land barren as the
desert, which might otherwise have been teem-
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP, xxiv
ing with the fruits of honest and profitable in-
dustry.
Edward's ideas of honesty we have already seen
in the affair of the Templars, and his feelings of
gratitude in his conduct towards the Scots. His
sense of justice may be gathered from his pro-
ceedings against the Jews. The silver pennies of
the realm having been clipped, the offence was
traced to some of that unfortunate people, and in
one day 280 of both sexes were executed in London,
besides a great many more in different parts of
the kingdom, where it seems simultaneous mea-
sures had been taken against them. That this
crime was confined entirely to the Jews, is not
likely. The implements by which it could be
committed were certainly not beyond the reach of
English intellect ; nor could the latter be supposed,
in every instance, superior to the temptation which
the gains presented. That the guilt of all who
suffered was ascertain, is impossible ; and a whole-
sale butchery of this kind, authorized by law, as it
could not answer the ends of justice, can only be
considered as gratuitously administering to the
worst of human passions.
The estimation in which Edward held those arts
which are calculated to instruct, refine, and elevate
the human mind, may be learned from his treat-
ment of the Minstrels of Wales. The remorseless
and sanguinary policy which suggested that un-
hallowed act, could only have found place in the
breast where every virtuous and honourable feeling
has disappeared before the withering influence of
a selfish and detestable ambition. In an age
when the Minstrel's profession was a passport to
the presence and protection of the great, and the
persons of those who exercised the calling were
held sacred even among tribes the least removed
from barbarism, the mind must have reached a
fearful state of depravity, that could break through
those barriers with which the gratitude and vene-
ration of mankind had surrounded the children of
genius, and thus immolate at the shrine of an
heartless despotism, the innocent and meritorious
depositories of a nation's lore.
The reader may form some idea of the treasures
squandered by Edward in the Scottish wars, from
the Statement of Receipts and Disbursements for
the year 1300, inserted in Appendix T, at the end
of this volume. The military operations of that
year were not on a more expensive scale than those
connected with the preceding and subsequent in-
vasions ; and by this statement, it will be found,
that the disbursements for the campaign of 1300,
exceeded, " within one department of the national
expenditure," one fifth of the national income.
That the expenses of this campaign pressed
equally hard on other departments of the exche-
quer, is sufficiently obvious from the singular expe-
dients which were resorted to for the purpose of
carrying it on. The year 1300 is remarkable for
the first attempt to depreciate the currency of the
realm, it having been then ordered that 243 pen-
nies should be coined out of the pound of silver, in
place of 240 as formerly. In this year, also, as
will be seen by the statements already alluded to,
the Wardrobe department was in arrears to the
amount of 59491. 4s. 3d., which circumstance —
__
7
taken in connexion with the fact, that Sir Simon
Frazer and other knights soon after de*t;rte<i the
English service, because their pay and other allow-
ances were withheld — proves that the treasury of
England at this time must have been in a very
depressed state. This profitless expenditure was
continued with little interruption, from 1296 till
1320, in pursuit of an object, which, happily for
the future prosperity of both countries, was unat-
tainable.
We have already alluded to the treacherous
designs of Edward, regarding the liberties of his
own subjects ; and, in illustration of the opinion
then expressed, we shall now subjoin the account
of his behaviour, after his triumphant return from
the north, as it appears in the pages of Dr. Lingard,
an author who certainly cannot be considered as a
friend to Scotland : — we wish we were able to call
him a candid adversary.
" Had Edward," says this learned, though often
disingenuous writer, " confined his rapacity to the
clergy, he might perhaps have continued to despise
their remonstrances ; but the aids which he had
annually raised on the freeholders, the tollages
which he so frequently demanded of the cities and
boroughs, and the additional duties which he
extorted from the merchants, had excited a general
spirit of discontent. Wool and hides were the
two great articles of commerce ; the exportation
of which was allowed only to foreign merchants,
and confined, by law, to eleven ports in England,
and three in Ireland. In the beginning of his
reign, the duty had been raised to half a mark on
each sack of wool ; but the royal wants per-
petually increased ; and, during his quarrel with
the King of France, he required five marks for
every sack of fine, three for every sack of coarse
wool, and five for every last of hides. On one
occasion, he extorted from the merchants a loan
of the value of all the wool which they exported ;
on two others, he seized and sold both wool and
hides for his own profit. He even stretched his
rapacious hands to the produce of the soil, and
the live-stock of his subjects ; and, to provision
his army in Guienne, he issued precepts to each
sheriff to collect, by assessment on the landholders
of his county, a certain number of cattle, and two
thousand quarters of wheat. Though this requi-
sition was accompanied with a promise of future
payment, the patience of the nation was exhausted :
consultations began to be held : and preparations
were made for resistance. Edward had assembled
two bodies of troops, with one of which he intended
to sail for Flanders, the other he destined to rein-
force the army in Guienne (1297, Feb. 24). At
Salisbury, he gave the command of the latter to
Bohun., Earl of Hereford, the constable, and to
Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, the mareschal of England ;
but both these noblemen refused the appointment,
on the alleged ground, that, by their office, they
were bound only to attend on the King's person.
Edward, in a paroxysm of rage, addressing himself
to the mareschal, exclaimed — ' By the everlasting
God, Sir Earl, you shall go or hang.' — <By the
everlasting God, Sir King,' replied Bigod, * I will
neither go nor hang.' Hereford and Norfolk im-
mediately departed : they were followed by thirty
bannerets, and fifteen hundred knights ; and the
royal officers, intimidated by their menaces, ceased
to levy the purveyance. Edward saw that it was
CHAP. XXIV.]
CONCLUSION.
necessary to dissemble, and summoned some, —
requested others, of his military tenants to meet
him in arms in London.
" The two Earls, in concert with the Archbishop
of Canterbury, had arranged their plan of resist-
ance to the royal exactions. On the appointed
day the constable and John de Segrave, as deputy-
mareschal (Bigod himself was detained at home
by sickness), attended the King's court ; but when
they were required to perform their respective
duties (July 8), they returned a refusal in writ-
ing, on the ground that they had not received a
legal summons, but only a general invitation. Ed-
ward appointed a new constable and mareschal ;
and, to divide and weaken his opponents, sought
to appease the clergy, and to move the commise-
ration of the people (July 11). He received the
primate with kindness, ordered the restoration of
his lands, and named him one of the council to
Prince Edward, whom he had appointed regent.
On a platform before the entrance of Westminster
Hall, accompanied by his son, the Archbishop,
and the Earl of Warwick, he harangued the
people (July 14). He owned that the burdens
which he had laid on them were heavy ; but pro-
tested that it had not been less painful to him to
impose, than it had been to them to bear them.
Necessity was his only apology. His object had
been to preserve himself and his liege men from
the cruelty and rapacity of the Welsh, the Scots,
and the French, who not only sought his crown,
but also thirsted after their blood. In such case,
it was better to sacrifice a part than to lose the
whole. ' Behold,' he concluded, ' I am going to
expose myself to danger for you. If I return,
receive me again, and I will make you amends ;
if I fall, here is my son ; place him on the throne,
and his gratitude shall reward your fidelity.' At
these words the King burst into tears ; the Arch-
bishop was equally affected ; the contagion ran
through the multitude ; and shouts of loyalty and
approbation persuaded Edward that he might still
depend on the allegiance of his people. This
exhibition was followed by writs to the sheriffs,
ordering them to protect the clergy from injury,
and to maintain them in the possession of their
lands.
" He now ventured to proceed as far as Win-
chelsey on his way to Flanders. But here he was
alarmed by reports of the designs of his opponents,
and ordered letters to be sent to every county,
stating the origin of his quarrel with the two earls,
asserting that he had never refused any petition
for redress, and promising to confirm the charter
of liberties and charter of the forests, in return for
the liberal aid of an eighth which had been granted
by the council in London. Soon afterwards a
paper was put into his hands, purporting to be the
remonstrance of the archbishops, bishops, abbots,
and priors, the earls, barons, and whole commonalty
of England. In it they complained that the last
summons had been worded ambiguously ; that it
called on them to accompany the King to Flanders,
a country in which tney were not bound to serve
by the custom of their tenures ; that even if they
were, they had been so impoverished by aids,
tallages, and unlawful seizures, as to be unable
to bear the expense ; that the liberties granted
to them by the two charters had been repeatedly
violated ; that the ' evil toll ' (the duty) annually on
wool amounted alone to one-fifth of the whole in-
come of the land ; and that, to undertake an expe-
dition to Flanders in the existing circumstances,
was imprudent, since it would expose the kingdom
without protection to the inroads of the Welsh and
Scots. Edward replied, that he could return no
answer on matters of such high importance, with-
out the advice of his council, a part of which had
already sailed for Flanders ; that if the remon-
strants would accompany him, he would accept it
as a favour ; if they refused, he trusted they would
raise no disturbance during his absence (Aug. 19).
Before his departure he appointed commissioners
in each county with powers to require security
from all persons for the payment of aids due to
the crown, and to imprison the publishers of false
reports, the disturbers of the peace, and such of
the clergy as might presume to pronounce cen-
sures against the royal officers for the discharge of
their duty.
" At length the King set sail, accompanied by
the barons and knights who had espoused his
cause ; and two days later, Bohun and Bigod, with
a numerous retinue, proceeded to the exchequer.
The constable, in the presence of the treasurer
and judges, complained of the King's extortions,
of his illegal seizures of private property, and
of the enormous duty imposed upon wool ; and
forbade them, in the name of the baronage of
England, to levy the last eighth which had been
granted by the great council, because it had been
voted without his knowledge and concurrence, and
that of his friends. From the exchequer they
rode to the Guildhall, where they called upon the
citizens to join in the common cause, and to aid
in wresting the confirmation of the national liber-
ties from a reluctant and despotic sovereign. The
tears which the Londoners had shed during Ed-
ward's harangue, were now dried up ; considera-
tions of interest suppressed the impulse of pity ;
and they gave assurances of their co-operation to
the barons, who immediately retired to their re-
spective counties. Both during their progress to
the capital, and their return from it, they had
marched in military array. But at the same tune
they had been careful to preserve the peace ; and
had threatened, by proclamation, to punish every
lawless aggressor with immediate amputation of a
hand, or the loss of the head, according to the
quality of the offence.
" The King was soon informed of these proceed-
ings, and ordered the barons of the exchequer to
disregard the prohibition. But in a few weeks
his obstinacy was subdued by a succession of un-
toward events. The people and clergy universally
favoured the cause of the earls ; the Scots, after
their victory at Stirling, had burst into the northern
counties ; and Edward himself lay at Ghent in
Flanders, unable to return to the protection of the
kingdom, and too weak to face the superior force
of the French king. In these circumstances, the
lords who composed the council of the young
Prince, invited the archbishop, six prelates, twenty-
three abbots and priors, the constable and mares-
chal, and eight barons, to treat with them on
matters of the greatest moment, and summoned
a parliament to meet in London a week later
(Sept. 30), and witness the confirmation of the two
charters. In the conferences which preceded, the
two parties, though opposed in appearance, had the
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
[CHAP. xxiv.
same interests and the same views ; a form of
peace (so it was called) was speedily arranged ;
and, to the ancient enactments of the charters,
were appended the following most important addi-
tions : — ' No tallage or aid shall henceforth be laid
or levied by us or our heirs in this our realm, with-
out the good will and common assent of the arch-
bishops, bishops, and other prelates, the earls,
barons, knights, burgesses, and other free men in
our realm. No officer of us or our heirs shall take
corn, wool, hides, or other goods, of any person
whatsoever, without the good will and assent of the
owner of such goods. Nothing shall henceforth be
taken on the sack of wool, under the name or pre-
tence of the evil toll. We also will and grant for
us and our heirs, that all both clergy and laity of
our realm shall have their laws, liberties, and free
customs, as freely and wholly as at any time when
they had them best ; and if any statutes have
been made or customs introduced by us or our
ancestors contrary to them, or to any article in the
present charter, we will and grant that such sta-
tutes and customs be null and void for ever. We
have, moreover, remitted to the Earl Constable,
and Earl Mareschal and all their associates, and to
all those who have not accompanied us to Flan-
ders, all rancour and ill will, and all manner of
offences which they may have committed against
us or ours before the making of this present
charter. And for the greater assurance of this
thing, we will and grant for us and our heirs, that
all archbishops and bishops in England for ever,
shall, twice in the year after the reading of this
charter in their cathedral churches, excommuni-
cate, and cause, in their parochial churches to be
excommunicated, all those that knowingly shall do
or cause to be done, any thing against the tenor,
force, and effect of any article contained in it.'
"When the parliament assembled (Oct. 10),
these additions to the charter were received with
enthusiasm ; and provided the King would assent
to them, the laity voted him an eighth, the clergy
of Canterbury a tenth, and the clergy of York a
fifth. The prince, by a public instrument, took the
Earls and their associates under his protection ;
and the Lords of the Council bound themselves to
indemnify them against the effects of the royal dis-
pleasure. A common letter was written to the
King, soliciting him to appease all differences by
giving his assent, and assuring him that his faith-
ful barons were ready at his command either to
join him in Flanders, or to march against his ene-
mies in Scotland ; but at the same time requiring,
in a tone of defiance, an answer against the sixth
day of December. It cost the haughty mind of
Edward several struggles, before he could prevail
on himself to submit ; three days were spent in
useless deliberation and complaints ; but at last,
with a reluctant hand, he signed the confirmation of
the two charters with the additional articles, and a
separate pardon for the Earls and their followers,
(Nov. 5).
j " This was perhaps the most important victory
j which had hitherto been gained over the Crown.
By investing the people with the sole right of
raising the supplies, it armed them with the power
of checking the extravagance, and controlling the
despotism of their monarchs. Whatever jealousy
might be entertained of Edward's intentions, his
conduct wore at first the semblance of sincerity.
As soon as an armistice had been concluded be-
;ween him and the King of France, he returned to
England, and appointed commissioners to inquire
nto the illegal seizures which had been made pre-
viously to his departure. They were to be divided
into two classes. Where the officers acted without
warrant, they were, at their own cost, to indemnify
the sufferers ; where the goods had been taken by
the royal orders, their value was to be certified
nto the exchequer, and prompt payment was to
be made. Still it was suspected that he only
waited for a favourable moment to cancel the con-
cessions which had been wrung from him by neces-
sity ; and it was whispered that among his confi-
dential friends he had laughed at them as being of
no force, because they had been made in a foreign
country, where he possessed no authority. When
he met his parliament at York, the Earls of Here-
ford and Norfolk required that he should ratify his
confirmation of the charters. He objected from
the necessity of hastening to oppose the Scots,
solemnly promised to comply with their request
on his return, and brought forward the Bishop of
Durham and three Earls, who swore ' on his soul,'
that he should fulfil his engagements." A.D. 1299,
March. " The victory of Falkirk and a long series
of success gave a lustre to his arms ; but when
the parliament assembled the next year, the King
was reminded of his promise. His reluctance
employed every artifice to deceive the vigilance,
or exhaust the patience, of the two Earls. He
retired from the parliament in anger ; he returned
and proposed modifications ; at last he ratified his
former concessions, but with the addition of a
clause, which, by saving the rights of the Crown,
virtually annulled every provision in favour of the
subject. Bohun and Bigod instantly departed
with their adherents ; and the King, to ascertain
the sentiments of the people, ordered the sheriff's
to assemble the citizens in the cemetery of St.
Paul's, and to read to them the new confirmation
of the charters. The lecture was repeatedly inter-
rupted by shouts of approbation ; but when the
illusory clause was recited, the air rung with ex-
pressions of discontent, and curses were poured
on the head of the prince, who had thus disap-
pointed the expectations of his people. Edward
took the alarm ; summoned a new parliament to
meet him within a fortnight ; granted every de-
mand ; and appointed a commission of three
Bishops, three Earls, and three Barons, to ascer-
tain the real boundaries of the royal forests *."
In the following extract, we find Edward, on the
14th July, holding up the Scots as a bugbear to
terrify his subjects into an acquiescence with his
oppressive demands ; and on the 30th September
the English, in turn, are found making the very
same use of the Scots, for the purpose of extorting
from their reluctant and unprincipled " Justinian,"
the confirmation of their national liberties. It did
not, however, appear to strike them that the sub-
version of freedom in Scotland was totally incon-
sistent with its existence in the southern part of
the island.
By the same author we are also told, that after
the surrender of Stirling Castle in 1304, Edward
sent a secret deputation to the Pope, craving that
* Vol. iii. 8vo. ed. p. 343—355; and vol. ii. of 4to. ed.
p. 459—468. 470.
CHAP. XXIV.]
CONCLUSION.
95
a dispensation might be granted him from the
oaths he had taken. This request appears to have
been complied with ; but the learned author adds,
" Whether the papal rescript did not fully meet the
King's wishes, or that he was intimidated by the
rebellion of the Scots, he made no public use of
its contents ; but suffered the concessions, galling
as they were, to remain on the statute-roll at his
death, and descend to future sovereigns as the
recognised law of the land. Thus, after a long
struggle, was won, from an able and powerful
monarch, the most valuable of the privileges en-
joyed by the commons of England at the present
day. If we are indebted to the patriotism of Car-
dinal Langton, and the Barons at Runnymead, the
framers of the great charter, we ought equally to
revere the memory of Archbishop Winchelsey and
the Earls of Hereford and Norfolk. The former
erected barriers against the abuse of the sovereign
authority ; the latter fixed the liberties of the sub-
ject on a sure and permanent foundation *." In
* Lingard, vol. iii. p. 356.
his list of meritorious characters, the learned au-
thor ought certainly not to have omitted the Knight
of Elderslie and his patriotic followers, who, in
standing nobly forward for the independence of
their own country, were also instrumental in secur-
ing such invaluable and lasting privileges for their
neighbours.
From the evidence adduced in the quotations
made, of the powerful diversion effected in favour
of English liberty by the stubborn opposition of
the Scots, it appears, that the success of the arms
of the latter was the palladium on which the most
important of England's chartered rights depended.
When the people of England, therefore, think of
erecting monuments to the characters the worthy
Doctor has enumerated, it is to be hoped that a
tablet to the memory of the Guardian of Scotland
will not be forgotten, on which, with propriety may
be inscribed,
" LIBERTE CHERIE, quand tu incurs en Ecosse,
Certes, 1'Anglais, chez lui, j?eut bien creuser TA foaas."
APPENDIX.
A.
WALLACE'S TREE. — TORWOOD.
Page 37.
THE following memoranda respecting this cele-
brated tree, will doubtless be acceptable to the
reader * : —
" In Dunipace parish is the famous Torwood,
in the middle of which there are the remains of
Wallace's Tree, an oak, which, according to a
measurement when entire, was said to be about
twelve feet diameter. To this wood Wallace is
said to have fled, and secreted himself in the body
of that tree, then hollow, after his defeat in the
north."— Stat. Ace. iii. 336.
" This oak is still dignified by the name of
Wallace's Tree. It stands in the middle of a
swampy moss, having a causeway round its ruins ;
and its destruction has been much precipitated,
by the veneration in which the Scottish hero has
been long held ; numerous pieces have been car-
ried off, to be converted into various memorials of
the Champion of Scotland." — Kerr's Hist, of Bruce,
i. 127.
" Wallace's Oak, as it has been called for ages,
still remains in the Torwood near Stirling. The
old tradition of the country bears, that Sir Wil-
liam Wallace, after a lost battle, secreted himself
in this tree, and escaped the pursuit of his enemies.
By this account, it behoved then, that is, about
500 years ago, to have been a large tree. What-
ever may be its age, it certainly has in its ruins the
appearance of greater antiquity than what I have
observed in any tree in Scotland.
" At a very remote period it has separated in
the middle, and the one half of it has mouldered
entirely away. The other half remains, and is in
one place about twenty feet high. But what the
tree was above this height, is unknown. All the
original part of the tree is putrid. Yet one may
perceive that the whole of it, from the head to the
very bark, has been red wood, and is so hard even
in its putrid state as to admit of a polish.
" In this ancient Torwood, it stands in a manner
alone. For there are no trees, nor any ruin of a
tree, to be seen that is nearly coeval. Compared
to it, even the oldest of them is of a very modern
date. The memory of its having saved Wallace,
has probably been the means of its preservation,
when all the rest of the wood at different times has
been destroyed. It has been immemorially held
in veneration, and is still viewed in that light.
* See also an interesting paper on this subject, in The
Edinburgh Literary Journal, No. 70.
" There is a peculiar sort of renovation of an
old tree that sometimes occurs, and has taken
place in this. A young bark has shot upwards
from the root in several places, which has formed
fresh branches towards the top of the old trunk.
This young bark has spread, and still spreads, like
a callus, over several parts of the old tree that are
dead; and particularly over a very large arm,
which has had no bark on it in the remembrance
of the oldest person alive.
" The tree stands in carse land, in a deep wet
clay-soil. The road that passes by it in the wood
is laid crossways with thick branches of trees, to
prevent carriages from sinking to the axles in wet
weather. — Essays on Natural History, by John
Walker, D.D. (1771.)
The ground on which this tree stood was ele-
vated above the surrounding level, which appears
at one time to have been a sort of swamp. Cause-
ways of a rude construction led up to the oak in
different directions ; and as the first formation of
these causeways is beyond the memory of the oldest
inhabitants living, it proves that the sheltering
place of the Defender of Scotland must have been
an object of deep interest to his countrymen at a
very early period. Although this ancient memorial
of Wallace measured, in the recollection of people
still living, forty-two feet in circumference, not a
vestige of it is now to be discovered. The venera-
tion with which it was regarded, secured it from
all human interference ; and it was left to the winds
of heaven, and the hand of time, till it reached
that state of decay which indicated an approach-
ing crisis. Its extinction was then hastened by
an anxiety on the part of visitors to possess some
portion of it, as a relic of one with whose name
it had been so long associated ; and so far was
this feeling carried, that, after the trunk had dis-
appeared, the ground was dug up to the extent of
twelve feet round it, in order to get at any frag-
ment of the root that might chance to remain.
This grand search took place after the time was
fixed for the visit of George IV. to Scotland ; and
Mr. Craig, an artist residing at Helensburgh, of
considerable taste in his profession, used a part of
it which had then been found, in the formation of a
snuff-box, ingeniously composed, besides, of various
small pieces of wood, including portions of "the
Elderslie Oak," " Queen Mary's Yew," the « Bush
abune Traquair," and other celebrated inmates of
the forest, which have been consecrated by the
historical and poetical Muse of Scotland. This
elegant little national gem was with much pro-
priety presented to, and graciously accepted by, his
Majesty, during his residence hi Scotland. Thus,
APPENDIX B.
97
after a lapse of ages, the root of that oak which had
preserved the houseless patiiot when outlawed by
the enemies of his country, has, by a strange vicis-
situde, been transplanted to the personal possession
of the legitimate descendant of that race of kings
for whose right he so nobly contended, and whose
beloved representative now wields a sceptre over a
countless accumulation of subjects, and a dominion
from which the sun may be said never to withdraw
his light.
In the preceding year, at the depth of a foot
from the surface, and about thirty feet west of
Wallace's tree, the head of an ancient Scottish
spear was found, which was presented to the
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, by Mr. Alex-
ander Kincaid. It measures eight inches hi length,
and, if not of higher antiquity, was probably one of
those used in the fatal conflict which took place in
the Torwood between James III. and his rebellious
nobles in 1488.
THE CRAWFURDS.
Page 40.
CRAWFURD is a corruption of two Celtic words
Crodh-Phort, pronounced Cro-forst, signifying a shel-
tering place for cattle, a designation expressive of the
general appearance of the parish of Crawford-John.
As every thing relating to so illustrious a character
as Wallace is important, the following pedigree,
showing his maternal descent, will doubtless be
acceptable to many.
According to that accurate genealogist, George
Crawfurd, author of the Scottish Peerage, and the
History of Renfrewshire, and of the House of Stewart,
published more than 100 years ago, the Craufurds
are derived from Thoi'longus, an Anglo-Danish
chief, who, being expelled from Northumberland
by William the Conqueror, found an asylum in
Scotland, and, in particular, had a grant of land in
the Merse from Edgar, King of Scots, whose reign
is included betwixt the year 1097 and the 8th
January 1106-7.
This appears from Crawfurd's MS. " History of
the Craufurds," in the Advocates' Library, and is
corroborated by Anderson in his Diplomata, com-
piled at the desire of the Scots Parliament, who
has this notice of Thor-Longus : — " Hie vir nobilis
et Anglus genere fuisse, videtur ac forte idem qui
Thor in Libro vulgo dicto Doomsday-Book, ssepius
memoratus amplissimis suis prsediis in borealibus
Anglise partibus sitis a Gullielmo Conquisitore erat
exutus."
At what particular time his expulsion took place,
does not precisely appear ; but it seems probable
that it must have been betwixt the years 1069 and
1074, when, from the unsubmissive spirit of the
Northumbrians, they brought down on their own
heads the most direful wrath of the Conqueror,
who was so provoked with them, for joining their
original countrymen the Danes, who had at that
time invaded England (and whom, for all his
prowess, he was fain to buy off ), that "he swore
by the splendour of God he would not leave a soul
alive ;" and so soon as he found it in his power
(the foreigners being now gone) to be avenged of
them, he ravaged their country in so merciless a
manner, that for sixty miles together he did not
leave a single house standing. — See Rapin, vol. i.
p. 172.
All this took place betwixt the years as above
stated ; and as they were quite subdued by the last
of these dates (1074), and as there appeared to
have been no more exterminating spoliation of this
part of the country afterwards during William's
reign, it seems to be a fair conclusion, that this
Anglo-Danish chief had found it necessary to fly,
and made his escape to Scotland during the interim
mentioned. The era of the Doomsday-Book itself
(1079), in which Thor is mentioned to have been,
before that time, deprived of his possessions,
should be a concluding evidence of the fact. That
he obtained lands in Scotland during the reign of
King Edgar, appears distinctly from the following
writs, copied from the MS. History of Crawfurd,
and which also are to be found in the archives of
the cathedral of Durham.
CHARTA tHORLONGI.
Omnibus sanctse matris Ecclesise filiis Thor-
longus in Domino, salutem : Sciatis quod Edgarus
Dominus meus Rex Scottorum, dedit mihi Edna-
ham desertam, quam ego suo auxilio et mea pro-
pria pecunia inhabitavi, et ecclesiam in honorem
Sancti Cuthberti fabricavi, quam ecclesiam cum
una carrucata terrse, Deo et Sancto Cuthberto et
monachis ejus in perpetuum possidendum dedi ;
hanc igitur donationem feci pro anima domini mei
Regis Edgari, et pro animabus patris et matris
illius, et pro redemptione Lefwini patris mei dilec-
tissimi, et pro meimet ipsius tarn corporis quam
animse salute, et siquis hanc meam donationem
sancto predicto et monachis sibi servientibus aliqua
vi vel ingenio auferre presumserit, auferat ab eo
Deus omnipotens vitam Regni celestis, et cum
diabolo et angelis ejus poenas sustinet eternas.
Amen.
EJUSDEM.
Domino suo charissimo David Comiti Thor, om-
nibusque suis, salutem : Scias domine mi, quod
Edgarus Rex frater vester dedit mihi Ednaham
desertam, quam ego suo auxilio et mea pecunia
inhabitavi, et ecclesiam a fundamentis fabricavi
quam frater vester Rex in honorem Sancti Cuth-
berti fecit, dedicavit, et una carrucata terree earn
dotavit. Hanc eandem ecclesiam pro anima ejus-
dem domini mei Regis Edgari et patris et matris
vestri et pro salute vestra et Regis Alexandri et
Mathildis Reginse, sancto predicto et monachis
ejus dedi, unde vos precor sicut dominum meum
charissimum, ut pro animabus parentum vestro-
rum et pro salute vivorum hanc donationem Sancto
Cuthberto, et monachis sibi in perpetuam servituris
concedatis.
This historian deduces the Crawfurds from the
above Thorlongus, in the following order of succes-
sion : —
I. Thorlongus, who has charters as above in
the reign of King Edgar (inter 1097 et 1107),
and whose seal in the first is quite entire, had two
sons j 1. Swane ; 2. William, whose name appears
in a charter by William de Vetereponte, in the
archives of Durham.
II. Swane, son of Thorlongus, whose name
appears in several charters of the same age, as in
H
1)8
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
one by King Edgar to the monastery of Colding
ham, of the lands of Swinton ; also in one of th<
reign of David I., as possessing the Fishery at Fis
wick, near Berwick, and others in these archives.
III. Galfredus, son of Swane, also mentione
in these archives. He is stated by Crawford t<
have had two sons ; 1. Hugh, the next in this line
2. Reginaldus, of whom afterwards.
IV. Hugh, the eldest son of Galfredus, from
whom came the Crawfords of Crawford proper, as
under.
V. Galfredus de Crawford, who is a witness to
a charter of Roger, Bishop of St. Andrew's, to tin
monastery of Kelso, in 1179, and died about 1202.
VI. Reginald de Crawford, probably his son, is
witness to a charter of Richard le Bard to the
same monastery, together with William, John, anc
Adam, his sons, in 1228. Of the first and third no
other memorial exists. The second,
VII. Sir John Crawfurd, his successor, is desig-
nated, Dominus de eodem miles, in several donations
He died without male issue in 1248, leaving two
daughters, of whom the eldest was married to
Archibald de Douglas, ancestor of all the Douglases
whose descent can be traced ; and the youngest
was married to David de Lindsay of Wauchope-
dale, ancestor of all the Lindsays in Scotland.
The last three are extracted from Wood's Peer-
age, under the title Crawford ; and the authorities
are stated on the margin. That these ladies, the
daughters of Sir John Crawfurd, were descended
from Hugh, No. IV., is distinctly mentioned by
Crawfurd, in the MS. History of the Crawfurds,
as above. To return now to the second son of
Galfredus, No. III.
Crawfurd further states, that Galfredus, No. III.,
as above, besides Hugh, had another son,
IV. Reginald, with whom another portion of
the barony of Craufurd remained, and that from
him descended his son,
V. John ; and hence the distinction of this part
of the barony into Crawford-John. This John,
he adds, is the first on record that used the sur-
name of Craufurd from his lands ; and he is men-
tioned as a witness to a charter by Arnold, Abbot
of Kelso, in 1140. In the account of Craufurd of
Auchnames, in Renfrewshire, p. 365, it is stated,
that Sir Gregan Craufurd, ancestor of the Dalma-
gregan branch of Craufurds, was a younger bro-
ther of Sir John Craufurd of Crawford-John ; of
course, he must also have been a son of Reginald,
No. IV. This point may afterwards be more
clearly verified. Suffice it here to say, that this
branch diverged into several, as those of Torring-
zean, Drongan, Camlarg, Balquhanny, Liffnoris,
&c., all either now extinct, or whose history is
very little known. They were distinguished by
the stag's head in their armorial bearings, in allu-
sion to their common ancestor Sir Gregan's having
rescued David I. from the attack of a stag which
had unhorsed him. This exploit is said to have
taken place near Edinburgh, in 1127, which date
corresponds not unfitly with the era of his supposed
brother, Sir John Craufurd of Crawford-John,
who appears as a witness, as above-mentioned, in
1140.
VI. Dominus Galfredus de Craufurd, is the next
stated by Craufurd the historian, in the succession
n this line. He lived in the reign of Malcolm IV.
inter 1153 et 1165), and in that of his successor
William ; and is a frequent witness to the dona-
tions of that prince to the abbacy of Arbroath,
particularly in 1179.
VII. Hugh de Craufurd appears to be the next
in succession, though it is more from probable con-
jecture than from precise evidence, that he is re-
ported to be the son of the preceding. But that
this Hugh was father of
VIII. Sir Reginald de Craufurd, sheriff of Ayr-
shire, Crawfurd has no hesitation in affirming.
This Sir Reginald, about the beginning of the
13th century, married the heiress of Loudoun,
and from him all the Crawfurds of that family, and
their numerous cadets, are descended. It would
appear that he had four sons ; 1. Hugh ; 2. Wil-
liam ; 3. John, from whom is descended the Craw-
fordland family ; and, 4. Adam.
IX. Hugh carried on the line of Loudoun. He
had two sons ; 1. Hugh ; 2. Reginald, who was
the first of Kerse.
X. Hugh, the eldest son, was of Loudoun. He
had a son, said to be ancestor of the Baidland
Craufurds, and a daughter, Margaret, who was
married to Sir Malcolm Wallace. She was the
mother of the Guardian of Scotland, Sir William
Wallace, from whom the Bailies of Lamington are
maternally descended. — Robertson's " Ayrshire
Families:9
0.
THE BURNING OF THE BARNS OF AYR.
Page 42.
As this is one of those portions of our history on
which Lord Hailes has thought proper to be scep-
tical, the following remarks of the learned Dr.
Jamieson * on the subject may be satisfactory to
the reader. With respect to the date, it may, with
great propriety, be fixed about Midsummer 1297-
'•' The story of the destruction of these buildings,
and of the immediate reason of it, is supported by
the universal tradition of the country to this day ;
and local tradition is often entitled to more regard
than is given to it by the fastidiousness of the
learned. Whatever allowances it may be neces-
sary to make for subsequent exaggeration, it is not
easily conceivable, that an event should be con-
nected with a particular spot, during a succession
of ages, without some foundation.
" Sir D. Dairy mple deems this story l inconsistent
with probability.' He objects to it, because it is
said, 'that Wallace, accompanied by Sir John
Irraham, Sir John Menteith, and Alexander Scrym-
;eour, constable of Dundee, went into the west of
Scotland, to chastise the men of Galloway, who had
espoused the part of the Comyns, and of the Eng-
ish ;' and that, 'on the 28th August, 1298, they
set fire to some granaries in the neighbourhood of
Ayr, and burned the English cantoned in them.' —
Annals, I. 255, N. Here he refers to the relations
)f Arnold Blair and to Major, and produces three
objections to the narrative. One of these is, that
Comyn, the younger of Badenoch, was the only
man of the name of Comyn who had any interest
n Galloway ; and he was at that time of Wallace's
>arty.' The other two are ; that f Sir John Gra-
am could have no share in the enterprise, for he
* Notes to " Wallace."
APPENDIX D.
was killed at Falkirk, 22d July, 1298 ;' and that
: it is not probable that Wallace would have under-
taken such an enterprise immediately after the dis-
comfiture at Falkirk.' Although it had been said
by mistake, that Graham and Comyn were present,
this could not invalidate the whole relation, for we
often find that leading facts are faithfully narrated
in a history, when there are considerable mistakes
as to the persons said to have been engaged.
" But although our annalist refers both to Major
and Blair, it is the latter only who mentions either
the design of the visit paid to the west of Scotland,
or the persons who are said to have been associates
in it. The whole of Sir David's reasoning rests on
the correctness of a date, and of one given only in
the meagre remains ascribed to Arnold Blair. If
his date be accurate, the transaction at Ayr, what-
ever it was, must have taken place thirty-seven
days afterwards. Had the learned writer exer-
cised his usual acumen here — had he not been
resolved to throw discredit on this part of the his-
tory of Wallace — it would have been most natural
for him to have supposed, that this event was post-
dated by Blair. It seems, indeed, to have been
long before the battle of Falkirk. Blind Harry
narrates the former in his Seventh, the latter in
his Eleventh Book. Sir David himself, after push-
ing the argument from the date given by Blair as
far as possible, virtually gives it up, and makes
the acknowledgment which he ought to have made
before. ' I believe,' he says, ' that this story took
its rise from the pillaging of the English quarters,
about the time of the treaty of Irvine, in 1297,
which, as being an incident of little consequence, I
omitted in the course of this history.' Here he
refers to Hemingford, T. I. p. 123.
" Hemingford says, that ' many of the Scots
and men of Galloway had, in a hostile manner,
made prey of their stores, having slain more than
five hundred men, with women and children.'
Whether he means to say that this took place at
Ayr, or at Irvine, seems doubtful. But here, I
think, we have the nucleus of the story. The barns,
according to the diction of Blind Harry, seem to
have been merely ( the English quarters,' erected
by order of Edward for the accommodation of his
troops. Although denominated barns by the Min-
strel, and horreas by Arnold Blair, both writers
seem to have used these terms with great latitude,
as equivalent to what are now called barracks. It
is rather surprising, that our learned annalist
should view the loss of upwards of five hundred
men, besides women and children, with that of
their property, * as an incident of little consequence,'
in a great national struggle.
" Major gives nearly the same account as Blair.
Speaking of Wallace, he says, < Anglorum insignes
viros apud horrea Aerie residentes de nocte incendit,
et qui a voraci flamma evaserunt ejus mucrone
occubuerunt.' — Fol. Ixx.
" There is also far more unquestionable evidence
as to the cause of this severe retaliation, than is
generally supposed. Lord Hailes has still quoted
Barbour as an historian of undoubted veracity.
Speaking of Crystal of Seton, he says —
' It wes gret sorow sekyrly,
That so worthy persoune as he
Suld on sic maner hangyt be.
Thusgate endyt his worthynes.
And off Crauford als Schyr Ranald wes,
And Schyr Bryce als the Blar,
Hangyt in till a berne in Ar.'
The Bruce, III. 260 v. &c.
" This tallies very well with the account given
by the Minstrel.
' Four thousand haill that nycht was in till Ayr.
In gret bernyss, biggyt with out the toun,
The justice lay, with many bald barroun.'
Wallace, vii. 334.
" The testimony of the Complaynt of Scotland, a
well-known national work, written A. D. 1548, con-
curs. Speaking of the king of England, the writer
says :
" ( Ony of you that consentis til his fals conques
of your cuntre, ye sal be recompenssit as your
forbears var at the blac perliament at the bernis of
Ayre, quhen kyng Eduard maid ane conuocatione
of al the nobillis of Scotland at the toune of Ayre,
vndir culour of faitht and concord, quha comperit
at his instance, nocht heffand suspitione of his
treasonabil consait. Than thai beand in his sub-
iectione vndir culour of familiarite, he gart hang,
cruelly and dishonestly, to the nummer of sexten
scoir of the maist nobillis of the cuntre, tua and
tua, ouer ane balk, the quhilk sextene scoir var
cause that the Inglismen conquest sa far vithtin
your cuntre.' " — Compl. Scotl. p. 144.
" The author refers to this as a fact universally
acknowledged among his countrymen, although, it
must be recollected, no edition of the Life of Wal-
lace was printed for more than twenty years after
this work was written. He introduces it again, as
a proof of treachery and cruelty, which still con-
tinued to excite national feeling.
" ' Doubtles thai that ar participant of the cruel
inuasione of Inglismen contrar thar natyue cun-
traye, ther cragges sal be put in ane mair strait
yoik nor the Samnetes did to the Romans, as Kyng
Eduard did til Scottis men at the blac parlament at
tlie bernis of Ayr, quhen he gart put the craggis of
sexten scoir in faldomis of cordis, tua and tua,
ouer ane balk, of the maist principal of them,' " &c.
— Ibid. p. 159, 160.
D.
MEMOIR OF BISHOP ANTHONY BEK.
Page 43.
FOR the following biographical notice of this eccle-
siastical warrior, who, in ambition, power, and
talents for political intrigue, may justly be con-
sidered as the Cardinal Wolsey of his day, we are
indebted to a work of Nicholas Harris Nicolas, Esq.,
a name sufficient to recommend it to all who have
any taste for antiquarian research.
" Of the period of Bek's birth we have no pre-
cise information. He was a younger son of Walter
Bek, Baronfof Eresby ; and in the 54th Henry III.
1270, was signed with the cross on going to the
Holy Land with Prince Edward *, who nominated
* In Dugdale's Baronage, vol. i. p. 426. In this memoir
all the statements are taken from Surtees' History of Dur-
ham, excepting where other authorities are cited.
H 2
100
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
him one of the executors of his will, which was
dated at Acre in June 1272 *. In 3rd Edward I.
1275, being then a clerk, he was appointed Con-
stable of the Tower of London •f1 ; and was con-
stituted Archdeacon of Durham as early as 1273 £.
He was present in the Parliament at Westminster
at the feast of St. Michael, 6th Edward I. 1278,
when the King of Scotland did homage to Edward
and on the 9th July, 1283, was elected Bishop of
Durham. The ceremony of his consecration was
performed by the Archbishop of York, in the pre-
sence of the King, on the 9th of January following ;
but at his enthronization at Durham on Christmas
eve, a dispute arose between the official of the
Archbishop of York and the Prior of Durham, as
to the right of performing the office, which the
bishop-elect terminated, by receiving the mitre
from the hands of his brother, Thomas Bek, Bishop
of St. David's. On the festival of St. John the
Evangelist, he presented the church with two pieces
of rich embroidery, wrought with the history of
the Nativity.
" It is impossible to state even the principal oc-
casions on which Bishop Bek was conspicuous ; it
being perhaps sufficient to observe, that scarcely a
single event of any importance took place during
the. reign of Edward the First, whether of war or
diplomacy, but in which he was concerned. Se-
veral facts might be mentioned which tend to
prove the influence that he at one time possessed
over the mind of his sovereign. According to
Fordun, it was by his advice that Edward sup-
ported the claim of Baliol instead of that of Bruce ||,
in the competition for the crown of Scotland ; and
he was frequently a mediator, not only between
the King and his barons, but between his Majesty
and his children. The Prelate's ambition was
equal to his resources ; and both were evinced by
the splendour of his equipage, and the number of
his followers. If his biographer *U, from whom Mr.
Surtees has derived a great part of his statements,
may be believed, the retinue with which he at-
tended the King in his wars amounted to twenty-
six standard-bearers of his household ** ; one hun-
dred and forty knights, and five hundred horse ;
and one thousand foot marched under the conse-
crated banner of St. Cuthbert, which was borne by
Henry de Horncestre, a monk of Durham. The
Bishop's wealth and power soon, however, excited
the suspicion of the King ; and the process of * quo
warranto ' was applied, with the view of reducing
them. His temporalities were seized, but he re-
covered them after an appeal to Parliament ; and
his palatine rights were confirmed in the most
ample manner by the Justices Itinerant in 1293.
* Royal Wills, p. 18, and Testamenta Vetusta, p. 8.
t Dugdale's Baronage, vol. i. p. 426.
I Le Neve's Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae, p. 353.
§ Rot. Parl. vol. i. p. 224.
|| Wyntown states the same thing ; and the words he puts
in the mouth of the subtle ecclesiastic are highly compli-
mentary to the spirit and military talents of Bruce, against
the consequences of which he effectually succeeded in
awakening the apprehensions of Edward. — Vide vol. ii. p.
45, 46.
IT Robert de Gledstanes, who was elected Bishop of Dur-
ham in 1333, but was set aside by the Pope, and died soon
afterwards. His labours are preserved in the Cottonian MSS.
Titus, A. ii.
** " Habuit de familia sua xxvj. vexillarios." Bannerels
were most probably meant.
From the proceedings in Parliament in the 21st
Edward I., it seems, that on the Wednesday before
the feast of St. James the Apostle, in the 20th
Edward I., namely, on the 23d July, 1292, at
Derlyngton, and afterwards at Alverton, and other
places, the Archbishop of York had formerly ex-
communicated the Bishop of Durham, he being
then engaged in the King's service in the North ;
for which offence the Archbishop was imprisoned,
but pardoned on paying a fine of 4000 merks *.
Bek's frequent quarrels with the Prior of Durham,
whom he had of his own authority deprived and
ejected, soon afforded a pretext for the royal inter-
ference ; and a formidable attack was afterwards
made upon his possessions. About the same time
he espoused the popular cause by joining the Earl
Marshal and the Earl of Hereford against the
crown ; and when charged by the King with de-
serting his interests, he boldly replied, ' That the
Earls laboured for the advantage and honour of
the sovereign and his realm, and therefore he
stood with them, and not with the King, against
them.' In the meanwhile he obeyed a second cita-
tion to Rome, for having deprived the Prior, where
he app ared with his usual magnificence, and
triumphed over his adversaries, by obtaining from
the Pontiff a confirmation of his visitorial supe-
riority over the convent. By quitting the realm
without license, he exposed himself to the enmity
of the crown ; and his vassals availed themselves
of his absence to urge then? complaints. The Pala-
tinate was seized into the King's hands ; and, in
July 1301, the temporalities of the see were com-
mitted to the custody of Robert de Clifford. In
the parliament in the following year, having effected
a reconciliation with his vassals, and submitted to
the King, the bishop obtained a restitution of his
temporalities. But Bek's intractable spirit soon
involved him in fresh disputes with the Prior ; and
being accused of having infringed on the dignity
of the crown, by some instruments which he had
obtained from Rome, his temporalities were, in
December 1305, once more seized ; and the King
seems to have used every exertion, not only to
humiliate the haughty prelate, but to divest his
see of some part of its extensive territories. From
this time until Edward's demise, he continued
under the royal displeasure ; but no sooner was
Edward the Second on the throne, than he added
to his power and titles, by procuring the dignity
of King of the Isle of Man, together with ample
restitution of what had been arrested from him by
the late monarch.
" It is here, however, necessary to refer to the
notice of the Bishop in the poem." (See Siege of
Carlaverock.) " Mr. Surtees has evidently adopted
the translation given of it in the 'Antiquarian
Repertory,' where the words <uns plaitz' are
rendered *a wound,' as he says, 'the Bishop of
Durham is described in the roll of Carlaverock,
as being absent from the siege on account of a
wound ; whereas the passage is presumed to have
meant, that the Bishop was detained in England in
consequence of a treaty on some other public trans-
action. It appears that he then sent the King one
hundred and sixty men-at-arms ; and at the battle
of Falkirk, he is stated to have led the second
division of the English army with thirty-nine
* Rot. Parl. vol. i. p. 102, et seq.
APPENDIX D.
101
banners *. In the 35th Edward I., being sent to
Rome with other Bishops and the Earl of Lincoln,
to present some vessels of gold to the Pope from
the King, his Holiness conferred on him the title
of Patriarch of Jerusalem -f*. Thus, Mr. Surtees
remarks, on receiving the sovereignty of the Isle
of Man, ' his haughty spirit was gratified by the
accumulated dignities of Bishop, Count Palatine,
Patriarch, and King.' The last political trans-
action of his life was his union with the Earl of
Lancaster, against Piers de Gaveston, in 1310 ;
and, on the 3d of March following, 1310-11, he
expired at his manor of Eltham in Kent.
" The character of Anthony Bek is given with
more elegance than truth in the Poem. ' The
mirror of Christianity' is an emphatic allusion to
his piety and virtue ; and his wisdom, eloquence,
temperance, justice, and chastity are as forcibly
pointed out, as the total absence of pride, covet-
ousness, and envy, for which he is said to have
been distinguished. But this is rather a brilliant
painting, than a true portrait ; for, if all the other
qualities which are there ascribed to him be con-
ceded, it is impossible to consider that humility
formed any part of his merits. His latest bio-
grapher, Mr. Surtees, has however described him
with so much discrimination and elegance, that
his words are transferred to these pages, because
they form the most appropriate conclusion of this
sketch, and powerfully tend to redeem its many
imperfections.
" * The Palatine power reached its highest eleva-
tion under the splendid pontificate of Anthony Bek.
Surrounded by his officers of state, or marching
at the head of his troops, in peace or in war, he
appeared as the military chief of a powerful and
independent franchise. The court of Durham
exhibited all the appendages of royalty ; nobles
addressed the Palatine sdvereign kneeling ; and,
instead of menial servants, knights waited in his
presence-chamber and at his table, bare-headed
and standing. Impatient of control, whilst he
asserted an oppressive superiority over the con-
vent, and trampled on the rights of his vassals, he
jealously guarded his own Palatine franchise, and
resisted the encroachments of the crown when they
trenched on the privileges of the aristocracy J.
When his pride or his patriotism had provoked the
displeasure of his sovereign, he met the storm with
firmness ; and had the fortune or the address to
emerge from disgrace and difficulty, with added
rank and influence. His high birth gave him a
natural claim to power ; and he possessed every
popular and splendid quality which could command
obedience, or excite admiration. His courage and
constancy were shown in the service of his sove-
reign. His liberality knew no bounds ; and he
regarded no expense, however enormous, when
placed in competition with any object of pleasure
or magnificence §. Yet, in the midst of apparent
* This passage probably meant, that among the Bishop's
followers there were thirty-nine bannerets.
t Dugdale's Baronage, vol. i. p. 426.
t During one of Edward's progresses to Scotland, a pal-
frey belonging to the royal train threw and killed its rider ;
and Anthony seized the palfrey as a deodand: " dedeins sa
fraunchise roiale."
§ He gave 40s. for as many fresh herrings, " Aliis mag-
natibus tune in Parliaments ibi consistentibus pro nimia
caristia emere non curantibus." Grayst. c. 14. On another
profusion, he was too prudent ever to feel the
embarrassment of Avant. Surrounded by habitual
luxury, his personal temperance was as strict as it
was singular ; and his chastity was exemplary, in
an age of general corruption *. Not less an enemy
to sloth "f" than to intemperance, his leisure was
devoted either to splendid progresses £ from one
occasion, hearing one say, " this cloth is so dear, that even
Bishop Anthony would not venture to pay for it ;" he imme-
diately ordered it to be bought and cut up into horse-cloths.
— Ibid.
* " Castissime vixit, vix mulierum faciem fixis oculis aspi-
ciens ; unde in translatione S. Willelmi Eboracensis cum alii
Episcopi ossa ejus timerent tangere, remordente eos con-
scientia de virginitate amissa, iste audacter manus impo-
suit; et quod negotium poposcit reverenter egit." — Ibid.
t " Quietis impatiens vix ultra unum somnum in lecto
expectans, dixit ilium non esse hominem qui in lecto de
latere in latus se verteret." — Ibid.
J "In nullo loco mansurus, continue circuibat demanerio
in manerium, de austro in boream ; et equorum, canum et
avium sectator." — Ibid. And here one cannot avoid being
reminded of the satirical lines of Piers Plowman : —
" And piked a boute on palfrays : fro place to maners
Have an hepe of houndes at his ers : as he a Lord were."
Bishop-Middleham, then a fortress of the first class,
appears, from the date of several charters, to have been
Anthony Bek's chief residence within the county of Dur-
ham. The reasons which led to this preference are obvious.
Defended by a morass on two sides, and by broken ground
to the north, the fortress presented an almost impregnable
stronghold during the wars of the Border, whilst Auckland
lay bare and defenceless, on the direct route of Scottish
invasion. It is no wonder that, in after times, Middleham
was deserted for the green glades of Auckland.
The following lines are extracted from an inedited poem
on the " Superstitions of the North."
" There Valour bowed before the rood and book,
And kneeling Knighthood served a Prelate Lord ;
Yet little deigned he on such train to look,
Or glance of ruth or pity to afford.
There time has heard the peal rung out by night,
Has seen from every tower the cressets stream :
When the red bale-fife on yon western height,
Had roused the Warder from his fitful dream ;
Has seen old Durham's lion-banner float
O'er the proud bulwark, that, with giant pride,
And feet deep plunged amidst the circling moat,
The efforts of the roving Scot defied.
" Long rolling years have swept those scenes away,
And peace is on the mountain and the fell ;
And rosy dawn, and closing twilight gray,
But hears the distant sheep-walk's tinkling bell.
And years have fled since last the gallant deer
Sprung from yon covert at the thrilling horn :
Yet still, when Autumn shakes the forest sear,
Black Hugo's voice upon the blast is borne.
Woe to the wight who shall his ire provoke,
When the stern huntsman stalks his nightly round,
By blasted ash, or lightning- shivered oak,
And cheers with surly voice his spectre hound."
Of this black Hugh, take the following legendary account :
" Sir Anthon Bek, Busshop of Dureme in the tyme of King
Eduarde, the son of King Henry, was the maist prowd and
masterfull Busshop in all England; and it was com'only
said that he was the prowdest Lord in Christienty. It
chanced that, emong other lewd persons, this Sir Anthon
entertained at his court one Hugh de Pountchardon, that for
his evill deeds and manifold robberies had been driven out
of the Inglische Court, and had come from the southe to
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
manor to another, or to the sports of the field ;
and his activity and temperance preserved his
faculties of mind and body vigorous, under the
approach of age and infirmity.
" ' In the munificence of his public works he
rivalled the greatest of his predecessors. Within
the bishopric of Durham he founded the colleges
of Chester and Lanchester, erected towers at Gain-
ford and Coniscliff, and added to the buildings of
Alnwick and Barnard Castles. He gave Even-
wood manor to the convent, and appropriated the
vicarage of Morpeth to the chapel which he had
founded at Auckland*. In his native county of
Lincoln, he endowed Alvingham priory, and built
a castle at Somerton f. In Kent he erected the
beautiful manor-house of Eltham, whose ruins still
speak the taste and magnificence of its founder.
Notwithstanding the vast expenses incurred in
these ^,nd other works, in his contests with the
crown and with his vassals, in his foreign journeys,
and in the continued and excessive charges of his
household, he died wealthier than any of his prede-
cessors, leaving immense treasures in the riches of
the age ; gallant horses, costly robes, rich furni-
ture, plate, and jewels J.'
" Anthony Bek was the first prelate of Durham
who was buried within the walls of the cathedral.
His predecessors had been restrained from sepul-
ture within the sacred edifice by a reverential awe
for the body of the holy confessor § ; and on this
occasion, from some motive of superstition, the
corpse was not allowed to enter the doors, although
a passage was broken through the wall^I for its
seek a little bread, and to live by stalynge. And to this
Hughe, whom also he imployed to good purpose in the
warr of Scotland, the Busschop gave the lande of Thikley,
since of him caulied Thikley-Pountchardon, and also made
him his chief huntsman. And after, this blake Hugh dyed
afore the Busshop : and efter that the Busshop chasid the
•wild hart in Galtres forest, and sodainly ther met with him
Hugh de Pontchardon that was afore deid, on awythe horse ;
and the said Hugh loked earnestly on the Busshop, and the
Busshop said unto him, ' Hughe, what makethe thee here ?'
and he spake never word, but lifte up his cloke, and then he
showed. Sir Anton his ribbes set with bones, and nothing
more ; and none other of the varlets saw him but the
Busshop only ; and the said Hughe went his way, and Sir
Anton toke corage, and cheered the dogges; and shortly
efter he was made Patriarque of Hierusalem, and he sawe
nothing no moe ; and this Hughe is him that the silly people
in Galtres doe call Le gros Venour, and he was seen twice
efter that by simple folk, afore that the forest was felled in
the tyme of Henry, father of King Henry that now ys."
* " Sed ipso mortuo Radulphus rilius Willelmi Dominus de
Graystoke patronatum praefatae Ecclesise per litem obtinuit ;
et presentato per ipsum per Episcopum admisso et institute,
capella indotata remansit." — Grayst. c. 22. The patronage
still remains with the heir of Greystoke.
t Castrum de Somerton curiosissime aedificavit. — Grayst.
c. 22.
t Ibid.
§ " Ante ilium enim ob reverentiam corporis S. Cuthberti
non est permissum corpus mortuum ingredi ecclesiam
Dunelmensem." Anthony Bek was, therefore, the first who
dared to bring
" A slovenly, unhandsome corse,
Betwixt the wind and his nobility."
IT If, however, the funeral of the patriarch Bishop was
conducted with the same solemnities as that of his successor
Cardinal Langley, the breaking an entrance through the wall
reception, near the place of interment. The tomb
was placed in the east transept, between the altars
of St. Adrian and St. Michael, close to the holy
shrine. A brass, long since destroyed, surrounded
the ledge of the marble, and bore the following
inscription : —
' Presul magnanimus Antonius hie jacet imus.
Jerusalem strenuus Patriarch a fuit, quod opimus
Annis vicenis regnabit sex et j plenis,
Mille trecentenis Christo moritur quoque denis.'
" The Bishop's heirs were found, by the inqui-
sition held after his decease, to be his nephew,
Robert de Willoughby, son of Alice his eldest
sister ; and his nephew John de Harcourt, son of
his second sister Margaret."
E.
EXPEDITION TO THE WEST HIGHLANDS.
Page 46.
IN this account of the expedition to Loch- A we,
the statements, as the reader will perceive, are all
taken from the pages of the Minstrel. The writer
was induced to do so, not from the circumstance
of Henry being the only ancient author who has
recorded the transaction, but from the evidence of
its truth, which may be found in the traditions of
the country where the conflict took place. These
have already been alluded to in the Introduction.
It may not, however, be improper to state, that
" Uagh Mliac Phadan" or M'Fadyan's cave, can
still be pointed out by old Highlanders, who add,
on the authority of tradition, that the determina-
tion with which the Irish leader defended himself
was such, that his pursuers had to throw down
bundles of burning furze into the cave before he
surrendered. The rock on which his head was
afterwards set up, still goes by the name of Bein-
nean Mhac Phadan, the Peak or Pinnacle of Mac-
Fadyan. In short, the localities of the country are
so correctly described, particularly the scene of the
battle, which appears to have been on the com-
paratively open space between Crag-an-aradh and
the rock of Bradhir or Brandir, as it is called, for
the convenience of the English reader, that few
who have had an opportunity of contrasting the
scenery with the account of the Minstrel, can resist
the impression of its being either the work, or
translated from the work, of an eyewitness. This,
taken in connection with the evidence afforded by
the coins of Edward I., which from time to time
have been found about the ruins of Ardchattan
priory, and which have also been previously ad-
verted to in the Introduction, ought to be pretty
conclusive as to the occurrence narrated.
This subject has already engaged the attention
of a literary gentleman * of talent and intelligence,
who has handled the matter with no small degree
of acumen. The following extracts may therefore
was a matter of necessity rather than superstition, for Lang-
ley's hearse was drawn into the nave of the cathedral by four
stately black horses, which, with all their housings of velvet,
become the official perquisite of the sacrist.
* John Hay Allan, Esq.
APPENDIX E.
103
be interesting to those readers who have not had
opportunities for personal investigation.
" Blind Harrie has very particularly related the
circumstances of MacPhadian's proceedings ; and
his account so exactly coincides with the tradition
and topography of the district where the facts are
said to have been performed, that there can be
little or no doubt of the truth of his narration.
" Loch- Awe, upon the banks of which the scene
of action took place, is thirty-four miles in length.
The north side is bounded by wide muirs and in-
considerable hills, which occupy an extent of coun-
try from twelve to twenty miles in breadth, and the
whole of this space is enclosed as by a circum-
vallation. Upon the north it is barred by Loch-
Eitive, on the south by Loch- A we, and on the east
by the deep and dreadful pass of Brandir, through
which an arm of the latter lake opens at about
four miles from its eastern extremity, and dis-
charges the river Awe into the former. The pass
is about three miles in length ; its east side is
bounded by the almost inaccessible steeps which
form the base of the vast and rugged mountain of
Cruachan. The craigs rise in some places almost
perpendicularly from the water ; and, for their
chief extent, show no space nor level at their feet,
but a rough and narrow edge of stony beach.
Upon the whole of these cliffs grew a thick and
interwoven wood of all kinds of trees, both timber,
dwarf, and coppice ; no track existed through the
wilderness, but a winding path which sometimes
crept along the precipitous height, and sometimes
descended in a straight pass along the margin of
the water. Near the extremity of the dt file, a
narrow level opened between the water and the
craig ; but a great part of this, as well as the pre-
ceding steeps, was formerly enveloped in a thicket,
which showed little facility to the feet of any but
the martins and the wild cats. Along the west
side of the pass, lies a wall of sheer and barren
craigs : from behind they rise in rough, uneven,
and heathy declivities, out of the wide muir before
mentioned, between Loch-Eitive and Loch- Awe ;
but in front they terminate abruptly in the most
frightful precipices, which form the whole side of
the pass, and descend at one fall into the water
which fills its trough. At the north end of this
barrier, and at the termination of the pass, lies
that part of the cliff which is called Craiganuni :
at its foot the arm of the lake gradually contracts
its water to a very narrow space, and at length
terminates at two rocks (called the rocks of Bran-
dir), which form a straight channel, something re-
sembling the lock of a canal. From this outlet
there is a continual descent toward Loch-Eitive,
and from hence the river Awe pours out its current
in a furious stream, foaming over a bed broken
with holes, and cumbered with masses of granite
and whinstone.
" If ever there was a bridge near Craiganuni
in ancient times, it must have been at the rocks of
Brandir. From the days of Wallace to those of
General Wade, there were never passages of this
kind ; but in places of great necessity, too narrow
for a boat, and too wide for a leap, even then they
were but an unsafe footway, formed of the trunk
of trees, placed transversely from rock to rock,
unstripped of their bark, and destitute of either
plank or rail. For such a structure there is no
place in the neighbourhood of Craiganuni, but at
the rocks above-mentioned. In the lake, and on
the river, the water is far too wide ; but, at the
strait, the space is not greater than might be
crossed by a tall mountain pine, and the rocks on
either side are formed by nature like a pier. That
this point was always a place of passage, is ren-
dered probable by its facility, and the use of re-
cent times. It is not long since it was the common
gate of the country on either side the river and
the pass. The mode of crossing is yet in the me-
mory of people living, and was performed by a
little currach. moored on either side the water,
and a stout coble fixed across the stream from
bank to bank, by which the passengers drew them-
selves across, in the manner still practised in places
of the same nature. It is no argument against the
existence of a bridge in former times, that the
above method only existed in ours, rather than a
passage of that kind which might seem the more
improved expedient. The contradiction is suffi-
ciently accounted for, by the decay of timber in
the neighbourhood. Of old, both oaks and firs of
an immense size abounded within a very incon-
siderable distance ; but it is now many years since
the destruction of the forests of Glen-Eitive and
Glen-Urcha has deprived the country of all the
trees of a sufficient size to cross the strait of
Brandir ; and it is probable, that the currach was
not introduced till the want of timber had disena-
bled the inhabitants of the country from maintain-
ing a bridge. It only further remains to be no-
ticed, that at some distance below the rock of
Brandir there was formerly a ford, which was used
for cattle in the memory of people yet living.
From the narrowness of the passage, the force of
the stream, and the broken bed of the river, it
was, however, a dangerous pass, and could only
be attempted with safety at leisure, and by expe-
rience.
" Such is the topography of the country in
which, tradition says, that Sir Niel Campbell made
his retreat and refuge. It now remains to show,
what correspondence there is between its features,
and the relation given by Blind Harrie. The
words of the Minstrel are as follows :
' Ye knycht Cambell maid gud.defens for yi
Till Craigunyn with thre hunder he zeid,
Yat strenth he held for all his * cruel deed,
Syne brak ye bryg quhar yai mycht not out pass
Bot throuch a furd quhar narow passage was
Ahandounly Cambell agayne yaim baid
Fast upon Avis yat was bathe deep and braid,
Makfadzan was apon ye toyir syd,
And yar on force behutfyt hym for to byd,
For at ye furd he durst nocht entir out,
For gud Cambell mycht set hym yan in dout,
Mak Fadzane socht, and a small passage fond
Had he lasar he mycht pass off yat land
Betwix a roch and ye gret wattir syd
Bot four in frount na ma mycht gang or ryd.'
Bookvii. Chap. iv. (Edin. Edit. 1758.)
" The correspondence between the above de-
scription and the account which I have before
given of the topography of the Pass of Brandir,
must be evident to every examiner. But the iden-
tity of that place and the one mentioned in the
poem, is confirmed to a degree of certainty ; first,
by the fact, that such a correspondence can be
* MacPhadian's.
104
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
found in no other part of the neighbouring dis-
tricts ; and, secondly, by the mention which is
made in the description of the poem, of names
which now exist in the appellation of the place to
which it is supposed to apply. ' Avis ' is well
known to have been the ancient name of Loch
Awe *, and is often met with in old poems which
make mention of that lake ; and Cragunyn is clearly
but a mis-spelling of * Craiganuni,' the name of
the rocks at the extremity of the Pass of Brandir.
The error is merely owing to the ignorance of the
transcribers of the poem, who did not understand
Gaelic orthography. Except by persons very com-
petently masters of the language of the country,
there is scarcely a name in the Highlands more
correctly written at the present day.
" It is easy to show the solecism of the corre-
spondence between Blind Harry's description of the
position of Sir Kiel, and the topography of the
Pass of Brandir. In the eighth line of the passage
above quoted, it is said, that when the Campbell
had gained the craig to which he retreated, he
' baid ' (abode) fast upon Loch- Avis. From whence
it is plain, that this post was immediately above
the shore of Loch- Awe. In the brief notices of
MacPhadian's situation at the same period, it is
equally evident, that he was entangled in a narrow
and dangerous pass, bounded on one side by rocks,
and on the other side by the lake. It is expressly
said that he was on the opposite side from the
Campbells. The water was then between them,
and yet their positions were communicable by a
bridge and a ford. In the whole sixty-eight miles,
which form the circuit of Loch- Awe, there is not a
spot where these circumstances could have existed
except in the Pass of Brandir. On no part of the
shore is there a pass of the nature and difficulty
implied in Blind Harry's notices of MacPhadian's
embarrassment except there. Neither is there any
part of the lake which could be interposed between
two bodies of men, and yet rendered evadable by a
bridge, except the arm which terminates in the
river Awe. In all other places the water is from
one to three miles wide, and does not contract into
any stream or inlet which could prolong its barrier
sufficiently to prevent it from being turned, and
yet admit of its being evaded by a passage of the
nature above mentioned. But in the Pass of
Brandir all these particulars are identically to be
traced. The narrowing of the lake to an incon-
siderable channel, and its prolongation into the
river Awe, by which the former might be inter-
posed as a barrier, and yet evaded by an immediate
crossing ; the bridge mentioned by Blind Harry as
having existed at the foot of Craigunyn, and the
probability that one formerly did exist in the cor-
responding spot of Craiganuni ; the ford described
as having been the only remaining communication
in the separating water, its dangerous character,
and the actual being of a pass of the same nature,
and the same relative position in the water of Awe,
all give the strongest evidence of the truth of the
Minstrel's relation, and the application of the scene
which he has described. Having then established
so much from the circumstances of the poem and
the nature of the country, we may draw a clear
deduction of the proceedings and motives of Sir
Niel Campbell previous to his entering Craiganuni."
* In this instance, it would rather seem that Henry has
merely preserved the name as he found it Latinized by Blair.
" Allowing that this spot was the place to which
that chief retreated from MacPhadian, it follows
as a necessary consequence, from the situation of
the latter at the breaking of the bridge, that he
must have made his pursuit round the east end of
Loch- Awe ; and it will very clearly appear, that
he could not have chosen this direction, had he
not been enticed into it by a similar route in the
flight of the Campbell. The proof that Mac-
Phadian did take the direction which I have ad-
vanced, is sufficiently decisive. We are expressly
told, that when Sir Niel had gained Craiganuni, he
was stopped in his pursuit on the opposite, or east
side of the water beneath. Now, as he possessed
no vessels on Loch- Awe, he could not have gamed
this side of the arm of the water which runs under
Craiganuni, had he not come to it by encircling
the east end of the whole lake, which is only four
miles distant. The conviction of this fact leads
decisively to discover the march of Sir Niel. It
is perfectly evident that he must have entered the
heights from the same side as that on which it is
apparent MacPhadian endeavoured to follow him ;
for, had he proceeded to Craiganuni by the west
end of the lake, or crossed the water any where
west of the Pass of Brandir, his enemy could have
had no motive in taking the eastern route. In
the first instance, he would have marched in an
opposite direction to those whom he was pursuing ;
and in the second, he would have taken a road,
which, allowing it might have been the shortest,
would have placed between him and his enemy an
impassable barrier, and have entangled him in a
strait and dangerous labyrinth, where his numbers
would have become useless, his attacks impracti-
cable, and his retreat dangerous. Among such
difficulties, it is not to be supposed that MacPha-
dian would voluntarily and unnecessarily have ha-
zarded his success and his safety ; he could only,
therefore, have been enticed into them, by the al-
lurement of pursuing upon the footsteps of his ene-
mies. The proceedings of Sir Niel are thus re-
duced to a degree of certainty, and leave no alter-
native from the circumstances which I have pointed
out.
" He observed, that entered from the east, and
having his enemy on that side, Craiganuni was the
most inaccessible and advantageous hold in all
Argyleshire ; but that entered and attacked from
the opposite direction, all the securities of the place
were converted into dangers. Placed then on this
quarter, it was only by a stratagem that he could
win the desired advantage ; and in prosecution of
its attainment, he adopted the only plan which
could have been unforeseen by his enemy, and
carried into execution with a certainty of success.
At the approach of MacPhadian into Nether Loch-
Awe, he fled before him along the south side, and
towards the east end of the lake. Drawn after
him by the consciousness of superiority, and the
facility of the pursuit, the Irish Captain followed
him with no thought but the eagerness of capture.
" The advantages, however, of Sir Niel in point
of time, was sufficient to prevent him from falling
into his hands in the open district from Inch-Con-
nel to Glen-Urcha ; and suddenly turning the head
of the lake, and circling towards the west, he dived
down the Pass of Brandir, crossed the water, broke
down the bridge, ascended the height, and threw
between him and his pursuers, the craigs, the
APPENDIX E.
105
rivers, and the lakes. It was then that the plan of
the chief was seen in all its superiority.
" Had he passed round the west end of the lake,
or crossed it westward of the Pass of Brandir, he
would have entered that wide and open country
which I have before described, — a country every
where untenable, and so surrounded by natural
barriers, that it would have been almost impossible
for him to have evacuated it under the closeness
of his pursuit. Craiganuni, which had been be-
fore him, would have been not only totally unser-
viceable to him, from the direction in which he
entered ; but its barriers lying wholly in his rear,
would have made it the most dangerous situation.
Had he been beset in the moors, the multitude of
his enemies had devoured him ; had he been over-
taken at the craig, his flight would have been cut
off by the gulf below ; and those who had fled
from the sword would have been driven over the
precipices, and plunged into the water. Had he
escaped these alternatives of ruin, every hardship
would have been presented to his retreat. The
country round the pass was wild and barren, even
to horror and desolation ; and had he succeeded
in gaining it with security, he must have pursued
his flight, hopeless of reinforcement and straitened
for subsistence. By the tactic upon which he acted,
he not only avoided all the evils, but converted the
whole of their disadvantages to the inconvenience
of his enemy. The instant he had occupied Craig-
anuni, and broken down the bridge over the mouth
of the river, he was inaccessible on every side,
and possessed in his rear a tract of nearly three
hundred square miles, wholly open to his opera-
tions, but secured from his enemies by the same
barriers which rendered himself unapproachable.
In front, the depth of the water, and the preci-
pices of the pass, were an insurmountable barrier ;
on the north, Loch-Eitive continued the line of
circumvallation from the sea to Beann Starabh ;
and on the south it was extended by Loch- Awe
from Lorn to Glen-Urcha. Sir Niel was thus en-
compassed by a formidable barrier of seventy-
three miles in circumference ; and from the ob-
stacles of this cordon, and the security of the wide
space in his rear, he could at pleasure have eva-
cuated his position under cover of the night, and
have retreated, in unmolested security, to Loch-
Fine, from whence he might have proceeded in his
galleys to the coast of Airshire, and here joined
himself with the successful associates of the late
victorious Wallace.
" I have said nothing of the ford through the
Awe, by which there was an approach to the posi-
tion of Sir Niel, nor of the capability of Mac
Phadian, to have passed Loch-Eitive by means of
his fleet ; of the first, the enemy feared to avail
himself from the danger of the passage, and the
want of discipline among his troops ; and from
the second, he could have reaped little avail, since,
in the consumption of time necessary to have
brought round these vessels from the sea, Sir Niel
might have abandoned his position, and in one
night have made good his retreat beyond Loch-
Awe.
" Thus baffled and out-manoeuvred, MacPhadian
not only failed in his object of offence, but found
himself drawn into an intricate and desolate laby-
rinth, where his multitude encumbered them-
selves ; the want of subsistence prevented him
from remaining to blockade Sir Niel, and his igno-
rance of the clues of the place made it difficult
to extricate himself by a retreat. In this exigence
he was desirous of returning to Nether Loch- Awe,
where there was abundance of cattle and game for
the support of his men. At length he discovered
a passage between the rocks and the water ; the
way was only wide enough for four persons to pass
abreast ; yet as they were not in danger of pursuit,
they retired in safety, and effected their march to
the south side of the lake *.
" Here we must leave MacPhadian, and return
to Duncan of Lorn. In his youth the latter had
been a school-companion of Wallace at Dundee ;
and he now determined to resort to him, and make
use of their old acquaintance to prevail on the
champion of Scotland to come to the assistance of
Sir Niel Campbell. As soon, therefore, as Mac
Phadian had evacuated the Pass, Duncan de-
scended from Craiganuni, and pursued his way for
the Low country, attended only by a single fol-
lower, named Gillemichel. This faithful clansman
was an aged man, but even in his age was still
famous for an uncommon speed of foot *f<, and on
their return performed good service for his master.
When Duncan arrived in the Low country he
found the Wallace at Dundaff, with Sir John the
Grseme. The patriot chieftain had just returned
from the overthrow of the English in the Barns
of Air and the city of Glasgow ; and besides the
friends and forces who had come to him upon those
occasions, he had been joined by Malcolm, Earl of
Lennox, and Richard of Lundi, who brought with
them a considerable number of their followers.
No sooner had Wallace heard the tidings of Dun-
can MacDougall, than he resolved to go to the aid
of Sir Niel Campbell ; and, assembling his force,
he instantly set out upon his march. He directed
his course by Stirling, either to gather increase of
followers, or apprehensive of leaving behind him
an English garrison on the threshold of the High-
lands. The castle, however, was not a place to be
taken in a day ; and bent upon the destruction of
MacPhadian, Wallace would not delay his march
to pursue the siege in person, but, leaving the Earl
of Lennox to carry on that service, he determined
to push forward his expedition into Argyleshire.
Having assembled his forces at the bridge of Stir-
ling, and found them to amount to two thousand
men, ' worthi and wycht,' he hastened forward
,011 his way. Duncan of Lorn acted as his guide ;
and while they pursued their march, he sent for-
ward his man Gillemichel to discover intelligence
of the enemy. Blind Harrie proceeds to relate,
that as the army proceeded, it became fatigued
with its march, that a great part of the men and
horses were incapable to continue their way with
that speed which the urgency of the expedition
required. Upon this Wallace determined to divide
the weary from the strong, and to hasten forward
with the latter only, and surprise the enemy before
they could have the opportunity of choosing a posi-
tion, where their superiority of numbers could be
displayed to its advantage. For this purpose he
divided his host into two bodies ; the first, consist-
ing of seven hundred men, he chose to haste for-
ward with himself ; and the second, which con-
tained but five hundred, and which was spent with
Book vii. 1. G60.
t Book vii. 1. 674.
106
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
fatigue, he left in the rear to follow as well as they
might. Before they continued their march Wal-
lace again separated the first division into three
companies ; the first, consisting of one hundred
men, his own chosen West country veterans, he
led in person as the advance guard ; the second,
of the same numbers, he committed to Sir John
the Graeme ; and the last, to the amount of five
hundred, he gave to Richard of Lundi, with whom
he joined Wallace of Richardtown, his cousin.
After this disposition, the two grand divisions
separated : that under the leading of Wallace
hastened forward on its march, and, crossing the
mountain in their front, lost sight of their feeble
comrades. In Glen-Dochart they were met by
Gillemichel the scout ; with him came Sir Niel
Campbell, who had escaped from Craiganuni, and
at the head of his three hundred clansmen had
hastened to join the approaching aid of Wallace.
" In this part of Blind Harrie's poem there is
an error, which throws some confusion upon the
traces of the march of Wallace. It appears, how-
ever, to have been the fault of the transcriber or
reciter, and I think may be satisfactorily explained.
The mistake consists in the contradiction of the
name of the place where the host of Wallace began
to fail with fatigue, and of that in which it is said,
that he afterwards met Sir Niel Campbell. The
words of the poem are thus : —
' Be our party was passit Straithfulan,
Ye small fute folk began to irk ilk ane.'
Book vii. 1. 763.
To which it is subsequently said
' In Glendowchar yair spy met yaim agayne,
With lord Cambell,' &c.
Ib. 1. 785.
" Straith-Phillan opens from the west end of
Glen-Dochart towards the north-west; and conse-
quently, as Wallace came from the south-east, it
must have been the second of the two places in
the succession of his march, and could not, as it
stands in the poem, have been the first. 1 shall
presently show, that there is every evidence from
the narrative of the Minstrel, and the evidence of
tradition, that Wallace did not pass through Straith-
Phillan in any part of his march. The mention of
the name, in this place, must therefore have been
an error altogether, arising either from the care-
lessness of the transcriber, or from the confusion
of two appellations, something similar in import.
I am inclined to lean to the latter opinion. At
the northern extremity of Straith-Earn, between the
Glen and Loch-Earn, the mountains form a little
amphitheatre, in the middle of which there is a
small conical hill, once sacred to St. Phillan, and
still called by his name. Near its summit was a
holy spring, distinguished also by the name of the
apostle, and at its foot was a small cell of religious,
formed originally by his disciples. It appears to
me highly probable, that Wallace entered the
Highlands by Straith-Earn ; that it was at St. Phil-
lan's Hill that his men became fatigued ; and that
it was this place which the reciter or transcriber of
Blind Harrie's poem confounded with Straith-Phil-
lan. This supposition is much supported by the
correspondence between the circumstances men-
tioned by the Minstrel respecting the march of
Wallace, and the route between Straith-Earn and
Glen-Dochart. A few miles north of St. Phillan's
Hill, the old and short track of the country emerges
from the level side of Loch-Earn, and, passing
over the transverse mountains at its extremity,
enters into Glen-Dochart, at the foot of Bean Mor,
and near the eastern extremity of the lake.
" This was the common Pass used of old by the
Highlanders, before the construction of the roads.
It is a wild and pathless track, but is still used by
shepherds, and is shorter than the modern < Rad
mor an righ ' * by some miles. The mention which
Blind Harrie makes of the march of Wallace, after
the separation from his weary men, agrees very
much with this path, and its direction : —
' Yus Wallace ost began to tak ye hycht,
Our a montayne sone passit off yar sycht.
In Glendowchar yair spy met yaim agayne
With lord Cambell, yan was our folk rycht fayne.'
Book vii. 1. 783.
" The correspondence is made still more near by
the hint which is given of the spot where the men
of Wallace met Sir Niel Campbell. It appears to
have happened immediately upon their entering
Glen-Dochart ; and, after having described the
meeting of the two parties, when the Minstrel tells
us, that they resumed their march, he says —
' By Louthdochyr full sodynlye yaim drew.'
Ib. 1. 792.
" From this it would appear, that Wallace en-
tered the glen near the extremity of the lake, and
this is the exact point where the mountain path
enters from Loch-Earn.
" From this period of the poem to the conclusion
of the episode of MacPhadian, the relation of the
Minstrel is clear and consistent ; and, by the aid
of the tradition of the country, the route pursued
by Wallace may be well identified with the locali-
ties of its existent topography. The oral account,
handed down in Argyleshire, states, that at the
coming of Wallace, MacPhadian and his host were
posted in the northern extremity of the Pass of
Brandir ; and that they were there attacked and
overthrown by Sir William and the Campbells. It
will be found, that this account is much confirmed
by the correspondence between the nature of the
country from Glen-Dochart to Loch-Awe, and the
particulars of the route described by Blind Harrie,
as having been pursued by Wallace from the latter
place to the hold where he encountered MacPha-
dian : it is still farther avouched by the exact con-
formity between the description of the scene of
battle, in the poem, and that marked as its site by
the tradition. Immediately after passing Loch-
Dochart, and consequently leaving that glen, the
Minstrel describes the host of Wallace as entering
a moss of such an extent and difficulty, that it pre-
vented the farther march of the horses, and obliged
the men to dismount and pursue their way on foot.
' Yan Wallace ost upon yair fute yai lycht,
Yair hors yai left yocht yai war neuir so wycht :
For moss and crag yai mycht na langer dre
Yan Wallace said quha gangs best let se.'
Book vii. 1. 803.
** A short distance beyond the west end of Glen-
Dochart, there is a high and wide tract of moss
* King's highway.
APPENDIX E.
107
and moor, called * The Churan Beag,' which occu-
pies the most considerable extent of the space
between Glen-Dochait and Glen-Urcha, the en-
trance to Loch- Awe. It is difficult to conceive a
more desolate spot, nor one which could more cor-
respond with the moss noticed by Blind Harrie.
Its whole extent is a vast waste of swamps, gullies,
and broken peat-hags ; and its outlets and entrances
are by rugged and steep declivities, embarrassed
with fragments of rocks, and torn into vast chasms
by the torrents which rise on the moss above.
Through this miserable region lies the shortest
path from Glen-Dochart to Glen-Urcha; and
though impassable for horses, yet, in the olden time,
when these were little used by the Highlanders, it
was the most common thoroughfare between the
above-mentioned places, and is still used, on ac-
count of its brevity, by the shepherds of the country,
and foot-travellers who require expedition. It is
several miles shorter than the way by Straith-Phil-
lan and Glen-Lochie ; for this reason, and also for
its utter solitude, it is highly probable that it
should have been the route chosen by Wallace in
preference to the other. In addition to the proofs
offered in its favour, by the correspondence of its
features with those of the road mentioned by Blind
Harrie, there is the negative confirmation, that
no place of the same nature occurs within the
neighbourhood of Glen-Dochart in any direction
by which it is pix>bable that the march of Wallace
could have been destined. For this reason, it is,
as I have before hinted, impossible that he could
have passed through Straith-Phillan ; for in the
whole way from Glen-Dochart, to Gleu-Urcha by
that road, there is neither moss nor muir, but plain
straith and narrow glen. From all these circum-
stances, it seems very conclusive, that it was
through the moss of ' the Churan Beag ' that Wal-
lace took his march, after his junction with Sir
Niel Campbell in Glen-Dochart. But to return to
the relation of the Minstrel.
" Previous to the entrance of Wallace upon the
muir, he mentions that Gillemichel had been again
sent forward to reconnoitre the route. He had
not been long entered the moss, when he met a
scout of MacPhadian, doubtless sent to discover
the approach of Wallace. At the appearance of
Gillemichel, the foeman fled ; but his speed was
not sufficient to enable him to outstrip the fleet
foot of his pursuer, and he was overtaken and
slam. Delivered from this danger of a discovery,
the host of Wallace effected their march through
the Churan in perfect secrecy, and reached the
hold of MacPhadian before their approach was
even known. It may, perhaps, be remarked, that
the paucity of the Minstrel, in his relation of this
part of the march of Wallace, is inconsistent with
the description of the country through which tra-
dition supposes it to have been made ; since the
poem makes no mention of the progress of the ex-
pedition through the intermediate space of ten
miles, which lies between the Churan and the pass
of Brandir, but, from declaring Wallace's delivery
from the moss, immediately proceeds to commu-
nicate his entrance to the hold, without taking any
notice of his arrival on the shore of Loch- Awe.
But it is to be observed, that, through the whole
march of Wallace, it describes those situations
only, the circumstances of which affect the inci-
dents of the story. The space from the Churan
being destitute of any feature dangerous or advan-
tageous, and the grand interest of the episode be-
ing the hold of MacPhadian, the Minstrel appears
to have been absorbed in that object, and to have
passed without regard the intervening way. This
is palpably the fact, by the certain evidence, that,
wherever the post of MacPhadian was situated,
there was between its entrance and the moss passed
by Wallace, a space of water which has not been
mentioned by the Minstrel.
' Then Wallace said quha gangs best let se,
Throuchout ye moss deliverly yai zeid,
Syne tuk ye hauld quharof yai had maist dreid,
Endlong ye schoir ay four in front yai past,' &c.
Book vii. 1. 806.
" From this notice of the shore, it is here evident
that Wallace arrived on the banks of some water
immediately previous to entering the position of
his enemy, and that Blind Harrie has neglected to
mention the circumstance. His omission of the
mention of Loch-Awe in his description of the
march of Wallace, is therefore no objection that
the latter was not made in the route affirmed by
tradition.
" From the arrival of Wallace in the hold of
MacPhadian, the account of Blind Harrie corre-
sponds entirely with the accounts of the oral re-
cord, and the nature of the pass of Brandir. The
place in which the old people of the country point
out the site of the battle, is that narrow stripe of
open space which lies near the northern extremity
of the pass, between the foot of Cruachan and the
narrowing of the lake to the rock of Brandir. The
Minstrel coincides with this account.
' Endlong ye schoir ay four in front yai past,
Quhill yai within assemblyt at ye last.'
Ib. 1. 810.
" From this narrowness of the column, and the
number of Wallace's men, the whole host could
not have entered within the pass, till the head had
arrived as far as the space before mentioned. The
description of the straitened situation of the posi-
tion also agrees with the pass of Brandir :
1 Her is na gait to fle zone pepil can,
Bot rockis heich and wattir depe and wan.'
Book vii. 1. 814.
" As soon as the men of Wallace arrived at the
post of their enemies, they fell upon them with the
utmost fury. Their scouts having been slain, as
before mentioned, MacPhadian's followers were
completely surprised and taken at disarray. Un-
dismayed, however, by this ill fortune, they snatched
up their arms, and rushed to defend the pass with
the boldest resolution. At the first onset, the
Scots bore back their enemies over five acres of
ground ; and Wallace, with his iron mace, made
a fearful havoc among the enemy. Encouraged,
however, by MacPhadian, the Irish came to the
rescue ; the battle thickened with more stubborn
fury ; and for two hours was maintained, with such
obstinate eagerness on both sides, that neither
party had any apparent advantage ; and, says the
Minstrel, the fiercest found ' eneuch ' of fighting.
At length the cause, and the valour of Wallace,
prevailed. The Irish gave way and fled ; and the
Scots of their party threw down their arms, and
108
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
kneeling for mercy, Wallace commanded them to
be spared for their birth's sake, but urged forward
the pursuit upon the Irish. Pent in by the rocks
and the water, the latter had but little hope in
flight. Many were overtaken and slain as they
enueavoured to climb the craigs ; and two thou-
sand were driven into the lake and drowned. Mac-
Phadian, with fifteen men, fled to a cave, and
hoped to have concealed himself till the pursuit
was over ; but Duncan of Lorn having discovered
his retreat, pursued and slew him with his com-
panions ; and having cut off the head of the leader,
brought it to Wallace, and set it upon a stone
high in one of the craigs, as a trophy of the vic-
tory."
*»« Before the writer met with the work whence the pre-
ceding extract is made, he entertained the belief that he was
the first who had studied the topography and tradition of
this romantic district, with a view of illustrating the labours
of the Minstrel, and hence bringing into notice a portion of
our history hitherto overlooked by all, save that ill-requited
author. Under this impression, he was arranging the mate-
rials he had collected, when he became aware of his being
anticipated by a more able hand. On comparing his notes
with the details of Mr. Allan, the similarity of their views
appears too striking to be supposed accidental ; and unwilling
to incur the charge of appropriating to himself the merits
of another, he has suppressed his own observations, in de-
ference to the ingenious author of the " Bridal of Caol-
chairn."
F.
MEMOIRS OF JOHN, EARL OF WARREN — LORD HENRY
DE PERCY — AND LORD ROBERT DE CLIFFORD.
I. WARREN.
Page 46.
IT is presumed the writer will not be far wrong,
if he anticipates a little curiosity on the part of the
reader, respecting the personal history of so con-
spicuous a character as the conqueror of Dunbar ;
and as our English neighbours consider it a matter
of difficulty, for a Scotsman to be impartial when
the conduct of an enemy of his country happens
to be the subject of his investigation, we shall,
without either denying or admitting the truth of
this allegation, endeavour to escape from the charge,
by giving the following biographical notice in the
elegant language of one of their own countrymen* :
" John, Earl of Warren and Surrey, was the son
of William, Earl of Warren and Surrey, by his
second wife, Maud, widow of Hugh Bigot, Earl
of Norfolk, and sister and coheiress of Anselm
Marshal, Earl of Pembroke. In 1240, being then
five years of age, he succeeded his father in his
dignities. In 1247 he married Alice, daughter of
Hugh le Brun, Count of March, and uterine sister
of King Henry the Third ; and in the following
year, though he could not have been above thirteen
years of age, he is said to have attended the Par-
liament which met at London in the octaves of the
Purification. During the reign of Henry the
Third, he is stated to have filled those stations
which, from his high rank, naturally devolved upon
* N. H. Nicolas, Esq.
him, and at the battle of Lewes he served in the
van of the royal army with Prince Edward ; but,
together with the Earl of Pembroke, disgracefully
deserted him at the commencement of the action,
and fled first to Pevensey Castle, and from thence
to France. Their flight is thus quaintly alluded
to by Peter de Langtoft '* :
" Ifce €de of saiarenne, 31 toote, be sfcapea otiec t^e ge,
2lna £u- J;»alj TttStsote alg tottfj t&e (Erie flea fje.
" In May following he returned, and claimed the
restitution of his possessions, which, notwithstand-
ing his treachery to the Prince, the rebellious
Barons had declared to have been forfeited. The
refusal of his demand induced him once more to
change sides, and he confederated with the Earl
of Gloucester for the restoration of the King's
power, and was present with the royal forces at
the battle of Evesham. Thus his interest, rather
than his honour, seems to have been his sole rule
of action ; and unfortunately, such conduct was
then far too general to entail upon those who
adopted it either punishment or reproach. In
1268 he had a dispute with Henry, Earl of Lin-
coln ; and about the same time became involved in
a serious affray with Alan Lord Zouche, relative
to some lands. This affair was attended with great
violence ; for, finding that he must submit to the
judgment of a court of law, he abused his adver-
sary and his son in the strongest terms, and then
assaulted them in such an outrageous manner in
Westminster-Hall, that he nearly killed the baron,
and severely wounded his son. Neither his power
nor influence could save the Earl from the ven-
geance of the laws he had so flagrantly violated ;
and, though he retired to his castle at Ryegate,
he was closely pursued by Prince Edward with a
strong force, and, finding that opposition would be
useless, he met the Prince on foot, and implored
the royal clemency with great humility. For his
offence he was fined ten thousand marks ; but this
sum was afterwards reduced to eight thousand four
hundred, and he was permitted to pay it by annual
instalments of two hundred marks each.
" Immediately after the solemnization of the
funeral of Henry the Third at Westminster, the
Earl of Warren and the Earl of Gloucester pro-
ceeded to the high altar, and swore fealty to his
son and successor, King Edward the First. In
the 3d Edward I. he received that monarch at his
castle of Ryegate in so honourable a manner, upon
his return from Gascony, that Edward was in-
duced to remit him one thousand marks of the
sum which he had been fined for the affair with
Lord de Zouche.
" The next circumstance recorded of the Earl,
is one in which that proud and sturdy spirit for
which he was celebrated, was displayed in a man-
ner so consonant to the feelings of the present day,
that this nobleman has always been a favourite
character in English biography ; and the pencil
was on one occasion employed to perpetuate his
independent conduct. After the enactment of the
statute of quo warranto, the Earl of Warren was,
under its provisions, questioned by what title he
held his lands ; to which inquiry, first unsheathing
an old sword, he is said to have replied, " Behold,
* Vol. i. p. 218.
APPENDIX F. 109
my Lords, here is my warranty. My ancestors
*stce 3To!jan QTount De iffacepn gpsft pep,
coming into this land with William the Bastard,
JDteu De #a alme ett meccp .
did obtain their lands by the sword ; and with the
sword I am resolved to defend them against whom-
Kp puc #a alme putera,
tZEcots mill joucg De pacDon abeca.'
soever that shall endeavour to dispossess me. For
" Of the subject of this article, but little that is
that King did not himself conquer the land and
favourable to his memory can be said ; though his
subdue it, but our progenitors were sharers and
faults, or more properly his vices, were those of
assistants therein.'
the age in which he lived. His treachery at the
" In the 23d Edward I., the Castle of Bamburgh
battle of Lewes has, to apply the beautiful ex-
was intrusted to his custody ; and, in the 24th
pression of a distinguished statesman of the pre-
Edward I., he commanded the forces sent to re-
sent day, ' left indelible stains upon his character,
duce Dunbar Castle, which, after a siege of three
which all the laurels of Dunbar ' cannot cover,
days, surrendered to him ; and having met the
nor its blood wash away ;' whilst his subsequent
Scotch army which came to its relief, he defeated
conduct was invariably marked by a turbulent and
them on Friday, the 27th April, and pursued them
intractable spirit. Not only was he frequently
several miles from the field of battle, when the
embroiled in disputes both with his compeers and
enemy sustained a loss of 10,000 men. Soon after
his sovereign, but, with almost unparalleled har-
this event, the Earl was appointed Regent of Scot-
dihood, he dared, in a court of justice, to use per-
land ; and in the following year was constituted
sonal violence towards a baron of the realm. That
general of all the English forces north of the Trent.
he should acquire renown in the field, and conse-
But his previous good fortune now deserted him ;
quently become possessed of the King's esteem, is
and his army sustained a signal overthrow at the
battle of Stirling, in September 1297-
perfectly consistent with that impetuous temper
for which he is celebrated. Bravery is, however,
"His misfortune did not, however, lessen him
but one redeeming trait in a picture, where all be-
in Edward's esteem, for he was immediately after-
sides is dark and repulsive ; and even the bold
wards reappointed to the command of the English
answer relative to his right to his lands, when
forces ; and, in the 28th Edward I., was made
properly considered, affords no room for praise ;
Governor of Hope Castle, in the county of Derby.
for the same resolute opposition to such an inquiry
In that year, also, he commanded the second squa-
dron at the siege of Carlaverock, .at which time he
would, there is no doubt, be as readily evinced to
defend any part of his property, if it had been
must have been about sixty-five years of age.
acquired by the most flagrant injustice on his part,
" In the 29th Edward I., the Earl was appointed,
instead of on that of his ancestors.
jointly with the Earl of Warwick and others, to
" A proof of the estimation in which the Earl
treat with the agents of the King of France, rela-
was held by Edward the First, is afforded, in Dug-
tive to a peace between England and Scotland ;
dale's opinion, by the fact, that the King issued
and in the same year he was a party to the letter
precepts, directed to the Bishops of Canterbury
from the barons to Pope Boniface VIII., in which
and London, and to several Abbots, commanding
he is only styled " Comes Warenne," though on
them to cause masses to be said for his soul ; but
his seal he is also properly called Earl of Surrey *.
this testimony of the royal consideration might
On the 5th calends of October, 32 Edward I., i.e.
have arisen from the near connection between the
27th September, 1304, being then, according to
Earl and his Majesty, as is shown by the annexed
Peter de Langtoftf, employed in Scotland, he died.
table :—
' The moneth of September yolden was Strivelyn,
King John = Isabel, daughter, and heir- = Hugh le Bran,
Edward may remembre the travaille and the pyn.
I ess of Aymer, Count of Count of March,
With many grete encumbre of in hard stoure,
j Angoulesme. 2d husband.
At Brustwick opon Humbre there he mad sojoure.
Sir Jon of Warenne that ilk tyme gan deie,
King Henry III. = Alice= John Earl of
I i Warren.
His body was redy then in grave for to leie,
After the enterment the King tokhis way,
King Edward I.
To the south,' &c.
1
" But, according to the registry of the Priory of
u By the said Alice le Brun, who died on the
Lewes, the Earl died that day at Kennington,
9th February, 1291, the Earl of Warren had issue,
having, says Dugdale, been Earl of Surrey no less
William, who died in his father's lifetime, leaving
than fifty-four years ; though, as he succeeded his
his wife enceinte with John, his son and heir, who
father in 1240, it is evident he must have borne
succeeded his grandfather in his honours. Alianor,
that title sixty -four years. He was buried in the
who married, first, Henry Lord Percy, by whom
midst of the pavement, in the quire of the Abbey
she had Henry Lord Percy, spoken of in the
of Lewes, before the high altar, and the following
poem (i.e. Carlaverock Castle), as the Earl's
epitaph was engraved upon his tomb.
' nevou ;' and, secondly, the son of a Scotch Ba-
ron ; and Isabel, wife of John Baliol. King of
' fflfousf qe pa22ej ob lioticlje dose,
Scotland*.
JPnej puc celp fee cp repose :
QEn bte come bousf egtist jaotg fu,
II. PERCY.
OEt bouss ttelgeccetj comeje gu.
" If the biographer of an ancient warrior," says
TIT XT' 1 Ct • • 1 *
Mr. Nicolas, " is in any degree influenced by that
* See some Remarks on the Titles and .Surname of this
1
Earl in the Archaeologia, vol. xxi. p. 195, 196.
* Vide Siege of Carlaverock, edited by N. H. Nicholas,
t P. 327,
Esq.
110
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
enthusiasm which deeds of chivalrous courage are
calculated to excite, it is only by more than ordi-
nary restraint upon his feelings that he is enabled
to relate them in the sober and chastened language
suitable to historical truth ; and, perhaps, in no
instance is that caution so necessary, as when any
member of the house of Percy is the subject of his
pen. In the age to which Henry de Percy be-
longed, as well as in a few succeeding centuries,
that name was synonymous with almost uncon-
trollable power, impetuous valour, and all those
stern military virtues which characterized the time ;
and the difficulty of successfully detailing the ca-
reer of an individual is considerably increased,
when, as in the case of this Baron, the merits of
his descendants have been sung, not only by rude
contemporary bards, but have been immortalized
by the greatest dramatic genius that ever existed.
" Henry de Percy was the third son of Henry
Lord Percy, by Eleanor, daughter of John, Earl
of Warren and Earl of Surrey, and succeeded to
the barony upon the death of his brother, John de
Percy, who died under age soon after the year
1272, at which time he appears to have been very
young. The first circumstance recorded of him is,
that, in the 15th Edward I., being then in ward,
on the King's expedition into Wales, he was ac-
quitted of 120£. required from him for scutage. In
the 22d Edward I. 1294, he made proof of his age,
obtained livery of his lands, and was summoned to
attend the King into Gascony ; and in March, 1296,
having accompanied Edward hi his invasion of
Scotland, he received the honour of knighthood
before Berwick. He was present at the battle of
D unbar, and was soon afterwards appointed Go-
vernor of Galloway and Aire in Scotland ; and in
1297, being with Lord Robert Clifford, commander
for the King of England in the eastern parts of
Scotland, they were appointed to re'ceive Margery,
daughter of Robert Brus, Earl of Carreck, as an
hostage for his fidelity to Edward. About the
same time he was sent by the Earl Warren, then
General of all the English army beyond the Trent,
with the forces at Carlisle into Scotland ; and
having entered Annandale with 300 men-at-arms,
and 40,00a foot, about the 19th August he pro-
ceeded to Aire, where he endeavoured to persuade
the inhabitants of Galloway to submit. Finding
that a party of Scots were on their route to oppose
him, he marched towards them ; but from the in-
feriority of their numbers, they surrendered upon
condition of being pardoned.
" In the 26th Edward I., Lord Percy was again
in the wars of Scotland, in which year he obtained
a grant of the lands forfeited by Ingelrom de Um-
freville ; and in the following year he was present
at the siege of Carlaverock — a fact unnoticed by
either of the writers just mentioned — when he
must have been about forty-two years of age. The
poet alludes to his determined hostility against the
Scots, which feeling appears to have been inherited
by his descendants, and describes him as the
' nevou ' of the Earl of Warren, which, like the
word * nepos,' seems to have been used for grand-
son as well as nephew, he being the son of Eleanor,
the daughter of that nobleman. In February, 28th
Edward I., 1301, he was a party to the letter from
the Barons to Pope Boniface, wherein he is styled
' Lord of Topclive ;' and in the 34th Edward I.,
was again sent into Scotland, to oppose Robert
Bruce, against whom he valiantly defended Kenteir.
In the 35th Edward I., he was a party to the treaty
of peace with Scotland.
" On the accession of Edward the Second, he
was, in common with the other peers of the realm,
summoned to attend that monarch's coronation ;
and in the 3d Edward II., he purchased the cele-
brated castle of Alnwick, which is now possessed
by his representative the Duke of Northumberland
In the 5th Edward II., he succeeded John de
Segrave, as Constable of Nottingham Castle, and
Justice of the Forests beyond the Trent, and about
the same period was constituted Governor of Scar-
borough and Bamburgh Castles. From a writ
tested on the 14th September, 1309, it appears
that he was then Constable of the Castle of York,
and in that and the preceding years he was again
in the wars of Scotland.
" Lord Percy distinguished himself by his enmity
to Piers de Gaveston, and it is perhaps just to con-
sider that his hostility arose from patriotic motives ;
but there is a suspicion attached to his behaviour
towards the unhappy favourite, which the biassed
historian of the house of Percy has rather increased
than lessened, by his laboured attempt to remove.
It appears that Gaveston was besieged in Scar-
borough Castle by the Earl of Pembroke ; that he
surrendered upon condition that his life and person
should be secured ; and that both the Earl and
Percy solemnly pledged themselves to that effect.
Through a false reliance, however, on the Earl's
honour, by Percy, as Collins relates it, the promise
was speedily broken, and Gaveston perished on the
scaffold at Warwick Castle. This is a version of
the tale, which so partial a biographer as that
writer uniformly shows himself, would naturally
give ; but although the impossibility of ascertaining
the real merits of the case render it unjust to pass
a positive censure upon Percy's conduct, it is at
least equally unfair to conclude that the whole
shame of the transaction belongs to his colleague,
and that his only error arose from a misplaced
confidence. Certain, however, it is, that the King
considered him guilty of Gaveston's death, for he
issued special precepts, tested on the 30th and 31st
July, 1312, for his apprehension, and for the sei-
zure of all his lands, tenements, and chattels.
Towards the end of that year, however, Percy was
included in the treaty between the King and the
barons ; and on making his submission his offence
was pardoned, and his lands restored to him. The
acquittance of the King to Thomas Earl of Lan-
caster, Guy Earl of Warwick, Robert de Clifford,
and this Baron, of the jewels and horses that, be-
longed to Gaveston, dated on the 6th February,
1313, 6. Edw. II., by which he acknowledges to
have received from them the articles therein men-
tioned, by the hands of Humphrey, Earl of Here-
ford, is still preserved. The document is highly
curious ; and with the hope of relieving the dulness
of this memoir, the following interesting extracts
from it are introduced :
' Un anel d'or, od un saphir, lequel seint Dunstan
forga de ses mayns.
Une boiste d'argent en d'orrez pur porter eynz un
anel entour le col de un homme.
Une grant rubi hors d'or, que fust trove sur sire
Piers de Gavaston quant il fust pris ; le pris de
mille livres.
APPENDIX F.
Ill
Trois granz rubis en aneaux, une amiraude, un
diamaund de grant pris, en une boiste d'argent
enamille, que fust trove sur le dit Pierres quant
il fust pris.
Deux seaux un grant e un petit ; e un petit seal
une clief pendaunte, un esterling plie, et un cal-
cedoyne ; les queux furent trovez en la burse
quant il fuit pris.
En un cofre, lie de feer, une mirour d'argent ena-
maille ; un pigne ; un priket, que fust donne* au
Roi par la Countesse de Bar a Gant.
Un coronal d'or od diverse perie, pris de cent mars.
Un chapelet d'argent garnis de diverse perie, pris
de doze soutz.
En un autre cofre, un grant pot d'argent od trois
peiz pur chaufer eawe, que poise sis livres quinze
soutz dis deners.
Trois plates d'argent por especierie, e poisent
quatre livres.
Deux plates d'argent pur fruit, des armes de roy
d'Engleterre, que poisent sessant dis oit souz
quatre deners.
Une burse de drap d'or ove deux pierres de Jerlm'
dedenz.
Un mors d'argent od quatre botons d'orrez, od
deux lions pur chaq'e de cuir.
Un veil seal entaille, e un pere de Calcedoine.
Trois furchesces d'argent pur mangier poires.
Une ceinture de fil de argent blank.
Une chapelet de Paris, pris de sis souz oit deners.
En un sak un bacenet burny od surcils.
En autre saak une peire de treppes des armes de
dit Pieres.
Deux cotes de velvet pur plates coverir.
Une Nouche pur palefrei, des armes du Roy.
Quatre chemises et trois brais de Gascoigne or-
fresez.
Une veille banere des armes le dit Piers.
Quarant Un destres et coucers e un palefrei.
Noef Somers. Duze chivauz charetters.
Deux charettes od tut le herneis *.'
« Fcedera, N. E. vol. ii. n. 203.
The following translation may be acceptable to some
readers : —
One gold ring, and a sapphire prepared by the hands of St.
Dunstan.
One silver box, gilt, for containing a ring, to be worn
round the neck of a man.
A large ruby, not set in gold, which was found on Sir Piers
de Gaveston when he was taken ; value one thousand
livres.
Three large rubies, set in rings,— an emerald,— a diamond
of great value (in a silver box enamelled), which was
found on the said Piers when he was taken.
Two seals, one large and one small ; and one little seal, (une
clief pendaunte} — a key attached to it, one crooked Ster-
ling (i. e. silver penny), and a chalcedony, which were
found in the purse when he was taken.
In a coffer, iron-bound, one silver mirror, enamelled; one
comb ; one tooth-pick, which had been given to the King
by the Countess de Bar at Ghent.
One coronal of gold, and sundry precious stones, valued at
one hundred marcs.
One chapelet of silver, ornamented with sundry precious
stones, valued at twelve sols (doze soutz)
In another coffer, a large silver pot, and three utensils (peiz}
for heating water, weighing six livres fifteen sols and ten
deniers.
Three silver dishes for spiceries, and weighing four livres.
Two silver fruit-dishes, with the arms of the King of Eng-
land, weighing seventy-eight sols four deniers.
" Great part of Gaveston's plate was marked
with an eagle, and several articles of jewellery
were in that form, his arms being, Vert, six eayles
displayed, Or.
" The little that remains to be said of this Baron,
may be related in a very few words. In 1313 he
received letters of safe conduct from the King, for
all his dominions ; in June in the following year
he was present at the fatal battle of Bannockburn,
and was regularly summoned to parliament from
the 6th February, 27th Edward I. 1299, to the
29th July, 8th Edward II. 1314. He died in 1315,
and was buried in the Abbey of Fountains in York-
shire ; and by Eleanor his wife, daughter of John,
Earl of Arundel, who survived him, he left issue,
Henry his eldest son, then aged sixteen years ; and
William, who was made a Knight of the Bath,
20th Edward II. and died in 1355."— Siege of Car-
laverock.
III. CLIFFORD.
u Robert de Clifford was the eldest son of Roger
de Clifford, who was accidentally slain between
Snowden and Anglesey in 1280. He was born
about Easter, April, 1274, and in the 14th Ed-
ward I., 1286, he succeeded his grandfather in his
baronial honours, being then twelve years of age.
In the 13th Edward I., he was found to be one of
the heirs of Ralph de Gaugy, and paid WQl. for his
relief ; after which, the next circumstance which
has been found recorded of him is, that he was
summoned to attend the King, with horse and
arms, on his expedition beyond the sea on the
4th May, 25th Edward I. 1297 ; and on the 26th
September following, he was ordered to be at Car-
lisle, similarly equipped, to serve against the Scots,
at the ensuing Feast of Pentecost ; but Dugdale
asserts, that he was present at the battle of Dunbar,
in 24th Edward I. ; that in the 25th Edward I., he
was sent with a hundred men-at-arms and twenty
thousand foot from Carlisle to plunder in Scotland ;
and that, after much slaughter, he returned with
considerable booty on Christmas eve. In that year
he was also appointed Justice of all the King's
forests beyond the Trent ; in 26th Edward I., he
was made governor of Nottingham Castle ; and on
the 27th Edward I., being constituted the King's
Lieutenant and Captain-General in the counties
of Cumberland, Westmoreland, and Lancaster
and throughout Annandale and the Marches of
Scotland, he was joined in commission with the
Bishop of Durham and others, to consider of the
One purse, of cloth of gold, containing two Jerusalem
stones.
One silver bit, and four gilt buttons, and two lions for each,
of leather.
One old seal cut, and a stone of chalcedony.
Three silver forks for eating pears.
One white girdle of silver lace.
One chapelet de Paris, value six sols eight deniers.
In a bag, one burnished bacinet and vizor (od surcils).
In another bag, one pair trappings with the arms of said
Piers.
Two surcoats of velvet for covering armour.
One bridle for palfrey, with the King's arms.
Four shirts and three kerchiefs de Gascoigne embroidered.
An old banner with the arms of said Piers.
Forty-one stallions and hunters, and one palfrey.
Nine sumpter-horses. Two cart-horses.
Two carts and all the harness.
112
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
means of garrisoning the castles in that kingdom,
and for guarding the marches. Clifford was again
summoned to the Scottish wars on the 7th May,
27th Edward I. 1299, and received his first writ
to parliament on the 29th December in the same
year.
" As Clifford did not attain his majority till
1295, he consequently could not have been above
twenty-five when he was thus honoured with
his sovereign's confidence, — a fact which speaks
forcibly in his praise. It was at this period of his
life that he was noticed in the poem * ; and as his
conduct at Carlaverock is wholly passed over by
his former biographer, it claims especial regard in
this memoir. After stating that he served in the
third squadron, which was led by the King in
person, and extolling Clifford's valour, descent, and
prudence, the writer adds, that if he were a young
maiden, he would bestow on him. his heart and
person, in consideration of his renown. During
the siege, we are told that he particularly distin-
guished himself, and was rewarded by being ap-
pointed Governor of the Castle when it surrendered ;
in consequence of which, his banner was placed on
its battlements. Clifford was a party to the letter
from the Barons to Pope Boniface, in the 29th
Edward I., February 1301, in which he is described
as " Castellanus de Appelby ;" and, in the 34th
Edward I., in recompence for his numerous ser-
vices, he obtained a grant of the borough of Har-
tlepole, and of all the lands of Robert de Brus.
In the same year, he was sent with Aymer de
Valence against the said Robert, who had then
assumed the title of King of Scotland ; about which
time the lands of Christopher de Seyton were
granted to him. Clifford attended the deathbed of
the King in 1307, and received the dying monarch's
injunctions to prevent the return of Gaveston into
the realm. In the 1st Edward II., he was again
made Governor of Nottingham Castle, and con-
stituted Earl Marshal of England ; and, on the
31st January 1308, he joined several other Lords
in an engagement to support the title and honour
of the young King with their lives and fortunes.
In the 2d Edward II. he was constituted Warden
of the Marches of Scotland, and soon afterwards
Governor of that kingdom ; and on the 17th March
1309-10, was one of the Peers selected to regulate
the royal household. Several valuable grants of
lands were bestowed upon him in the 3d and 4th
Edward II., in consideration of his merits ; and he
was again summoned to serve in Scotland, in the
4th Edward II. In the 6th Edward II. he was
joined in commission with the Earl of Hereford
and others, to continue a treaty begun at Margate
with the Count of Eureux and the Bishop of
Poitou, upon some important affairs. On the 6th
February 1313, he received an acquittance from
the King, for the jewels, horses, &c. belonging to
Piers de Gaveston ; and he firmly adhered to
Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, against the unfor-
tunate favourite, for his agency in whose death he
afterwards procured the royal pardon.
" Lord Clifford was regularly summoned to par-
liament from the 29th December, 28th Edward I.
1299, to the 26th November, 7th Edward II. 1313 ;
and he terminated his career in a manner strictly
consistent with his life, for he fell in the battle of
* Siege of Carlaverock, by Walter of Exeter.
Bannockburn, on the 25th June 1314, at the early
age of forty years. His body was sent to King
Edward at Berwick, and is supposed to have been
buried at Shapp Abbey, in Westmoreland.
" Clifford married Maud, daughter, and even-
tually coheir of Thomas de Clare, steward of
Waltham-Forest, son of Thomas, younger son of
Richard de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hert-
ford, by whom, who survived him, and remarried
Robert, Baron Welles, he had issue Roger, his
successor in the barony, then aged fifteen years,
but who died, s. p. in 1337 ; Robert, brother and
heir of Roger, and, according to some pedigrees,
two other sons, John and Andrew ; and a daugh-
ter, Idonea, the wife of Henry, Lord Clifford.
" From Robert de Clifford, the second son of
the subject of this article, descended the baronial
line of Clifford, which, in the reign of Henry the
Eighth, was elevated to the earldom of Cumber-
land. The barony of Clifford is now possessed by
Edward Southwell, the present Lord de Clifford,
the abeyance having been terminated in favour of
his Lordship's father in 1776 *."
HUGH DE CRESSINGHAM.
Page 49.
RESPECTING this avaricious and time-serving mi-
nion, few particulars are known. The historians
of his country appear to have left his memory in a
state between obloquy and oblivion, and the odium
he drew upon himself, during his short administra-
tion in Scotland, remains unrelieved by the relation
of any redeeming circumstances on the part of
those who may be supposed intimately acquainted
with his character. Sir Walter Scott, in his
Border Antiquities, mentions, that he was Rector
of Ruddely, Chief Justiciary of York Assizes, and
Prebendary of many churches.
But his numerous ecclesiastical duties were
totally neglected, for the more congenial pursuits
afforded by the cabinet and the camp ; and it is
stated, that though in the possession of so many
lucrative benefices, he never assumed the garb
peculiar to his sacred profession. In his character
of Treasurer, he incurred a degree of detestation,
which does not appear to have been attached to
any of the other officers appointed by Edward to
the management of affairs in Scotland. Among
his own countrymen, his peculation occasioned
disgust, and in many instances desertion ; while
his short-sighted rapacity chafed the impatient and
angry feelings of a people smarting under the in-
fliction of a yoke to which they had been hitherto
unaccustomed, and greatly contributed in raising
that spirit of insurrection in which his aggressions
met with the vengeance they had provoked.
H.
ORIGINAL LETTER FROM SIR WILLIAM WALLACE AND
SIR ANDREW MURRAY.
Page 51.
IT affords the writer no little pleasure, to be able
to lay before his readers the following authentic
* Vide Siege of Carlaverock, edited by N. H. Nicolas, Esq.
APPENDIX H.
113
document, which establishes beyond a doubt the
early and deep interest which Wallace took in the re-
establishment of the commercial prosperity of Scot-
land. As this important writing, however, has not
hitherto appeared in the works of either English
or Scottish historians, nor even been alluded to in
any former account of Wallace, it will be neces-
sary to give some explanation respecting the
source from which it has been obtained. In the
Foreign Quarterly Review for August, 1829, the
following notice appeared : — " Our Scottish anti-
quarian friends will be gratified to hear, that Dr.
Lappenburg of Hamburg, in his researches among
the ancient records of that city, has discovered a
letter, of the date 1287, addressed by Robert Wal-
lace and Andrew Murray to Hamburg and Lubec."
An intimation of this kind could not fail to excite
a considerable degree of interest in the writer ;
and the possibility that a mistake might have oc-
curred respecting the date, as well as the name
of one of the parties, encouraged the hope, that a
letter of William Wallace and Andrew Murray,
with which the public were unacquainted, might
still be in existence. Under this impression, the
writer communicated with an intelligent friend,
through whose means application was made to
Dr. Lappenberg on the subject, who, with that
genuine politeness which seldom fails to accompany
distinguished merit, promptly communicated a
copy of the letter in question, taken from the
original, which still exists among the archives of
the Hanseatic city of Lubec.* The letter is to the
following effect : —
" Andreas de Morauia et Willelmus Wallensis,
duces exercitus regni Scotie et communitas eius-
dem Regni, prouidis viris et discretis ac amicis di-
lectis, maioribus et communibus de Lubek et de
Hamburg salutenvet sincere dilectionis semper in-
crementum. Nobis per fide dignos mercatores
dicti regni Scotie est intimatum, quod vos vestri
gratia, in omnibus causis et negociis, nos et ipsos
mercatores tangentibus consulentes, auxiliantes et
favorabiles estis, licet nostra non precesserint me-
rita, et ideo magis vobis tenemur ad grates cum
digna remuneracione, ad que, vobis volumus obli-
gari ; rogantes vos, quatenus preconizari facere ve-
litis inter mercatores vestros, quod securum acces-
sum ad omnes portus regni Scotie possint habere
cum mercandiis suis, quia regnum Scotie, Deo re-
graciato, ab Anglorum potestate bello est recupera-
tum. Valete. Datum apud Badsingtonam in Sco-
tia, undecimo die Octobris, Anno gracie, millesimo
ducentesimo nonagesimo septimo. Rogamus vos
insuper vt negocia Johannis Burnet, et Johannis
Frere, mercatorum nostrorum promoueri digne-
mini, prout nos negocia mercatorum vestrorum
promovere velitis. Valete. dat. ut prius."
TRANSLATION.
" Andrew Murray and William Wallace, com-
manders of the army of the kingdom of Scotland,
and the community of the same kingdom — To the
prudent and discreet men, and well-beloved friends,
the Mayors and Commonwealths of Lubeck and
* In the recovery of a document connected with the hero
of Scotland, which had thus lain in obscurity for so long a
period, the writer feels himself particularly called upon to
express his grateful acknowledgments to T. G. Repp, Esq.
of the Advocates' Library, and his friend E. K. Sieveking,
Esq., Syndic of the city of Hamburgh.
of Hamburg, greeting, and perpetual increase of
sincere friendship.
" To us it has been intimated, by trust-worthy
merchants of the said kingdom of Scotland, that,
as a mark of your regard, you have been favour-
able to, counselling and assisting in, all matters and
transactions relating to us and said merchants,
though [such good offices] may not have been pre-
ceded by our deserts, and on that account we are
the more bound to tender you our thanks, and a
suitable return. This we have willingly engaged
ourselves to [perform towards] you, requesting,
that in so far you would cause your merchants to be
informed, that they will now have safe access to all
the ports of the kingdom of Scotland with their
merchandise, as the kingdom of Scotland, thanks
to God, has during the war been recovered from
the power of the English. Farewell. — Given at
Badsingtoii [Haddington * ?], in Scotland, this
eleventh day of October, in the year of grace one
thousand twelve hundred and ninety-seven. — We
have moreover to request, that you would conde-
scend to forward the interests of our merchants
John Burnet and John Frere in their business, in
like manner as you may wish us to act towards
your merchants in their commercial transactions.
Farewell — Dated as above."
Dr. Lappenberg, in his valuable communication,
remarks, that this letter " appears to be the oldest
document existing relative to the intercourse of
Hamburg and Lubec, or other Hanseatic cities,
with Scotland f." As the reader will perceive,— a
mistake had occurred in the date, and also in the
name of Wallace.
From the above interesting muniment, various
important points in our history may be established.
In the first place, it seems evident, that Wallace
and Murray, up to the llth October 1297, acted only
as " duces exercitus regni Scotie," in behalf of the
community of said kingdom ; and that the commission
from John Baliol, authorizing them to act under
his sanction, must have been received by them on
their march to England, or during the time the devas-
tation of that country was going forward ; that is to
say, between the llth October and 7th November,
on which day the charter was granted to the monks
of Hexham £, where we find " the name of the
illustrious Prince John by the Grace of God King of
Scotland," is added to the authorities mentioned
in the above letter. And again, that between the
7th November, 1297, and the 29th March, 1298,
another commission must have been forwarded from
* The writer is inclined to beiieve, that, in copying the
antiquated original, Badsington has been put down by the
transcriber in a mistake for Haddington. He has left it
however, in charge of a note of interrogation, for the pur-
pose of inviting his readers to the exercise of their critical
acumen.
t Our readers will be gratified to learn, that Dr. Lappen-
burg has'been for some time engaged on a highly interesting
work relating to the origin of the Hanseatic League, in the
course of which there will appear upwards of 400 documents
which have escaped the research of former writers, illustra-
tive of the state of commerce among the nations of Europe
between 1170 and 1370. A considerable number of these
documents, we understand, relate to the mercantile transac-
tions of England and Scotland ; and a publication of this
kind cannot fail to be anxiously looked for, by all who set a
value upon well-authenticated historical information.
t Seep. 115.
I
114
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
Baliol to Wallace, constituting him the sole Regent
of the kingdom of Scotland, as we find him on tliat
day at Torphichen, granting, in that capacity, a
charter to Alexander Scrimgeor, and affixing to it
the seal of Baliol ; which circumstance is mentioned
in the charter, while no mention is made of any
seal being used in that at Hexham *.
From the circumstance of Andrew Murray's
name having precedence in the letter to the Hanse
Towns, and in the charter of Hexham, it may with
great probability be inferred, that these two docu-
ments were either written by Wallace himself, or
under his direction. That he was qualified for the
task is evident, from the care which had been
bestowed on his education ; first by his uncle, and
afterwards by the seminary of Dundee. If Murray
had either written them, or ordered them to be
written, it is not likely that he would have placed
his own name before one whose merits were so
generally acknowledged, as to procure him the
appointment of Regent in so short a time after-
wards ; while Wallace, in placing, or causing the
name of Murray to be placed, before his own,
appears acting in perfect consistency with those
amiable traits in his character which we have
already noticed. As these writings are also free
from that monkish pedantry, and mystification
which pervades the literature of that age, they
may with great probability be considered as the
composition of the talented Liberator f".
* By the above letter, the writer is also enabled to correct
a mis-statement at page 56. The election of Wallace to
the Regency did not (as is there mentioned) take place before
his^ advance into England. The authority by which he
and* Sir Andrew Murray made the preparations for the in-
vasion, appear to have been derived from the community
of Scotland, and " duces exercitus regni Scoiie" the highest
title they considered themselves invested with at the time.
t Under the impression that the letter and charters alluded
to above are the composition of Wallace, we conceive some
of our readers may not be displeased with the following
attempt at a translation of the charter in favour of Scrym-
geour, as they will then have in this volume English ver-
sions of every known document that can with any proba-
bility be considered as emanating from the pen of Wallace.
" Charter of Sir William Wallace, Guardian of Scotland, in
the name of King John Baliol, with the seal of the
same John.
" William Walays, Knight, Guardian of the Kingdom of
Scotland, and Leader of the Armies of the same, in the
name of the excellent Prince Lord John, by the Grace of
God, the illustrious King of Scotland, — with the consent of
the community of the same kingdom. — To all trusty men of
the said kingdom, to whom the present writing may come,
Eternal Salvation in the Lord. — Be it known to You all, that
We, in the name of our foresaid Lord the King of Scotland,
by the consent and approbation of the Grandees of said
kingdom, Give and Concede, and that self-same donation
and concession by the present charter, Do confirm, to Alex-
ander, named Skirmischur, six merks of land in the terri-
toiy of Dundee, namely, that land which is called the Upper
Field near the town of Dundee, on the north side, with those
acres in the west field, commonly fronting the Royal
Grounds, near the town of Dundee, on the west side, and
also the Royal Meadow in the foresaid territory of Dundee,
and also the Constabulary of the Castle of Dundee, with the
rights, liberties, and privileges belonging thereto, without
any reservation whatsoever, on performing homage to the
foresaid Lord and King, and his heirs or his successors ;
and lor the faithful service and assistance rendered to his
It may be remarked, that the envy which a
number of the magnates of Scotland entertained
towards the Guardian, seems to have arisen after
his appointment to the Regency, How Sir Andrew
Murray demeaned himself on the occasion, does
not appear ; but the conduct and feelings of
Cumyn, his near relation *, were too unequivocally
expressed to be misunderstood.
The above letter, besides affording a good spe-
cimen of the diplomatic talents of our hero, is at
the same time highly complimentary to the friendly
feelings and mercantile integrity of the merchants
of the two Hanse cities, and exhibits a singular
contrast to the policy of Philip, who, though bound
by treaties, allowed his allies to struggle on against
their powerful adversary, without affording them
the slightest assistance.
I.
MEMOIR OF PATRICK EARL OF DUNBAR f.
Page 52.
THIS powerful and warlike baron was descended
from Gospatrick, the Governor of Northumberland,
in the tune of William the Norman, who deprived
him of that office in consequence of his joining the
Danes in 1069, on their invasion of England. He
afterwards retired to Scotland, and sought the
protection of Malcolm III., who conferred on him
the Castle of Dunbar and the lands adjoining. In
virtue of this grant, his descendants were styled
Earls of March, and sometimes of Dunbar; the
former title being derived from the lands, the latter
from the name of the principal castle belonging to
the family. They were also possessed of the castle
of Coldbrands-path, a fortress of almost equal
importance.
Patrick, or (Corspatrick, as he is sometimes
called), the subject of the present notice, was the
eighth Earl of Dunbar ; he succeeded to his father
in 1289, being then about forty-seven years of age.
He was one of the nobles who consented to the
projected marriage between Prince Edward and
foresaid kingdom, in bearing the Royal Standard in the
Army of Scotland, at the time the present writing has been
drawn up. — Securing and preserving to the foresaid Alex-
ander and his heirs, from our said Lord the King, and his
heirs or his successors, free, quiet, entire, peaceable, and
honourable possession, in perpetuity, with all the rights,
liberties, and privileges belonging to said land, meadow
above named, and forementioned Constabulary, fronting as
at present, or in what manner soever in future, on perform-
ing annually therefore to the Lord the King, and his heirs
or successors, namely, for the foresaid land, meadow, and
Constabulary, with their rights, liberties, and privileges, the
service attached to said Constabulary, as well as for all that
in future may be required on account of the foresaid. In
testimony of which, the common seal of the _foresaid king-
dom of Scotland has been affixed to the present writing.
Given at Torphichen, on the 29th day of March, in the year
of Grace 1298."
* Sir Andrew Murray, who was killed at the battle of
Stirling, was married to a sister of Cumyn, Lord of Bade-
noch. — Vide Scottish Baronage.
t The arms of the Earl of Dunbar, were gules, a lion
rampant, argent, within a bordure of the second, charged
with a rose of the first. The banner of the son, at the siege
of Carlaverock, was the same as that of the father, with the
addition of a blue label.
APPENDIX I.— K.
115
Margaret the young Queen of Scotland. In 1291,
he put in his claim to the crown, among the other
competitors, founding his right on being the great-
grandson of Ilda or Ada, the daughter of William
king of Scots. On the commencement of hostili-
ties between Edward and Baliol, he adhered to
the former ; but his castle of Dunbar being left in
possession of his wife Margery, daughter of Alex-
ander Comyn, Earl of Buchan, she delivered it
over to Baliol — conceiving the duties she owed her
country paramount to the injunctions of her hus-
band.
• Whatever blame maybe attached to this Earl,
for the active part he took against the interest of
Scotland, still the merit of consistency must be
awarded to him in the crooked line of policy he
adopted ; for, having sworn fealty to Edward
in 1291, he adhered to the interests of his over-
lord with zeal and fidelity. The answer * which he
* " Lychtly he lowch, in scorn as it had beyn,
And said ; ' He had sic message seyldyn seyne,
That Wallace now as gouernowr sail ryng :
Her is gret faute off a gud prince or kyng.
That king off Kyll I can nocht wndirstand ;
Off him 1 held neuir a fur off land.
That bachiller trowis, for fortoun schawis her quhell,
Thar with to lest ; it sail nocht lang be weill.
Bot to yow, lordis, and ye will wndirstand,
I mak yow wyss, I aw to mak na band,
Als fre I am in this regioun to ryng,
Lord off myn awne, as euyr was prince or king.
In Ingland als gret part off land I haiff;
Manrent tharoff thar will no man me craiff.
Quhat will ye mar 1 I warne yow, I am fre ;
For your somoundis ye get no mar off me.' "
In corroboration of an insolent answer having been returned
by the Earl of Dunbar, Dr. Jamieson quotes the following
authority : " When summoned by the guardian of Scotland
to attend a convention at Perth, he contemptuously refused.
Blind Harrie is supported by the Tower Records." Cale-
donia, ii. p. 246.
Also on the following lines of the answer,
" That King off Kyll I can nocht wndirstand ;
Off him I held neuir a fur off land,"
the Doctor remarks " I need scarcely say, that the earl had
given Wallace this contemptuous designation, as being a
native of the district of Kyle in Ayrshire." It is with much
reluctance we hazard an opinion at variance with so learned
and respectable an authority as Dr. Jamieson, more particu-
larly where the subject is one connected with a study, in
the pursuit of which he has acquired a lasting and well-
merited reputation. That the scoffing Earl intended any
allusion to the birth-place of Wallace, by styling him " King
of Kyle," we would feel inclined to question, even if it had
been established that he was a native of that district. Kyle,
as well as Carrick (two neighbouring districts of Ayrshire),
are derived from the Celtic words, C6ille, and Carraig : the
former signifying a forest, or woody district, and the latter
the rocky portion of the country, two terms perfectly de-
scriptive of the localities of both districts. Wallace had
always been spoken of, by the English and their emissaries,
as a leader of a banditti. Langtoft calls him " William
Waleis that maister was of theves ;" and they represented
him as a sort of Robin Hood, who had established his autho-
rity in the woods of Scotland, in the same manner as the
" King of merry Sherwood" had done in the forest of that
name. When Gospatrick, therefore, called Wallace " King
of Kyll," we presume he meant to call him " King of the
Forest," which implied a king of robbers and outlaws ; and
that this was the sense in which it was understood by him
and the Scottish nobles, is evident from the indignation it
excited, and the instant determination of the Guardian to
returned to Wallace and the Scottish barons as-
sembled at Perth, is quite in accordance with that
tone of independence assumed by the family, and
which, according to Lord Hailes, was so prejudicial
to Scotland.
After being driven from Scotland, as has already
been stated, he continued to molest his countrymen
as he found occasion. In 1298, he was actively
engaged in the Scottish wars, and in November
was appointed one of Edward's Lieutenants in
Scotland. In 1300, he and his son *, a youth at
that time about 15 years of age, were present at
the siege of Carlaverock castle, when he must have
been at least 58 years old. In 33d Edward I.,
he was to have attended the parliament as one of
the representatives of the Commons of Scotland ;
but from some reason or other, he did not appear.
On the 30th September, 1308, he was commanded
by Edward II. to assist in suppressing the insur-
rection of Bruce, but what efforts he made, cannot
well be ascertained. In the following year he died,
and was succeeded by Patrick, his son by the
daughter of the Earl of Buchan.
K.
CHARTER OF PROTECTION GRANTED TO THE PRIOR
AND CONVENT OF HEXCELDSHAM.
Page 53.
" ANDREAS de Moravia et Willelmus Wallensis,
Duces exercitus Scotice, nomine prceclari Principis
Domini JoJiannis, Dei gratia, Regis Scotice illustris,
de consensu communitatis regni ejusdem, omnibus
hominibus dicti regni ad quos prsesentes literse
pervenerint, salutem. Sciatis, nos, nomine dicti
Regis, Priorem et Conventum de Hexhildesham in
Northumbria, terras suas, homines suos, et uni-
versas eorum possessiones, ac omnia bona sua,
mobilia et immobilia, sub firma pace et protectione
ipsius Domini Regis, et nostra, juste suscepisse.
Quare firmiter prohibemus, ne quis eis in personis,
terris, seu rebus, malum, molestiam, injuriam, seu
gravamen aliquod, inferre praesumat, super ple-
naria forisfactura ipsius Domini Regis, aut mortem
eis, vel alicui eorum, inferat, sub poena amissionis
vitae et membrorum ; prsesentibus post annum
minime valituris. Dat. apud Hexhildesham, vii.
die Novembris." — W. Hemingford, t. i. p. 135 f.
revenge the insult which had been thus offered to himself
and those under his authority. To have called him the
king of the place in which he was born, could not be con-
sidered by Wallace as a very grievous insult, considering the
situation he occupied. That Cdille was at one time gene-
rally used all over Scotland to designate a wood or forest, is
evident from the names of many places in which the word
can still be traced. It is, however, sometimes improperly
confounded with Cill (a place of interment). We are afraid
that the above etymology will not meet the approbation of
the favourers of the pretensions of Old King Coilus, but
this we cannot help; and have only to regret that the
ancient language of the country has been so little consulted
by those who engage to write its history.
* This youth succeeded to his father's honours in 1309,
being then twenty-four years of age. The foreign predilec-
tions of the old baron, for a long time regulated the conduct
of the son ; and it was owing to him that Edward II. escaped
the pursuit of Bruce, after the Battle of Bannockburn.
t A translation of the above document has been given by
i 2
116
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
L.
Page 54.
THE intentions of Edward to curtail the power of
his barons, and render them more subservient to
his will, were most unequivocally displayed in his
proceedings towards Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, im-
mediately after his return from the conquest of
Scotland. The imperious language of the tyrant,
and the bold and determined conduct of the vassal,
the reader will find narrated in the extracts from
Dr. Lingard, inserted in the concluding chapter of
the narrative. The plans of Edward for the ex-
tinction of British freedom, were such as have
been generally resorted to by other despots, who
have encroached upon the rights of their subjects
or neighbours. While the Scots w§re summoned
to fight his battles in France, the Welsh were
marched to Scotland to assist in the subjugation of
that country ; and had the former remained passive
under the yoke, there is every reason to believe
that they would soon, in their turn, have been
employed to enforce the arbitrary measures of the
ambitious monarch upon the subjects of his native
kingdom. Thus Scotland, England, and Wales,
would have mutually assisted in rivetting the fetters
of each other.
M.
THE SETONS.
Page 55.
WITH respect to the fate of Cristell of Seyton,
some little inquiry may be necessary. It is well
known, that a person of his name appears to great
advantage in the history of the struggles of Bruce,
and afterwards became a martyr in his cause ; of
course, he could not have been the individual men-
tioned in the text. It appears from various sources,
that there were three of the Seyton family, of the
name of Christell, grandfather, father, and son. If
any of these were killed in the above battle, it must
have been the second, for the first, " a man given
more to devotion nor worldliness," died in the
reign of Alexander III. As the other two were
both engaged in the contest for independence along
with Wallace, the following account of them may
the writers nearly to the following effect : — " Andrew Mur-
ray and William Wallace, commanders of the army of Scot-
land, in the name of the excellent Prince Lord John, by the
Grace of God, the illustrious King of Scotland, with the con-
sent of the community of the same kingdom, to all men of
the said kingdom, greeting. Know ye, that we, in the name
of the said King, have taken the Prior and Convent of Hex-
hildesham in Northumberland, their lands, men, posses-
sions, and all their goods, moveable and immoveable, under
the firm peace and protection of the said Lord the King and
ours. Wherefore we strictly forbid you to do any hurt, mis-
chief, or injury whatsoever, to them, in persons, lands, or
goods, under penalty of forfeiture of your own goods and
estates to the said Lord the King, or to kill them, or any of
them, under pain of death. These presents to remain in
force for one year, and no longer. Given at Hexhildesham
the 7th day of November."
be interesting to the reader. It is taken from the
History of the House of Seyton, by Sir Richard
Maitlaud of Lethington, and lately printed by the
Maitland Club, from the MS. in the Advocates'
Library.
"OFF CHRISTELL SEYTOUN,
The secund of that name.
" Christell the secund of that name succedit to
Christell the first, his father, in the tyme of Allex-
ander the Thryd, and was ane nobill man, and did
mony gud actis aganis the Inglismen, quhen the
Crowne was desolat and in pley betuix the Bruce
and the Balioll. Quhilk Christell, quhen he micht
nocht brouk the lawland of Lowthyane, quhair was
his duelling place, duelt and remainit wyth his kyn
and freyndis in Jedburgh forrest, ay awating his
tyme contrare the Inglismen ; and deit in the tyme
of William Wallace."
"OFF CHRYSTELL SEYTOUN,
The thryd of that name.
"Christell the thryd succedit to Christell the
secund, his father, hi the tyme of Williame Wal-
lace ; quhilk Christell was efter maid knycht be
King Robert Bruce, and for his rnonye gude actis
done againis the Inglismen, was callit Gud Sr
Christell. Quha quhen King Robert Bruce was
tane presonare in handis be the Inglismen at ane
feild besyde Methven, and thay that tuke him cryit
in scorne and derisioun, Quha will help the new
maid King ? quhilk cry the said Sr Chrystell hard,
and come in all haist and straik at erd him that
had the king in handis ; and thair he and his
freindis reskewit the said King Robert, and pat
him to Jibertie. This Chrystell maryit the said
King Robert Bruce sister, and thairfor the said
King Robert gaif to the said Sr Chrystell the
dowbil tresour of flour de lycis, to be worne about
his armes and the armes of his posterite, lyk as
the King weris thame. Efter mony grit and nota-
bill actis done be the said Sr Chrystell contrair
Ingland, he was tane at the last, and had to Lon-
doun, and thair put to deid in maist cruell maner.
In this mene tyme, King Robert Bruce hapnit to
be in the toun of Dunfreis, and passand furth till
ane lytill knoll besyd the said toun to tak the air,
quhair the word and tythingis come to him of the
crewell slauchter of the said Sr Chrystell, quhilk
the king heirand maid grit lamentatioun wyth sum
teiris, saying, It is ane piet6 that sa nobill ane
knycht suld die sa crewell ane deid. And incon-
tinent, in the samin place quhair he wes standand
quhen the tythingis come to him, gart found ane
chapell in honour of the Virgene Marie ; and hi
remembrance of the said Sr Chrystell foundit ane
preist to do devyne service thairin perpetuallie,
and pray for the said Schir Chrystell ; and gaif to
the said preist and his successouris the sowme of
fyve pundis Streviling, to be tane of the ba-
ronie of Carlauerok, for thair sustentatioun.
Quhilk fundatioun I haue had oft in my handis,
and red it sindrie tymes. The quhilk chapell
was standand haill and vndecayit in the yeir of
God Jm vc lii yeiris, as I saw my self ; and as I
beleve standis yit in the samin maner, and is callit
be all the inhabitaris in that cuntr<J Christallis
chapell.
APPENDIX N.— 0.
117
" ANE EIK OF SB CHRISTOPHER OF SETOUN,
The thrid of that name.
" It is to wit that efter that I had wryttin the
Historic of the Hous of Setoun, I haue fund in the
greit Cronicles of Ingland, set furth sen I wret
the historic of Setoun, quhilk ar as efter followis :
" Efter this was the castell of Lochdore taiken,
and wythin it Christopher Seitoun, that had ma-
ried the sister of Robert le Bruce ; [and bicause
he was no Scot, but an Englishman borne,] the
King of Ingland commandit that he suld be led
wnto Dunfreis, quhar he had killit on of the Kingis
knychtis, and thair to be haiigit draw in and quar-
terit : The wyf of this Christopher Seitoun he
apoyntit to be keipit in the monesterie of Thixell
in Lyndsay." — " Morouer, the manor of Seitoun,
in Quhytbestroud, he gaue wnto the Lord Edmonde
de Mawlay, and those wther landis that belongeth
to the said Christopher Seitoun in Northumberland
he gaue wnto the Lord Williame Latemer."
" And howbeit that I wret of before as I was in-
formit for the tyme, That the first tyme that King
Robert the Bruce com to Dunfreiss efter that Sr
Christopher Setoun was crewellie slane in Ingland,
that in the sam place quhar the King was quhen
the thydingis com till him he garde bige ane cha-
pell, and dottit the samyng perpetuallie to pray for
the said Sr Christopher ; bot now it apeiris be the
Inglis Cronicles, That quhan the said King com to
Dunfreis, that quhan it was reportit till him be the
inhabeturis of the said toun the crewell marter-
dome of the said Sr Christopher, that he garde
bige the said chapell in the samyng place quhar the
said Sr Christopher was pute to deid and executtit.
Of the quhilk chapell I haue red the foundatioun
and infythment of ane priest onder the saidis
kingis greit seill ; and hes hard Mes in the samyng
chapell, quhilk staudis as I beleif to this present
day."— P. 18-21.
N.
MEMOIR OF FITZ-MARMADUKE.
Page 57.
"THIS stern soldier was the eldest son of Mar-
maduke Fitz-Geoffrey, Lord of Hordene, in the
bishoprick of Durham, who, in the 45th Henry
III., 1260-1, obtained the King's license to em-
battle his mansion-house there. In August 1282,
John Fitz-Marmaduke, with nine other knights,
performed services due from the Bishop of Dur-
ham, who styled him, on another occasion, ' Nostre
tres cher bachelier, Monsr Jehan le Fitz-Marma-
duk ;' but from that time nothing is recorded of
him, until February, 1301, when he was a party
to the Letter from the Barons to the Pontiff, in
which he is called ' Lord of Hordene,' except-
ing that he was at the siege of Carlaverock in
June, 1300, where his bravery was particularly
conspicuous. He came, we are told, to assail the
castle with a great and full troop of good and select
bachelors, and stood as firm as a post, and his
banner received many a rent difficult to mend.
" It is most extraordinary, that for nearly twenty
years, no notice can be found in the records of an
individual who, at the end of that period, was a
party to an instrument from the Baronage of the
realm ; and it was from this circumstance, the
similarity of their arms, and his surname, that he
was confounded with Marmaduke de Thweng in
the " Synopsis of the Peerage."
" In the 3lst Edward I., Fitz-Marmaduke was
commanded to appear before the King on the first
Sunday in Lent, with full powers from the com-
munity of the Bishoprick of Durham to accept
his Majesty's mediation between them and the
Bishop ; and, in April in the same year, he was
appointed a Commissioner of Array. On the 30th
September, 1st Edward II. 1307, he was ordered,
with others, to proceed to Galloway, to repress
the rebellion of Robert de Brus ; and, in October
following he was commanded to serve with horse
and arms against the Scots ; after which time his
name does not occur among the writs of service.
He continued in the wars of Scotland, " comme
une estache ;" and, on the 21st June 1308, was
again enjoined to oppose the attempts of Bruce.
On the 16th February, 3d Edward II. 1310, he
was authorized, , with others, to treat with the
Scots for a truce. Fitz-Marmaduke died in 1311,
at which time he was governor of St. John's Town
of Perth ; and a very curious fact is recorded
respecting his funeral. He particularly requested
to be interred within the precincts of the cathedral
of Durham, but, as the state of the country
prevented the removal of his corpse in the usual
manner, his domestics adopted the expedient of
dismembering the body, and then boiling the flesh
from the bones ; by which means they preserved
his reliques, until an opportunity offered of trans-
mitting them with safety across the border. For
this outrage against an ecclesiastical canon, which
had been promulgated in consequence of the
frequency of the practice, Cardinal Berengarius,
Bishop of Jerusalem, imposed on the offenders the
mild penance of attending their master's obsequies
in the cemetery of the cathedral of Durham, having
first used the authority of the church to ensure the
quiet transportation of his remains.
" Fitz-Marmaduke was twice married ; first, to
Isabella, sister and heiress of Robert Brus of Stan-
ton, by whom he had Richard, his son and heir,
and a daughter, Mary, who married Lumley ;
and, secondly, Ida, who survived him, and was
living his widow in 1313. Richard Fitz-Marma-
duke was Seneschal of the Bishoprick of Durham,
and was slain, in 1318, by his kinsman Robert
Neville, on the Old Bridge of Durham, as he was
riding to hold the county court, which event is de-
scribed as " a most strange and detestable action."
Though married to Alianora , he died without
children, when Mary, his sister, became his heiress.
She left issue Robert Lumley of Ravensholm,
who married Lucia, the daughter and coheiress of
Marmaduke de Thweng. They had issue a son,
Marmaduke Lumley, whose representative is the
present Earl of Scarborough." — Siege of Carla-
xerock.
0.
MEMOIR OF BRIAN FITZ-ALAN.
Page 58.
" BRIAN Fitz-Alan succeeded his father Brian
before the 5th Edward I., and on the 6th April.
118
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
10th Edward I. 1282, and 14th June 1287, was
summoned to serve with horse and arms in Wales.
In the 19th Edward I. he obtained permission to
make a castle of his house at Kilwardeby in York-
shire ; and in the following year, being one of
King Edward's vicegerents in Scotland, he, with
others, received that monarch's precept to give
John de Balliol possession of the kingdom. He
was a witness to that personage's surrender of his
crown on the 10th July 1296, about which time he
was constituted the King's Lieutenant in Scotland.
Fitz-Alan was present at the siege of Carlaverock
in June 1300 ; and in the ensuing February, was
a party to the Letter from the Barons to Pope
Boniface, in which he is styled, " Lord of Bedale."
His seal affixed to that document has been the
subject of remark, for instead of containing his
arms, it presents a whimsical assemblage of ani-
mals, apparently consisting of two birds, a rabbit,
a stag, and a pig or boar, all of which are looking
to the dexter excepting the latter, which is regard-
ing the chief, and is inscribed with this curious
legend,
TOT . CAPITA . TOT . SENTENCIE.
" The inference to be drawn from this singular
seal tends to establish, that its owner was eccen-
tric or satirical ; for it must either have been used
from unmeaning caprice, or with the intention of
ridiculing the devices in the signets of his contem-
poraries. The allusion in the poem (The Siege
of Carlaverock) to the arms of Fitz-Alan, is too
important to be allowed to pass unnoticed. It not
only informs us of an event in his life, by proving
that he had been involved in a dispute with Hugh
Poyntz, but shows that it was always one of the
fundamental laws of arms, that no two persons
should bear the same ensigns, and that there was
then sufficient pride felt on the point to resent its
infringement.
" All that is farther known of Fitz-Alan is, that
he was summoned to Parliament from the 23d
June, 23d Edward I. 1295, to the 22d January,
33d Edward I. 1305, though he died in 1302. The
name of his wife is not stated, but it is almost cer-
tain that he married late in life ; for, according to
a note of the inquisition held on his death, Maud
his daughter was his heir ; though, at the death
of his brother Theobald Fitz-Alan, on the 1st
Edward II. 1307-8, his heirs are said to have been
Maud and Katherine, the daughters of his brother
Brian Fitz-Alan, the former of whom was then
aged seven years, and the latter five ; so that
Katherine, who made proof of her age on the 12th
Edward II., was probably a posthumous child. A
discrepancy, however, exists on the subject ; for,
agreeable to a note of the inquisition on the death
of this baron, his daughter Maud was then eight
years old, and Dugdale says that Katherine was
at the same time aged six, which, if the other state-
ment be correct, was impossible. Of these daugh-
ters, Maud married Sir Gilbert Stapleton, and,
according to a pedigree in Dodsworth's MSS.,
secondly Thomas Sheffield ; and Katherine became
the wife of John Lord Grey of Rotherfield. Brian
Fitz-Alan was buried in the south aisle of Bedale
church in Yorkshire, and a sumptuous monument
was there erected to his memory, a beautiful en-
graving and accurate description of which are given
in Blore's " Monumental Remains." Sir Brian is
said to have possessed a very elegant figure, and
manners highly polished for the age." — Siege of
Carlaxerock .
P.
MEMOIR OF AYMER DE VALLENCE, EARL OF PEMBROKE.
Page 66.
" AYMER DE VALENCE was the third son of William
de Valence, who was created Earl of Pembroke by
his uterine brother King Henry the Third. He
was born about 1280, and succeeded his father in
his honours on the 13th June 1296, both of his
elder brothers having previously died without issue.
The earliest notice of him which is recorded, is,
that on the 26th January, 25th Edward I. 1297, he
was summoned to Parliament as a baron, though,
according to modern opinions on the subject, he
was fully entitled to the earldom of Pembroke, nor
was the title ever attributed to him in public
records, until the 6th November, 1st Edward II.
1307 5 and the first writ to Parliament addressed
to him as " Earl of Pembroke," was tested on
the 18th of the following January. Upon this
remarkable circumstance, some observations have
been recently made ; but it is wholly impossible to
explain the cause of the anomaly in a satisfactory
manner. Although never styled " Earl of Pem-
broke" until the accession of Edward II., it is
manifest, that from the death of his father, he
ranked above all barons excepting Henry of Lan-
caster, who being of the blood royal, is uniformly
mentioned next to Earls ; hence it appears, that
notwithstanding his claim was not positively ac-
knowledged, he was considered to be entitled to a
higher degree of precedency than belonged to the
baronial dignity. In the 25th Edward I., he was
in the expedition into Flanders, and, in the same
year, was appointed a commissioner to ratify an
agreement between the King and Florence, Count
of Holland, relative to some auxiliaries from the
Count in that war ; and was likewise one of the
ambassadors sent by Edward to treat for a truce
between England and France. In the 26th and
27th Edward I ., he was in the Scottish wars, and
in June 1300, in the 28th Edward I., was present
at the siege of Carlaverock, when he must have
been about twenty-one years of age ; but the poet
pays him no other compliment than what a pun
upon his name suggested.
1 Le Valence Aymars li Vaillans.'
" In the following year, he was a party to the
Barons' letter to the Pope, in which, though his
name occurs immediately after that of the Earl of
Arundel, and before Henry de Lancaster's, he is
only styled * Lord of Montmiac.' Shortly after-
wards, he was appointed to treat with the ambas-
sadors of the King of France on the subject of
peace. In the 31st Edward I., he was again in
the wars of Scotland ; and, in the same year, re-
ceived permission to leave the realm upon his own
affairs. He obtained a grant, in 1305, of the Cas-
tles of Selkirk and Traquair, and of the borough
of Peebles in Scotland, to hold by the service of
one knight's fee, together with other possessions
in that kingdom ; and, in the 34th Edward I.,
was constituted Guardian of the Marches of Scot-
APPENDIX P.
119
land towards Berwick, when he was intrusted with
the sole command of the English forces which had
been levied against Robert Bruce. In the instru-
ment by which he was appointed to that important
duty, as well as in most others, he is styled
" Dilectum consanguineum et fidelem nostrum."
The appellation of " Cousin " was not then a mere
title of honour, when addressed to a peer, but was
used in its most literal sense ; and Aymer de
Valence's claim to it is shown by the following
slight pedigree.
Hugh le Brun,=Isabel, daughter, and heir-=King John,
ess of Aylmer, Count of
Angouleme.
ob. 1216,
1st hus-
band.
William de Valence, created^ King Henry III. ob. 1272.=
Earl of Pembroke, ob. 1296. 1 |
| !
AYMER DE VALENCE, EARL=KING EDWARD I. ob. 1307_
OF Pembroke, ob. 1323. I
I
KING EDWARD II.
" The successes which attended this nobleman
against Robert Bruce, are described by a contem-
porary chronicler ; and it is said that Valence,
after a severe contest, pursued Bruce, and pre-
suming that he would take refuge in Kildrummie
castle, he gained possession of that place, but
finding only Nigel de Bruce, brother of Robert,
there, he caused him and all who were with him,
to be immediately hung. This action has given
rise to some pertinent remarks by the able bio-
grapher of the Earl in the beautiful work before
noticed *, who has satisfactorily shown that Nigel
was not put to death by him, but that at least the
forms of law were practised on the occasion. On
the deathbed of Edward. I., Pembroke, with some
other personages, received the King's dying injunc-
tions to afford his son their counsel and support,
and not to permit Piers de Gaveston to return into
England. His strict adherence to this command,
naturally excited the favourite's displeasure ; and
he is said, in derision of his tall stature and pallid
complexion, to have termed him ' Joseph the Jew.'
In the first year of the young monarch's reign,
Valence was, as has been before observed, allowed
and summoned to Parliament by his proper title of
Earl of Pembroke ; and at the coronation of that
monarch, he carried the King's left boot, but the
spur belonging to it was borne by the Earl of Corn-
wall. In the same year, after performing homage
upon the death of his mother for her lands, he was
joined with Otho de Grandison in an embassy to
the Pope ; and in the 3d Edward II., was found
heir to his sister Agnes, or more probably Anne.
It has been considered, from the circumstance of
the Earl being a witness to the instrument by
which the King recalled Gaveston, and bestowed
the possessions of the Earl of Cornwall upon him,
that he approved of, or at least consented to, those
acts ; but this idea rests upon far too uncertain
evidence to be relied upon ; and if he ever changed
his opinion, it was of short duration, for in the
3d Edward II., he joined the Earl of Lancaster
* Blore's " Monumental Remains."
against Gaveston, and when he was banished the
realm in 1311, the Earl of Pembroke was one
of the persons deputed to petition the King that he
should be rendered incapable of ever holding any
office.
" In the 6th Edward II., he was again sent on a
mission to Rome, and in the same year obtained a
grant of lands in London, in which was included
the New Temple. In the 7th Edward II. he was
appointed Gustos and Lieutenant of Scotland, until
the arrival of the King, and was present at the
fatal battle of Bannockburn. Two inedited MSS.
cited in the ( Monumental Remains,' allude to
the Earl's conduct on that occasion, in words fatal
either to his loyalty or his courage : the one stating
that 'Insuper Comes de Pembrok, Henricus de
Bellomonte, et multi magnates, cordetenus Pharisei,
a certamine recesserunt ;' and the other, that
' in pedibus suis evasit ex acie et cum Valensibus
fugientibus se salvavit.' In all probability, how-
ever, the language was in both instances that of
an enemy, and deserves but little credit ; though,
even if it were true, ' there is no great disgrace,' as
the learned biographer, from whose memoir these
extracts are taken, has truly remarked, 'in seeking
safety by flight when defeat was inevitable, and the
whole army pursued a similar course.'
" In the 9th Edward II., the Earl was a com-
missioner for holding a Parliament in the King's
absence, and he took an active part in the proceed-
ings therein. Being sent to Rome on a mission
to the Pontiff, a singular misfortune befel him, as
he was taken prisoner on his return by a Burgun-
dian called John de Moiller with his accomplices,
and sent to the Emperor, who obliged him to pay
a ransom of 20,000 pounds of silver, upon the
absurd pretence that Moiller had served the King
of England without being paid his wages. Edward
used every exertion to procure the Earl's liberty,
and wrote to several sovereign princes, soliciting
them to interfere on the subject ; but he did not
immediately succeed. In the llth Edward II.,
Pembroke was once more in the Scottish wars,
and was appointed governor of Rockingham castle ;
and upon the King's purposed voyage in the 13th
Edward II., to do homage to the King of France
for the Duchy of Acquitaine, he was constituted
Guardian of the realm during his absence, being
then also Custos of Scotland. In the 15th Ed-
ward II., he sat in judgment on the Earl of Lan-
caster at Pontefract ; and for his conduct on the
occasion, was rewarded with the grant of several
manors.
" In March, 1309, the Earl of Pembroke was one
of the peers appointed to regulate the royal house-
hold ; in the 5th Edward II., he was commanded
not to approach the place where the Parliament
was held with an armed retinue, or in any other
manner than was observed in the time of the late
King ; in the 8th Edward II., he was a commis-
sioner to open and continue a parliament at York ;
in the 12th Edward II., he was sent to Northampton
with others to treat with the Earl of Lancaster, for
the better government of the realm, and was one
of the peers then appointed to be about the King's
person, at which time he signed the agreement
between the King and that Earl ; he advised the
reversal of the judgment against Hugh le De-
spencer the younger ; by writ tested on the 19th
January, 14 Edward II. 1321, he was appointed a
120
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
commissioner to treat for peace with Robert de
Brus ; and in the 18th Edward II., the Earl, as
Justice in Eyre of the Forest of Essex, claimed
the appointment of Marshal thereof.
"The Earl of Pembroke accompanied Isabel,
Queen of England, to France in 1323 ; and is said
to have lost his life in that year, at a tournament
given by him, to celebrate his nuptials with his
third wife, Mary, daughter of Guy de Chastillon,
Count of St. Paul's ; though, from the obscure
manner in which his death is mentioned by some
chroniclers, and the attempt which they have made
to consider it as a mark of the vengeance of heaven
for his conduct relative to the Earl of Lancaster,
Dugdale asserts that he was murdered on the 23d
June, 1324, ' by reason he had a hand ' in that
affair. But the former statement his recent bio-
grapher considers to be corroborated by the fol-
lowing lines in a long MS. poem, containing a Life
of the Earl, in the Cottonian collection, written by
Jacobus Nicholaus de Dacia, who calls himself a
scholar of Mary de St. Paul, Countess of Pembroke ;
by which he probably meant that he belonged to
Pembroke Hall, which she had founded.
' Mors Comitem Comitum necuit, mors ipsa cruenta
Ipsa cruore rubrum campum facit et rubicundum.'
" From the annexed account of the Earl's death,
however, by another contemporary writer, it would
appear that he died of apoplexy :
" ' Ea vero tempestate primorum consultu direxit
ad partes transmarinas Rex Almaricum de Va-
lencia Comitem de Penbrokia, virum siquidem ad
queque nepharia peragenda iuxta sue propinqui-
tatis nequiciam continue paratum, regis Franco-
rum presencie nuncium super dictis negociis as-
sisteudum vt eiusdem regis Francorum animum ab
inceptis revocaret, ut ipsius benevolenciam affec-
tum regis Anglorum varijs blandiciis inclinaret.
Quo perveniente, ac iuxta proposita suorum verbo-
rum responsis acceptis, per Pykardiam rediens, ad
quoddam inunicipium mi. villa, id est,dimidia villa,
nuncupatum, tribus leucis a Compyne distans, in
vigilia Sancti Johannis, declinavit pransurus, ubi
Christus voluit virum sanguineum et dolosum non
dimidiare dies suos. Sed finita refectionis hora
thalamum ingreditur, deambulando statim in atrio
corruit, ac sine confessione et viatico salutari in-
felicem animam subito in solo sutHavit *.' "
The following account of the Earl of Pembroke
is from the pen of Hutchinson. " This Earl "
(Adomer de Valence) " seemed to have a divine
interdict depending over him, and the immediate
vindictive hand of Providence to be upon him and
his posterity for his atrocious deeds. He was a
tool to his prince, and servilely submitted to the
mandate of the crown, contrary to the dictates of
humanity, honour, and justice. He sat in judgment
on Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, and impiously ac-
quiesced in his sentence. He was a chief instru-
ment in apprehending the famous Scottish patriot
Wallace in 1305 ; accomplishing his capture by
the treachery of his most intimate associates, and
those in whom he placed his utmost confidence, Sir
John Menteith and others of infamous memory.
Adomer, on his bridal day, was slain in a tourna-
ment, held in honour of his nuptials ; and left a
* " Siege of Carlaverock."
wife at once a maiden, bride, and widow. It is said
that, for several generations of this family, a father
was never happy enough to see his son, the proscribed
parent being snatched off by the hand of death
before the birth of his issue." (Hutchinson's His-
tory of Northumberland.)
It may be also remarked as a singular coinci-
dence, the fatality which attended the Stuarts after
they came to the throne, not one of whom, fot-
many generations, died a natural death. John
Menteith was the son of Walter Stuart, Earl of
Menteith, and of the same family which afterwards
swayed the Scottish sceptre.
Aymer, or Adomer de Valence, is likewise
charged by the Minstrel, as being the instrument
made use of for corrupting the fidelity of Men-
teith ; and he mentions, that the infamous bargain
was finally concluded in " Ruglyne Kirk," where
the two met by appointment, and that Menteith
received from Vallence three thousand crowns of
gold as the price of his friend. " Ruglyne " is si-
tuated nearly mid-way between Both well and Dum-
barton castles ; the former being the place where
the Earl of Pembroke usually resided when in
Scotland, and was quite convenient for his keeping
an appointment at f( Ruglyne " with the governor of
Dumbarton Castle. When it is recollected, that
John Comyn, who, according to " Douglas's peerage"
married a sister of Vallence, was hatching the
treason which he afterwards put in practice against
Bruce, at the time when his brother-in-law was
tampering with the friend of Wallace, it will not
be doing him great injustice, if we suppose him at
least in the secret of the infamous transaction with
Menteith. In fact, both of these deeds of dark-
ness appear to have been part of the same plan for
placing Comyn, and consequently the sister of the
Earl of Pembroke, on the Scottish throne.
The Earl was thrice married ; first, to Beatrix,
daughter of Ralph de Noel, Constable of France ;
secondly, to a daughter of the Earl of Barre ; and
thirdly, to Mary, daughter of Guy de Chastillon,
Count of St. Paul ; but he had no issue ; and the
descendants of his sisters, Isabel, the wife of John
Baron Hastings, and Joan, who married John Co-
myn of Badenoch, are consequently his represen-
tatives. His eldest sister, Anne, married, first,
Maurice Fitz-Gerard ; secondly, Hugh de Balliol ;
and, lastly, John de Avennes ; and probably died,
s. P. in the 3d Edward II.
Mary, Countess of Pembroke, is chiefly known
to the present age by an action, which seldom fails
to ensure immortality. She was the foundress of
a College for the purposes of learning and religion,
which still bears the name of Pembroke Hall ; and
was likewise a benefactress to several religious
houses. She died about 1376 ; and on the 13th
March in that year made her will at Braxted, in
Essex, by which she ordered her body to be buried
in the church of the sisters of Denny, where she
had caused her tomb to be made ; and bequeathed
to the church of the Abbey of Westminster, where
her husband was interred, a cross, with a foot of
gold and emeralds, which Sir William de Valence,
Knight, brought from the Holy Land.
The body of the Earl of Pembroke was con-
veyed to England, and buried in Westminster Ab-
bey ; but upon the beautiful tomb erected to his
memory, it is unnecessary to say a single word,
ample justice having been done to it by the artist
APPENDIX Q,
121
and the author of a biographical notice, which
accompanies a recent engraving of his tomb.
Siege of Carlaverock.
I
Q.
MEMOIR OF HENRY DE LACY, EARL OP LINCOLN.
Page 69.
" HENRY DE LACY was the eldest son of Edmund
de Lacy, Earl of Lincoln, by Alice, the daughter of
the Marquess of Saluces, in Italy. He succeeded
his father in the earldom in 1257, at which time
he was probably about nine years of age, his pa-
rents having been married in May, 1247- The
first circumstance relating to the Earl after his
birth, of which we have any notice, was his mar-
riage, in 1256, to Margaret, the eldest daughter
and co-heiress of William de Longespee, the co-
venants of which are given by Dugdale. In 1269,
the Earl became involved in a dispute about some
lands with John, Earl Warren, and each party pre-
pared to establish his claim by force of arms ; but
their intention becoming known to the King, he
commanded his Justices to hear and determine the
cause, who decided it in favour of the Earl of
Lincoln. William de Longespee, his wife's father,
died in the 52d Henry III. ; and soon afterwards
the Countess and her husband performed homage
for, and obtained livery of, all the lands which had
in consequence devolved upon her. In her right
he is considered to have become Earl of Salisbury,
the said William de Longespee having been enti-
tled to that dignity, though he was never allowed
it, as son and heir of William de Longespee, the
natural son of King Henry II., by the well-known
Rosamond Clifford, who obtained the Earldom of
Salisbury by his marriage with Elizabeth, the
daughter and heiress of William d'Evereux. On
the feast of St. Edward, 18th March, 1272, the
Earl of Lincoln received the honour of knighthood,
and in the same year was appointed Governor of
Knaresborough Castle. In 5th Edward I. he had
livery of the fee which his ancestors had usually
received 'nomine comitatus Lincoln' with all the
arrears from the time he was invested by King
Henry III. with the sword of that earldom. Upon
several occasions, between the 6th and 10th Ed-
ward I., he obtained grants of fairs, markets, and
free-warrens in different parts of his domains ; and
in the year last mentioned, he accompanied the
expedition then sent into Wales. Leland asserts
that the Earl built the town of Denbigh, the land
of which had been granted io him " from his having
married into the blood of those princes, and that
he walled it, and erected a castle, on the front of
which was a statue of him in long robes ; and that
anciently prayers were offered in Saint Hillary's
chapel in that place, for Lacy and Percy.
" Dugdale considers, that his surrender of the
casti? and barony of Pontefract to the King, with
all the honours thereto belonging, in the 20th Ed-
ward I., «>rose from his " having been long married,
and doubting whether he should ever have issue,
but upon couJition, as it seems," for the king, by
his charter, \ioted at Newcastle-on-Tyne, 28th
December, 21st Ed\vard I., re-granted the same to
him and to the heirs of his body, with remainder
to Edmund, Earl of Lancaster, the King's brother,
and to the heirs of his body, failing which, to the
king and his heirs. In almost the next paragraph,
however, that eminent writer says, " that in the
22d Edward I., the Earl received a grant of se-
veral manors from the King, with remainder to
Thomas, the son of Edmund, Earl of Lancaster,
and Alice his wife, sole daughter of the Earl, and
to the heirs of their two bodies lawfully begotten,
and failing such issue, to the right heirs of the said
Thomas," from which it would appear, that, at the
time of the surrender by the Earl of Lincoln to
the King, the said Alice was living ; and which is
further confirmed by his saying, in a subsequent
page, that she was twenty-eight years of age at the
death of her father in 1312, in which case she
must have been above seven at the time in ques-
tion. In the 20th Edward I., the Earl was sent as
ambassador to the King of France, to treat on the
subject of the restraint of those pirates who robbed
some French merchants ; and in the 22d year of
that monarch he again attended him into Wales,
and was likewise in the expedition sent into Gas-
cony. He accompanied the Earl of Lancaster, in
the 24th Edward I., into Brittany, and was present
at various successes of the English forces. On the
death of that nobleman, he succeeded him in his
command, and besieged the town of Aux with great
vigour, though without success, and was forced to
retreat to Bayonne ; from which place he marched,
with John St. John, towards Bellegard, which was
then besieged by the Count d' Artois. The engage-
ment which took place in the vicinity of that town,
does not, from Dugdale's relation of it, appear to
have added to the reputation of the Earl, as he
informs us, upon the authority of Walsingham, that
" approaching a wood about three miles from Bel-
legard, he divided his army into two parts, whereof
the van was led by John de St. John, and the rear
by himself ; but having past the wood where St.
John, meeting the enemy, began the fight, dis-
cerning their strength, he retreated to Bayonne,
leaving the rest to shift for themselves, so that St.
John and many others were by reason thereof
taken prisoners." Whatever stain this circum-
stance might have cast upon his military character,
seems to have been partially removed towards the
end of that year, by his having obliged the enemy
to raise the siege which they had laid to St. Ka-
therine's, in Gascony ; soon after which he pro-
ceeded into Flanders, and thence returned to Eng-
land. In the ensuing year, 27th Edward I., he was
summoned by writ, tested 17th September, 27th Ed-
ward I., 1299, to be at York, with horse and arms,
on the morrow of the Feast of St. Martin, to serve
against the Scots ; and, in the next year, he is
stated to have been sent to the Pope, with Sir
Hugh Spencer, to complain of injuries received
from the Scots ; and about the same time he was
appointed Lieutenant of Gascony. In the 29th Ed-
ward I., he was made Governor of Corfe Castle,
from which year until the 31st Edward I., when he
was joined in oommission with the Bishop of Win-
chester to treat of peace between England and
France, Dugdale gives no account of him.
" It was, however, on the 24th June, in the 29th
Edward I., anno 1300, when the Earl must have
been about fifty years of age, that he commanded
the first division of the army which besieged Car-
122
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
laverock Castle. The only characteristic trait re-
corded of him by the poet, is that of valour, which,
we are told, was the principal feeling that animated
his heart, and in so rude an age, this attribute was
perhaps the highest and most gratifying praise
that could be imagined. His name does not after-
wards occur in that production, from which we
may conclude, that his services at the siege and
assault were not very conspicuous. In 1305, the
Earl was again employed on a mission to the Pope,
being deputed with the Bishops of Lichfield and
Worcester to attend the inauguration of the Pontiff'
at Lyons, and to present him, in the name of the
King, with several vessels of pure gold. After
having executed this command, it appears that he
was once more in the wars in Gascony, and in the
ensuing year was similarly employed in Scotland.
Upon the death of the King, at Burgh, in Cumber-
land, the Earl was one of the Peers who attended
him in his last moments, and received his solemn
request to be faithful to his son, and not to allow
Piers de Gaveston to return into England. Imme-
diately after Edward's demise, he joined some Earls
and Barons in a solemn engagement to defend the
young King, his honour and authority ; and at his
coronation he is recorded to have carried one of
the swords borne at that ceremony ; shortly after
which he was appointed Governor of Skipton Castle.
His conduct seems to have secured the confidence
of the new monarch, for, upon his expedition
towards Scotland in the third and fourth years of
his reign, the Earl of Lincoln was constituted Go-
vernor of the realm during his absence.
" The preceding account of this personage has
been almost entirely taken from Sir William Dug-
dale's Baronage. The only facts which have been
ascertained relating to him, not stated in that work,
are, that he was one of the Mainpernors for the
Earl of Gloucester, in 1292 ; that he was a Re-
ceiver and Trier of Petitions in 1304 ; that he was
present in the parliament held at Carlisle in Febru-
ary, 35th Edward I., 1307 5 and that he was one
of the Peers appointed to regulate the King's
household in May, 3d Edward II., 1309.
" His works of piety were proportionate to his
extensive possessions, and, adopting this criterion
of his religious sentiments, we may conclude that
he was not behind his contemporaries in supersti-
tion or devotion. Amongst his more substantial
gifts to the church, was his large contribution to
the "new work" at St. Paul's Cathedral in Lon-
don ; and three gilt crosses and a carbuncle, and a
cup of silver gilt, which was said to have belonged
to the shrine of St. Edmund, in the abbey of Salley.
" The Earl of Lincoln closed a long and active
career in 1312, at Lincoln's Inn*, in the suburbs
of London, being then about sixty-three or sixty-
four years of age, and he is reported to have called
his son-in-law, the Earl of Lancaster, to him, upon
his death-bed, and, after representing how highly
* This celebrated Inn of Court is recorded to have been
the town residence of the Bishops of Chichester, from the
reign of Henry III. till that of Henry VIII. It seems, how-
ever, to have been for a short time possessed by the subject
of this memoir, who, although the only Earl of Lincoln who
resided there, left it the name, which it has permanently
retained during the five subsequent centuries. The arms of
Lacy, on the gatehouse in Chancery-Lane, were erected by
Sir Thomas Lovel, together with his own, 1518.
" it had pleased God to honour and enrich him
above others," he told him that " he was obliged
to love and honour God above all things ;" and tlien
added, « Seest thou the Church of England, here-
tofore honourable and free, enslaved by Romish
oppressions, and the King's wicked exactions ?
Seest thou the common people, impoverished by
tributes and taxes, and, from the condition of free-
men, reduced to servitude ? Seest thou the no-
bility, formerly venerable throughout Christendom,
vilified by aliens, in their own native country ? I
therefore charge thee, by the name of Christ, to
stand up like a man for the honour of God and his
church, and the redemption of thy country, asso-
ciating thyself to that valiant, noble, and prudent
person, Guy, Earl of Warwick, when it shall be
most proper to discourse of the public affairs of
the kingdom, who is so judicious in counsel, and
mature in judgment. Fear not thy opposers who
shall contest against thee in the truth, and if thou
pursuest this my advice, thou shalt gain eternal
honour ! " This patriotic speech, which is attri-
buted to him by Walsingham, who wrote in the
fifteenth century, is worthy of attention, as con-
veying the view taken of the affairs of the period
by a monk about one hundred years afterwards ;
for it would require extraordinary credulity to
consider that it was really uttered by the dying
Earl, whose whole life does not appear to present
a single action indicative of the sentiments there
attributed to him. His body was buried in the
eastern part of St. Paul's Cathedral, in London,
between the chapel of our Lady and that of St.
Dunstan.
" The Earl of Lincoln was twice married, first
to Margaret de Longespee before-mentioned, by
whom he had a son, Edmond de Lacy, who was
drowned in a well in a high tower, called the Red
Tower, in Denbigh Castle, in his father's lifetime ;
a*nd a daughter, Alice, the wife of Thomas, Earl
of Lancaster, who was his sole heiress, and, at the
Earl's death, was twenty-eight years of age. His
second wife was Joan, sister and heiress of William
Baron Martin, who survived him, and was remar-
ried to Nicholas Baron Audley.
" Alice, Countess of Lancaster, whose romantic
life has been made the subject of a popular novel,
styled herself, as sole inheritrix of the extensive
possessions of her father and mother, Countess of
Lincoln and Salisbury. She was thrice married ;
first to the Earl of Lancaster ; secondly, to Eubolo
le Strange ; and, thirdly, to Hugh le Frenes ; but
died without issue on the Thursday next after the
feast of St. Michael, 22d Edward III., i.e. 2nd
October, 1348, when the representation of the
powerful house of Lacy became vested in the de-
scendants of Maud, the sister of Henry, Earl of
Lincoln, who married Richard de Clare, Earl of
Gloucester." — Siege of Carlaurock.
MEMOIRS OF RICHARD SIWARD, AND WALTER DE
HUNTERCOMBE.
Page 72.
WE shall here insert some account of Richard
Siward and Walter de Huntercombe, two cha-
APPENDIX R.
123
racters who appeared on this occasion. The latter,
besides being at the siege of Carlaverock, where
he attracted the notice of the poet, who mentions
him as the handsome Huntercombe, bearing " er-
mine with two red gemmells," was also governor
of Edinburgh castle, and engaged in almost every
campaign which Edward made in Scotland. The
following notice, therefore, abridged from Mr.
Nicolas, will be useful in supplying that informa-
tion respecting him which it has been inconvenient
to give in the course of the narrative. It is also
the more necessary, from the circumstance of the
writer being pledged, in the advertisement of the
" Life of Wallace," to furnish " biographical no-
tices of contemporary English and Scottish war-
riors " who figured in the contest between the two
countries.
RICHARD SIWABD. — " Though this individual is
frequently spoken of in the records of his day, yet
very few particulars are known that can throw
much light on his family pedigree. It has been
conjectured, that he was descended from Syward,
the great Saxon Earl of Northumberland ; but of
this, however, there is little certainty. His im-
portance appears to have been considerable ; for
we find that, on 18th Novembei-, 1292, he was ap-
pointed by Edward I. (in his character of Umpire
on the question of the Succession) to act as Go-
vernor of the Castles of Dumfries, Wigton, and
Kirkcudbright. On the 22d April, 1294, he ob-
tained a grant of the marriage of the widow of
Simon Fresel, or Frazer ; and on the 15th Octo-
ber, in the same year, he was summoned to attend
the English monarch, with all his retainers, in the
expedition to Wales. Towards the end of 1295,
he affected to unite with the Scottish Barons in
their attempt to restore their King to the dignity
of an independent sovereign, and, in consequence,
had the defence of the Castle of Dunbar assigned
to him. How he conducted himself on that oc-
casion, has already been noticed. His subsequent
confinement in the Tower, has been adduced by
some writers as a powerful argument against the
charge of treason brought against him by his coun-
trymen. We cannot, however, see it in that light.
His treachery was of the most profligate descrip-
tion. By negociating the surrender of a fortress,
which, from its strength and importance, was
reckoned in those days the key of the kingdom,
and also using it, at the same time, as a trap to en-
snare the greater part of the nobility, was conduct
that required the exercise of some ruse in order
to lessen the odium it was calculated to excite
even in the estimation of the English nobility, who
must otherwise have looked with disgust on a man
who could have acted in so base a manner towards
his own countrymen. By the following lines of
Peter Langtoft, Siward appears to have had for
some time a private understanding with the enemy :
' A knycht was tham among, Sir Richard Seward,
Tille our faith was he long, & with kyng Edward.
Tille our men he com tite, & said, ' the Scottis wilde
Thre dayes'haf respite, & than the castelle zelde.
To the Baliol suld thei send, ther castelle to rescue,
Bi that bot he vs mend with for zow to remue
The castelle ze salle haue, without any delay.'
Vol. ii. p. 274, 5.
" For the performance of this agreement, host- |
ages were given to the English, and a messenger
despatched to acquaint Baliol that a truce had
been obtained ; which he was instructed to say,
was effected entirely by the dexterity of Siward,
and his personal influence with a number of the
English nobles. Baliol was also advised to ad-
vance and attack the English araay while ' at meat,'
and that, at the same time, Siward would make a
sally to assist him in destroying the enemy — which
the messenger spoke of as a matter of certainty,
and moreover counselled Baliol to proceed imme-
diately afterwards and plunder Northumberland.
" On the third day, Siward, from the battlements
of Dunbar, discovered the Scottish army rapidly
approaching towards him ; he therefore hastily
sought the English head-quarters, and proffered
to go personally and retard the advance of the
Scots till the expiry of the time stipulated for by
the agreement. The English, however, were not
inclined to believe that he would carry his treason
quite so far, and refused him permission to pro-
ceed to the Scottish lines *.
" Siward, on being relieved from his confinement
in the Tower, rose high in the confidence of Ed-
ward. On 26th September, 1298, 7th May and
16th June, 1299, he was summoned, by the title
" Baron," to serve in Scotland. His name appears
on several occasions in the Wardrobe Account of
28th Edward I. In that year he received 411. 5s.
for the services of himself and his followers in the
garrison of Lochmaben. Also an allowance of
21. 13s. 4d. for the value of a horse killed at Kirk-
cudbright ; eight merks for a winter dress (robe) ;
and the like sum appears to have been paid to him
for a summer dress. In the same year he was
again summoned for the Scottish war, and also in
1301. He was made sheriff of Dumfries-shire in
1305, and was also aiding in the suppression of
Robert Bruce in 1308 ; in which year he was ap-
pointed to the charge of a district in Galloway,
under Edward II. In 1309 he was governor or
constable of Dumfries, and is supposed to have
died in 1310.
" By his wife Mary he had two sons, Richard
and John. They both attained the age of man-
hood ; and John, in particular, appears to have
followed the crooked anti-patriotic policy of his
father. He accompanied the Earl of Pembroke in
his invasion of Fife, as has been already mentioned,
and was rewarded by Edward with an appointment
as Governor of Perth. Little appears to have been
known of Richard. He was married to Elizabeth
-- in 1296. The arms of Siward, as has
been already noticed, were sable, a cross fleury,
argent.
" WALTER DE HUNTERCOMBE succeeded his father
in his lands in the 55th Henry III., at which time
he was of full age ; and shortly afterwards mar-
ried Alice, third daughter and co-heiress of Hugh
de Bolebec, and who, in the 2d Edward I., was
found to be one of the co-heirs of Richard de
Muntfichet, in right of her grandmother Margery,
his sister. In the 5th Edward I. he paid 501. for
his relief of the barony of Muschamp ; and on the
* Tide Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 275, 6. This author does not
say a word of Baliol and his barons having been made ac-
quainted with the agreement to surrender the castle on the
third day.
124
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
12 th December in that year, was summoned to
serve with horse and arms against the Welsh : he
received similar writs tested 6th April and 24th
May, 10th Edward I., and 1 4th June, 15th Ed-
ward I. He was one of the peers who were pre-
sent in parliament in the 18th Edward I., when a
grant was made to the King, for the marriage of
his eldest daughter, of the same aid as had been
given to Henry III. for the marriage of his daugh-
ter the Queen of Scotland ; and shortly afterwards
the Isle of Man was intrusted to his charge, but
which he only held three years, as, in obedience
to the King's commands, he surrendered his trust
to John de Baliol in the 21st Edward I. In the
19th Edward I., by writ tested the 16th April at
Darlington, he was ordered to be at Norham,
equipped for the field by the ensuing Easter ; and
obtained a charter of free- warren in all his demesne
lands in the county of Northumberland before the
end of that year. On the 26th June, 1294, Hun-
tercombe was ordered to* join the expedition then
made into Gascony. His military services, during
the remainder of the reign of Edward I. were in-
cessant, for he was in the Scottish wars in the
25th, 26th, 28th, 31st, and 34th years of that
monarch ; was Governor of Edinburgh Castle in
the 26th ; Lieutenant of Northumberland in the
27th Edward I. ; and afterwards Warden of the
Marches there. In the 28th Edward I. we find
that he was at the siege of Carlaverock ; and in
the next year he was a party to the letter to Pope
Boniface, in which he is called * Walter, Lord of
Huntercombe.' It appears from the Wardrobe
Accounts of the 28th Edward I., that he was al-
lowed 101. as a compensation for a black nag
which was killed by the Scots at Flete, on the 6th
August, 1299. But the nature and extent of Hun-
tercombe's services are best shown by his own
statement of them in his petition to the King in
the 35th Edward I., praying a remission of his
scutage for the expeditions in which he had been
engaged, with which prayer the crown complied.
He says, that he had been in all the wars of Scot-
land up to that time ; namely, in the first war at
Berwick with twenty horse ; then at Stirling with
thirty-two horse, in the retinue of the Earl of
Warren ; then at Le Vaire Chapelle with thirty
horse in the retinue of the Bishop of Durham ;
afterwards at Gaway with sixteen horse ; and that
he sent eighteen horse to the last battle, though
he was not present himself, being then Warden
of the Marches of Scotland and Northumberland.
From that year nothing more is known of this
Baron, excepting that he was summoned to Par-
liament from the 23d June, 23d Edward I., 1295,
to the 16th June, 14th Edward II., 1311, and
died in 1312 ; but after the 25th Edward I. he
was probably prevented by age from taking an
active part in public affairs, for even allowing him
to have been but twenty-one in the 55th Henry III.,
he must have been above sixty in 1307 5 which
calculation makes him to have been about fifty
when he was at Carlaverock, and sixty -four at his
decease. Though he was twice married he died
without issue. His first wife was Alice de Bolebec,
before mentioned ; but we only know that the
Christian name of his second was Ellen, and that
she survived him. Nicholas Newbaud, his ne-
phew, son of his sister Gunnora, was found to be
his heir.
" The arms of Huntercombe were ermine, two
bars gemells, gules."
s.
MEMOIR OF SIR SIMON FRASER.
Page 76.
THIS warrior appears to have been most actively
engaged in the battle of Roslin ; and the renown
which has in consequence attached itself to his
name, will perhaps render the following notice of
him acceptable.
Simon de Fraser was the eldest son of Simon
de Frazer, the ancestor of the baronial houses of
Saltoun and Lovat ; and is supposed to have been
a near connexion of William Frazer, Bishop of
St. Andrew's, whose politics he appears in his
early years to have adopted ; for, when he was
taken prisoner on the surrender of the castle of
Dunbar in 1296, he swore fealty to Edward, and
remained faithful to the English interest till 1302.
He was repeatedly summoned to fight against his
countrymen, particularly on 26th September 1298,
and 7th May 1299. He also figured at the siege
of Carlaverock in 1300 as a Baron ; — in the same
year, he was appointed Warden of the Forest
of Selkirk, and, by that designation, the truce
between the two countries was announced to him
on the 30th October. In the same year, the sum
of 64£. 18s. is charged in the Wardrobe Account as
having been paid him as the wages of himself and
a retinue of three knights and twelve esquires,
from 13th July till 3d September, at which time
his horses were valued, and hire for fifty-nine
days allowed him. There is also an allowance of
17^. 6s. 8d. for the maintenance of his wife Lady
Mary, her daughters and family, living in the
castle of Jedworth, by the grant of the King, from
Christmas till St. John Baptist's day, twenty-six
weeks, at a merk per week, as per agreement with
the Steward of Berwick-upon-Tweed *. On his
withdrawing from Edward, he joined Comyn, and
gained the battle of Roslin, as has already been
observed. When the English afterwards succeeded
in subduing Scotland, a severe penalty was inflicted
upon him ; he was banished from all the territories
belonging to, or under the influence of England, for
three years, and his rents for that time forfeited.
In 1306 he joined Bruce ; but having unfor-
* From the following reproof, which he gave the Trea-
surer at Roslin, it would appear that these, or similar
moneys due to him, had not been justly settled for ; and
perhaps the chagrin he felt on that account may have partly
occasioned his defection from Edward.
" Symon was austere, to Rauf spak fulle grim :
' That mad the Tresorere thou has desceyued him,
& me & many mo, fro our wages zede quite.
Sir Rauf thou resceyued tho, bi taile & hi scrite,
Thou did vs more trauaile, ilk man thou reft his wage.
Now salle I wite the taile, & put the in the Arerage,
Of preste thou has no merke, albe ne non amite,
Bot laced in a hauberke, thai is no clerkis abite.
For alle tho clerkes of Rome, that sing in kirk or rede,
Thou salle haf thi dome, als thou serued in dede.' "
. ., Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 319.
APPENDIX S.
125
tunately fallen into the hands of the enemy, he was
conveyed to London and ordered by Edward for
execution ; — after being drawn and quartered, his
head was fixed upon London Bridge. " But," says
Mr. Nicholas, " a much more minute and curious
account is given of the tragical termination of
Frazer's life in a fragment of an inedited chronicle
in the British Museum of the fifteenth century *,
from which Mr. Ritson printed the subjoined ex-
tract in illustration of a poem which will be more
fully noticed.
" The fryday next before assumpcioun of oure
lady, King Edeward mette Robert the Brus bi-
sides seynt Johns toune in Scotland and with his
companye, of whiche companye King Edewarde
quelde sevene thowsand. When Robert the Brus
saw this myschif, and gan to flee, and hovd hym
that men my'gte nougt hym fynde, but Sr Simond
Frisell pursuede hym socore, so that he turnede
ayen and abode bataille, for he was a worthy
knyght and a bolde of body, and the Englisshe
men pursuede hym sore yn every syde, and quelde
the stede that Sr Symond Frisell rood uppon, and
ther toke hym and lad hym to the host. And
Sr Symond began for to flater and speke faire, and
saide, Lordys, I shall yeve you iiij thousand marke
of sylver, and myne hors and harneys, and all my
armure and vicome. Tho answerd Theobaude of
Pevenes, that was the Kinge's archer, Now God
me so helpe hit is for nougt that thou spexte,
for alle the gold of Engelonde I wold the noght
lete gone withoute commaundement of King Ede-
ward. And tho was he lad to the King. And
the King wolde not see hym, but commaunded to
lede hym awey to his dome to London on our
Ladyes even nativite, and he was honge and drawe,
& his heede smyten of, and honged ayene with
chynes of jren oppon the galwes, and his hede
was sette oppon London brug on a sper. And
ayens Cristesmasse the body was brent, for enche-
soun that the men that kepte the body by nyghte
sawe menye devellis rampande with jren crokes,
rennynge uppon the gallews, and horribliche tor-
mented the body ; and meny that ham sawe, anoon
after thei deied for dred, or woxen mad, or sore
sykenesse thei had."
In one of the Harleian manuscripts f, there is
a ballad written on the subject, a few years after
the circumstance took place, and which was pub-
lished by Ritson J. The folio whig stanzas are so
extremely interesting, from the manner in which
Frazer is alluded to, that, notwithstanding the
length to which they extend, it is impossible to
avoid inserting them. After noticing the capture
and the fate of his unfortunate companions, the
poet says : —
" Thenne saide the iustice that gentil is ant fre,
Sire Simond Frysel, the Kynges traytour hast thou be,
In water ant in londe that monie myhten se,
What sayst thou thareto, how wolt thou quite the ?
Do say.
Sa foul he him wiste,
Nede waron truste
For to segge nay.
* Harl. MSS. 266.
I Ancient Songs.
t Harl. MSS. No. 2253.
Ther he was ydemed, so hit wes londes lawe,
For that he wes lordswyk furst he wes to drawe,
Upon a retheres hude forth he wes ytuht,
Sum while in ys time he wes a modi knycht,
In huerte.
Wickednesse and sunne
Hit is lutel wunne,
That maketh the body smerte
For al is grete poer yet he wes ylaht,
Falsnesse and swykedom all hit g'eth to nacht
Tho he wes in Scotlond lutel wes ys thoht,
Of the harde iugement that him wes bysocht
In stounde.
He wes foursithe forswore
To the King ther bifore,
And that him brohte to grounde.
With feteres and with gyves ichot he wes to drowe,
From the tour of Londone, that monie myhte knowe,
In a curtel of burel aselkethe wyse,
Ant a gerland on ys heued of the newe gwyse,
Thurh Cheepe
Moni mon of Engelonde,
For to se Symond,
Thideward con lepe.
Tho he come to galewes furst he wes an honge,
Al quick byheueded, thah him thohte longe,
Seth the he wes yopened, is boweles ybrend,
The heued to Londone brugge wes send,
To shonde :
So ich ever mote the
Sum while wende he
Thes lutel to stonde.
He rideth thourh the site as y telle may,
With gomen and wyth solas, that wes here play,
To Londone brugge hee nome the way,
Moni wes the wyves chil that ther on laketh a day,
Ant seide alas
That he was ibore,
And so villiche forlore,
So feir mon ase he was.
Now stont the heued above the tubrugge,
Faste bi Waleis, soth forte sugge,
After socour of Scotlond longe he mowe prye,
Ant after help of Fraunce, met halt hit to lye,
Ich wene.
Betere him were in Scotlond,
With is ar in ys hond,
To pleyen othe grene.
Ant the body hongeth at the galewes faste
With yrnene claspes longe to laste,
Forte wyte wel the body, and Scottysh to garste,
Foure and twenti the beoth to sothe ate laste,
By nychte,
Yef eny were so hardi
The body to remny,
Also to dyhte.
Frazer left two daughters, his co-heirs, one of
whom married Sir Patrick Fleming, ancestor of
the Earls of Wigton ; and the other named Mary,
was the wife of Sir Gilbert Hay, ancestor of the
Marquess of Tweedale. From Alexander Frazer
his brother the Barons Saltoun and Lovat de-
scended.
The arms of Simon Frazer were, sable, seme'e
of roses argent ; but the descendants of his brother
bear, azure, three cinque foils argent.
After this notice of so distinguished a leader
among the Scots, the reader may reasonably be
120
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
supposed to feel some curiosity respecting the
English general,
SIB JOHN SEGRAVE.
From the researches of Mr. Nicolas, it appears
that this eminent Baron was the eldest son of
Nicholas Baron Segrave ; and at his father's death,
in the 23d Edward I., was thirty -nine years of
age. In the 54th Henry III., he married Chris-
tian, daughter of Hugh de Plessets, knight, and
at the same time, his sister Amabil became the
wife of his brother-in-law, Sir John de Plessets.
Soon after the accession of Edward I., he was
engaged in the wars of Scotland, and in the 13th
Edward I. he attended the King in his expedition
into Wales. In the 19th Edward I. he was with
his father in the Scottish wars ; and in the 24th
Edward I. executed the office of Constable of the
English army.
Dugdale asserts, that in the 25th Edward I.,
John de Segrave was, by indenture, retained to
serve Roger le Bigot, Earl of Norfolk, the Earl
Marshal, with six knights, including himself, as
well in peace as war, for the term of his whole
life, in England, Wales, and Scotland, with the
following retinue : — In time of peace, with six
horses, so long as the Earl should think fit, taking
bouche of court for himself and six knights ; and
for his esquires hay and oats, together with livery
for six more horses, and wages for six grooms and
their horses. He was also to receive two robes
for himself, as for a banneret, yearly, as well in
peace as in war, with the same robes for each of
his five knights, and two robes annually for his
other bachelors. In war, he was bound to bring
with him his five knights and twenty horses, in
consideration of which, he was to receive for him-
self and his company, with all the said horses,
xl s. per diem ; but if he should bring no more
than six horses, then xxij s. per diem. It was fur-
ther agreed, that the horses should be valued, in
order that proper allowance might be made, in
case any of them should happen to be lost in the
service ; and, for the performance of this agree-
ment, he had a grant from the Earl of the manor
of Lodene in Norfolk.
The preceding document has been dited nearly
in Dugdale's own words, because at the same time
that it affords much information with respect to
the retinue by which Segrave was attended to the
field, it proves that he was intimately connected
with the Earl Marshal, which tends to explain his
having in the same year, namely, on the 12th
August, 25th Edward I. 1297, been appointed by
the Earl to appear in his name before the King,
in obedience to a precept directed to him and the
Constable, commanding them to attend him on
the subject of a body of armed men which had
assembled in London. The record states, that on
the appointed day, the Earl of Hereford as Con-
stable, and " Monsr John de Segrave, qui excusa
le Comte Mareschal par maladie," came accord-
ingly *• In the 25th Edward I., this baron was
also summoned to accompany the King beyond
the sea, and afterwards at Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
with horse and arms ; and, hi the next year, was
present when the English army gained the victory
of Falkirk. In the 28th Edward I., he was again
* Fcedera, N. E. vol. i. 872.
summoned to serve in the wars of Scotland, in
which year, when he must have been about forty-
five years old, he was at the siege of Carlaverock.
The account given of him by the poet, that he
performed the Earl Marshal's duties upon that
occasion, because that nobleman was prevented
from attending, is not only strongly corroborated
by the preceding statement of his having acted as
deputy of the Earl Marshal in the year 1297, but
also by the following extract from Peter de Lang-
toft's chronicle (p. 309), when speaking of the
expedition into Scotland in 1300.
" After Midesomers tide thorgh comon ordinance,
No lenger suld thei bide, bot forth & stand to chance.
Norreis & Surreis, that seruice auht the kyng,
With hors & harneis at Carlele mad samnyng.
The erle Marschalle Rogere no hele that tyme mot haue,
He went with his banere Sir Jon the Segraue,
To do alle tho service that longed the office tille,
& mayntend alle the prise, ther he sauh lawe & skille."
After Carlaverock castle surrendered, Segrave's
banner, from his having acted as Marshal during
the siege, was displayed on its battlements. In
the 30th of Edward I., he was a party to the
Letter from the Barons to the Pope, in which he is
styled " John Lord of Segrave ;" and about that
time was appointed Governor of Berwick, and
Warden of Scotland. In the same year, whilst
riding out of Berwick with a small escort, he was
surprised by an ambuscade of the Scots, wounded,
and taken prisoner ; which event is thus noticed
by Langtoft (p. 319) :—
" Our men in Scotland with sautes sodeynly,
The Segrave myght not stand, Sir Jon tok the gayn stie.
His sonne & his brother of bedde als thei woke,
& sextene knyghtes other, the Scottis alle them toke."
His captivity was however, it appears, of short
duration ; for, on Edward's return to England,
Segrave was left as his Lieutenant of Scotland. At
different periods during the reign of Edward I., he
obtained grants of free warren and other privileges
in several of his manors, and possessed that ele-
vated place in his sovereign's confidence and es-
teem, which his long and zealous services so justly
merited. Nor was he less distinguished by his suc-
cessor, for soon after the accession of Edward II.,
he was constituted Governor of Nottingham Castle,
which had belonged to Piers de Gaveston, and was
likewise appointed to his situation of Justice of the'
Forests beyond the Trent, and Keeper of all the
Rolls thereto belonging ; but he resigned these
offices in the following year, when they were con-
ferred upon Henry de Percy. In the 2d Ed-
ward II., he was again appointed Warden of Scot-
land ; in the 6th Edward II. he was taken prisoner
at the battle of Bannockburn, and about twelve
months afterwards Thomas de Moram and several
other Scots, then prisoners in the Tower of London,
were delivered to Stephen de Segrave, son and
heir of the Baron, to be exchanged for him. In
the 8th Edward II., commissioners were appointed
to hear and determine all disputes relative to the
taking up of carriages by him or his agent, in con-
sequence of his offices of Keeper of the Forests
beyond the Trent, and of the castles of Nottingham
and Derby. He was summoned upon several occa-
sions to serve in the Scottish wars during the early
APPENDIX T.
127
part of the reign of Edward II., and to Parlia-
ment from the 26th August, 24th Edward I., 1296,
to the 6th of May, 18th Edward II., 1325. In the
10th Edward II., in consequence of his great ser-
vices, and of his imprisonment in Scotland, he
received a grant of 1000Z. ; but what was then due
to the crown for money received by him from the
time of his appointment of Warden of the Forests
beyond the Trent and Governor of Nottingham
Castle, was to be deducted from that sum.
The tide of royal favour at last turned, and he
accidentally fell a victim to the displeasure of his
sovereign. Having, in 1325, excited Edward's
anger by the escape of Roger Lord Mortimer from
the Tower, he sent Segrave and the Earl of Kent
into Gascony, under the pretence of defending that
province, where he was attacked with a disease
then prevalent there, of which he shortly after-
wards died, aged about seventy years, leaving John
de Segrave, his grandson, son of his eldest son
Stephen, who died in his lifetime, his heir.
The preceding unadorned narrative of John de
Segrave's services forms a splendid monument of
his fame : for, whilst the impossibility of colouring
the biography of his contemporaries with meretri-
cious ornaments of language, is strongly felt when
their actions are few or obscure, the absence of
such assistance tends to the advantage of those who
need no other eulogy than the simple record of the
occasions upon which they were present in the
field, or were selected to execute high and im-
portant duties.
John de Segrave, the next Baron, added to the
honours of his ancestors in an unprecedented man-
ner, by marrying Margaret, the daughter and
heiress of Thomas de Brotherton, Marshal of Eng-
land, younger son of King Edward I. Through
the Marriage of Elizabeth, the daughter and
heiress, with John Lord Mowbray, that family
attained the Marshalship of England. The pre-
sent representatives of John Baron Segrave, the
subject of' this article, are the Lords Stourton and
Petre and the Earl of Berkley. The arms of John
de Segrave were sable, a lion rampant, argent,
crowned or.
T.
EXTRACTS FROM THE WARDROBE ACCOUNTS.
Page 78.
THIS, of course, is mere conjecture on the part of
the author ; but that he has, at least, probability
on his side, may be inferred from the extraordinary
outlay attending, the Scottish expeditions as proved
by the following extracts from the Wardrobe Ac-
counts — exhibiting the Revenue and Expenditure
of Edward for the year 1300, and including the
disbursements occasioned by the invasion of Scot-
land during that year : —
Total amount of receipts, p. Exchequer, for
this present 28. year of Edward I. . £49,048 19 10
Fines levied, and proceeds of stores, horses,
&c., sold ...... 9,106 16 2£
Perfo. 15. . £58,155 16
Charges on Scottish War.
For royal garrisons and castles in Scotland,
fo. 154 £18,638 1 8
— replacing horses killed or destroyed in
King's service, belonging to knights, and
officers, and gratification to messengers,
servants, &c. fo. 187 .... 4,386 4 5
— annual fees to knights of King's house-
hold, wages of bannerets and simple
knights, &c. fo. 210 . . . . 3,077 19 0
— wages of engineers, archers, sergeants -
at-arms of King's household, esquires,
&c. fo. ix. Observ. on W. A. . . 1,03810 7
— wages of foot-soldiers, crossbow-men,
archers, artificers, and workmen, fo. 270 4,446 9 11$
— wages of seamen belonging to the fleet
of the Cinque Ports and other towns, em-
ployed in the King's service, fo. 279 . 1,233 9 8
Amount of charges for the year £32,820 15
3,338 19
87 11
77 6
Separate Disbursements.
Alms and charitable donations of the King
and his family, fo. 47 . . . . £1,166 14
Necessaries for the King's household, tra-
velling expenses, ambassadors, messengers
to Court of Rome, wages of King's servants
not on the Marshall's roll, &c. (Observ. on
W. A. fo. viii.) .....
Expenses of messengers and others, de-
spatched on King's business, fo. 303 .
Falconers, huntsmen, &c. fo. 309 . .
Allowance to bannerets, knights, clerks, and
other servants of the King's household for
their winter and summer robes, fo. 331 .
Expenses of sundry furnishings for the Royal
household, including separate the
Queen and her household, amounting to
£3668. 2s. 9d., and Chancellor's fee,
amounting to £581. 9s. 9d. fo. 360 .
" The account then states the payments con-
tained in this book to amount to . . .53,17815
" To which are added the expenses of the
household contained in a separate account,
amounting to ...... £10,969 16
714 3 4
15,575 18
And " the whole of the national expenditure,
within this department, during one entire
year," is stated at £64,105 0
It is added, " The account is corrected and
approved by the comptroller in every page ;
but the balance is not struck. If we take,
however, the sum told of the money re-
ceived, which amounted to ...
And deduct it from the money paid, we shall
find a balance due to the accountant,
amounting to
58,155 16 2
£5,949 4
On data furnished by the ascertained difference in the
value of silver in 1300, which is stated to be "thrice as
much" as it was in 1700, and the comparative value of cer-
tain provisions, estimated, as being in 1300, "five times as
cheap" as in 1700. Bishop Fleetwood "makes the differ-
ence of the value of a shilling between the two periods to
be fifteen ; " and it is added, "supposing this calculation to
be well-founded, computations might be made, so as to
form a judgment of the difference between the latter of
those periods and the present time." — (Vide p. xii. Observa-
tions on Wardrobe Account, 1787.)
An estimate of the expense of the Scottish war,
according to this mode of computation, would j
128
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
therefore present the following result, for (1700)
the period alluded to by Bishop Fleetwood : —
Charges on Scottish war for 1300
For difference in the weight of silver
32,820 15 3
003
98,462 5 10
For the variation in the value of money
£492,311 9 4J
being an increase of the sum of 32,820Z. 15s. 3J&,
of the year 1300, to 492,31 II. 9s. 4%d., or nearly
one-eighth of 3,895,205/., the revenue of the king-
dom in the reign of William III., according to Sir
John Sinclair : — while, from a statement by the
same respectable authority, the whole revenue of
the kingdom under Edward I. is estimated at
150,000^.; the disbursements for the Scottish war
will therefore be found to exceed, within one de-
partment of the national expenditure, one-fifth of
the national income.
u.
TRIAL OF WALLACE.
Page 87.
" WILLIAM WALLACE, which had oft-times set Scot-
land in great trouble, was taken and brought to
London, with great numbers of men and women
wondering upon him. He was lodged in the house of
William Delect, a citizen of London, in Fenchurch
Street. On the morrow, being the eve of St. Bar-
tholomew, he was brought on horseback to West-
minster-hall ; John Segrave and Geoffrey, knights,
the mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen of London, many,
both on horseback and on foot, accompanying him ; and
in the great hall, at Westminster, he being placed on
the south bench, crowned with laurel, for that he had
said in times past that he ought to wear a crown in
that hall, as it was commonly reported ; and being
appeached as a traitor by Sir Peter Malorie, the
King's Justice, he answered that he was no traitor to
the King of England; but for other things whereof
he was accused, he confessed them, and was, after,
headed and quartered." — Stow. Chron. p. 209.
iueth in-x
he wes >
X.
ON THE MARTYRDOM OF WALLACE.
Page 88.
THE following account is giving by Langtoft of the
capture, sentence, and execution of Wallace :
" A ! Jhesu, when thou wille how rightwis is thi mede?
That of the wrong has gilt, the endying may thei drede.
William Waleis is nomen, that maister was of theues,
Tething to the Kyng is comen, that robberie mischeues.
Sir Jon of Menetest sewed William so nehi,
He tok him whan he wend lest, on nyght his leman hi.
That was thorght treson of Jak Schort his man,
He was the encheson, that Sir Jon so him nam,
Jak brother had he slayn, the Waleis that is said,
The more Jak was fayn, to do William that braid.
Selcouthly he endis the man that is fals,
If he trest on his frendes, thei begile him als.
Begiled is William, taken is & bondon,
To Inglond with him thei cam, & led him vnto London,
The first dome he fanged, for treson was he drawen.
For robbrie was he hanged, & for he had men slawen,
& for he had brent abbies, and men of religion,
Eft fro the galweis quik thei lete him doun,
& boweld him alle note, & brent tham in the fire,
His hede than of smote, suilk was William hire ;
& for he had mayntend the werre at his myght,
On lordschip lended thore he had no right,
& stroied those he knewe, in fele stede sers
His body thai hewe on foure quarters,
To hang in foure tounes, to mene of his maners
In stede of Gonfaynounes, & of his baners.
At London is his heued, his quarters ere leued, in Scotland
f spred.
To wirschip her iles, & lere of his wiles, how wele that he
sped.
It is not to drede, traytour salle spede, als he is worthi,
His lif salle he tyne, & die thorgh pyne, withouten merci.
Thus may men here, a ladde for to lere, to biggen in pays ;
It fallis in his iye, that hewes ouer hie, with the Walays."
Vol. ii. p. 329, 330.
" The martyrdom of Wallace," says the editor of
Wyntoun's Chronicle, " is thus described, in a bal-
lad written about a year after, when the head of
Sir Simon Frazer, one of the heroes of Roslin, was
set up beside those of Wallace and Lewellyn, the
I last sovereign of Wales.
" To warny alle the gentilmen, that liueth
Scotlonde.
The Waleis wes to drawe seththe he wes >to abyde.
anhonge,
Al quic biheueded, ys boweles ybrend,
The heued to Londone brugge wes send
Sire Edward oure Kyng, that ful ys of piete,>.
The Waleis quarters sende to is oune centre, I t>
On four half to honge, huere myrour to be, j Al
Ther-apon to thenche, that manie myhten se,-'
MS. Harl. No. 2253, f. 59, b. Trivet, p. 340.
a Thus did Edward glut his vengeance on the
dead body of this worthy man, whose living soul all
his power never could subdue.
" Some of the English historians have stained
their pages with low invectives against Wallace.
Carte, in particular [Hist. v. ii. p. 290.], labours
hard to prove him a traitor to King Edward,
whose mercy he praises. That he was a traitor, he
proves from his being a native of Galloway, or the
Cambrian territories, which, he says, the kings of
Scotland held in vassalage of the crown of Eng-
land, and because the subvassals were, in cases of
rebellion, subject by the feudal law to the same
forfeitures and penalties as the immediate vassal.
" A man must feel himself very much pinched
for arguments, when he has recourse to such as
are confessedly not founded on reason, and to
quibbles and perversion of facts. Clydesdale, the
ancient kingdom of Strathcluyd, one of the first
independent kingdoms established in Britain by
the expulsion of the Romans, which for many cen-
turies withstood the attacks of the Angles, Pichts,
Scots, and Norwegians, and had the honour to pro-
duce STEWART, DOUGLAS, and WALAYS, was never
pretended to be any part of the territories of which
the kings of England claimed the superiority. So
the pretence that Walays was a traitor, in conse-
quence of the place of his birth, falls to the ground ;
and the pretence of rebellion is equally unfounded,
unless the noble exertions of a free people against
APPENDIX X.
129
the unjustifiable attempts of a neighbouring prince
to subject them to his dominion, are to be branded
with the name of rebellion. Well may the spirit
of the noble Walays forgive those writers for
accusing him of inhumanity and rebellion, who
have extolled the clemency of Edward I." — Notes
to Wyntown's Chronicle, vol. ii. p. 503.
The inclination to detract from the merits of
Wallace, does not appear to have become entirely
extinct among the historians of England. Dr. Lin-
gard thus expresses himself respecting our hero :
" It may perhaps offend the national partiality of
some among my readers, but 1 greatly suspect that
Wallace owes his celebrity as much to his execu-
tion as to his exploits. Of all the Scottish chief-
tains who deserved and experienced the enmity of
Edward, he alone perished on the gallows ; and
on this account his fate called forth and mono-
polized the sympathy of his countrymen." — Vol. iii.
p. 227.
On this Mr. Tytler remarks, " It is not true, that
of all the Scottish chieftains who deserved Edward's
enmity, Wallace was the only one who perished
on the gallows. Sir Nigel Bruce, Sir Christopher
Seton, John Seton, the Earl of Athol, Sir Simon
Fraser, Sir Herbert de Morham, Thomas Boys,
Sir David Inchmartin, Sir John de Somerville, Sir
Thomas and Sir Alexander Bruce, both brothers
of the king, and Sir Reginald Crawfurd, were all
hanged by Edward's orders in the course of the
year 1306, within a year of the execution of Wal-
lace. So much for the accuracy of the ground on
which Lingard has founded his conjecture, that
Wallace owes his celebrity * to his execution.' "
Respecting the inaccuracies of Dr. Lingard on
this subject, we shall give another extract from the
same authority. " He," Dr. Lingard, " observes,
that after the surprise of Ormesby the Justiciary,
by Wallace and Douglas, other independent chief-
tains arose in different counties who massacred the
English, and compelled their own countrymen to
fight under their standards. These other inde-
pendent chieftains are brought in 4 for the nonce '
| by Dr. Lingard. They are utterly unknown to
the contemporary historians, English and Scottish.
But they do not appear upon the stage without a
use. On the contrary, they first multiply like
Falstaff 's men in buckram, ' into numerous parties,'
and then act a principal part in the next sentence ;
for the historian goes on to observe, * that the origin
! and progress of these numerous parties had been
| viewed with secret satisfaction by the Steward of
Scotland, and Wishart the Bishop of Glasgow,
who determined to collect them into one body,
and to give their efforts one common direction.
Declaring themselves the assertors of Scottish in-
dependence, they invited the different leaders to
i rally around them ; and the summons was obeyed
! by Wallace and Douglas, by Sir Alexander Lind-
say, Sir Andrew Moray, and Sir Richard Lundy,'
vol. iii. p. 305. This last sentence is one of pure
and gratuitous invention, without a shadow of his-
torical authority to support it. The numerous and
independent parties and chieftains who rose in
different counties — the silent satisfaction with
which they were contemplated by the Bishop of
Glasgow and the High Steward — their determina-
tion to collect them into one body, and to give
them one common direction — their declaring them-
selves the assertors of Scottish independence —
their summons to the different leaders to rally
round them, and the prompt obedience of this
summons by Wallace, Douglas, and the rest — are
facts created by the ingenuity of the historian.
They seem to be introduced for the purpose oi
diminishing the reputation of Wallace ; and the
impression they leave on the mind of the reader,
appears to me to be one totally different from the
truth. The Steward and the Bishop of Glasgow
are the Patriot chiefs under whom Douglas and
Wallace, and many other independent chieftains
consent to act for the recovery of Scottish free-
dom ; and Wallace sinks down into the humbk1
partisan, whose talents are directed by their supe-
rior authority and wisdom. Now, the fact is ex-
actly the reverse of this. The Steward and Wis-
hart, encouraged by the successes of Wallace and
Douglas, joined their party, and acted along with
them in their attempt to free Scotland ; but
neither Fordun, nor Wynton, nor Bower gives
us the slightest ground to think that they acted
a principal part, or any thing like a principal part,
in organizing the first rising against Edward.
On the contrary, these historians, along with
Trivet and Walsingham, Tyrrel and Carte, ascribe
the rising to Wallace alone, whose early success
first caused him to be joined by Douglas, and
afterwards by the Bishop and the Steward, along
with Lindsay, Moray, and Lundy. Indeed, instead
of playing the part ascribed to him by Lingard,
the patriotism of the Steward and the Bishop, was
of that lukewarm and short-lived kind which little
deserves the name. It did not outlive eight
weeks ; and they seized the first opportunity to
desert Wallace and the cause of freedom. The
atack upon Ormesby ^jie Justiciary took place
some time in May, 1297 5 and on the 9th of July
of the same year, did Bishop Wishart, this patriot
assertor of Scottish independence, negociate the
treaty of Irvine, by which he and the other Scot-
tish barons, with the single exception of Wallace
and Sir Andrew Moray of Bothwell, submitted
to Edward. Lingard's other hero, the High
Steward, who is brought in to divide the glory
with Wallace, was actually in the English service
at the battle of Stirling ; and although he secretly
favoured the Scottish cause, he did not openly join
his countrymen till he saw the entire destruction
of Surrey's army. I may remark, in concluding
this note, that the idea of an attack upon Wallace,
and an eulogy on the clemency of Edward, has
probably not even the merit of originality. It
appears to be borrowed from Carte, vol. ii. p. 290 ;
but it is only the idea which is taken. The clumsy
and absurd argument of Carte is discarded, and a
far more ingenious hypothesis, with a new set of
facts, is substituted in its place. On reading over
Hemingford again, I find one expression which
may perhaps have suggested this theory of Lin-
gard. Hemingford says, speaking of Bruce, p. 120,
that he joined the Bishop of Glasgow and the
Steward, ' qui tocius mali fabricatores exstiterant.'
Yet this is inconsistent with his own account in
p. 118, and is not corroborated, so far as I know,
by any other historian."
Among other singular passages in the work of
the learned Doctor, we cannot omit taking notice
of the following : " The only great battles in
which Wallace is known to have fought, are those
of Stirling and Falkirk. In the first he was vic-
K
130
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
torious ; but he must share the glory of the action
with Sir Andrew Murray, who was certainly his
equal in command, perhaps his superior. In the
second he was defeated, and the defeat was the
most disastrous that Scotland ever experienced.
In the history of the next five years, his name is
scarcely ever mentioned." Scottish historians
never pretended that there was any battle of equal
importance to those of Stirling and Falkirk, in
which Wallace was engaged. But where Dr.
Lingard could get his information, that Sir Andrew
Murray held a superior, or even an equal command
with him, it is not easy to conjecture. In Scottish
authors, evidences to the contrary are innume-
rable ; and if Dr. Lingard had not preferred sub-
stituting his own " perhaps," hi place of historical
record, he might have proofs in direct opposition
to the statement he has made, and that even from
English authors, with whom he appears to be
familiar.
At the treaty of Irvine, for the submission of
the Scottish barons, when all deserted Wallace
but Sir Andrew Murray, it is mentioned in the
instrument as having been notified to Wallace
" Escrit a Sire Willaume," and the name of Sir
Andrew is not even alluded to. This would cer-
tainly not have been the case, had he held even an
equal command, much less a superior. — Foedera,
t. ii. p. 774.
In the Chronicle of Langtoft, page 297, we have
an account of the battle of Stirling, which is thus
introduced : —
" The rascail of ther route bigan to werre alle newe,
Now Edward is oute, the barons be not treue.
The suffred, as it sais, theficottis eft to rise,
& William the Walais ther\ed $ ther justise.
Thorgh fals concelement William did his wille,
Our castels has he brent, our men slayn fulle ille."
The chronicler, after telling us that Wallace was
the head and justice of the Scots — expressions which
embrace a pretty extensive prerogative — proceeds
to narrate the operations of the day, in which he
speaks of Wallace as the only commander opposed
to Warren : nor does he even hint of any indi-
vidual who had a right to " divide the glory " of
the victory with him : on the contrary he says,
" The Tnglis were alle slayn, the Scottis bare them wele,
The Waleis had the wayn, als'maistere of that eschele."
Sir Andrew Murray is not even mentioned by
Langtoft. That he fought bravely, and died nobly
in defence of his country, is what no one will
attempt to deny, and the same might be said of
many more who were present on that occasion ;
but being the only man amongst a timid and back-
sliding aristocracy, who acted with patriotism and
spirit in so trying a time, his name has been handed
down to the grateful remembrance of posterity.
" In the next five years," adds Dr. Lingard,
the " name " of Wallace " is scarcely ever men-
tioned." When Scottish affairs are concerned,
and more particularly when the character of her
deliverer is the subject adverted to, a reference to
authorities appears to be extremely irksome, or
attended with too much trouble to our learned
author. In the present instance, however, we shall
not ask him to go farther than the pages of his
own work, where he will find matter that might
lead him to suspect the truth of the above asser-
tion, as well as the correctness of the view he has
taken of the grounds on which our patriot's popu-
larity is founded. We are informed (vol. iii.
p. 227), " The only man whose enmity could give
him " (Edward) a " moment's uneasiness, was
Wallace, and in few months he was brought cap-
tive to London." And again, vol. iii. p. 329, " If
the fate of Wallace was different from all others,
it proves that there was something peculiar in his
case which rendered him less deserving of mercy."
If we are to credit our author's statements, Edward
must have been a more nervous character than he
has ever been supposed to be, if he could feel
" uneasiness " at " the enmity " of a man who had
been thus buried in obscurity, and whose " name
had scarcely been heard of for five years," — one
who, in the only great battle in which he was suc-
cessful, held but a subordinate command, and acted
during the insurrection in the humble character of
a mere partisan, under the direction of others.
Surely there was nothing peculiarly aggravating in
the case of such a man, to have " rendered him less
deserving of mercy " than his more guilty supe-
riors, particularly from one whom our author in-
forms us " was not a blood-thirsty tyrant." It is
strange that it did not appear to Dr. Lingard, as a
very high degree of praise, that after Wallace had
been deprived, by the severe and sanguinary policy
of Edward, of all resources save what arose from
his own dauntless heart and irresistible arm, that
he should still continue to be the only man irJtoK
" enmity " could give the oppressor of his country
"a moment's . uneasiness." From this circum-
stance, and from this alone, arose that " something
peculiar " in his case which rendered him ob-
noxious to the tender mercies of Edward. In con-
clusion, we cannot help remarking, that the Doc-
tor's method of substituting, where his prejudices
happen to be interested, his own theoretical con-
jectures, in opposition to the authentic records of
the country, is rather an indirect way to the confi-
dence of his reader.
Y.
PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF WALLACE.
Page 88.
FROM the following passage in the Minstrel it
would seem, that a portrait of Wallace had been
taken during his short stay in France, and for-
warded to his friends in Scotland. What after-
wards became of this precious relic, cannot now
be discovered. Though there are many likenesses
of him to be met with in the country, yet the pre-
tensions to originality of all those we have yet
seen, are extremely questionable. It would be
difficult for a blind man to give his ideas of a pic-
ture in more appropriate language than the fol-
lowing.
" The wyt off Frans thocht Wallace to commend ;
In to Scotland, with this harrold, thai send
Part off his deid, and als the discriptioune
Off him tane thar, be men off discretioun,
Clerkis, knychtis, and harroldis, that him saw;
Bot I hereoff can nocht reherss thaim aw."
The description of Wallace, in the following
APPENDIX Z.
131
lines, places the genius of Henry in a very favour-
able light. It is evidently the effort of a master,
and might be studied to advantage by the artist
who intended to commit his ideas of the hero of
Scotland to canvas : —
"Wallace statur, off gretness, and off hycht,
Was jugyt thus, be discretioun off rycht,
That saw him bath dissembill and in weid ;
Nyne quartaris large he was in lenth indeid ;
Thryd part lenth in schuldrys braid was he,
Rycht sembly, strang, and lusty for to se ;
Hys lymmys gret, with stalwart paiss and sound,
Hys browys hard, his armes gret and round ;
His handis maid rycht lik till a pawmer,
Offmanlik mak, with naless gret and cler;
Proportionyt lang and fayr was his wesage ;
Rycht sad off spech, and abill in curage ;
Braid breyst and heych, with sturdy crag and gret,
His lyppys round, his noyss was squar and tret ;
Bowand bron haryt, on browis and breis lycht,
Cler aspre eyn, lik dyamondis brycht.
Wndir the chyn, on the left syd, was seyn,
Be hurt, a wain ; his colour was sangweyn.
Woundis he had in mony diuerss place,
Bot fayr and weill kepyt was his face.
Off ryches he kepyt no propyr thing ;
Gaiff as he wan, lik Alexander the King.
In tym off pes, mek as a maid was he ;
Quhar wer approchyt the rycht Ector was he.
To Scottis men a gret credens he gaiff;
Bot knawin enemyss thai couth him nocht disayff.
Thir properteys was knawin in to Frans,
Off him to be in gud remembrans."
Bookix. 1909—1942,
The subjoined extract, from Fordun, fully cor-
roborates the statements from the Minstrel : —
" Erat statura procerus, corpore giganteus, facie
serenus, vultu jocundus, humeris latus, ossibus
grossus, ventre congruus, lateribus protelus, aspectu
gratus, sed visu ferus ; renibus amplus, brachiis
et cruribus vigorosus ; pugil acerrimus, et omni-
bus artubus fortissimus et compactus. Insuper
sic eum Altissimus et ipsius vultum varium qua-
darn hilaritate favorabili insigniverat, ita dicta et
facta illius quodam coelesti dono gratificaverat ut
omnia fidorum corda Scotorum solo aspectu sibi
conciliaret in gratiam et favorem. Et nee mirum :
erat enim in donis liberalissimus, in judiciis eequis-
simus, in consolatione tristium compatientissimus,
in consilio peritissimus, sufferentia patientissimus,
hi locutione luculentissimus, — super omnia falsi-
tatem et mendacia prosequens, ac proditionem
detestans ; propter quod fuit Dominus cum eo, per
quern erat vir in cunctis prospere agens ; ecclesiam
venerans, ecclesiasticos reverens, pauperes et viduas
sustentans, pupillos et orphanos refovens, oppresses
relevans, furibus et raptoribus insidians, et sine
pretio super eos, justitiam exercens et rigorem.
Cujuscemodi justis operibus, quia quam maxima
Deum gratificabat, ipse propterea omnia ejus opera
dirigebat." — Lib. x. cap. 28.
Z.
BEMINISCENCE OF WALLACE.
Page 88.
AMONG the few speeches of Wallace which we
have on record, the following is mentioned by
English writers, as having been addressed by him
to the Scottish schiltrons, on the eve of the battle
of Falkirk : — " I haif brocht you to the ring, hap
gif you cun." Respecting the meaning of these
words, however, there is no agreement between
Scottish or English writers. Walsingham has it, " I
haif brocht you to the King, hop gif you cun j" — on
which Lord Hailes very properly remarks : —
" This speech of Wallace has generally been
related and explained in a sense very different. I
must therefore give my reasons for having departed
so widely from the common opinion. Walsingham,
p. 75, says, ' Dicens eis patria lingua, — / haif brocht
you to tJie King, hop gif you eun.' This short speech
has always appeared to me as utterly inconsistent
with the character of Wallace. It is commonly
understood to mean, ' I have brought you to the
King, hope if you can hope.' To say nothing of
the impropriety of the appellation of King, be-
stowed by Wallace on Edward, the sentiment,
'hope, if you can hope,' seems only fit for the
mouth of a coward or a traitor. Abercrombie,
perceiving this, has given a more plausible inter-
pretation of the word hop. He renders the phrase
thus, ' Fly if you can ;' as if Wallace had meant to
say, ' Fight, for you cannot fly.' There is nothing
incongruous in this sentiment ; but surely it did
not merit to be recorded : Neither was it strictly
true ; for the Scottish army might have retired
with unbroken forces into the forest which lay in
the rear. The only satisfactory interpretation of
Wallace's address to his troops, is to be found in
W. Westm. p. 451, ' Ecce adduxi vos ad annulum
charolate (chorolate) sive tripudiate vos, sicut
melius scitis.' King, in Walsingham, ought to be
ring. The words of Wallace were, ' I haif brocht
you to the ring, hap gif you cun.' The ring means
the dance a la, ronde. Douglas translates ' Exercet
Diana choros,' ^Eneid ii., thus, ' Ledand ring-dances?
p. 28. 1. 42. « Te lustrare choros,' ^Eneid vii., thus :
* To the scho led ring-sangis in karoling,' p. 220,
1. 31. Elsewhere, in his own person, he says, ' Sum
sang ring-sangis,' Prologue, xii. B. p. 402, 1. 33.
That hap or hop is understood of dancing, is also
plain from Douglas. He thus paraphrases ' Hie
exultantes Salios,' ^Eneid viii.
' The dansand Preistis, clepit Salii,
Happand and singand.' P. 267, 1. 21.
" I need not prove, that ' gif you cun ' implies
'if you have skill,' or, 'according to your skill.'
The verb is obsolete ; but the noun and the adjec-
tive are still remembered. ' Let my right hand
forget its cunning,' ( a cunning artificer,' ' a cun-
ning man.' Langtoft, vol. ii. p. 305, as translated
by Brunne, reports the words thus : ' To the renge
ere ye brouht, hop now if ye wille.' But he does
not seem to have understood the import of the
words."
The above is all learned enough ; but his lord-
ship has stopped short in his explanation, and left
his readers as much in the dark, as any of his pre-
decessors, respecting the meaning or propriety of
such a phrase in the mouth of a general, on the
commencement of a great battle. Some of our
readers perhaps require to be told that schiltron
means a body of men drawn up in a circle *. The
* In this explanation of the term, the writer finds him-
self at variance with the opinion of Mr. Tytler, who says,
" schiltron " seems to denote nothing more than a compact
K 2
132
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
war-dance of the Scots and other northern nations,
as is well known, was performed round a large
fire. Each warrior's hand was firmly clasped in
that of his neighbour. Their motion was at first
slow, and gradually increased, till their rapidity
almost rivalled the velocity of the whirlwind.
When arrived at this state of fury, if any luckless
wight slipped his hold, or otherwise became un-
steady, the impetus which he and his fellows had
acquired, pitched him headlong amid the flames,
when his endeavours to extricate himself from the
blaze, and regain his place, formed the chief sport
of his companions. To render the schiltron the
most formidable figure for defensive operations,
steadiness was all that was requisite. When
Wallace, therefore, on the rapid advance of the
English, addressed his soldiers in the manner
alluded to, he gave utterance to the happiest
thought, in the fewest words, that perhaps ever
presented itself to the mind of genius in a case
of emergency. The striking similarity between
their form of battle and their favourite dance, was
apparent to all ; and the impending conflict became
instantly stripped of its terrors, by a playful allusion
to an amusement with which they were familiar,
while it flashed upon their minds with all the con-
viction of experience, that on the preservation of
their ranks their safety depended. The behaviour
of the schiltrons on that fatal day showed that they
understood the address of their leader better thau
any of its subsequent commentators.
body of men. As this restricted meaning of the expression
appears to have been adopted on the authority of Heming-
ford, who says, " qui quidem circuli Schiltronis vocabantur,"
it is to be inferred that he has not examined the term with
his accustomed accuracy. Schiltron is, without doubt, com-
pounded of the two Saxon words "scheld" and "roun."
When a general, in giving the word of command, called out
" Scheltron " to any portion of his army, they would have as
little difficulty in understanding him, as a modern battalion
would if ordered to " form square." It may also be observed,
that by placing their shields together, they derived consider-
able advantage, being thereby enabled to form with greater
celerity; and when once in order, a more impenetrable
figure could not be presented to the attack of an enemy.
That this is the ancient meaning of the word, is evident
from the manner it is used by old chroniclers. Hearne, in
his Glossary to Peter Langtoft, thus explains " Schelde,"
shield, target, buckler, protection, government. " Sheltron,"
shelter, covering, or rather shiltrons, or round battailes. The
expression, therefore, in Hemingford, of " circuli schiltronis,''
only shows that a man, even in a learned language, may
utter an absurdity.
In order to render the schiltron formidable in offensive
warfare, it was necessary to have the centre occupied with
archers, who, enclosed within the barrier of the spearmen,
could ply their deadly shafts in comparative security. That
this was part of the plan of Wallace to supply his deficiency
in cavalry at the battle of Falkirk, is highly probable. By
this measure, neither the superiority of the enemy in this
formidable description of force, nor the desertion of the
Scottish cavalry, would have been so severely felt. That
this arrangement did not take place, was very likely owing
to the pertinacity of Steward, who commanded the archers,
and rashly exposed himself and those under him to the
overwhelming charges of the heavy armed squadrons of the
English. This obstinacy on the part of the knight of Bon-
kill, affords a very natural solution of the feud between him
and Wallace. Had the archers been in the centre of the
schiltrons, they could have returned the murderous dis-
charge of their enemies' missiles with corresponding effect,
and have eventually produced a more favourable termination
to the operations of the day.
AA.
WALLACE'S DESCENDANTS.
Page 90. -
WALLACE appears to have left a daughter, whose
legitimacy has been called in question, but on very
slender grounds. In Chalmers's Caledonia, vol. i.
p. 579, we find the following passage : — " It has
been said that Wallace left no legitimate issue ;
but he had a natural daughter, who married Sir
William Baillie of Hoprig, the progenitor of the
Baillies of Lamington." It has never been dis-
puted, that the lady by whom Wallace had this
daughter was the heiress of Lamington, in right of
her father, Sir Hew de Bradfute ; it would there-
fore have been satisfactory, if the learned author
above mentioned had explained how the Baillies
of Hoprig came to the possession of Lamington.
If the daughter of Wallace was legitimate, their
succession appears the natural consequence of the
marriage of Sir William Baillie ; if not, the manner
in which they became possessed of that property
requires elucidation. That Wallace and the heir-
ess of Lamington were lawfully married, is asserted
by Henry, who draws the following picture of their
connubial happiness : —
" Quhat suld I say, Wallace was playnly set
To luff hyr best in all this warld so wid ;
Thinkand he suld off his desyr to get;
And so befell be concord in a tid,
That sho [was] maid at his commaund to bid ;
And thus began the styntyn aff this stryff :
Begynnyng band, Tvith graith witness besyd,
Myn auctor sais, sho was his rychtwyss wyff.
Now leiffin pees, now leiff in gud concord !
Now leyffin blyss, now leiffin haill plesance !
For scho be choss has bath hyr luff and lord,
He thinkis als, luff did him hye awance,
So ewynly held be favour the ballance,
Sen he at will may lap hyr in his armyss.
Scho thankit God off hir fre happy chance,
For in his tyme he was the flour off arrays.
Fortoune him schawit hyr fygowrt doubill face,
Feyll syss or than he had beyne set abuff:
In presoune now, delyuerit now throw grace,
Now at vness, now in to rest and ruff;
Now weyll at wyll, weyldand his plesand luff,
As thocht him selff out off aduersite ;
Desyring ay his manheid for to pruff,
In cairage set apon the stagis hye.
The werray treuth I can nocht graithly tell,
In to this lyffhow lang at thai had beyne :
Throuch natural course of generacioune. befell,
A child was chewyt thir twa luffaris betuene,
Quhilk gudly was, a maydyn brycht and schene."
Buke Sext, 41—69.
According to the above authority, the offspring
of this marriage was first united in the bands of
wedlock to an Esquire of the name of Shaw.
Whether this was any connection of William de
Shaw, mentioned at page 18 of this work, as wit-
nessing the charter of James, Lord High Steward
of Scotland, along with some other friends of Wal-
lace, we have no means of ascertaining. We are
told, however, that
" Rycht gudly men come off this lady ying."
Whether these were the issue of the marriage
with Shaw, or of that afterwards contracted with
APPENDIX B B.
133
Baillie of Hoprig, or of both, it is difficult to deter-
mine. It is probable, as Sir William Baillie is
designated, of Hoprig, and his descendants as
proprietors of Lamington, that they may have
succeeded to the inheritance, after the offspring of
the first marriage had become extinct. It has
also been advanced, as an argument against the
legitimacy of the daughter of Wallace, that she
inherited none of the property of her father. Those,
however, who started this objection, would have
done well to have shown, that Wallace possessed
property to which she could have succeeded. It
does not appear that he was ever personally
invested in any of the lands belonging to the
family. And mention is made of his brother
Malcolm having left a son of the name of John,
in whom the succession was prolonged, till it
merged in the family of Craigie. In Langtoft's
Chronicle, vol. ii. p. 338, we have an account of
the capture and execution of a Sir John de Wal-
lace, who is there called a brother of Sir William.
This is evidently a mistake, and might very easily
arise from the closeness of the connection between
the two parties. Another " John Walays of El-
rysla " (Elderslie) is taken notice of as among
the witnesses to the chai'ter of Robert, Duke of
Albany ; and, from the family title being pre-
served, it is highly probable that the stock of Sir
Malcolm Wallace had not then become extinct.
BB.
ON THE TREACHERY OF MENTETH.
Page 90.
IN the account of the capture of Wallace, we have
thought it advisable to follow, in a great measure,
the statement given by the Minstrel. It is, we
conceive, the only rational one we are possessed
of ; and as the authority of the author has been
supported by the Tower records, and other incon-
trovertible muniments, in matters of comparatively
trifling importance, it would be unfair to doubt
his veracity on so important a part of the history
of his hero, particularly when all the notices we
have in other writers, tend more or less to confirm
the truth of what he asserts. Lord Hailes, how-
ever, has attempted to remove the odium which
has for these 500 years been attached to the
memory of Menteth ; but his efforts to exculpate
the Judas of Scotland, have been viewed by the
generality of his countrymen in rather an unfa-
vourable light. In the remarks his Lordship has
made on the subject, we cannot discover that
acuteness which frequently appears in his other
writings. Dr. Jamieson has thus replied to him : —
"The account given of the treachery of Men-
teth, is one of those points on which Sir D. Dal-
rymple shows his historical scepticism. He in-
troduces it in language calculated to inspire doubt
into the mind of the reader ; observing, that ' the
popular tradition is, that his friend. Sir John Men-
teth, betrayed him to the English.' — Annals, i. 281.
It is rather strange that he should express himself
in this manner, at the very moment that he quotes
the Scotichronicon on the margent ; as if this ve-
nerable record, when a modern should be disposed
to adopt a theory irreconcileable with its testimony,
were entitled to no higher regard than is due to
' popular tradition.'
He adds, ( Sir John Menteth was of high birth,
a son of Walter Stewart, Earl of Menteth.' I can
perceive no force in this remark, unless it be meant
to imply that there never has been an instance of a
man of noble blood acting the part of a traitor.
On the same ground, we might quarrel with all the
evidence given of the conspiracies formed against
Robert Bruce ; and even call in question the
murder of that amiable and accomplished prince,
James I.
" But ' at this time,' we are told, ( the important
fortress of Dumbarton was committed to his (Men-
teith's) charge by Edward.' Here, it would seem,
the learned writer fights the poor Minstrel with
his own weapons. For I find no evidence of this
fact in the Foedera, Hemingford, or the Decem
Scriptores ; and Lord Hailes has referred to no
authority ; so that there is reason to suspect, to
use his own language, that he here ( copies ' what
' is said by Blind Harry, whom no historian but Sir
Robert Sibbald will venture to quote.' If Harry's
narrative be received as authority, it is but justice
to receive his testimony as he gives it. Now, in
the preceding part of his work, he represents Men-
teith as holding the castle of Dumbarton at least
with the consent of Wallace, while acknowledged
as governor of Scotland. It would appear, indeed,
that the whole district of the Lennox had been
intrusted to him.
' In the Leynhouss a quhill he maid repayr ;
Schyr Jhon Menteth that tym was captane that.'
B. viii. 1595.
" But even at this time there was something
dubious in the conduct of Menteth. While he
retained the castle, the English held the town un-
der Edward.
' In peess thai duelt, in trabyll that had beyn,
And trewbut payit till Ingliss capdanis keyn.
Schyr Jhon Menteth the castell had in hand :
Bot sum men said, that was a prewa band
Till Sotheroun maid, be menys off that knycht,
In thar supple to be in all his mycht.'
B. ix. 1393.
" It is perfectly conceivable, that, although it
was known to Wallace that Menteth had some
secret understanding with the English, this artful
man might persuade him that he only wished an
opportunity of wreaking the national vengeance on
them, or at least of more effectually serving the
interest of Wallace when he saw the proper time.
Although Wallace had been assured that Menteth
had taken an oath of fealty to Edward, he would
have had no more reason for distrusting him than
for distrusting by far the greatest part of the no-
bility and landholders of Scotland, who, as they
believed, from the necessity of despair had sub-
mitted to the usurper.
a John de Menteth is designated by Arnold
Blair, immanis proditor ; and the writer proceeds
to curse him as if with bell, book, and candle. —
Relatwnes, p. 8.
" Sir David aims another blow at this account,
in the following words : — ( That he had ever any
intercourse of friendship or familiarity with Wa>
lace, I have yet to learn.' But the truth is, the
worthy Judge does not seem disposed to learn this.
134
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
It is difficult to say what evidence will satisfy him.
The incidental hints, in the preceding part of the
poem, in regard to Wallace's connection with Men-
teth, all perfectly agree with the mournful termi-
nation. Such confidence had he in him, according
to the Minstrel, that he not only resided in Dum-
barton Castle for two months, while Menteth had
the charge of it, but gave orders for building * a
house of stone ' there, apparently that he might
enjoy his society.
' Twa monethis still he duelt in Dumbertane ;
A houss he foundyt apon the roch off stayne ;
Men left he thar till bygg it to the hycht.'
B. viii. 1599.
" But, independently of the testimony of Blind
Harry, Bower expressly asserts the co-operation
of Menteth with Wallace, Graham, and Scrym-
geour, in the suppression of the rebellious men of
Galloway. ' In hoc ipso anno (1298), viz. xxviii.
die mensis Augusti, dominus Wallas Scotise custos,
cum Johanne Grhame et Johanne de Menteth, mi-
litibus, necnon Alexandro Scrimzeour constabu-
lario villse de Dundee, et vexillario Scotise, cum
quinquagentis militibus armatis, rebelles Gallovi-
dienses punierunt, qui regis Angliee et Cuminorum
partibus sine aliquo jure steterunt.'
" These words, which seem to be a quotation, in
the Relationes of Blair, from the Scotichronicon,
are not found in the MSS. from which Goodall
gave his edition. They appear to have formed the
commencement of the xxxii. chapter of the eleventh
book, one of the two chapters here said to be
wanting. Now this, whether it be the language of
Bower, or of Blair, could not have been borrowed
from the Minstrel, for the circumstance is over-
looked by him. It seems to refer to that period of
the history of Wallace, in which he is said to have
made a circuit through Galloway and Carrick.
« Fra Gamlis peth the land obeyt him haill,
Till Ur wattir, baith strenth, forest, and daill.
Agaynis him in Galloway hous was nayne.'
B. vi. 793-5.
" It is to be observed, that John Major expressly
affirms the treachery of Menteth, as acting hi con-
cert with Aymer de Valloins, Earl of Pembroke.
He says, that Menteth was considered as his most
ultimate friend ; ' ipsi Vallacco putatus amicissi-
mus.' Hist. Fol. Ixxiii. Now, although he rejects
many of the transactions recited by Blind Harry,
* as false,' so far is he from insinuating the slightest
hesitation as to this business, that he formally
starts an objection as to the imprudence of Wal-
lace in not being more careful of his person, and
answers it by remarking, that ' no enemy is more
dangerous than a domestic one.' He differs from
the Minstrel hi saying that Wallace was * captured
in the city of Glasgow.'
" It may be added, that Bower expressly asserts
that Wallace, ' suspecting no evil, was fraudulently
and treacherously seized at Glasgow by Lord John
de Menteth.' — Scotlchron. xii. 8. Bower again re-
fers to the treacherous conduct of Menteth towards
Wallace when afterwards relating a similar plan
which he had laid for taking King Robert Bruce
prisoner, under pretence of delivering up to him
the Castle of Dumbarton, on condition of his re-
ceiving a hereditary right to the lieutenancy of the
Lennox ; v. Lib. xii. c. 16, 17, Vol. ii. 243. These
two chapters are not in all the MSS., but are found j
in those of Cupar, Perth, and Dunblane. Now,
Bower was born anno 1385 ; Ibid. ii. 401. The
date assigned to the Scotichronicon, as published
with his Continuation, is 1447, and that to the
Minstrel's Poem, 1470; v. Pinkerton's Maitland
Poems, Intr. Ixxxvi— Ixxxix. It is therefore im-
possible that Bower could have borrowed the ac-
count given of Menteth from Blind Harry. Bower
was born, indeed, only eighty or eighty-one years
after the fact referred to ; and, considering the
elevation of the character of Wallace, and the
great attachment of his countrymen even to this
day, as well as the multitude of his enemies, it is
totally inconceivable that a whole nation, learned
and unlearned, should concur in imputing this
crime to one man, without the most valid reasons.
"Wyntown finished his ' CronyJctt,' anno 1418.
He, it is generally believed, was born little more
than fifty years after the butchery of our magnani-
mous patriot. Sir David Dalrymple could not, one
would suppose, reasonably object to his testimony.
Let us hear it.
' A thousand thre hundyr and the fyft yhere
Eftyr the byrth of oure Lord dere,
Schyre John of Menteth in tha days
Tuk in Glasgw Willame Walays,
And send hym in-til Ingland swne.
Thare wes he quartaryd and wndwne
Be dyspyte and hat Inwy :
Thare he tholyd this Martyry.'
Cron. viii. c. 20.
" I shall only add an important proof from the
Lanercost MS., referred to in the Preliminary
Remarks *. ' Captus fuit Willelmus Waleis per
unum Scottum, scilicet per dominum Johannem de
Mentiphe, et usque London ad Regem adductus,
et adjudicatum fuit quod traheretur, et suspende-
retur, et decollaretur, et membratim divideretur,
et quod viscera ejus comburentur, quod factum est ;
et suspensum est caput ejus super pontem London,
armus autem dexter super pontem Novi Castri su-
per Tynam, et armus sinister apud Berwicum, pes
autem dexter apud villam Sancti Johannis, et pes
sinister apud Aberden.' Fol. 211. Mentiphe is
obviously an erratum for Menteth."
Mr. Tytler, in the " Notes and Illustrations " to
the first volume of his History of Scotland, has
also handled this subject with considerable ability.
We shall select the following, as affording addi-
tional arguments to those already advanced by Dr.
Jamieson. In alluding to the evidence afforded
by the Lanercost MS., that intelligent writer ob-
serves, " We cannot be surprised that Lord Hailes
should have been ignorant of this passage, as he
tells us, Annals, vol. ii. p. 316, he had not been
able to discover where the MS. of Lanercost was
preserved.
" The same excuse, however, will not avail him
as to the next piece of evidence, of Menteth's
having seized Wallace. It is contained in Leland's
extract from an ancient MS. Chronicle, which
Hailes has elsewhere quoted ; I mean the Scala
Chronicle, preserved in Corpus Christi Library,
Cambridge. In Leland's Collect., vol. i. p. 541,
we have this passage from the Chronicle. * Wyl-
• To The Bruce and The Wallace, vol. ii. Edin. 1820, 4to.
APPENDIX BB.
135
Ham, Waleys was taken of the Counte of Menteth
about Glaskow, and sent to King Edward, and after
was hangid, drawn, and quarterid at London.'
This is only Leland's abridgment of the passage,
which in all probability is much more full and sa-
tisfactory in the original. Yet it is quite satis-
factory as to Menteth's guilt.
" The next English authority is Langtoft's Chro-
nicle, which Hailes has himself quoted in his Notes
and Corrections, vol. ii. p. 346. It is curious, and
as to Menteth's guilt perfectly conclusive.
' Sir Jon of Menetest serwed William so nehi,
He tok him whan he wend lest, on nyght his leman hi.
That was thorght treson of Jak Schort his man,
He was the encheson, that Sir Jon so him nam.' P. 3 29.
" We learn from this, that Sir John Menteth
prevailed upon Wallace's servant, Jack Short, to
betray his master, and came under cover of night,
and seized him in bed, * his leman bi,' and when
he had no suspicion of what was to happen. How
Hailes, after quoting this passage, which was writ-
ten more than two centuries before Blind Harry,
should have represented this poor minstrel as the
only original authority for the guilt of Menteth, is
indeed difficult to determine."
Having given these authorities, all of them
prior to Blind Harry, it is unnecessary to give the
testimony of the more modern writers. The an-
cient writers prove incontestably, that Sir John de
Menteth, a Scottish baron, who had served along
with and under Wallace against the English, de-
serted his country, swore homage to Edward, and
employed a servant of Wallace to betray his master
into his hands ; that he seized him in bed, and de-
livered him to Edward, by whom he was instantly
tried, condemned, and hanged. It was natural that
the voice of popular tradition should continue from
century to century, to execrate the memory of
such a man. Whether Menteth was the intimate
friend of Wallace, or what precise degree of fa-
miliarity existed between them, it is now not easy
to determine, nor is it of any consequence as to his
guilt. Indeed it is impossible to regard, without
a smile, the weak and inconclusive evidence, if it
deserves so grave a name, on which Hailes has
founded what he calls his Apology for Menteth,
which, after all, seems to be borrowed from Carte,
vol. ii. p. 3H9. Lord Hailes also remarks, " It is
most improbable, that Wallace should have put
himself in the power of a man whom _new to
be in an office of distinguished trust under Edward :"
and almost in the same breath paraphrases the
lines of Langtoft, in which it is stated that his cap-
ture was effected through the treason of Jack
Short, whose brother Wallace is said to have slain.
Surely the confidence was as imprudent in the one
case as it would have been in the other. It may
be observed, however, that if there had been a
possibility of rescuing the name of Menteth from
the execrations of his country, the task would not
have remained for the learned annalist to perform.
The great family interest which he possesse-d, wa«
sufficient to protect him from punishment, not only
for his treachery to Wallace, but also for his sub-
sequent perfidy to Bruce. Yet though that in-
terest was powerfully exerted to screen him from
the consequences of his demerits, not a single
effort was made to remove the dishonourable stain
from his character.
The following transaction, which has already
been alluded to, is quite consistent with the conduct
ascribed to him by the Minstrel. It will also ac-
count for the impunity which attended his crimes.
" About this time, there happened a passage not
unworthy to be related, in regard to the variety of
providences, in a narrow compass of time. John
Menteith, who betrayed his friend Wallace to the
English, and was therefore deservedly hated by the
Scots, received, amongst other rewards, the govern-
ment of Dumbarton castle from the English. When
other forts were recovered, that only, or but very
few with it, held out for the English. And because
it was naturally impregnable, the king dealt with
the governor, by his friends and kindred, to sur-
render it. He demanded the county or earldom of
Lennox, as the price of his treachery and sur-
render. Neither would he ever so much as hear
of any other terms. In this case the King wavered
and fluctuated in his mind what to do. On the one
side, he earnestly desired to have the castle ; yet,
on the other, he did not so much prize it, as for its
sake to disoblige the Earl of Lennox, who had been
his fast and almost his only friend in all his calami-
ties. But the Earl of Lennox hearing of it, and
coming in, soon decided the controversy, and per-
suaded the King, by all means to accept the con-
dition. Accordingly the bargain was made as John
Menteth would have it, and solemnly confirmed.
But when the King was going to take possession
of the Castle, a carpenter, one Roland, met him in
the wood of Colquhoun, about a mile from it ; and
having obtained liberty to speak with the King,
concerning a matter of great importance, he told
him what treachery the governor intended against
him ; nay, and had prepared to execute it. It was
this : — In a wine-cellar concealed, and under
ground, a sufficient number of Englishmen were
hid, who, when the rest of the castle should be
given up, and the King secure, were to issue forth
upon him as he was at dinner, and either to kill, or
take him prisoner. This being thus related, the
King, upon the surrender of the other parts of the
castle by John, being kindly invited to a feast, re-
fused to eat ; till, as he had searched all other parts '
of the castle ; so, he had viewed that wine-cellar
also. The governor excused it, pretending that
the smith, who had the key, was out ef the way,
but that he would come again anon. Ihe King,
not satisfied therewith, caused the door lo be broke
open, and so the plot was discovered. The Eng-
lishmen were brought forth in their armour, and j
being severally examined, confessed the whole mat- j
ter ; and they added also another discovery, viz.
that a ship rode ready in the next bay to carry the
King into England. The complices in this wretched
design were put to death ; but John was kept in
prison, because the King was loth to offend his
kindred, and especially his sons-in-law, in so dan-
gerous a time : for he had many daughters, all of
them very beautiful, and married to men rich
enough, but factious. Therefore, in a time of such
inuninicnt danger, the battle drawing near wherein
all was at stake, lest the mind of any powerful man
might be rendered averse from him, and thereby
inclined to practise against him, John was released
out of prison, upon this condition (for the perform-
ance whereof his sons-in-law undertook), that he
should be placed in the front of the battle, and
there, by his valour, should wait the decision of
136
LIFE OF SIR WILLIAM WALLACE.
Providence. And indeed the man, otherwise frau-
dulent, was in this faithful to the King ; for he
behaved himself so valiantly, that that day's work
procured him not only pardon for what was past,
but large rewards for the future." — Buchanan's
Hist. vol. i. p. 310.
It may here be mentioned, that, since the Note
on page 86 was printed off, we have learned from
one, whose researches, and whose connection with
the name, entitle him to express an opinion, that
the M'Kerlies of Wigtonshire, and not the Kers
of Kersland, are the real descendants of Eerie", or
Kerlie, who, with Sir William Wallace and Stephen
of Ireland, carried by assault the Fort of the Black-
Rock of Cree, or Cruggleton Castle, and who was
the last friend that clung to the fortunes of his
master. Although the records of the burgh of
Whitehorn furnish no information on the subject,
being all of a date subsequent to the Reforma-
tion, it is still handed down by tradition, that the
M'Kerlies were once proprietors of Cruggleton
Castle, and that their ancestor was the companion
of the Scottish hero.
CO.
SINGULAR LEGEND.
Page 90.
THIS' monkish legend Henry has carefully pre-
served ; and as it affords a specimen of the super-
stition of the age, we shall give it a place for the
gratification of the curious among our readers.
" Wyss clerkyss yeit it kepis in remembrans,
How that a monk off Bery abbay than,
In to that tym a rycht religiouss man ;
A yong monk als with him in ordour stud,
Quhilk knew his lyff was clene, perfyt, and gud.
This fadyr monk was wesyd with seknace,
Out off the warld as he suld pass on cace,
His brothyr saw the spret lykly to pass ;
A band off him rycht ernystly he coud ass.
To cum agayn and schaw him off the meid,
At he suld haiff at God for his gud deid.
He grantyt him, at his prayer to preiff,
To cum agayn, gyffGod wald geiff him leiff.
The spreyt, changyt out off this warldly payn,
In that sammyn hour cum to the monk agayn.
Sic thing has beyn, and is be woice and sycht.
Quhar he apperyt, thar schawyt sa mekill lycht,
Lyk till lawntryns it illumynyt so cler,
At warldly lycht thar to mycht be no peyr,
A woice said thus :— ' God has mp grantyt grace
That I sail kep my promess in this place.'
The monk was blyth off this cler fygur fayr ;
Bot a fyr brand in his forheid he bayr,
And than him thocht it myslikyt all the lawe.
' Quhar art thou sp-eyt ? Ansuer, sa God the sawe.'
' In purgatory.'—' How lang sail thow be thair ? '
' Bot halff ane hour to com, and litill mair.
Purgatory is, I do the weill to wit,
In ony place quhar God will it admyt.
Ane hour of space I was demed thar to be;
And that passis, supposs I spek with the.
Quhy has thow that, and all the layff so haill ?'
' For off science I thocht me maist awaill.
Quha prydys tharin, that laubour is in waist,
For science cummys bot off the haly Gaist.'
' Eftir thi hour, quhar is thi passage ewyn ? '
' Quhen tym cummys,' he said, ' to lestand hewin."
' Quhat tym is that ? I pray the now declar.'
1 Twa ar on lyff mon be befor me thar.'
' Quhilk twa ar thai ? ' The verite thow may ken,
' The fyrst has bene a gret slaar of men.
Now thai him kep to martyr in London toun
On Wednyssday, befors king and commoun.
Is nayn on lyffat has sa monyslayn.'
1 Brodyr,' he said, ' that taill is bot in wayn ;
For slauchtyr is to God abhominabill:'
Than said the spreyt, ' Forsuth this is no fabill.
He is Wallace, defendour off Scotland,
For rychtwyss war that he tok apon hand.
Thar rnchtwysnes is lowyt our the lawe ;
Tharfor in hewyn he sail that honour hawe.
Syn a pure preyst, is mekill to commend ;
He tuk in thank quhat thing that God him send.
For dayly mess, and heryng off confessioun,
Hewin he sail haiffto lestand warysoun.
I am the thrid, grantyt throw Goddis grace.'
' Brothir," he said, ' tell I this in our place,
Thai wyll bot deym, I othir dreym or rawe.'
Than said the spreyt : — ' This wetnes thow sail hawe.
Your bellys sail ryng, for ocht at ye do may,
Quhen thai hym sla, halff ane hour off that day.'
And so thai did, the monk wyst quhat thaim alyt
Throuch braid Bretane, the woice tharoff was scaylyt,
The spreyt tuk leyff at Goddis will to be,
Off Wallace end to her it is pet6;
And I wald nocht put men in gret dolour,
Bot lychtly pass atour his fatell hour."
Book xi. 1238—1304,
DD.
ON THE DEATH OF WALLACE.
Page 90.
THE verses on the death of Wallace, which have
been attributed to John Blair, stand thus in the
original : —
Invida mors tristi Gulielmum funere Vallam,
Quae cuncta tollit, sustulit :
Et tanto pro cive cinis, pro finibus urna est,
Frigusque pro lorica obit.
Ille quidem terras, loca se inferiora reliquit ;
At fata factis supprimens,
Parte sui meliore solum coslumque pererrat ;
Hoc spiritu, illud gloria.
At tibi si in scrip turn generoso pectus honesto
Fuisset, hostis proditi
Artibus, Angle, tuis, in pcenas, parcior isses,
Nee oppidatim spargeres
Membra viri sacranda adytis. Sed scin' quid in ista
Immanitate viceris 1
Ut Vallae in cunctas oras sparguntur et horas
Laudes, tuumque dedecus.
Abercrombie, who confounds John Blair with
Arnold Blair, doubts of the above lines being
composed by him. Arnold, in his Relationes, has
certainly given nothing of his own, his brief de-
tails, as we have already observed, being merely
extracts from the Scotichronicon ; and it is more
than probable, that as he borrowed from Fordun
in the one instance, he might also be inclined to
take the same liberty with Blair in the other. The
verses are evidently the effusion of a superior
mind, brooding over a recent calamity. They are
attached to the end of Arnold Blair's Relationes,
to which the date of 1327 is affixed.
THE END.
DA
783
.3
C3
Carrick, John Donald
Life of Sir William
Wallace of Elderslie
4th ed.
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY